Published
Let me preface this article to say that I'm not stirring a pot. I found this article a little dispassionate considering the choice made.
When One Is Enough
By AMY RICHARDS as told to AMY BARRETT
Published: July 18, 2004
I grew up in a working-class family in Pennsylvania not knowing my father. I have never missed not having him. I firmly believe that, but for much of my life I felt that what I probably would have gained was economic security and with that societal security. Growing up with a single mother, I was always buying into the myth that I was going to be seduced in the back of a pickup truck and become pregnant when I was 16. I had friends when I was in school who were helping to rear nieces and nephews, because their siblings, who were not much older, were having babies. I had friends from all over the class spectrum: I saw the nieces and nephews on the one hand and country-club memberships and station wagons on the other. I felt I was in the middle. I had this fear: What would it take for me to just slip?
Now I'm 34. My boyfriend, Peter, and I have been together three years. I'm old enough to presume that I wasn't going to have an easy time becoming pregnant. I was tired of being on the pill, because it made me moody. Before I went off it, Peter and I talked about what would happen if I became pregnant, and we both agreed that we would have the child.
I found out I was having triplets when I went to my obstetrician. The doctor had just finished telling me I was going to have a low-risk pregnancy. She turned on the sonogram machine. There was a long pause, then she said, ''Are you sure you didn't take fertility drugs?'' I said, ''I'm positive.'' Peter and I were very shocked when she said there were three. ''You know, this changes everything,'' she said. ''You'll have to see a specialist.''
My immediate response was, I cannot have triplets. I was not married; I lived in a five-story walk-up in the East Village; I worked freelance; and I would have to go on bed rest in March. I lecture at colleges, and my biggest months are March and April. I would have to give up my main income for the rest of the year. There was a part of me that was sure I could work around that. But it was a matter of, Do I want to?
I looked at Peter and asked the doctor: ''Is it possible to get rid of one of them? Or two of them?'' The obstetrician wasn't an expert in selective reduction, but she knew that with a shot of potassium chloride you could eliminate one or more.
Having felt physically fine up to this point, I got on the subway afterward, and all of a sudden, I felt ill. I didn't want to eat anything. What I was going through seemed like a very unnatural experience. On the subway, Peter asked, ''Shouldn't we consider having triplets?'' And I had this adverse reaction: ''This is why they say it's the woman's choice, because you think I could just carry triplets. That's easy for you to say, but I'd have to give up my life.'' Not only would I have to be on bed rest at 20 weeks, I wouldn't be able to fly after 15. I was already at eight weeks. When I found out about the triplets, I felt like: It's not the back of a pickup at 16, but now I'm going to have to move to Staten Island. I'll never leave my house because I'll have to care for these children. I'll have to start shopping only at Costco and buying big jars of mayonnaise. Even in my moments of thinking about having three, I don't think that deep down I was ever considering it.
The specialist called me back at 10 p.m. I had just finished watching a Boston Pops concert at Symphony Hall. As everybody burst into applause, I watched my cellphone vibrating, grabbed it and ran into the lobby. He told me that he does a detailed sonogram before doing a selective reduction to see if one fetus appears to be struggling. The procedure involves a shot of potassium chloride to the heart of the fetus. There are a lot more complications when a woman carries multiples. And so, from the doctor's perspective, it's a matter of trying to save the woman this trauma. After I talked to the specialist, I told Peter, ''That's what I'm going to do.'' He replied, ''What we're going to do.'' He respected what I was going through, but at a certain point, he felt that this was a decision we were making. I agreed.
When we saw the specialist, we found out that I was carrying identical twins and a stand alone. My doctors thought the stand alone was three days older. There was something psychologically comforting about that, since I wanted to have just one. Before the procedure, I was focused on relaxing. But Peter was staring at the sonogram screen thinking: Oh, my gosh, there are three heartbeats. I can't believe we're about to make two disappear. The doctor came in, and then Peter was asked to leave. I said, ''Can Peter stay?'' The doctor said no. I know Peter was offended by that.
Two days after the procedure, smells no longer set me off and I no longer wanted to eat nothing but sour-apple gum. I went on to have a pretty seamless pregnancy. But I had a recurring feeling that this was going to come back and haunt me. Was I going to have a stillbirth or miscarry late in my pregnancy?
I had a boy, and everything is fine. But thinking about becoming pregnant again is terrifying. Am I going to have quintuplets? I would do the same thing if I had triplets again, but if I had twins, I would probably have twins. Then again, I don't know.
Michelle, I completely agree that there are way too many abortions in this country. My only disagreement comes in what to do about it. I don't think criminalizing it will stop it. I think good sexual education (and that means more than just the plumbing) coupled with easily available birth control is the way to go.
After reading thru this thread, I know my opinion will meet with opposition but I can't help but put in my .02.
Reading this made me feel physically ill.
I am pro-choice. I believe a woman has a choice to have sex or not to have sex and after that she needs to live with the consequences. I do not believe a woman has the right to kill a child. (sorry to be so blunt, but to me it is murder)
This women sickens me, and it only shows how so many women in this country feel and act. Spoiled rotten. Me me me. I don't want to give up any time, any money, wahhhhhhhhhhhhh, poor me! It's not alive! Kill it! WAHHHHHHHH!
Get over it. Give up 9 months of your life and give your baby(s) up for adoption.
Damn, this woman was(is) one sick puppy. I feel sorry for her husband who obviously had other ideas and had no say over the future of his children.
Michelle, I completely agree that there are way too many abortions in this country. My only disagreement comes in what to do about it. I don't think criminalizing it will stop it. I think good sexual education (and that means more than just the plumbing) coupled with easily available birth control is the way to go.
Now we're getting somewhere. I am majorly pro-life...but, I'm not sure about making it criminal either. In a perfect world it shouldn't have to be legal. However we do not live in that perfect world and everyone has their free will. Do I think it should be legal? Certainly not...but, I'm not really sure about making it illegal now because that is just the way the world is headed. I don't know if you understand what I am saying. It's just the way I feel.
Birth control is the key to lowering abortion rates. Unfortunately, since abortion is so readily accessible, more women may not think of birth control.
Just MHO.
Now call me naive, but, I still have enough faith in human conscience to think that nowhere near that number is because of molestation or rape.No, most of those abortions are because "I screwed up...and I am selfish...and I don't want to live with the consequences so I'll just kill my child now. After all, that is my choice."
I just have to wonder if some of these women aren't just using abortion as birth control. Regular birth control has a much higher success rate and is cheaper.
Edited because I was trying to verify the actual percentage of pregnancies ending in abortion each year.
What faith is that, exactly? I mean, you say you have faith these pregnancies did not occur out of rape/coercion/incest. Is the the same faith that guides you to believe the "vast majority" of abortions are sought for soley selfish reason? Just wondering.....seems a real contradiction here in what you are saying, if you ask me.
Now we're getting somewhere. I am majorly pro-life...but, I'm not sure about making it criminal either. In a perfect world it shouldn't have to be legal. However we do not live in that perfect world and everyone has their free will. Do I think it should be legal? Certainly not...but, I'm not really sure about making it illegal now because that is just the way the world is headed. I don't know if you understand what I am saying. It's just the way I feel.Birth control is the key to lowering abortion rates. Unfortunately, since abortion is so readily accessible, more women may not think of birth control.
Just MHO.
I think I get you, but I don't agree with the last bit. Most women who have abortions are not the repeaters having 4 or 5 or 6 just to avoid birth control. I'm sure those women exist, but it just doesn't make sense to go through the trouble, pain and expense of abortions rather than use a pill, so I don't believe they are the norm (especially considering that abortion isn't as accessible in many areas of the country thanks partly to providers being scared out of performing them).
I think our abortion rates are just a symptom of our society's attitudes towards sex in general. We don't want to talk about it openly, honestly and respectfully. We don't want to tell our children about what it means to value their bodies and their partners. We stick our heads in the sand then bemoan the results.
What faith is that, exactly? I mean, you say you have faith these pregnancies did not occur out of rape/coercion/incest. Is the the same faith that guides you to believe the "vast majority" of abortions are sought for soley selfish reason? Just wondering.....seems a real contradiction here in what you are saying, if you ask me.
You wouldn't be one of the ones nit-picking, now would you?
Oh, and what other reason would an abortion be for if it wasn't for rape/incest/medically necessary?
Fergus . . . maybe the guys aren't at pro-choice rallies but in my experience they do have a "out" when it comes to responsibility for a pregnancy. And they mostly like it. I think it makes it easier for them to fool around without thought to the consequences. It is an easy "out" for them. Just sleep around and if she gets preggers, she can get an abortion.The other part about it being a life, I thought he left it open a bit . . . "It is life. Maybe not fully formed. Maybe not fully conscious."
I guess, not wanting to get in a debate with you over abortion . .to me, it is a life.
I actually thought he was pretty evenhanded . . . .
Again, it is perspective. Sorry it bothered you.
steph :kiss
Although I was disturbed by the attitude of the woman in the original article, I found the posted editorial response to be highly biased to the right.
Society is much more accepting of in vitro than it is of abortion. I have to wonder why this is. The two are, essentially, the same - in terms of dying embryos. The only difference is that one is due to a lack of planning, whereas the other is due to infinite planning..
Very, very interesting POV. I have never thought of it this way.
I think it is because wanting to be a mother is seen a natural, and admirable, even if embyros are killed in the process. Whereas, a woman who does not want to be a mother is seen as unnatural, weird, selfish.
I have never wanted to be a parent, and with careful planning, I never will be. I am often looked on as an oddity because of this. People are always asking me how many kids I have. When I say "none", I start getting questions such as "Why? What's wrong with you? .....Hubby shooting blanks?" (I was asked this one just yesterday at a party). "Have you tried fertility tx?" etc. The assumption is always that I am unable to have children; never that I choose not to.
On the rare occasions when I have openly revealed that I don't have kids because I never wanted to, people look at me like I have 3 heads.
A common response is for the questioner to become completely speachless with a look of total confusion on their face.
"About one in four pregnancies end in elective abortion...not counting miscarriages. "
What's the source for this? I find it hard to believe that one in four women would even have abortion facilities within a couple hours' drive, let alone that one in four pregnancies is aborted. Sounds very high to me.
"About one in four pregnancies end in elective abortion...not counting miscarriages. "What's the source for this? I find it hard to believe that one in four women would even have abortion facilities within a couple hours' drive, let alone that one in four pregnancies is aborted. Sounds very high to me.
There is an abortion clinic in Redding, CA and Chico, CA . . .all very near me. Then Sacramento too. Of course, this is California . . .
I googled "abortion rates" and got lots of info that pretty much correlates with the following:
The Center for Disease Control and Prevention figures for 1996, released in 1999-JUL, showed that the highest abortion rate is in California (39 per year per 1000 women ages 15 to 44). California was followed by New York (37), Florida (27), Delaware (26) Rhode Island (24). The lowest was Wyoming with 2.
I'm sure it is broken down in many other ways . . .
steph
michelle95
329 Posts
Last comment. I'm not sure if you all are aware of exactly how many abortions are performed each year. 1.3 million. About one in four pregnancies end in elective abortion...not counting miscarriages. Now call me naive, but, I still have enough faith in human conscience to think that nowhere near that number is because of molestation or rape.
No, most of those abortions are because "I screwed up...and I am selfish...and I don't want to live with the consequences so I'll just kill my child now. After all, that is my choice."
I just have to wonder if some of these women aren't just using abortion as birth control. Regular birth control has a much higher success rate and is cheaper.
Edited because I was trying to verify the actual percentage of pregnancies ending in abortion each year.