Published
I was admitting a patient the other night into the PICU, and the parents were VERY anxious. Rightfully so. Our attending, in an effort to make them more at ease, said, "Meanmaryjean has been a nurse for over thirty years and is our most experienced nurse!"
As is sometimes the case, I discovered that I have been a nurse longer than the parents have been alive. But it got me thinking, so I offer up this thread for you 'more experienced' nurses (and those who aren't if you want).
I'll start off by saying:
I've been a nurse since before there was an internet. Before AIDS. Before Elvis died.
How 'bout you?
I've been a nurse since doctors and nurses smoked at the desk. I was working the night John Lennon was killed. We wore those darn dresses to clinical, with seem binding in light blue sewn around the collar. White leather shoes, no sneakers! White stockings, no runs, extra pair in my locker, just in case. Our "State Boards", were two days long, and only offered in April and October. We waited 3 months to get the results , and then were afraid to open the envelope! Caps, everyone wore one. Male nurses were few and far between. I graduated in December of 1979, took my boards in April of 1980. Least you worry, I'm not keeping up, I retired officially, in July on my birthday, 33 and a half years after I started, only because I wanted to!
Actually no, it isn't relevant. This wasn't a thread about who was "better", simply a fun thread about how many changes we've seen. No need to come in and pee on it.And I've been a nurse since beds had cranks - my shins still remember!
Look, by definition, it was relevant (google it). That's not an opinion, it's the definition of the word.
But maybe back in your day they defined it differently.......
haha, I'm kidding. Seriously though, I'm sorry you took it as me "peeing" on a fun topic. I didn't think of it that way. Oh those pesky little opinions and points of view......
Have a good one.
Look, by definition, it was relevant (google it). That's not an opinion, it's the definition of the word.But maybe back in your day they defined it differently.......
haha, I'm kidding.
Seriously though, I'm sorry you took it as me "peeing" on a fun topic. I didn't think of it that way. Oh those pesky little opinions and points of view......
Have a good one.
OK, I just have to ask.... what are we supposed to Google?
I believe he meant I should google the word "relevant". But, you know, I'm old - I prefer Webster's to google
Ohhhhhhh don't get me started on Webster. Ever since I learned that "figuratively" is a new and acceptable definition for "literally", I started planning my creative plot to destroy Webster for all eternity. THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.
Ohhhhhhh don't get me started on Webster. Ever since I learned that "figuratively" is a new and acceptable definition for "literally", I started planning my creative plot to destroy Webster for all eternity. THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.
Say wha? Look, I know as a child of the 80s I said "bad" and meant "good" but this insanity has really gone too far now!
Say wha? Look, I know as a child of the 80s I said "bad" and meant "good" but this insanity has really gone too far now!
I kid you not.
http://i.word.com/idictionary/literally
At least in the 80s, the good people of Webster had sense enough to not change word meanings to slang.
geesh what happens to the phrase "literally and figuratively" ? meaning to cover both bases.....they CERTAINLY don't mean the same thing!
and no, mrnurse, you post was not relevant to this thread, unless they have changed the meaning of that word also?
I kid you not.Literally - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
At least in the 80s, the good people of Webster had sense enough to not change word meanings to slang.
abbnurse
405 Posts