When One Child Is Enough

Published

Let me preface this article to say that I'm not stirring a pot. I found this article a little dispassionate considering the choice made.

When One Is Enough

By AMY RICHARDS as told to AMY BARRETT

Published: July 18, 2004

I grew up in a working-class family in Pennsylvania not knowing my father. I have never missed not having him. I firmly believe that, but for much of my life I felt that what I probably would have gained was economic security and with that societal security. Growing up with a single mother, I was always buying into the myth that I was going to be seduced in the back of a pickup truck and become pregnant when I was 16. I had friends when I was in school who were helping to rear nieces and nephews, because their siblings, who were not much older, were having babies. I had friends from all over the class spectrum: I saw the nieces and nephews on the one hand and country-club memberships and station wagons on the other. I felt I was in the middle. I had this fear: What would it take for me to just slip?

Now I'm 34. My boyfriend, Peter, and I have been together three years. I'm old enough to presume that I wasn't going to have an easy time becoming pregnant. I was tired of being on the pill, because it made me moody. Before I went off it, Peter and I talked about what would happen if I became pregnant, and we both agreed that we would have the child.

I found out I was having triplets when I went to my obstetrician. The doctor had just finished telling me I was going to have a low-risk pregnancy. She turned on the sonogram machine. There was a long pause, then she said, ''Are you sure you didn't take fertility drugs?'' I said, ''I'm positive.'' Peter and I were very shocked when she said there were three. ''You know, this changes everything,'' she said. ''You'll have to see a specialist.''

My immediate response was, I cannot have triplets. I was not married; I lived in a five-story walk-up in the East Village; I worked freelance; and I would have to go on bed rest in March. I lecture at colleges, and my biggest months are March and April. I would have to give up my main income for the rest of the year. There was a part of me that was sure I could work around that. But it was a matter of, Do I want to?

I looked at Peter and asked the doctor: ''Is it possible to get rid of one of them? Or two of them?'' The obstetrician wasn't an expert in selective reduction, but she knew that with a shot of potassium chloride you could eliminate one or more.

Having felt physically fine up to this point, I got on the subway afterward, and all of a sudden, I felt ill. I didn't want to eat anything. What I was going through seemed like a very unnatural experience. On the subway, Peter asked, ''Shouldn't we consider having triplets?'' And I had this adverse reaction: ''This is why they say it's the woman's choice, because you think I could just carry triplets. That's easy for you to say, but I'd have to give up my life.'' Not only would I have to be on bed rest at 20 weeks, I wouldn't be able to fly after 15. I was already at eight weeks. When I found out about the triplets, I felt like: It's not the back of a pickup at 16, but now I'm going to have to move to Staten Island. I'll never leave my house because I'll have to care for these children. I'll have to start shopping only at Costco and buying big jars of mayonnaise. Even in my moments of thinking about having three, I don't think that deep down I was ever considering it.

The specialist called me back at 10 p.m. I had just finished watching a Boston Pops concert at Symphony Hall. As everybody burst into applause, I watched my cellphone vibrating, grabbed it and ran into the lobby. He told me that he does a detailed sonogram before doing a selective reduction to see if one fetus appears to be struggling. The procedure involves a shot of potassium chloride to the heart of the fetus. There are a lot more complications when a woman carries multiples. And so, from the doctor's perspective, it's a matter of trying to save the woman this trauma. After I talked to the specialist, I told Peter, ''That's what I'm going to do.'' He replied, ''What we're going to do.'' He respected what I was going through, but at a certain point, he felt that this was a decision we were making. I agreed.

When we saw the specialist, we found out that I was carrying identical twins and a stand alone. My doctors thought the stand alone was three days older. There was something psychologically comforting about that, since I wanted to have just one. Before the procedure, I was focused on relaxing. But Peter was staring at the sonogram screen thinking: Oh, my gosh, there are three heartbeats. I can't believe we're about to make two disappear. The doctor came in, and then Peter was asked to leave. I said, ''Can Peter stay?'' The doctor said no. I know Peter was offended by that.

Two days after the procedure, smells no longer set me off and I no longer wanted to eat nothing but sour-apple gum. I went on to have a pretty seamless pregnancy. But I had a recurring feeling that this was going to come back and haunt me. Was I going to have a stillbirth or miscarry late in my pregnancy?

I had a boy, and everything is fine. But thinking about becoming pregnant again is terrifying. Am I going to have quintuplets? I would do the same thing if I had triplets again, but if I had twins, I would probably have twins. Then again, I don't know.

Susanna,

I don't quite think its fair of you to imply in your post that my feelings on this issue were not well thought out (i.e. advising me to research and reflect on it) but then I am not supposed to respond to the "rhetorical" question. How it would be possible for me to discuss this topic without referencing my son I can't imagine, and in fact I think it would be dishonest not to disclose my intensely personal experience.

And just to clarify--I didn't say that it was selfish for people to get pg. and "not know how to take care of their babies". IMHO it is selfish for people to purposely get pregnant, and then throw their baby away because it is less than perfect. To me it is the definition of selfishness, that because a child may require more care and support and interfere with their own desires, that someone would deprive that child of the right to live. Becoming a parent is all about sacrifice, and if you aren't prepared for that then don't get pregnant. And I do *not* think that the choice to continue a pg. means someone is more "spiritually grown" but rather the experience of parenting the child with special needs provides a great opportunity for spiritual growth.

I think that when we rationalize terminating for non-lethal abnormalities that it becomes a slippery slope--if a baby with T21, or one missing kidney, or spina bifida, or CF is OK to abort, then what about abortion for sex selection when the sex of the baby doesn't fit the parents ideal?

I havn't experienced caring for people with the degree of disability that you have. My knowledge is mostly about T21, for obvious reasons. And because it is the most common birth defect, and 90% of people who find out prenatally terminate, thousands of babies just like my son are deemed unfit to live, because their parents did not want the "burden". I understand that other people may see it differently--but if that isn't selfish then I can't imagine what is.

Again, I have done research, I have talked to geneticists, I have talked to parents, I have read Smiths...so I do know, really, what could happen. I stand by my opinion, just as you are entitled to yours. I also don't need to hear about the misfortune of others to know that I am deeply blessed or to feel happy. All I have to do is to see the determination on my son's face as he perseveres in reaching a milestone that might come easily to other babies and the priceless grin when he reaches his goal and I have all the happiness I need.

Shannon

Shannon, regarding your quote "I think that when we rationalize terminating for non-lethal abnormalities that it becomes a slippery slope--if a baby with T21, or one missing kidney, or spina bifida, or CF is OK to abort, then what about abortion for sex selection when the sex of the baby doesn't fit the parents ideal?" . .. . . . the original article WAS about a woman who decided to abort her twins because she didn't want three children. So, the slippery slope is here . .

I appreciate your post. I live near a ranch for developmentally disabled adults called "The Mountain Jewel Ranch". One of the disabilities is DS. The people who run it have a DS son. His name is Rusty. He is a delightful man of 36 who raises pigs on his family's ranch, rides horses, helps out on the ranch with chores. They have a basketball team that usually sweeps our local Special Olympics. Our high school boys practice with them. Every winter will find them on the slopes skiing. Rusty usually gives me a great big hug whenever I see him. He attended school. He reads. He sings with joy at church. The ranchers are the "mountain jewels". They are precious in His sight.

So is your son. Thank you for sharing.

steph

Shannon, regarding your quote "I think that when we rationalize terminating for non-lethal abnormalities that it becomes a slippery slope--if a baby with T21, or one missing kidney, or spina bifida, or CF is OK to abort, then what about abortion for sex selection when the sex of the baby doesn't fit the parents ideal?" . .. . . . the original article WAS about a woman who decided to abort her twins because she didn't want three children. So, the slippery slope is here . .

I appreciate your post. I live near a ranch for developmentally disabled adults called "The Mountain Jewel Ranch". One of the disabilities is DS. The people who run it have a DS son. His name is Rusty. He is a delightful man of 36 who raises pigs on his family's ranch, rides horses, helps out on the ranch with chores. They have a basketball team that usually sweeps our local Special Olympics. Our high school boys practice with them. Every winter will find them on the slopes skiing. Rusty usually gives me a great big hug whenever I see him. He attended school. He reads. He sings with joy at church. The ranchers are the "mountain jewels". They are precious in His sight.

So is your son. Thank you for sharing.

steph

Thank you Steph, for your post--:) :crying2: --you don't know how much hope that gives me. Now I have to get Lukas walking so we can get him up on skiis, LOL!

Shannon

Shannon, with your experience I don't think it's fair to ask you to be impartial. You're his mom and I don't mean to fault you one bit for feeling the way you do about aborting babies with DS. How else would you be expected to feel?:) I'm just saying I can't have the same black and white view you do, cause I still don't know how I would handle finding out I was carrying a child with a serious or fatal health disorder. I just don't know.

As far as slippery slope.... there is no slippery slope since a woman can abort for any reason she wants already. We did have issues in my home province of women aborting baby girls so many doctors stopped telling parents the sex on ultrasounds. Personally I don't know how a line could be drawn legally. For those of us who don't believe abortion is murder anyways, it's hard to argue that parents should have to carry babies with serious disorders to term when women are allowed to abort unwanted fetuses for any reason at all.

As an adopted child, who is ...obviously... all for the idea of adoptiong, I have just recently endured the suffering with a dear friend the loss of 3 babies in a row -- she lost them all very early in her pregnancies, and has been devistated each time. She and her husband are so sedperate to have a child of their own -- as a mom, with two children -- I can understand that too. There is nothing that compares to looking into eyes that look exactly like your own, seeing your husband's smile duplicated in miniature on another face, hearing his chuckle from a little body, watching your father's walk mimiced in your son's steps..... for some... the horrible anguish and trauma of multiple loss are worth it!

I can't put a price on that. I never had to . In the wisdom/ providence of God/Fate I was fortunate enough not to have to. Now that I have been granted that -- would I go through fire for it? You bettcha!! Would I fight like a wild woman to protect it? Yes! What mom wouldn't protect her gang at all cost? I know I would do my darndest to keep my gang safe! Isn't this drive similar to what drives these folks --sort of? I just know I count myself very blessed and spend an awful lot of time praying/wishing for grace and peace for those who so desperately want a baby of their own to love while there are so many unwanted, wnloved little ones out there needing homes and love!

+ Join the Discussion