Published
Let me preface this article to say that I'm not stirring a pot. I found this article a little dispassionate considering the choice made.
When One Is Enough
By AMY RICHARDS as told to AMY BARRETT
Published: July 18, 2004
I grew up in a working-class family in Pennsylvania not knowing my father. I have never missed not having him. I firmly believe that, but for much of my life I felt that what I probably would have gained was economic security and with that societal security. Growing up with a single mother, I was always buying into the myth that I was going to be seduced in the back of a pickup truck and become pregnant when I was 16. I had friends when I was in school who were helping to rear nieces and nephews, because their siblings, who were not much older, were having babies. I had friends from all over the class spectrum: I saw the nieces and nephews on the one hand and country-club memberships and station wagons on the other. I felt I was in the middle. I had this fear: What would it take for me to just slip?
Now I'm 34. My boyfriend, Peter, and I have been together three years. I'm old enough to presume that I wasn't going to have an easy time becoming pregnant. I was tired of being on the pill, because it made me moody. Before I went off it, Peter and I talked about what would happen if I became pregnant, and we both agreed that we would have the child.
I found out I was having triplets when I went to my obstetrician. The doctor had just finished telling me I was going to have a low-risk pregnancy. She turned on the sonogram machine. There was a long pause, then she said, ''Are you sure you didn't take fertility drugs?'' I said, ''I'm positive.'' Peter and I were very shocked when she said there were three. ''You know, this changes everything,'' she said. ''You'll have to see a specialist.''
My immediate response was, I cannot have triplets. I was not married; I lived in a five-story walk-up in the East Village; I worked freelance; and I would have to go on bed rest in March. I lecture at colleges, and my biggest months are March and April. I would have to give up my main income for the rest of the year. There was a part of me that was sure I could work around that. But it was a matter of, Do I want to?
I looked at Peter and asked the doctor: ''Is it possible to get rid of one of them? Or two of them?'' The obstetrician wasn't an expert in selective reduction, but she knew that with a shot of potassium chloride you could eliminate one or more.
Having felt physically fine up to this point, I got on the subway afterward, and all of a sudden, I felt ill. I didn't want to eat anything. What I was going through seemed like a very unnatural experience. On the subway, Peter asked, ''Shouldn't we consider having triplets?'' And I had this adverse reaction: ''This is why they say it's the woman's choice, because you think I could just carry triplets. That's easy for you to say, but I'd have to give up my life.'' Not only would I have to be on bed rest at 20 weeks, I wouldn't be able to fly after 15. I was already at eight weeks. When I found out about the triplets, I felt like: It's not the back of a pickup at 16, but now I'm going to have to move to Staten Island. I'll never leave my house because I'll have to care for these children. I'll have to start shopping only at Costco and buying big jars of mayonnaise. Even in my moments of thinking about having three, I don't think that deep down I was ever considering it.
The specialist called me back at 10 p.m. I had just finished watching a Boston Pops concert at Symphony Hall. As everybody burst into applause, I watched my cellphone vibrating, grabbed it and ran into the lobby. He told me that he does a detailed sonogram before doing a selective reduction to see if one fetus appears to be struggling. The procedure involves a shot of potassium chloride to the heart of the fetus. There are a lot more complications when a woman carries multiples. And so, from the doctor's perspective, it's a matter of trying to save the woman this trauma. After I talked to the specialist, I told Peter, ''That's what I'm going to do.'' He replied, ''What we're going to do.'' He respected what I was going through, but at a certain point, he felt that this was a decision we were making. I agreed.
When we saw the specialist, we found out that I was carrying identical twins and a stand alone. My doctors thought the stand alone was three days older. There was something psychologically comforting about that, since I wanted to have just one. Before the procedure, I was focused on relaxing. But Peter was staring at the sonogram screen thinking: Oh, my gosh, there are three heartbeats. I can't believe we're about to make two disappear. The doctor came in, and then Peter was asked to leave. I said, ''Can Peter stay?'' The doctor said no. I know Peter was offended by that.
Two days after the procedure, smells no longer set me off and I no longer wanted to eat nothing but sour-apple gum. I went on to have a pretty seamless pregnancy. But I had a recurring feeling that this was going to come back and haunt me. Was I going to have a stillbirth or miscarry late in my pregnancy?
I had a boy, and everything is fine. But thinking about becoming pregnant again is terrifying. Am I going to have quintuplets? I would do the same thing if I had triplets again, but if I had twins, I would probably have twins. Then again, I don't know.
Since my son is still in Africa and I still look at the photos of the orphans and since I realize there are so many older kids who need homes here in the US I guess I wish people would look at adoption more. Having your own biological kid is NO guarantee that you will have a perfect kid.
steph
I so agree with you here.
Why tell him anything?????????
My mom had an abortion right before she got pregnant with me. Then, she and my dad seriously considered aborting me too but they didn't.
From my point of view, I'd say that I would feel that the parents would be doing the kid a great injustice by not telling him what really happened. I would feel that these are not truly honest and loving parents that want to give life but parents who just wanted to have a baby to own a life for themselves if they did not feel it was necessary to tell him the truth about themselves and about his birth.
I didn't find out about my parents' plannings until I was past 20. I felt betrayed that they hadn't told me earlier what had been going on while I was growing in there. But what if they hadn't told me at all? If they hadn't, then, I must have truly been like some kind of dog or cat to them that you just buy at the pound and put to sleep to get declawed and neurtered so that I'd be exceptable for them to own. No, I don't need to know the truth. I just need to love my parents????(saracasm) No, no, in my opinion, it is a given that you tell your children the truth about yourselves and about your relationship to your child.
My opinion on the mother selectively aborting the two twins: Howver cruel it may sound, I beleive the fact that the children were growing on and inseperable from HER body to take precedence and so, imho, it was her choice to remove from her body whatever she was uncomfortable with and this is nobody else's business to choose this.
Naturally-occuring triplets! Amazing....I am not sure what to say of this person's personal situation, it was difficult at best. Too bad she did not feel she could adopt out the two she could not raise.....sad......But I have strong ideas on IVF-created multiples and high-order multiples.
I am glad to know, the program I know of here only will implant no more than 3 and it's a top ten fertility/IVF program in the nation. I think that is ethical and right. I, too, am sick of the famous "litter" of kids we read of yearly. I am glad they are all ok and the family is taken care of, but come on! The chances of SEVEN surviving and being HEALTHY throughout pregnancy and life after birth is so slim. WHY implant SO MANY?
And for some reason, even though I am pro-choice, (I know this makes no sense to some folks), I Have issues with selective reduction. I know that isa quirk of mine. As far as IVF goes: They are improving IVF techniques so much nowadays, that some skilled and experienced fertility specialists may only implant ONE or TWO quality embryos at parents' request. They then cryo-preserve the rest for further attempts at a later time, should it fail or parents wish to have another child or two later on. This, I know firsthand. I think that is a HUGE step forward in the right direction; this is how far they have come in IVF procedures and techniques.
And I am with fergus, I wish adoption were not so rife with red tape bureaucracy in the USA. I would (and have) consider it, but I have some friends who have had heartbreaking situations arise in trying to adopt kids. Even adopting outside the USA can be very difficult, and I would love to have a Chinese or Russian (or any) child of international heritage. Just dont' know if I have the strength to gut out the process I would have to go through to do it.
Oh well, just musings from a person who has been thru multiple losses in the last 2 years.....I will flame NO ONE HERE for his / her opinion. Just have my own strong views as someone who has been on the fertility roller coaster and has, thus far, lost the battle. (sigh)
I'm with you on that Steph. Obviously, having been adopted myself makes me a little biased, but I think adoption is a great way to have a family. I would like to see it made easier and less costly though.
My husband and I are trying to adopt. It's difficult, time consuming and expensive. If it were made easier then families who desperately want children would have them; it wouldn't be for the well to do only.
I believe that every child should be desperately wanted, and the article's author's callous, cavelier attitude towards conceiving her children rather irresponsible.
My SIL is adopted. 35 years ago it wasn't necessary to have a criminal background check, federal clearance, state/city/county criminal clearances and certificates of good conduct from your police department, in addition to your references, letters from your employer and 3-5 years of financial/bank statements sent over to the agency.
"And for some reason, even though I am pro-choice, (I know this makes no sense to some folks), I Have issues with selective reduction."
Glad to see I'm not the only one. I know this position seems weird to most and If I had to explain my reasoning, my argument would probably fall flat. It just doesn't seem right. It really doesn't seem right when you factor in the fact that she basically planned her pregnancy. She knowingly stopped taking bcp. I believe this is my biggest issue with her. If it were a total surprise maybe I could somehow see her point, but when you plan a child you can't order the number of babies you want. It's the luck of the draw and she should have dealt with it. Just my opinion!!
Let me start by saying this...I strongly believed in a woman's right to choose before I had children. Now I feel slightly different... but could in no way condemn someone for their actions. I don't have that right. We do not know everyone's personal circumstances, so I believe we shouldn't judge. My belief is that everything happens for a reason, good, bad or ugly. Both of my boys were suprises. Not mistakes, my husband and I were overly excited and nervous with the both of them. I cannot imagine my life without them. There is just something about seeing a part of you laughing and smiling, learning new things everday that words could never express. The closest I could come is telling you that my heart feels like it is going to burst when I see these things. And my heart breaks when I see them cry. When you are pregnant you do not know beforehand that you will feel like this and that these are little people with their own personalities that you come to cherish and can't imagine being without. There is always a way to work things out...if you were blessed to have 3 children do your best to raise them, you will love them and you life will change. It is alot, 3, I can't imagine. But I could never destroy my own flesh and blood. Am I pro-choice??? I question myself often about that...I used to be. I don't know where I fall now. I can't see destroying a little life...so many people are torturing themselves trying to have children...
This story makes me cringe, my personal opinion is she shuldn't worry about having more. In her case I just feel she was selfish. Some people that are blessed with the ability to have children do no see it that way. And there are fabulous people waiting to be parents that it just may never happen for them. It's sad. I know I will probaly be flamed for taking a side, but I really do feel that her case is one of selfishness.
I think in this issue there are many areas on both sides of the debate that will cause even the most ardent pro-life/pro-choice person to wince or have second thoughts. I find no dishonor in that. Life is not black and white.
For me, someone who is pro-life, seeing an eleven year old rape victim who is pregnant is a gray area.
Maybe this instance is gray for pro-choicers. Or the folks who use abortion as birth control and have one after the other. I have a sibling who went for multiple abortions until we finally talked her into getting "fixed".
Here is a silly example from tv . . remember on ER when a woman came in c/o abd pain, she was writhing on the gurney, had a sono, found out she was preggers, asked the sex of the baby (girl) and Carol Hathaway found out the woman had been faking the abd pain just to see if she was having a girl so she could have an abortion "Girls are too much trouble". Carol was pro-choice and appalled.
There is room here folks for discussion without flaming so don't be afraid of that. I think we've managed to discuss this intelligently so far.
steph
June55Baby
226 Posts
This article made me sad...
As a mother of fraternal twin daughters (who are now 25 years old) I am thankful that I never had to make a decision such as this.