When One Child Is Enough

Published

Let me preface this article to say that I'm not stirring a pot. I found this article a little dispassionate considering the choice made.

When One Is Enough

By AMY RICHARDS as told to AMY BARRETT

Published: July 18, 2004

I grew up in a working-class family in Pennsylvania not knowing my father. I have never missed not having him. I firmly believe that, but for much of my life I felt that what I probably would have gained was economic security and with that societal security. Growing up with a single mother, I was always buying into the myth that I was going to be seduced in the back of a pickup truck and become pregnant when I was 16. I had friends when I was in school who were helping to rear nieces and nephews, because their siblings, who were not much older, were having babies. I had friends from all over the class spectrum: I saw the nieces and nephews on the one hand and country-club memberships and station wagons on the other. I felt I was in the middle. I had this fear: What would it take for me to just slip?

Now I'm 34. My boyfriend, Peter, and I have been together three years. I'm old enough to presume that I wasn't going to have an easy time becoming pregnant. I was tired of being on the pill, because it made me moody. Before I went off it, Peter and I talked about what would happen if I became pregnant, and we both agreed that we would have the child.

I found out I was having triplets when I went to my obstetrician. The doctor had just finished telling me I was going to have a low-risk pregnancy. She turned on the sonogram machine. There was a long pause, then she said, ''Are you sure you didn't take fertility drugs?'' I said, ''I'm positive.'' Peter and I were very shocked when she said there were three. ''You know, this changes everything,'' she said. ''You'll have to see a specialist.''

My immediate response was, I cannot have triplets. I was not married; I lived in a five-story walk-up in the East Village; I worked freelance; and I would have to go on bed rest in March. I lecture at colleges, and my biggest months are March and April. I would have to give up my main income for the rest of the year. There was a part of me that was sure I could work around that. But it was a matter of, Do I want to?

I looked at Peter and asked the doctor: ''Is it possible to get rid of one of them? Or two of them?'' The obstetrician wasn't an expert in selective reduction, but she knew that with a shot of potassium chloride you could eliminate one or more.

Having felt physically fine up to this point, I got on the subway afterward, and all of a sudden, I felt ill. I didn't want to eat anything. What I was going through seemed like a very unnatural experience. On the subway, Peter asked, ''Shouldn't we consider having triplets?'' And I had this adverse reaction: ''This is why they say it's the woman's choice, because you think I could just carry triplets. That's easy for you to say, but I'd have to give up my life.'' Not only would I have to be on bed rest at 20 weeks, I wouldn't be able to fly after 15. I was already at eight weeks. When I found out about the triplets, I felt like: It's not the back of a pickup at 16, but now I'm going to have to move to Staten Island. I'll never leave my house because I'll have to care for these children. I'll have to start shopping only at Costco and buying big jars of mayonnaise. Even in my moments of thinking about having three, I don't think that deep down I was ever considering it.

The specialist called me back at 10 p.m. I had just finished watching a Boston Pops concert at Symphony Hall. As everybody burst into applause, I watched my cellphone vibrating, grabbed it and ran into the lobby. He told me that he does a detailed sonogram before doing a selective reduction to see if one fetus appears to be struggling. The procedure involves a shot of potassium chloride to the heart of the fetus. There are a lot more complications when a woman carries multiples. And so, from the doctor's perspective, it's a matter of trying to save the woman this trauma. After I talked to the specialist, I told Peter, ''That's what I'm going to do.'' He replied, ''What we're going to do.'' He respected what I was going through, but at a certain point, he felt that this was a decision we were making. I agreed.

When we saw the specialist, we found out that I was carrying identical twins and a stand alone. My doctors thought the stand alone was three days older. There was something psychologically comforting about that, since I wanted to have just one. Before the procedure, I was focused on relaxing. But Peter was staring at the sonogram screen thinking: Oh, my gosh, there are three heartbeats. I can't believe we're about to make two disappear. The doctor came in, and then Peter was asked to leave. I said, ''Can Peter stay?'' The doctor said no. I know Peter was offended by that.

Two days after the procedure, smells no longer set me off and I no longer wanted to eat nothing but sour-apple gum. I went on to have a pretty seamless pregnancy. But I had a recurring feeling that this was going to come back and haunt me. Was I going to have a stillbirth or miscarry late in my pregnancy?

I had a boy, and everything is fine. But thinking about becoming pregnant again is terrifying. Am I going to have quintuplets? I would do the same thing if I had triplets again, but if I had twins, I would probably have twins. Then again, I don't know.

This article was very hard for me to read. If I found out that I was having 3, I would be more excited than anything! How precious to be able to have 3 children without fertility drugs. You shouldn't be able to have any more kids. You didn't keep the other two. Who knows what might happen this time. Sorry but it is just very upsetting to me.:angryfire

Pretty disturbing to read. I think she should have weighed all her options. She did not even consider placing the twins up for adoption. She instead chose her needs over that of unborn children.:o Disconcerting when not being able to have anymore children myself, although I have one beautiful biological child and one beautiful adopted child.

Pretty disturbing to read. I think she should have weighed all her options. She did not even consider placing the twins up for adoption. She instead chose her needs over that of unborn children.:o Disconcerting when not being able to have anymore children myself, although I have one beautiful biological child and one beautiful adopted child.

Gosh, you are so BLESSED! Did you adopt first or have secondary infertility? I have a miracle IVF son who is now 5 years old. We are looking into adoption for baby # 2.

Before I went through the bumpy road of infertility, I thought nothing of women having abortions. I did become a lot more sensitive to it, when it became out of my reach. I still believe a woman has a right to pro choice, but my heart is really pro life. It SUCKS going through infertility!

Gosh, you are so BLESSED! Did you adopt first or have secondary infertility? I have a miracle IVF son who is now 5 years old. We are looking into adoption for baby # 2.

My first child is 6 years old and is biological. We had no problems trying to get pregnant with her. When trying to have more we realized nothing was happening and went to a specialist. They did all the tests and diagnosed me with PCOS. They put me on the meds and fertility treatments with inseminations, ect., but still no baby. So, we finally got to the point of IVF and we prayed about adoption or IVF and found adoption was our answer. We have a beautiful 18 month old right now whom we got at two days of age. We certainly are blessed!

Specializes in Geriatrics, DD, Peri-op.

Nevermind...it's not worth it. One day folks will realize the horror of abortion. :o

Specializes in 5 yrs OR, ASU Pre-Op 2 yr. ER.
Nevermind...it's not worth it. One day folks will realize the horror of abortion. :o

And maybe by THEN, 11 and 12 year little girls won't be getting raped (or anyone for that matter).

Nevermind...it's not worth it. One day folks will realize the horror of abortion. :o

I read your post before you deleted it and thought it was a heartfelt message. Please don't think your opinion isn't worth posting. The truth is lots of people are ambivalent about abortion. Folks on both sides have mentioned in this thread having problems with the woman in the article and her reasons for reducing her pregnancy from 3 to 1. Pro-choice folks have problems with partial birth abortion. Pro-life folks have second thoughts when it comes to young girls being raped.

As unfortunate as rape is, and especially 11 and 12 year old girls who are raped . . . it is a rare occurance and a small percentage of the total amount of abortions done in this country. And there are women who are irresponsible and use it for birth control. My own sister had numerous abortions before we finally convinced her to get her tubes tied. Anecdotal, I know . . .

Thanks for your thoughts.

steph

I heard there were 25000 rapes resulting in pregnancies last year. I'll have to look it up, but that seems like a big deal to me. (It really doesn't factor into my opinion on legalized abortion either way, but I do think it's important to recognize).

Steph, I think your comment says it all. Most people lie somewhere in the middle on this issue.

Specializes in 5 yrs OR, ASU Pre-Op 2 yr. ER.

Rape factors in my opinion of abortion, because if it were made illegal, the rape victims are left without a choice yet again.

I can understand that. I just don't think it is good policy to make rape the only case where it is legal. It would simply lead to a lot of false accusations, so I think it's better to keep abortion accessible to all women. That's what I mean when I say it doesn't affect my opinion.

Specializes in Specializes in L/D, newborn, GYN, LTC, Dialysis.

What about the "horror" of an 11 or 12 year old giving birth after molestation or rape?

Or the holocaust suffered by kids brought up by abusive, drug-using, criminal parents who never wanted them in the first place??????

Ah, will those who feel abortion should be illegal step up to the plate and take em all in? UNLIKELY I would say. I really think there should be a choice, no matter HOW I PERSONALLY feel about it.....right now the thought of abortion is so, so awful to me. You who know me can understand why. But MY personal situation and feelings are not what should determine what others choose they must do. I am really tired of hearing pro-life folks go on about this holocaust yet many of these same folks would never hear of adopting said children. It's not fair, either way, is it????? But "prochoice" is not synonymous with "pro-abortion". Many don't see that however.

I am sorry I said I would abstain here, and I should have. I really am way emotional these days. :o

What about the "horror" of an 11 or 12 year old giving birth after molestation or rape?

Or the holocaust suffered by kids brought up by abusive, drug-using, criminal parents who never wanted them in the first place??????

Ah, will those who feel abortion should be illegal step up to the plate and take em all in? UNLIKELY I would say.

I completely agree.

What's more, I doubt that the very people opposing abortion the most will even tolerate an adequate portion of their taxes going toward buying these kids some milk and peanut butter. I am generalizing here - I admit it - but I always find it ironic that the Republican party takes such a strong stand on abortion while they are cutting welfare, childcare programs, etc.

+ Join the Discussion