President Biden thread

On 3/5/2021 at 2:22 PM, Beerman said:

I believe I said that above.  He got his Costco size package of executive order pens, and started reversing Trumps policies.

How would you explain reemergence of masses at the border?

Do you realize how illogical you are blaming A for situation B, as if situation B has ONLY 1 cause?  Any problem that has only one cause can be tackled easily.  Mass immigration is a world wide problem.  Do you think only presidential elections caused the problems?  Trump admires dictators - Bolsonaro, Maduro and Trump - The Three Desperados. More than 4 million people have left Venezuela.  He did nothing to create jobs in the southern hemisphere to help people stay in place.  Do I actually believe that one single American president can solve the bad economies of other countries?  And in a single term?  That's as ridiculous as believing a Biden administration can alleviate this humanitarian disaster in 4 years.

1 hour ago, subee said:

Do you realize how illogical you are blaming A for situation B, as if situation B has ONLY 1 cause?  Any problem that has only one cause can be tackled easily.  Mass immigration is a world wide problem.  Do you think only presidential elections caused the problems?  Trump admires dictators - Bolsonaro, Maduro and Trump - The Three Desperados. More than 4 million people have left Venezuela.  He did nothing to create jobs in the southern hemisphere to help people stay in place.  Do I actually believe that one single American president can solve the bad economies of other countries?  And in a single term?  That's as ridiculous as believing a Biden administration can alleviate this humanitarian disaster in 4 years.

Much less alleviate it in less than 40 days.

2 hours ago, Beerman said:

I didn't expect him to solve it. 

He exacerbated the problem, exponentially.  In less then 40 days. 

The real issue is that the Democrats don't see it as a problem.   It's just what they want.

 

You don't expect solutions? What's the point in making hyperbolic and partisan criticisms if there's not even any expectation for corrective action.  At least Biden hasn't stolen and lost any children yet in an attempt to deter immigration. 

It's interesting that you seem to think that making absurd blanket statements about what Democrats (they) "want" doesn't harm your credibility.  Or maybe you are simply attempting to be inflammatory because just talking facts and reality doesn't really support your outrage.  

11 hours ago, Beerman said:

“When President Biden rescinded the emergency order on the southwest border, it stopped resources, and it stopped construction on our border,” Dannels said. “As a result of that, one area where the fence is not complete, we get five or six groups a day coming across there. It’s [opened up] the border. It opened up the message that it’s okay to come in this country. This administration owns this decision. And what it’s doing is it’s forcing us back to 2019, where we had the largest what I call crime scene in the country to include the largest humanitarian situation going on.”

https://www.dailywire.com/news/arizona-border-sheriff-on-border-crisis-biden-owns-this-we-had-it-under-control-under-trump?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro

That's a really good example of what we're talking about, although we probably wouldn't agree as to why.

The Sherriff claimed that under Trump, border security was working and that it was "under control", but that now, because of Biden, the border is "wide open".  So what's different security for the border in his jurisdictiondction? Nothing, there is the same amount of "fence" as there was under Trump, and since the Trump border emergency declaration diverted border security resources to wall-building funds, it would appear unlikely that resources were decreased, if anything they increased.  The fact that Trump never managed to get dedicated funds for the wall, despite democrats handing him his full funding request and then him changing his mind and turning it down, should be a whole different thread, but anyway.  

We could maybe excuse his fibbing because he was just really banking on new "fencing" being built, and therefore what he meant was that they weren't where they were hoping to be in regards to wall construction, but it didn't take a lot research to discover that the Sherriff in question doesn't consider a physical fence or wall to be more effective than security like manpower or technology.  

It turns out that when given $220,000 for additional fencing, he chose to spend it on additional staff and technology for "virtual" fencing.  So it makes you wonder why he's all of a sudden very critical even though the amount of fencing hasn't changed, and funding to his preferred method of border security has been restored where it had been previously diverted to a wall he didn't feel like he needed.

22 minutes ago, Beerman said:

Youre missing the point.  There is exponentially more people coming to the border, overwhelming the border security, and more people arectrying to get through where there isn't a wall or fence.

Hm.

So Biden is responsible for this by not being a cruel, narcissistic, and xenophobic despot like his predecessor. 

Dang.

25 minutes ago, Beerman said:

Youre missing the point.  There is exponentially more people coming to the border, overwhelming the border security, and more people arectrying to get through where there isn't a wall or fence.

So you're complaining because we're back to being a country people desire to be a part of, a literal "first world problem".  

21 hours ago, Beerman said:

Yep.  Combined with Democrats efforts to get rid of voter ID laws in their new bill, it's pretty obvious, isn't it?

Dude, you are supporting someone who did what Lindbergh did 2nd world War. You probably don't know this because of the miniscule amount of history taught in this country. Charles Lindbergh used the same tactics that Trump did (Trump of course is ignorant about what he did), Lindbergh was a Nazi supporter and he used to state that the British and American were different races from Jewish people and instigated deportation of Jewish people because they were trying to drag America into the 2nd World War. He even implied that the British were a different race from Americans to isolate America and allow Germany to continue their war mongering. 

Do you know how effective it is when a prominent person gives voice to a sentiment? They give it oxygen, allow others to think the same and give them permission to hate and do unspeakable crimes against them. 

Trump used the same against Hispanics, Jews, Asians, gay people, Black people, Liberal and Democrats. He allowed a disgruntled, ignorant faction to believe that an election was stolen, that everyone else was responsible for something he did, giving credence to Alternative Facts and allowing possibly hundreds of thousands of Americans to die! 

That's what voter ID laws remind me of. Nazi Germany! Is that what you want? 

12 hours ago, MunoRN said:

 

That's a really good example of what we're talking about, although we probably wouldn't agree as to why.

The Sherriff claimed that under Trump, border security was working and that it was "under control", but that now, because of Biden, the border is "wide open".  So what's different security for the border in his jurisdictiondction? Nothing, there is the same amount of "fence" as there was under Trump, and since the Trump border emergency declaration diverted border security resources to wall-building funds, it would appear unlikely that resources were decreased, if anything they increased.  The fact that Trump never managed to get dedicated funds for the wall, despite democrats handing him his full funding request and then him changing his mind and turning it down, should be a whole different thread, but anyway.  

We could maybe excuse his fibbing because he was just really banking on new "fencing" being built, and therefore what he meant was that they weren't where they were hoping to be in regards to wall construction, but it didn't take a lot research to discover that the Sherriff in question doesn't consider a physical fence or wall to be more effective than security like manpower or technology.  

It turns out that when given $220,000 for additional fencing, he chose to spend it on additional staff and technology for "virtual" fencing.  So it makes you wonder why he's all of a sudden very critical even though the amount of fencing hasn't changed, and funding to his preferred method of border security has been restored where it had been previously diverted to a wall he didn't feel like he needed.

 

 

 

Look at the quality of his news cources.  The NY Post and now this website:

The credibility checker NewsGuard assessed that The Daily Wire "severely violates basic standards of credibility and transparency", "often misstates facts to advance partisan opinion" and "frequently publishes false and misleading information, particularly in stories about abortion".

The Daily Wire - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Wire