Do you need all those degrees?

Nurses Professionalism

Published

Where I work, we have a trend of nurses obtaining multiple degrees after obtaining basic nursing training and their RN license. At a management meeting this issue came up about why nurses are going for all these degrees (MSN, MPH, MBA, MPA, MHA, DNP, JD, Dr.P.H. etc.). I have colleagues that have two or three graduate degrees. I frequently see these degreed nurses working in staff, charge or lower level non clinical work (case management/discharge planning). The degree(s) did not get them far from the bedside.

An attending physician made a point that being a manager or charge nurse does not require an MBA degree. Another doctor stated that his son works at a Fortune 100 company in a significant job with a bachelor level education.

The impression I got is that the attendees saw this degree mania in nursing as silly and wasteful. The word wasteful was used as the facility provides tuition reimbursement.

Another comment was made that these degrees are mostly online degrees or from low standard/open enrollment schools. There appears to be true to this statement.

A department head then said why can't nurses be happy to be a nurse. If they want to be managers or executive, move on so that nurses who want to nurse can be at the bedside. He then discussed a nurse colleague who has two management degrees who is a bedside nurse and a nursing supervisor who has four graduate degrees (she has a master's in nursing to be an adult health nurse practitioner, a master's in public health, a master's in business and a master's in community health). The sad part is that the 4 graduate degree nursing supervisor could not prepare a report detailing an major event that occurred when she was on duty (she asked me to rewrite what she had written so as to not be embarrassed by her poor language skills--English is her second language). About twenty years ago I worked with a nurse who went to school to get a master's degree in journalism. She wanted out of nursing and saw journalism as her ticket. Unfortunately, when she graduated she could not locate a job that paid. She did not investigate the need to pay her dues in the competitive field of journalism. End result, she ended up staying in nursing. The impression we had of her then was she was a nice lady who was misguided and did not investigate what awaits graduates of her program. I hope by now she had paid off her student loans.

Back to the discussion...I did not respond about this issue during the meeting as I myself have mixed feelings about getting degrees especially since I do not see the degree holder having benefited from the education. Writing skills are still poor, professional presentation and presence is lacking and analytic skills are weak. When I interact with my degreed colleagues, I think to myself, what has all this schooling taught you?

In my day, you entered nursing via a diploma or associated degree and learned your trade on the floor. A degree (BSN or MSN)was needed to be a nursing director or nursing professor. I really never understood why nurses undertook going for these degrees since they stayed in nursing anyway. I know a few nurses over the years who thought that an MBA/MPH would get them into corporate America/government position only to be heartbroken that the degree got them nowhere. Having an MBA in marketing or Finance really isn't applicable to nursing even at the highest levels. Adding to this is the fact that if you do not practice these fields or specialty areas, you are not competent but rather have a degree as a trophy.

As for the DNP, I understand the logic of wanting to be like pharmacy and physical therapy, but even with a clinical doctorate degree, they are still a pharmacist or a physical therapist. If it hasn't elevated these other professions, what makes us think it will elevate us? Where I work, the culture of not calling these degree holders "doctor" prevails.

Anyway, I wanted to hear what other nurses think about the degree proliferation in nursing. Do you think this is a good trend or is this just breeding more discontented nurses who will continue to dream about careers they will never have?

This touched a raw spot for me. I have a degree in art. It was NOT a waste of time. I love art. Just because I don't have a career in it anymore does not make it worthless OR anyone else's business. I do not have any type of gainful employment in any art field. SO WHAT?

I am also looking into getting a business degree. Why? Because I want to understand business and don't. I learn better with a structured curriculum than I do on my own.

I am not a trust fund baby. I am actually trailer trash and the first in my family to graduate college. I work for each degree I get and I am still paying for the first one.

I have a diploma now, but I want a BSN. I may go as far as MSN, because I like to expand my practice and learn new things. I just like to learn. I don't understand why that is a big deal.

If other people want to remain ignorant, good for them. Just don't be the crab in the bucket that pulls down people like me that realized ignorance isn't bliss, it sucks.

PS - If I want to be a fry cook, why does that make me less because I will be an educated fry cook? What if I just like to read philosophy over french fries?

The fact that you are a nursing student proves that you chose to pursue higher education that is very specialized and career-oriented. I, too, come from working class roots, and taking "fluff" classes for my own personal edification was never an option for me, either. Or, at least it wasn't an option without first obtaining a practical education gives me a job that generates disposable income. To do otherwise would be putting the cart before the horse.

Being able to pursue higher education purely for personal growth and enlightenment is a luxury way beyond the reach of most people.

Higher education is ungodly expensive. It's a huge investment. To invest tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in a four-year program that isn't directly related to a career at the end of the tunnel is incredibly impractical for most of the population.

Our education system, from elementary on up, promotes the idea that everyone should be "well rounded" and that "following your dream" is the most important consideration in choosing a career. This has resulted in a generation of thirty-somethings in never-ending grad school with massive debt, working at starbucks, living with mom all in the pursuit of an education that will result in many employers simply saying "so what?".

We need to start herding students after middle school into vocational education where they can learn a useful trade. Find out what they like and are good at, and funnel them off into specialized, vocational programs. One for finance, one for healthcare, one for mechanics, one for engineering, etc.

Trying to achieve some sort of idealized broad or well rounded education has become a joke that's a waste of the students' time and a waste of society's resources. To force these kids to spend their high school years reading "Catcher in the Rye" and playing with clay benefits no one. And I say this as someone who considers himself well-read, listens to NPR and all that good stuff. But once kids get the fundamentals of reading, writing and arithmetic, it's time for the education to become specialized and time to begin ushering them toward a career.

I don't see the point unless someone wants to go further in their career. When I get my RN I will go through an associate's degree program. I will later get my BSN only because it seems everywhere I look the jobs hiring want me to have my BSN. I think it's pointless. You learn the same nursing skills in both programs & I will get paid the same regardless of my degree. As an LVN I'm making more than my best friend out of nursing school with a BSN who graduated at the top of her class.

I agree. There is nothing wrong with learning more and advancing your knowledge. Why pay thousands of dollars for it? Books are free at the library...

Specializes in FNP, ONP.

I think the assessment that quality education is a "waste" if it doesn't lead to some income producing work-a-day job is the saddest thing i have ever read. A "job" is not the purpose of education. Pursuit of knowledge and understanding is the primary purpose of education. Career potential is merely a secondary consideration. Education is about coming to understand ones-self and the human condition, so as to improve circumstances for all. That is it. It has nothing whatever to do with a paycheck. What a sad way to think about it, and with that mindset, it is no wonder so many people never get very far.

"I must study politics and war, that our sons may have liberty to study

mathematics and philosophy. Our sons ought to study mathematics and

philosophy, geography, natural history and naval architecture,

navigation, commerce and agriculture in order to give their children

a right to study painting, poetry, music, architecture, statuary,

tapestry and porcelain." -John Adams

The study of the classics humanities and the arts is the single most important undertaking of any student. No learning is more critical than gaining an understanding of human history, the human heart and the human mind. This is best done through literature and the arts. The most interesting and successful people will always be those that have the best liberal arts education guiding their philosophy. Getting a vo-tech certificate just to get a job is one thing, it will help make a living. It will not help one make an impact on their culture or community. Aim higher people. Life is not about just getting by. What a sad view of one's potential and frankly, a waste of a whole lifetime, if you ask me.

Do you need all those degrees?

What exactly are these degrees?

Learning is a lifelong process and there is nothing wrong with a person wanting to become better knowledgeable. People further their education for different reasons and purposes to different outcomes.

In today’s market, one would do well to remain competitive and marketable in the workforce. But that being said, acquiring education that does not have any impact on your career might be considered a sheer waste of time, valuable efforts and money.

But again, understanding the reason for these degrees is understanding the person who has them.

Several things could factor into a reason for the person having these degrees any of which could include tuition reimbursement, career change or promotion, better understanding of one’s job etc. It also could be any or those or none of those.

Humans are inherently selfish and to say that one should simply “acquire” a degree for its sake with no thoughts of career promotion or better career outcomes, but simply to

“understand ones-self and the human condition, so as to improve circumstances for all”
is almost insulting. Truly?

I perceive the OP’s confusion might stem from nurses who have the many degrees attached to their names but could not translate it into better job outcome or growth.

That, in all fairness could be seen as sheer waste.

Some might suggest that these many degreed nurses invested to be better prepared for tomorrow’s market. That might be a mistake; the future is now!

I would rather they put those degrees to the purpose for which they were intended and put in the work now and then get to reap the dividends of their hard work from tomorrow’s market.

And yes, I went beyond the BSN, but I was darned if it wasn't going to translate into a better lucrative employment opportunity, thank GOD!

That, OP, was the intended outcome!

*** If you think your desire to learn and expand your practice is a big deal then I have wonder if you have read this discussion?

Huh? I'm confused. Didn't I specifically state that I don't understand why it's a big deal? Which means, by the way, that I DON'T think it's a big deal. Did you read what I wrote? Or is this a snark attack?

I think learning for the sake of learning is fine. I think that if people want to get letters after their name, let them. I think that if you have a bajillion degrees and make a decent wage rather than scads of money, it's OK. If you are a lifelong learner and don't work, as long as it's OK with the people who support you, go for it!

I don't agree that people who love to learn and don't work are somehow less worthy than people who love to work but don't learn.

I don't believe that education is only a for-profit return on investment kind of thing.

Specializes in Psych/med surg.

In the city I live in, getting a job with just an ADN is almost impossible if you don't know someone. We have 12 nursing schools in this city pumping out ADN and BSN nurses all competing for nursing jobs. I had to take a community health nursing job because I had no luck getting into the hospitals and was not willing to wait like some people do. I am currently working on my RN to MSN from a regionally accredited online university. Most of the RN to BSN degrees or MSN degrees are online today anyway. Just because a school is online doesn't mean it is a diploma mill. The program I am in is a lot of work and takes a lot of self motivation which not everyone can do. After I am done with my MSN, I plan to get my post grad certificate to be a family and psych nurse practitioner. Not everyone wants to be a bedside nurse the rest of their life. Some of us just enjoy lifelong learning and a competitive advantage when it comes to nursing jobs. Poo is not for everyone.

Specializes in ICU + Infection Prevention.

Education for education's sake is a virtue I would hope to see in any clinician.

I liked it when I had a boss who got promoted because she was excellent at the bedside

Nursing has a reputation for extremely poor managers. I think it is because people are selected for management because of their bedside ability, not their management abilities.

I've seen too many managers who don't know the first thing about how to be a manager but were promoted because they were good at their subordinate's job. These people make good instructors and clinical resources. The ability to manage people is a very different set of abilities. It is nice when a good manager also knows their subordinates jobs to the point of being fully competent to wade back into it. It is not a requirement.

Specializes in Eventually Midwifery.
I really doubt that the majority of MA prepared nurses are staying at the bedside for personal fulfillment! I think many either were unable to transition to the career/job they had hoped for or found out the pay wasn't adequate to live on and decided to just stay bedside. It is ironic that hospital management is concerned over too many people going back to school, but they obviously realize it is not cost effective to pay for education that is really not necessary for their nurses. Going back to school for personal fulfillment is a pretty expensive hobby, and I think a person should consider whether they can actually afford it before signing up for more school! Society pushes more schooling as the answer to career advancement because it doesn't want to face the reality that what is needed is more unions and more jobs that pay a living wage. But the end result is a bunch of over educated, indebted people stuck in low wage jobs. Nursing is one of the few jobs out there that pays a living wage and that is why so many people are jumping on the nurse bandwagon! I think many of the people going back to school may live to regret it when they are struggling to pay back the student loans and realize they don't have the money they need for life and for retirement!

Some specialties REQUIRE MSN's, such as midwifery.

Over-educated, really? I don't see how you can ever have too much eduaction....

Specializes in burn ICU, SICU, ER, Trauma Rapid Response.
Huh? I'm confused. Didn't I specifically state that I don't understand why it's a big deal? Which means, by the way, that I DON'T think it's a big deal. Did you read what I wrote? Or is this a snark attack?

I think learning for the sake of learning is fine. I think that if people want to get letters after their name, let them. I think that if you have a bajillion degrees and make a decent wage rather than scads of money, it's OK. If you are a lifelong learner and don't work, as long as it's OK with the people who support you, go for it!

I don't agree that people who love to learn and don't work are somehow less worthy than people who love to work but don't learn.

I don't believe that education is only a for-profit return on investment kind of thing.

Talking about learning for the sake of learning, lifelong learning, and furthering one's education all have nothing at all to do with the subject of the OP and the discussion we have had.

Specializes in ED.

I think it is a good idea for nursing as a profession to standardize it's education requirements. It elevates nursing from being just a career choice to being a profession. The way it is now, one can become a Registered Nurse from a diploma school, an Associates program or a Bachelor program. All will come out of school, take the same licensing test and begin pretty much in entry level positions. To be lawyer one needs X amount of years of education. To be a doctor, one needs X amount of years of education. To be a pharmacist, one needs X amount of years of education. I believe nursing should be standardized too. I feel all new nurses should have a bachelor degree and the associates programs and diploma programs should be phased out. I know that may not be a popular opinion and many will say "I don't want to go to school for 4 years to become a nurse", however, if that is the requirement than to be a nurse, you must complete the required education. There are no shortcuts for doctors, lawyers, engineers. To be any of those, one must complete the required education.

I also believe that by standardizing the required education for nursing, we would help eliminate many of these diploma mills. These so called schools are geared for the already licensed registered nurse who wants to obtain advanced degrees.

Education is good. Advancing one's education is always good thing, no matter what reason one is doing it for.

Talking about learning for the sake of learning, lifelong learning, and furthering one's education all have nothing at all to do with the subject of the OP and the discussion we have had.

Really. Here is a condensed version of the OP with salient points bolded.

Where I work, we have a trend of nurses obtaining multiple degrees after obtaining basic nursing training and their RN license. At a management meeting this issue came up about why nurses are going for all these degrees (MSN, MPH, MBA, MPA, MHA, DNP, JD, Dr.P.H. etc.). I have colleagues that have two or three graduate degrees. I frequently see these degreed nurses working in staff, charge or lower level non clinical work (case management/discharge planning). The degree(s) did not get them far from the bedside.

...

The impression I got is that the attendees saw this degree mania in nursing as silly and wasteful. The word wasteful was used as the facility provides tuition reimbursement.

...

When I interact with my degreed colleagues, I think to myself, what has all this schooling taught you?

In my day, you entered nursing via a diploma or associated degree and learned your trade on the floor. A degree (BSN or MSN)was needed to be a nursing director or nursing professor. I really never understood why nurses undertook going for these degrees since they stayed in nursing anyway.

...

Anyway, I wanted to hear what other nurses think about the degree proliferation in nursing.Do you think this is a good trend or is this just breeding more discontented nurses who will continue to dream about careers they will never have?

So, my posts are saying that the reason nurses are getting degrees is because they want them. In some cases (like mine) because they like to learn. How is that irrelevant?

Talking about learning for the sake of learning, lifelong learning, and furthering one's education all have nothing at all to do with the subject of the OP and the discussion we have had.

You need to re-read the OPs initial post. Much of it has to do with non-nursing degrees and the thought that since these nurses are not actively profiting from these degrees that they wasted their time and money, as if learning and becoming educated was not a reward within itself.

You have posted the phrase, "useless degrees" before, well what is a "useless degree?" Do YOU determine if a degree holds value to the individual? Must the degree holder submit an essay to you to prove that they are worthy of a degree and that degree holds value?

The discussion if about nurses obtaining useless degrees from questionable diploma mills. My point was that it is evidence of and a symptom of the wide spread lack of self esteem in nursing.

Selected quotes from the OP,

I really never understood why nurses undertook going for these degrees since they stayed in nursing anyway...

...Adding to this is the fact that if you do not practice these fields or specialty areas, you are not competent but rather have a degree as a trophy.

WHAT IS WRONG WITH WANTING TO BE A REGISTERED NURSE WITH A COLLEGE DEGREE!?!?!?

WHAT IS WRONG WITH HAVING A NON-NURSING COLLEGE DEGREE?

Why do you people care what someone else does with their time and their money? Are you and the OP insecure of your own educational achievements?

+ Add a Comment