Updated: Published
A coworker had a one-hour antibiotic infusion scheduled for 0600. She opted to hang it at 0635 so it wouldn't finish at an inopportune time during the 0700-0730 shift change. Another coworker indicated that this was seriously inappropriate of her. They even said, "Well, it's your license on the line," implying that action could be taken against her license.
I'm really curious what could possibly be wrong with this. An antibiotic scheduled for 0600 can be started any time between 0500 and 0700 (at this hospital at least) and still be considered on time. I don't see any reason why the person who hung the antibiotic has to be the one to saline-lock afterwards. It's not like you have to stay with and continuously monitor the patient during antibiotic infusions. If that were the rule we would have a 1 to 1 nurse-to-patient ratio.
Does anybody agree with this other nurse? Is there something I'm missing that makes what the nurse did horrible?
mtmkjr said:Take it to a logical conclusion and you don't have to go far to see how ridiculous that is.That said...I do think each shift should have a goal of completing their tasks if it is reasonable to do so. Unless I knew things went off the rails towards the end of shift, I'd be slightly annoyed if I still had a 6am antibiotic running when I came in.
If it can be planned to be finished by end of shift, then it should be. But it's not a big enough deal that I would ever say actually say anything. Just a minor annoyance.
Why would you be annoyed? It's scanned, up, and running. Depending on how your facility runs piggybacks, the most you would have to do is spike a flush bag behind it and then shut off a pump.
How could that possibly annoy you?
RNperdiem, RN
4,592 Posts
The only thing won't do right at the end of shift is give a laxative suppository. Antibiotics? No problem.