Beerman

Grand jury proceedings are only one-sided. Only the prosecution presents their case and there is no judge. Almost always, an indictment comes from them. Not this time, however. So, the report is pretty insignificant. Marijuana is still illegal for kids here in Colorado.

He believes illegal immigrants shouldn't get due process? That sounds bad. Do you have a source for this?

For those who have been in the dark, the WNBA continues to illuminate the insanity of the trans movement. https://sports.Yahoo.com/articles/sophie-cunningham-name-banned-wnba-202416817.html https://www.foxnews.com/outkick-sports/wnba-fans-recall-ejection-threat-xx-xy-athletics-shirt-fever-dream-game-flabbergasted.amp

Nevermind....

The antivax movement thst led to the comeback of measles predates Trump. You'll have to remind me what the school vaccine requirements are in England? Hopefully parents trust their pediatrician more than Trump or the CDC. I need a shingles vax. Thank you for the reminder.

When it fits their agenda, liberals often compare life expectancy, crime, happiness, etc. rates of the US vs other countries. I'm curious as to how our child vaccine schedule compares to others. You sound like you have some expertise on the subject. Maybe you know? Again, MMR guidelines didn't change. You do know the M in MMR stands for measles, right? Yes, I do know about the AAP statement. It was after your post, too. So, it appears your disagreement was more about Trump than science.

Nothing changed in regards to MMR and varicella recommends. Can't bl MMR and varicella guidelines didn't change. So your camp story is irrelevant. When was that, anyway? Recently? What insurance companies will pay for is also irrelevant as to determining if a child needs a vaccine. What is relevant is what the American Academy of Pediatrics says. It would have better if you started there and would have given some credibility to your first post.

We all know vaccination rates have been decreasing since before Trump. And, parents certainly have their pediatrician to advise them. I checked out the recommendations. I'm assuming you disagree with what they've changed. What specificly is it that you disagree with and why?

This story has nothing to do with government. It's about the WNBA's policy. And you can find many stories on this issue relating to the WNBA in various political websites and social media. I inadvertently posted it in "47". Hopefully, that helps you understand.

Karpernick opted out of what was remaining on his contract after being a backup for a year or two and the coach didn't think he fit into his scheme. He was a mediocre player. Kanter would dominate the WNBA. From a talent standpoint, any general manager would move mountains to get him.

Will the WNBA be "inclusive", or will they make a rule against males? https://sports.Yahoo.com/articles/meet-every-single-requirement-ex-181528682.html

BINGO? Are you some kind of expert on the subject? Your phrasing is very telling. A "blow to Trump" feeds the dopamine receptors of many, doesn't it? Other than Trump's involvement, what is the objection? Anyway, as a practical matter, what exactly should happen now? The project is pretty far down the tracks.

You claim youre very aware of them. Very well. You fell short though of making the case that the commission is needed.

Let me guess...you've never even were aware of it's existence until Trump put the final nail in it's coffin? I've never heard of it. But, it seems it's only been in existence for less than 25 years, and has a spotty history. I think we'll get by without it.

Do I need to go through EVERY sport to see if it gives biological males an advantage over biological females? Could have said Horse Racing, Luge, almost any of the downhill Winter sports. No. Actually you didn't need to list any of them. I didn't ask you to, and it's irrelevant.