The Controversy: Mandatory Flu Vaccines

Many hospitals are moving towards creating mandatory influenza vaccination policies as a condition of employment. Such mandates are causing surefire responses on both sides of the fence. What is the push behind the movement, and what is causing the pushback?

Updated:  

First, let me just go over some of the symptoms of the flu, and then we will get down to business on the controversy surrounding the push to create mandatory flu vaccines for healthcare workers:

  • Sudden onset fever
  • Headache
  • Chills
  • Myalgia
  • Dry cough
  • Sore throat
  • Stuffy nose
  • Loss of appetite
  • Limb or joint pain
  • Difficulty sleeping
  • Diarrhea or upset stomach

I can't think of anyone who wants any of these symptoms, or to come down with the flu, can you?

Influenza vaccination research has clearly documented the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine (Google it - you will find a plethora of information...however, I will list some links at the end of this article for your information). However, even though there is sufficient evidence to prove the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine, vaccination rates among healthcare workers are pitifully low. In 2013, only 55% of nurses in the frontlines were vaccinated.

Organizations such as The Joint Commission, the American Nurses Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Centers for Disease Control, Healthy People 2020, etc., etc., have stated their position on recommending the flu vaccine for healthcare workers in order to decrease the risk of exposure and reduce deaths. Due to this recommendation, many healthcare facilities are now creating mandatory flu vaccine policies as a condition of employment.

Employers who create mandatory policies will have exemptions, of course. Exemptions are made for medical and religious exceptions. For places that do not have a mandatory flu vaccine, they may "strongly recommend" the vaccination and may have a declination form for employees to submit if they refuse the vaccine. Additionally, some employers will enforce refusers to wear a mask during flu season while they are at work in order to protect the patients and the employee.

What is the purpose behind the push toward flu vaccines?

Evidence has shown that there are more than 36,000 deaths in the US each year related to influenza, and more than 200,000 hospitalizations. Influenza is the 6th leading cause of death. Healthcare workers are the leading cause of influenza outbreaks in the healthcare system. up to 50% of people who are infected by the flu virus do not fill ill for several days and can spread the virus to people at risk of complications and death from the flu. Additionally, evidence shows vaccination decreases mortality by 40%, decreases the spread of nosocomial infections by 43%, and decreases absenteeism by 20-30%.

Additionally, there is the ethics to consider. As healthcare workers, we have all taken an oath to "do no harm". As a nurse caring for patients who are not in their most physically healthy state, do we take the vaccination in order to prevent spreading the flu to our vulnerable patients, in order to "do no harm"? We must consider this when we make our decision to take or refuse the vaccination.

What hospitals have created a mandatory flu vaccine policy?

I have the names of a few hospitals, and this is by no means a comprehensive list. This is based on a ListServe survey of hospitals and these are the responses received:

  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Philadelphia, PA) - since 2009
  • Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics (Kansas City, MO)
  • Children's Colorado (Aurora, CO)
  • Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters (Norfolk, VA)
  • Children's Medical Center Dallas (Dallas, TX) - since 2012
  • Riley Children's (Indianapolis, IN) - since 2012
  • East Tennessee Children's (Knoxville, TX) - since 2013
  • Boston Children's (Boston, MA)
  • Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns (San Diego, CA) - since 2013
  • Roger Williams Medical Center (Providence, RI)
  • Brookwood Medical Center (Birmingham, AL)
  • Johns Hopkins (all hospitals/clinics) (Baltimore, MD)
  • Driscoll Children's Hospital (Corpus Christi, TX)
  • Spohn Health System (Corpus Christi / San Antonio, TX)
  • All Connecticut Hospitals

What are some reasons that people refuse the flu vaccine?

Refusal may be largely due to misconceptions related to the vaccine. Fears that the immune system will cause them to get the flu, beliefs that hygiene and better nutrition are more helpful than the vaccine, fear of needles, beliefs that the vaccine does not work, and fear of side effects. Others believe that they have a constitutional right to refuse the vaccine and that mandatory policies are violating these rights.

Common concerns and myths about the flu vaccination

(taken from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health outline of flu vaccine talking points for managers)

The flu shot will give me the flu

The flu shot does not give people the flu. It uses inactivated ("dead") virus. People may still catch a cold or other virus that the vaccine is not designed match.

I don't believe the flu vaccine actually works

Studies have shown that flu vaccination prevents flu in 70% to 90% of healthy adults younger than 65 years old.

I had the vaccination last year

You need a new vaccine every year - the virus changes over time.

What about possible adverse reactions

Serious adverse reactions are very rare. They are explained on the CDC's Vaccine Information Statement, which is distributed when the vaccine is administered.

Local short-term reactions - such soreness at the vaccination site, slight fever, achy feeling - may occur but usually do not last long. Over the counter medicines are helpful. Even short-term reactions are much less bothersome than catching the flu and feeling very sick for days.

I'm not in a high-risk group

Your patients are at-risk, and possibly some friends and family members. You can be infected with the flu virus but not feel ill - and can still transmit flu to at-risk patients.

The flu vaccine made every year does not match the circulating flu strain

Inactivated influenza vaccine is effective in preventing transmission and reducing complications of the flu. In years when there is a close match between the vaccine and circulating virus strains, the vaccine prevents illness among approximately 70%--90% of healthy adults under 65 years of age. Vaccinating healthy adults also has been proven to lead to decreased work absenteeism and use of health-care resources, including use of antibiotics. Strong protection is also expected when the vaccine is not a close match with circulating strains, with 50%--77% effectiveness in these instances. In addition, effectiveness against influenza-related hospitalization for healthy adults from inactivated vaccine is estimated at 90%.

Knowledge is Power

All healthcare facilities will be facing the choice of creating a mandatory influenza vaccination in the near future, if they have not already. In order to make an informed decision on the topic, we must have information. Knowledge is power. Before you make a blanket statement on pros or cons, have the information you need, know the research, and make an educated decision.

Please respond to this article by answering the following questions:

  1. Do you take the flu vaccine yearly? If you do not, what is the reason you do not participate (if you don't mind answering this question)?
  2. Does your employer have a mandatory influenza vaccination policy as a condition of employment? If yes, where do you work?
  3. What concerns do you have about the flu vaccine?
  4. Do you know if anyone who has been released from their job because they did not get the flu vaccine?

References

American Association of Family Practitioners. (2011). AAFP supports mandatory flu vaccinations for healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: AAFP Supports Mandatory Flu Vaccinations for Health Care Personnel

ATrain. (2014). To accept or refuse the flu vaccine. Retrieved from: ZZZ_133_Influenza: Module 7

CDC. (2014). Vaccination: Who should do it, who should not and who should take precautions. Retrieved from: Vaccination: Who Should Do It, Who Should Not and Who Should Take Precautions | Seasonal Influenza (Flu) | CDC

Influenza Action Coalition. (2015). Influenza vaccination honor roll. Retrieved from: Honor Roll: Mandatory Influenza Vaccination Policies for Healthcare Personnel

Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2014). Talking points for managers. Retrieved from: http://tinyurl.com/p6nbg2u

National adult and influenza immunization summit. (2015). Vaccinating healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: Vaccinating Healthcare Personnel - National Adult and Influenza Immunization Summit

NursingTimes. (2014). Why do health workers decline flu vaccination? Retrieved from: http://www.nursingtimes.net/Journals/2014/11/28/y/k/x/031214-Why-do-health-workers-decline-flu-vaccination.pdf

TJC. (2012). R3 Report: Requirement, rationale, reference. Retrieved from: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/R3_Report_Issue_3_5_18_12_final.pdf

concerned lady said:
Hi JustBeachyNurse,

You wrote, "....Double blind studies do not need to have a placebo...."

I think NOT having a placebo is UN-ETHICAL!

I think that pharmaceutical companies who AVOID using a placebo, have SOMETHING TO HIDE!

You have GOT to be kidding. You don't see how it would be UNETHICAL to give a cancer patient a placebo during a drug trial?!?!?!? Have you even thought through what you just said?

Union says Ontario nurses can't be forced to wear masks in flu season | CTV News

After 911 the government tried to get every nurse in the US to take a smallpox vaccine. It was a dangerous attempt by the pharmaceutical companies to profit from a crisis. I am not anti-vaccine and have taken many. However, as soon as anyone tries to bully or shame me, I resist. I have never had a flu vaccine.

Can you please provide a source re: your statement that the government "tried to get every nurse in the US to take a smallpox vaccine"?

Hi Horseshoe,

By NOT using a REAL placebo during a drug trial, pharmaceutical companies are risking mistaking the placebo effect as being the so called efficacy of the very drugs being "tested"! I think that's a bit too convenient ($), and un-ethical also!

Specializes in Peds/Neo CCT,Flight, ER, Hem/Onc.
concerned lady said:
Hi Horseshoe,

By NOT using a REAL placebo during a drug trial, pharmaceutical companies are risking mistaking the placebo effect as being the so called efficacy of the very drugs being "tested"! I think that's a bit too convenient ($), and un-ethical also!

Do you understand how drug trials, particularly cancer treatment drugs, are run? There is no chance of "placebo affect" as the evidence of efficacy they look at are measurable not subjective. By measurable I mean labwork and imaging studies. None of which are subjective in any way. So, yes, it would be highly unethical to use a placebo and knowingly allow a patient's cancer to progress. Not using a placebo is in no way manipulating the results.

concerned lady said:
Hi Horseshoe,

By NOT using a REAL placebo during a drug trial, pharmaceutical companies are risking mistaking the placebo effect as being the so called efficacy of the very drugs being "tested"! I think that's a bit too convenient ($), and un-ethical also!

Not only is what you're suggesting unethical, but, as a practical matter, testing of new drugs requires large numbers of people willing to participate in the trials in order for the results to have any validity. How willing would you be, as a member of the public with a dangerous, potentially (or definitely) fatal disease, to agree to forego/postpone conventional, standard treatment of your illness in order to participate in a drug trial in which you had a 50% chance of getting no treatment at all (a placebo), a delay that might cost you your life? How many people do you think would be willing to take that risk with their own lives, now, order to further some hypothetical, theoretical, better treatment for other people some day in the distant future, and sign up for a drug trial under those conditions? What IRB would be willing to approve that? (Oh, wait, you probably don't know about IRBs, since you clearly have a v. limited understanding of how modern healthcare and research actually work.)

Julie Reyes said:

1)__ Do you take the flu vaccine yearly? If you do not, what is the reason you do not participate (if you don't mind answering this question)?

2)__ Does your employer have a mandatory influenza vaccination policy as a condition of employment? If yes, where do you work?

3)__ What concerns do you have about the flu vaccine?

4)__ Do you know if anyone who has been released from their job because they did not get the flu vaccine?

I agree that knowledge is power. I'm a nursing student. I do have some concerns about the flu vaccine. I don't think I'd admit this readily besides here because sometimes people tend to attack anyone with vaccine hesitations or questions.

1. I never have gotten the flu vaccine (or the flu) and next month will be the first time. The reasons I never participated before are that I never worked in health care even though I've volunteered and that I don't(didn't) believe it was very effective (only 23% effective last year according to the CDC), and that friends and family who got it said they were sick for a few weeks afterwards with flu like symptoms.

2. To be in the nursing program at my university we need to get the flu vaccine.

3. I don't know how to exactly express my concerns without coming across as "anti-vaccine" (which I'm not). I have concerns with first the evidence for the flu vaccine. I have read more than one peer reviewed study that has evidence that this vaccine increases infection risk. I have seen statistics where flu deaths are increasing not decreasing over the years despite the flu vaccine push. But then I read peer reviewed studies supporting it's efficiency. So I find that confusing and don't know which to believe.

4. No.

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
So I find that confusing and don't know which to believe.

You are doing the best thing you can do; reading about the topic and formulating a plan based on the evidence you have seen, there is nothing wrong with that. As you learn more in nursing you can re-evaluate the evidence with a new set of eyes.

The one thing I would say is that efficacy of the vaccine was low this past season due to antigenic drift, which does occur, rarely and there is no good solution for it, yet. Even at 20% it still protects 1 person in 5, which is better than 0 of 5.

I just wanted to say that after making it (almost all the way) through this thread, I will be getting a flu shot this year for the first time in my life (28 years). I'm deathly afraid of needles, which is the biggest reason I've never gotten one, but I haven't ever considered that I may be spreading an illness to other people, even if I don't feel the symptoms myself. I should have realized this because I have taken nursing courses and know these things, but it's just something that hasn't registered until now.

So thanks for opening my eyes about this guys. :)

Umpty pages ago, someone asked why those of us who were spreading the word about why people need to be vaccinated continued to do so.....and I had responded because there were people on the fence, people who hadn't just dug their heels in against it and were willing to read and learn. And maybe, if even one of them decided they ought to do it, it'd be worth the head-banging ;)

You have proven the point, and made it worthwhile. Yay, you! :)

assumptions and stereotypes, you, my dear are the one appearing angry and one sided.

I am not "my dear" to you (there you go again with the patronizing insults). I have made no assumptions, but HAVE made statements based on the evidence provided in this thread. Not an assumption if you can point to the reasoning. No "stereotyping" either....I respond to what is in front of me, just as you so obviously take joy in doing, misguided though it may be, one small bite at a time.

And as far as one-sided, since when is that a problem in a debate? One MUST take "one side"....or shut up and get out of the discussion ;)

concerned lady said:
Hi JustBeachyNurse,

You wrote, "....Double blind studies do not need to have a placebo...."

I think NOT having a placebo is UN-ETHICAL!

I think that pharmaceutical companies who AVOID using a placebo, have SOMETHING TO HIDE!

I have been waiting for someone to refer to Tuskegee's infamously unethical syphilis study involving test subjects who THOUGHT they were receiving treatment, and INSTEAD got NO treatment. Trust was placed by sick people in the medical professionals "helping" them, but their trust was misplaced as they were harmed, effectively murdered. Seems I need to post this:

About the USPHS Syphilis Study | Tuskegee University

Anyone with even a vague understanding of this horror show of an experimental study should have no questions about WHY it was WRONG.

And anyone who knows the facts of this case and continues to lobby for it to be repeated....well, it's clear nothing will help them to understand.

Today, I spoke with several pharmacists, ALL of whom MISTAKENLY thought that a REAL placebo was used, for ALL NEW VACCINATIONS, such as flu shots, etc., in "double blind" studies!

Hmmm. Makes me ask whether flu shots' efficacy/usefulness, (when they supposedly work, 20% of the time...)may actually be due to the "placebo effect" of the new vaccine itself!

Everyone should re-read what BlondeNurse wrote a few days ago, and she's been a nurse a lot longer than I was!

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.

I was a little behind on my reading and in the process of getting caught up to date today I came across this study published a little over a month ago in the NEJM, and I thought of this thread.

The study found that the community acquired pneumonia requiring hospital admission was most frequently viral in etiology not bacterial, at almost a 2:1 ratio. The most common pathogens? Rhinovirus and influenza.

Jain, S., Self, W. H., Wunderink, R. G., Fakhran, S., Balk, R., Bramley, A. M., ... & Finelli, L. (2015). Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among US adults. New England Journal of Medicine, 373(5), 415-427.