Many hospitals are moving towards creating mandatory influenza vaccination policies as a condition of employment. Such mandates are causing surefire responses on both sides of the fence. What is the push behind the movement, and what is causing the pushback?
Updated:
First, let me just go over some of the symptoms of the flu, and then we will get down to business on the controversy surrounding the push to create mandatory flu vaccines for healthcare workers:
I can't think of anyone who wants any of these symptoms, or to come down with the flu, can you?
Influenza vaccination research has clearly documented the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine (Google it - you will find a plethora of information...however, I will list some links at the end of this article for your information). However, even though there is sufficient evidence to prove the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine, vaccination rates among healthcare workers are pitifully low. In 2013, only 55% of nurses in the frontlines were vaccinated.
Organizations such as The Joint Commission, the American Nurses Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Centers for Disease Control, Healthy People 2020, etc., etc., have stated their position on recommending the flu vaccine for healthcare workers in order to decrease the risk of exposure and reduce deaths. Due to this recommendation, many healthcare facilities are now creating mandatory flu vaccine policies as a condition of employment.
Employers who create mandatory policies will have exemptions, of course. Exemptions are made for medical and religious exceptions. For places that do not have a mandatory flu vaccine, they may "strongly recommend" the vaccination and may have a declination form for employees to submit if they refuse the vaccine. Additionally, some employers will enforce refusers to wear a mask during flu season while they are at work in order to protect the patients and the employee.
Evidence has shown that there are more than 36,000 deaths in the US each year related to influenza, and more than 200,000 hospitalizations. Influenza is the 6th leading cause of death. Healthcare workers are the leading cause of influenza outbreaks in the healthcare system. up to 50% of people who are infected by the flu virus do not fill ill for several days and can spread the virus to people at risk of complications and death from the flu. Additionally, evidence shows vaccination decreases mortality by 40%, decreases the spread of nosocomial infections by 43%, and decreases absenteeism by 20-30%.
Additionally, there is the ethics to consider. As healthcare workers, we have all taken an oath to "do no harm". As a nurse caring for patients who are not in their most physically healthy state, do we take the vaccination in order to prevent spreading the flu to our vulnerable patients, in order to "do no harm"? We must consider this when we make our decision to take or refuse the vaccination.
I have the names of a few hospitals, and this is by no means a comprehensive list. This is based on a ListServe survey of hospitals and these are the responses received:
Refusal may be largely due to misconceptions related to the vaccine. Fears that the immune system will cause them to get the flu, beliefs that hygiene and better nutrition are more helpful than the vaccine, fear of needles, beliefs that the vaccine does not work, and fear of side effects. Others believe that they have a constitutional right to refuse the vaccine and that mandatory policies are violating these rights.
(taken from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health outline of flu vaccine talking points for managers)
The flu shot does not give people the flu. It uses inactivated ("dead") virus. People may still catch a cold or other virus that the vaccine is not designed match.
Studies have shown that flu vaccination prevents flu in 70% to 90% of healthy adults younger than 65 years old.
You need a new vaccine every year - the virus changes over time.
Serious adverse reactions are very rare. They are explained on the CDC's Vaccine Information Statement, which is distributed when the vaccine is administered.
Local short-term reactions - such soreness at the vaccination site, slight fever, achy feeling - may occur but usually do not last long. Over the counter medicines are helpful. Even short-term reactions are much less bothersome than catching the flu and feeling very sick for days.
Your patients are at-risk, and possibly some friends and family members. You can be infected with the flu virus but not feel ill - and can still transmit flu to at-risk patients.
Inactivated influenza vaccine is effective in preventing transmission and reducing complications of the flu. In years when there is a close match between the vaccine and circulating virus strains, the vaccine prevents illness among approximately 70%--90% of healthy adults under 65 years of age. Vaccinating healthy adults also has been proven to lead to decreased work absenteeism and use of health-care resources, including use of antibiotics. Strong protection is also expected when the vaccine is not a close match with circulating strains, with 50%--77% effectiveness in these instances. In addition, effectiveness against influenza-related hospitalization for healthy adults from inactivated vaccine is estimated at 90%.
All healthcare facilities will be facing the choice of creating a mandatory influenza vaccination in the near future, if they have not already. In order to make an informed decision on the topic, we must have information. Knowledge is power. Before you make a blanket statement on pros or cons, have the information you need, know the research, and make an educated decision.
Please respond to this article by answering the following questions:
References
American Association of Family Practitioners. (2011). AAFP supports mandatory flu vaccinations for healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: AAFP Supports Mandatory Flu Vaccinations for Health Care Personnel
ATrain. (2014). To accept or refuse the flu vaccine. Retrieved from: ZZZ_133_Influenza: Module 7
CDC. (2014). Vaccination: Who should do it, who should not and who should take precautions. Retrieved from: Vaccination: Who Should Do It, Who Should Not and Who Should Take Precautions | Seasonal Influenza (Flu) | CDC
Influenza Action Coalition. (2015). Influenza vaccination honor roll. Retrieved from: Honor Roll: Mandatory Influenza Vaccination Policies for Healthcare Personnel
Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2014). Talking points for managers. Retrieved from: http://tinyurl.com/p6nbg2u
National adult and influenza immunization summit. (2015). Vaccinating healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: Vaccinating Healthcare Personnel - National Adult and Influenza Immunization Summit
NursingTimes. (2014). Why do health workers decline flu vaccination? Retrieved from: http://www.nursingtimes.net/Journals/2014/11/28/y/k/x/031214-Why-do-health-workers-decline-flu-vaccination.pdf
TJC. (2012). R3 Report: Requirement, rationale, reference. Retrieved from: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/R3_Report_Issue_3_5_18_12_final.pdf
Do you understand how drug trials, particularly cancer treatment drugs, are run? There is no chance of "placebo affect" as the evidence of efficacy they look at are measurable not subjective. By measurable I mean labwork and imaging studies. None of which are subjective in any way. So, yes, it would be highly unethical to use a placebo and knowingly allow a patient's cancer to progress. Not using a placebo is in no way manipulating the results.
Sorry, I didn't see your post. I just posted essentially the same thing.
concerned lady said:Today, I spoke with several pharmacists, ALL of whom MISTAKENLY thought that a REAL placebo was used, for ALL NEW VACCINATIONS, such as flu shots, etc., in "double blind" studies!Hmmm. Makes me ask whether flu shots' efficacy/usefulness, (when they supposedly work, 20% of the time...)may actually be due to the "placebo effect" of the new vaccine itself!
Everyone should re-read what BlondeNurse wrote a few days ago, and she's been a nurse a lot longer than I was!
I can only imagine the looks on the pharmacists' faces when you said you believe the flu vaccine's effectiveness was based on placebo effect. Please bring a camera next time you decide to do this.
I've heard many cases where conventional treatments were tried and failed, so the patients looked in other directions, and many found help...I think it's a good thing to consider all kinds of possibilities if one wishes. I certainly would.
This thread is long already, but here's my anecdotal experience. My young sister was dx with a fast growing type of brain cancer, called a GBM, grade 4/5 at age 22. She was given 6 mo-1 yr to live. She underwent medical tx: surgery, radiation and chemo. They removed all they could and told her the the prognosis was the same.
She had to go to get screenings and radiation q6mos thereafter. Each screening was clear, but they still dosed her with radiation, saying it was necessary to prevent a recurrence.
After 2-5 yrs of the clear scans and radiation, she told them that she'd researched the issue on her own and felt that continued radiation posed a greater risk of harm.
The treating doctors told her she had to continue with the radiation or her cancer would come back. They really scared her with their promises of recurrence. She instead chose to continue eating well, avoiding known dietary carcinogens, etc.
it's now been >10yrs and she's still cancer free.
There's a place for medicine and a place for thinking about what is best for the individual person.
Can you please provide a source re: your statement that the government "tried to get every nurse in the US to take a smallpox vaccine"?
It was one of those "voluntary" campaigns, similar to flu vaccination, that they were trying to roll out.
I remember when the Administrators started talking about a "get vaccinated or lose your job" stance. I was in California and man it was going to get ugly if that happened.
Smallpox Vaccination: Time to Roll Up Your Sleeve? - NurseZone
concerned lady said:Hi Horseshoe,By NOT using a REAL placebo during a drug trial, pharmaceutical companies are risking mistaking the placebo effect as being the so called efficacy of the very drugs being "tested"! I think that's a bit too convenient ($), and un-ethical also!
So let me understand you...in the case of trying out a new insulin, you believe a type 1 diabetic should be given a placebo in order to test out a new insulin. Knowing that would cause that person's death, you are staunchly in favor of using placebo to test the effectiveness of the new drug...All I can say to that is thank goodness no one would let you near this kind of study.
Or take a cancer patient...they should sign up to take part in a study, knowing that if they receive the placebo, they will likely die, when the whole point is to see if the new drug is better than the current regimen. You think that in order to prove that the new drug is superior to the current regimen, the study subjects should not take either the new drug or the current regimen, but the new drug or a placebo...
Really? Seriously? How do you propose to recruit people to this study if they they are to agree to either get an experimental drug or NO DRUG at all to treat their cancer.
Sorry, but your logic is horrific...
Hi Ixchel,
I can imagine (didn't see their faces, as I had telephoned them) that the look on those pharmacists' faces, was that of disbelief and confusion, when they honestly told me that they actually thought that all new vaccine studies involved real placebos, not fake placebos.
I do like your humor, however, and if I could have taken a picture through my phone (an old fashioned one), I would have. ?
concerned lady said:Hi Ixchel,I can imagine (didn't see their faces, as I had telephoned them) that the look on those pharmacists' faces, was that of disbelief and confusion, when they honestly told me that they actually thought that all new vaccine studies involved real placebos, not fake placebos.
I do like your humor, however, and if I could have taken a picture through my phone (an old fashioned one), I would have. ?
I'm not having any trouble finding recent placebo-controlled studies on the influenza vaccine, where did you get the impression that they don't exist?
It was one of those "voluntary" campaigns, similar to flu vaccination, that they were trying to roll out.I remember when the Administrators started talking about a "get vaccinated or lose your job" stance. I was in California and man it was going to get ugly if that happened.
Smallpox Vaccination: Time to Roll Up Your Sleeve? - NurseZone
You do realize that generations of us got routinely vaccinated against smallpox as children, were happy to have the opportunity to be protected against the disease, and suffered no ill effects, right??
You do realize that generations of us got routinely vaccinated against smallpox as children, were happy to have the opportunity to be protected against the disease, and suffered no ill effects, right??
Yeah, I'm 58 and had the vaccine and have suffered no ill effects :)
Although . . . . . most people my age are getting gray hair and most of us have had that vaccine. So, maybe smallpox vaccine causes our hair to turn gray? Either that or it was the fresh cow's milk delivered to our home at 5 a.m. in glass bottles.
I think some folks need to go read about the history of vaccines and Mr. Jenner, way back in 1798. Or take that History of Vaccines class by Dr. Paul Offit.
Participating In Clinical Trials
Note this statement:
Patients who participate in clinical trials receive either a promising new treatment or the best available conventional treatment.
Not a placebo, but the best available conventional treatment, or, as I said previously, the current SOC.
OCNRN63, RN
5,979 Posts
Crimenities! So you think in aa clinical trial for a new oncology drug it would be better to give one group a placebo instead of the current SOC? If they did that, no one would be willing to participate in clinical trials.