January 6 Select Committee

Published

Things seem to be unfolding rather quickly. Former White House aides and advisors are scrambling to cover themselves as they receive subpoenas to appear and produce documents. 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/12/03/clark-eastman-fifth-amendment/

It’s rare when lawyers — as opposed to their clients — take the Fifth Amendment. But Jeffrey Clark, the former Justice Department lawyer who reportedly tried to help Donald Trump overturn the 2020 presidential election, is now claiming the privilege against self-incrimination to avoid testifying before the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. He has just been joined in that posture by one of Trump’s main outside legal advisers, John Eastman.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/08/politics/mark-meadows-lawsuit/index.html

The lawsuit comes after the committee signaled it would pursue a criminal contempt referral against Meadows because of his refusal to sit for a deposition in the investigation into the Capitol riot. Meadows alleges that the subpoenas are "overly broad and unduly burdensome," while claiming that the committee "lacks lawful authority to seek and to obtain" the information requested.

And apparently Mark Meadows had a power point outlining how to overturn election results. 

https://www.newsweek.com/mark-meadows-powerpoint-January-election-results-trump-1658076

The 38-page presentation, entitled "Election Fraud, Foreign Interference & Options for 6 Jan," is dated one day before the Capitol riot. It's believed to have been submitted by Meadows after he was subpoenaed by the panel in connection with the insurrection.

Only the finest people...

 

10 hours ago, MunoRN said:

I feel like those that were there were pretty clear that their intent was to prevent the electoral college from legally determining that Biden was the next President, and to instead take steps to install Trump as the next President, is that still something that is supposedly up for debate?  

I was also skeptical when it was reported that part of the strategy of the Proud Boys and other groups was that there was an advantage to being unarmed, but actually it does make sense.  An armed violent mob isn't even making it to the Capital steps, much less to the point where they can force their way in.  Once they're in, being armed or not really doesn't make that much of a difference.  

I would certainly agree that if Navarro was really placed in "leg irons" then that was probably unnecessary, although I've seen no confirmation that this occurred.  As for whether it was excessive to arrest him, no, he's been charged with two criminal counts, those are things nobody should be surprised to get arrested for.

their intent was to CHALLENGE the election, lest we forget that the house was conducting a hearing over election irregularities when the greatest distraction was allowed to happen under Nancy Pelosi's order by refusing to allow 20,000 national guard troops to be present? the protestors felt compelled to challenge the results because everyone had to endure 4 years of the left challenging the legitimacy of Trump's presidency which turned out to be based on lies concocted by Hillary Clinton's campaign. it's obvious that Trump stood in the way of the global elite and they are now making up for lost time. 

Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
2 hours ago, bunnyandthorton said:

their intent was to CHALLENGE the election, lest we forget that the house was conducting a hearing over election irregularities when the greatest distraction was allowed to happen under Nancy Pelosi's order by refusing to allow 20,000 national guard troops to be present? the protestors felt compelled to challenge the results because everyone had to endure 4 years of the left challenging the legitimacy of Trump's presidency which turned out to be based on lies concocted by Hillary Clinton's campaign. it's obvious that Trump stood in the way of the global elite and they are now making up for lost time. 

That's interesting spin of a violent attack on our peaceful transition of power to benefit one of the worst and most corrupt Presidents in our brief history as a nation.  

Specializes in CRNA, Finally retired.
1 hour ago, bunnyandthorton said:

their intent was to CHALLENGE the election, lest we forget that the house was conducting a hearing over election irregularities when the greatest distraction was allowed to happen under Nancy Pelosi's order by refusing to allow 20,000 national guard troops to be present? the protestors felt compelled to challenge the results because everyone had to endure 4 years of the left challenging the legitimacy of Trump's presidency which turned out to be based on lies concocted by Hillary Clinton's campaign. it's obvious that Trump stood in the way of the global elite and they are now making up for lost time. 

That's ridiculous.  Hilary conceded.  Case over.  You should look up the definition of '"challenge".  What we saw spilled over into a violent insurrection.

37 minutes ago, toomuchbaloney said:

That's interesting spin of a violent attack on our peaceful transition of power to benefit one of the worst and most corrupt President's in our brief history as a nation.  

there's no spin. Pelosi and Muriel Bowser (DC mayor) both refused to have national guards present despite Trump's request. If Trump placed them at the capitol it would have been a violation of law. Here's mayor Bowser's tweet just a day before the protest: 

Correspondence with Pelosi's office hasn't been release yet, nor have 1000s of hours of capitol security footage, either. Stop repeating lies, you are being lied to for nefarious reasons. The sudden change in lifestyle since this new administration took over is no accident, it's a designed collapse of the American economy and Trump stood in the way of global interests.

40 minutes ago, subee said:

That's ridiculous.  Hilary conceded.  Case over.  You should look up the definition of '"challenge".  What we saw spilled over into a violent insurrection.

Hillary may have technically conceded but her campaign, along with major media support, concocted a phony Russia collusion hoax that was designed to remove Trump from office, spied on him during his presidency, and he was illegally impeached twice yet not convicted of anything. The "insurrection" was planned and orchestrated to coopt a legitimate protest over election integrity and was turned violent by agent provocateurs to prevent Trump from ever running again for president since the impeachment didn't stick the first time...yet nothing was found incriminating Trump, but we're still having "hearings" on January 6th? Why did Pelosi and DC Mayor Muriel Bowser refuse 20,000 National Guard troops that were approved by Trump? Here's mayor Bowser's tweet just a day before Jan 6th: 

It's almost like Democrats wanted something to happen on Jan 6th so they could point their finger to it and say "see? we finally proved Trump is evil!" Give me a freaking break.

Specializes in Vents, Telemetry, Home Care, Home infusion.
2 hours ago, bunnyandthorton said:

their intent was to CHALLENGE the election, lest we forget that the house was conducting a hearing over election irregularities when the greatest distraction was allowed to happen under Nancy Pelosi's order by refusing to allow 20,000 national guard troops to be present? the protestors felt compelled to challenge the results because everyone had to endure 4 years of the left challenging the legitimacy of Trump's presidency which turned out to be based on lies concocted by Hillary Clinton's campaign. it's obvious that Trump stood in the way of the global elite and they are now making up for lost time. 

Hope all who feel this way watch the committees televised hearings/report and citizen testimony presented this month to compare/contrast with known information and previous TV coverage of the event so a full picture of the attempt to overturn the 2020 US presidential election, planning behind it and any government officials involved in overthrowing our Democracy.

6 minutes ago, NRSKarenRN said:

Hope all who feel this way watch the committees televised hearings/report and citizen testimony presented this month to compare/contrast with known information and previous TV coverage of the event so a full picture of the attempt to overturn the 2020 US presidential election, planning behind it and any government officials involved in overthrowing our Democracy.

we already had an impeachment over Jan 6th and nothing came about from it. these hearings are political theater, why else would the committee refuse to allow any republicans with a backbone to be a part of it? not one word of Pelosi refusing 20,000 national guard troops will be mentioned. 

Specializes in Vents, Telemetry, Home Care, Home infusion.

USA Today 6/9/22

Watch the Jan. 6 hearings like your democracy is at stake. (It is.)

While we are a polarized nation, these hearings offer us an opportunity to come together in shared purpose to safeguard our democracy's future.

https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/justthefaqs/2021/11/10/jan-6-committee-what-we-know-panel-targeting-trump-aides/6376507001/

Former Judge Luttig, is a well known conservative voice.

Adding per Robert Costa tweet:

Quote

CBS News has learned that@judgeluttig has been invited, and accepted, an invitation from the Jan. 6 committee to testify next week. "It will be an honor to testify before the January 6th committee," he told CBS News.

PBS:

"I believe that the Constitution never contemplated ... an attack on America and her democratic processes from within." Former federal judge J. Michael Luttig, who counseled Mike Pence's team in the days before the Jan. 6 attack, talked to FRONTLINE.

Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
5 minutes ago, NRSKarenRN said:

USA Today 6/9/22

Watch the Jan. 6 hearings like your democracy is at stake. (It is.)

While we are a polarized nation, these hearings offer us an opportunity to come together in shared purpose to safeguard our democracy's future.

https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/justthefaqs/2021/11/10/jan-6-committee-what-we-know-panel-targeting-trump-aides/6376507001/

 

 

That is true, preserving and protecting our republic should unite us.  Today House republican leadership held a press briefing, only one of them indicated that they would watch the hearings. 

Specializes in Vents, Telemetry, Home Care, Home infusion.

The FBI has now arrested the leading Michigan GOP candidate for Governor, Ryan Kelley, who was at the Capitol building on January 6, 2021; released after hearing. He organized a protest at the Michigan Capitol, inviting heavily armed militias to gather inside the statehouse

ABC News 6/9/22

Michigan GOP hopeful charged in Jan. 6 riot, roiling primary

Quote

 

A Republican candidate for Michigan governor and ardent defender of former President Donald Trump was charged with misdemeanors Thursday for his role in the 2021 post-election riot at the U.S. Capitol, further complicating an already messy GOP primary.

Ryan Kelley, 40, was arrested in western Michigan and appeared at a brief hearing in federal court in Grand Rapids, where he was released from custody without posting bail. The government did not ask that Kelley be detained....

...Kelley, a real estate broker who lives in Allendale Township, is accused of disruptive conduct, injuring public property and entering restricted space without permission, according to the criminal complaint.

In a court document made public Thursday, federal investigators said Kelley was recorded on video outside the U.S. Capitol on the day of the insurrection, repeatedly waving to the crowd and directing them toward stairs leading into the building. He used his phone to “film the crowd assaulting and pushing past U.S. Capitol police officers” and was in a crowd that climbed stairs to a Capitol entrance after causing police to retreat, the FBI said.

The document included multiple photos of Kelley that the FBI described as screengrabs from video taken that day, with Kelley wearing aviator sunglasses and a baseball cap worn backward, trying to rally the pro-Trump crowd....

...Kelley also has made election fraud and the lie that Trump won the election a major focus of his activism and his campaign for governor. After the 2020 election, Kelley was a speaker at a “Stop the Steal” rally in Lansing, telling the crowd that Democrats were trying to steal Trump’s victory. As a candidate, Kelley said that if elected governor, he would work to cancel contracts with companies that provide voting machines in Michigan and eliminate same-day voter registration. ...

 

Specializes in Emergency.
20 hours ago, Beerman said:

That's obviously something that would be easy to find.

What I meant was, I don't believe he us the judge who denied bail to Rehl.

Let's see how long it takes you to figure out you were wrong on that.

I’m seldom right, but I’m never wrong….

“U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly on Tuesday rejected defense attorneys' arguments that the four men — Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl and Charles Donohoe — are charged with conduct that is protected by the First Amendment right to free speech.”

Another 15 seconds. Is that sufficient?

https://www.npr.org/2021/12/29/1068703011/judge-refuses-to-dismiss-indictment-against-alleged-proud-boys-leaders

 

Specializes in Critical Care.
5 hours ago, bunnyandthorton said:

their intent was to CHALLENGE the election, lest we forget that the house was conducting a hearing over election irregularities when the greatest distraction was allowed to happen under Nancy Pelosi's order by refusing to allow 20,000 national guard troops to be present? the protestors felt compelled to challenge the results because everyone had to endure 4 years of the left challenging the legitimacy of Trump's presidency which turned out to be based on lies concocted by Hillary Clinton's campaign. it's obvious that Trump stood in the way of the global elite and they are now making up for lost time. 

Nancy Pelosi is Speaker of the House and has no mechanism to deploy or block the deployment of National Guard troops.

The stated purpose of the various group that took part in the insurrection was to obstruct the legal process of democracy, effectively a (very poorly implemented) coup.

2 hours ago, bunnyandthorton said:

Hillary may have technically conceded but her campaign, along with major media support, concocted a phony Russia collusion hoax that was designed to remove Trump from office, spied on him during his presidency, and he was illegally impeached twice yet not convicted of anything. The "insurrection" was planned and orchestrated to coopt a legitimate protest over election integrity and was turned violent by agent provocateurs to prevent Trump from ever running again for president since the impeachment didn't stick the first time...yet nothing was found incriminating Trump, but we're still having "hearings" on January 6th? Why did Pelosi and DC Mayor Muriel Bowser refuse 20,000 National Guard troops that were approved by Trump? Here's mayor Bowser's tweet just a day before Jan 6th: 

It's almost like Democrats wanted something to happen on Jan 6th so they could point their finger to it and say "see? we finally proved Trump is evil!" Give me a freaking break.

As your own post points out, Muriel Bowser requested the presence of the National Guard prior to January 6th.  

DC mayor calls in National Guard ahead of pro-Trump protests | AP News

+ Join the Discussion