When One Child Is Enough

Published

Let me preface this article to say that I'm not stirring a pot. I found this article a little dispassionate considering the choice made.

When One Is Enough

By AMY RICHARDS as told to AMY BARRETT

Published: July 18, 2004

I grew up in a working-class family in Pennsylvania not knowing my father. I have never missed not having him. I firmly believe that, but for much of my life I felt that what I probably would have gained was economic security and with that societal security. Growing up with a single mother, I was always buying into the myth that I was going to be seduced in the back of a pickup truck and become pregnant when I was 16. I had friends when I was in school who were helping to rear nieces and nephews, because their siblings, who were not much older, were having babies. I had friends from all over the class spectrum: I saw the nieces and nephews on the one hand and country-club memberships and station wagons on the other. I felt I was in the middle. I had this fear: What would it take for me to just slip?

Now I'm 34. My boyfriend, Peter, and I have been together three years. I'm old enough to presume that I wasn't going to have an easy time becoming pregnant. I was tired of being on the pill, because it made me moody. Before I went off it, Peter and I talked about what would happen if I became pregnant, and we both agreed that we would have the child.

I found out I was having triplets when I went to my obstetrician. The doctor had just finished telling me I was going to have a low-risk pregnancy. She turned on the sonogram machine. There was a long pause, then she said, ''Are you sure you didn't take fertility drugs?'' I said, ''I'm positive.'' Peter and I were very shocked when she said there were three. ''You know, this changes everything,'' she said. ''You'll have to see a specialist.''

My immediate response was, I cannot have triplets. I was not married; I lived in a five-story walk-up in the East Village; I worked freelance; and I would have to go on bed rest in March. I lecture at colleges, and my biggest months are March and April. I would have to give up my main income for the rest of the year. There was a part of me that was sure I could work around that. But it was a matter of, Do I want to?

I looked at Peter and asked the doctor: ''Is it possible to get rid of one of them? Or two of them?'' The obstetrician wasn't an expert in selective reduction, but she knew that with a shot of potassium chloride you could eliminate one or more.

Having felt physically fine up to this point, I got on the subway afterward, and all of a sudden, I felt ill. I didn't want to eat anything. What I was going through seemed like a very unnatural experience. On the subway, Peter asked, ''Shouldn't we consider having triplets?'' And I had this adverse reaction: ''This is why they say it's the woman's choice, because you think I could just carry triplets. That's easy for you to say, but I'd have to give up my life.'' Not only would I have to be on bed rest at 20 weeks, I wouldn't be able to fly after 15. I was already at eight weeks. When I found out about the triplets, I felt like: It's not the back of a pickup at 16, but now I'm going to have to move to Staten Island. I'll never leave my house because I'll have to care for these children. I'll have to start shopping only at Costco and buying big jars of mayonnaise. Even in my moments of thinking about having three, I don't think that deep down I was ever considering it.

The specialist called me back at 10 p.m. I had just finished watching a Boston Pops concert at Symphony Hall. As everybody burst into applause, I watched my cellphone vibrating, grabbed it and ran into the lobby. He told me that he does a detailed sonogram before doing a selective reduction to see if one fetus appears to be struggling. The procedure involves a shot of potassium chloride to the heart of the fetus. There are a lot more complications when a woman carries multiples. And so, from the doctor's perspective, it's a matter of trying to save the woman this trauma. After I talked to the specialist, I told Peter, ''That's what I'm going to do.'' He replied, ''What we're going to do.'' He respected what I was going through, but at a certain point, he felt that this was a decision we were making. I agreed.

When we saw the specialist, we found out that I was carrying identical twins and a stand alone. My doctors thought the stand alone was three days older. There was something psychologically comforting about that, since I wanted to have just one. Before the procedure, I was focused on relaxing. But Peter was staring at the sonogram screen thinking: Oh, my gosh, there are three heartbeats. I can't believe we're about to make two disappear. The doctor came in, and then Peter was asked to leave. I said, ''Can Peter stay?'' The doctor said no. I know Peter was offended by that.

Two days after the procedure, smells no longer set me off and I no longer wanted to eat nothing but sour-apple gum. I went on to have a pretty seamless pregnancy. But I had a recurring feeling that this was going to come back and haunt me. Was I going to have a stillbirth or miscarry late in my pregnancy?

I had a boy, and everything is fine. But thinking about becoming pregnant again is terrifying. Am I going to have quintuplets? I would do the same thing if I had triplets again, but if I had twins, I would probably have twins. Then again, I don't know.

Specializes in 5 yrs OR, ASU Pre-Op 2 yr. ER.

One person's idea of morals may not be another's.

This is a tough issue. I am strongly pro-choice, but like Mandarella can't think of it personally since having children. There was a disturbing element to this story though; it came off as the mother's "selfishness" but I think it was the way the storywas told. Very unemotional. I think that if we are to allow women the freedom to choose we should try to leave them free of our judgement as well.

Specializes in 5 yrs OR, ASU Pre-Op 2 yr. ER.
I think that if we are to allow women the freedom to choose we should try to leave them free of our judgement as well.

EXCELLENT!! That would make a great statement on a bumpersticker as well.

Specializes in Specializes in L/D, newborn, GYN, LTC, Dialysis.

Let me clarify something:

I am pro-choice but not judgement free. Can't be. And I dont' think that is wrong of me. I would never harass another for her choices, but I cannot agree with what happened in this case. No one is judgement-free, you know. We all make judgements, daily. Saying we don't is lying. It is human nature. She made her legal choice, a choice I think should be preserved. But I cannot and will not agree with it!

No, no, in my opinion, it is a given that you tell your children the truth about yourselves and about your relationship to your child.

There's such a thing as TOO much 'truth'-- my mother told my sister and I that we were both 'mistakes' and the only reason we were even born was that she was a Catholic and couldn't use birth control. I think I could have gone a lifetime without needing to know that.

The 'truth' of that woman's situation is in print for anyone to read... I think eventually the kid will find out. There's always an aunt who can't resist gossipping, and kids have ways of finding out 'secrets.'

Personally I could never do a 'selection' based on convenience and/or finances-- I'd have to have a pretty big medical problem to even consider it. But if this woman is so terrified of getting pregnant with multiples again, she should make sure she doesn't get pregnant in the first place! To 'select' again would truly be obscene.

Specializes in Home Health.
I think that if we are to allow women the freedom to choose we should try to leave them free of our judgement as well.

Very well said!! They may well receive judgement from the only thing that matters, their higher power, if they believe in one. There are enough judges in this world already!!

Am I pro-choice??? I question myself often about that...I used to be. I don't know where I fall now. I can't see destroying a little life...so many people are torturing themselves trying to have children...

Sigh...this is such a gray area. I used to feel the same way. Now, however, I look at a world that is already teeming with people we can't take care of. I look at a world filled to the brim with children already born, waiting for homes. I see people fighting harder for embryos than for kids! I hear people talking about the value of life but completely ignoring the thousands upon thousands of foster children fighting for a chance, ignoring those living in poverty, ignoring the abused, slashing funding for social services... What is more important? Fighting to save what essentially, at the time the author wrote this, is truly a cluster of cells (I know that sounds heartless, but the triplets had not become sentinent beings yet, they had not gained consciousness)? Or spending what energy, time, and money we have fighting for those who are already here?

People ARE torturing themselves to have children - and I wish that they would adopt instead. I know, I know, I've given birth, so I can't understand. I admit it. But it seems hypocritical to judge this woman's choice based on morality when a similar judgement could be made of people who are torturing themselves to have kids. Why not adopt? If we're going to invoke the name of God, involve spirituality, why not talk about God's plan? If you can't have kids, maybe that's because you should adopt. I'm not saying this is necessarily the way I feel, just that there is such an incredible double standard. We are so willing to judge those having abortions, but we are absolutely unwilling to judge those bring more kids into the world when, as I said before, we can't take care of the ones already here.

Disrespect for human life? Disrespect for the sanctity of life? NO. But there is more to respecting life than preserving mere existence. Here is what I think of when I think of respecting life: funding education, spending more money on feeding our kids than killing people in wars, funding childcare and healthcare, working to resolve the inequities in our world, funding birth control instead of completely eliminating funding for it because the providers counsel on the option of abortion...I would rather someone have one kid and completely devote herself to it, love it, be able to give all her resources to it, than have 3 that she doesn't want, will resent, will not be able to spend time with, will barely be able to support...In my opinion, this IS respecting the sanctity of life. There is nothing selfish about admiting that you want your child to have a good life, instead of being a martyr, making your multiples and yourself miserable forever and giving birth in the name of morality.

NiobiusSwan, for a lot of people adoption is out of reach. It is EXTREMELY expensive in many cases to adopt a healthy child (and let's be honest, few people can handle a very sick child). One organization, Americans for African Adoptions tries to place orphans from Africa with American families. These are kids without parents from the poorest countries on earth, and to adopt them will cost you more than $10 000. Now that birth mothers in American can choose the adoptive parents, those who aren't making a fabulous living aren't competitive. It isn't easy to adopt anymore.

Specializes in Specializes in L/D, newborn, GYN, LTC, Dialysis.

Thank you ferg. You know what, I am real sick of hearing people ask me "why don't you just adopt" as if you can go and pick out the kid like at a store or something, and it's a done deal. PUUUUHLEEZE it can be a nightmare process. One many just can't stomach or afford! It should NOT be so damn hard for good people who want to take in a child and make him or her a part of their lives and family.

Thank you ferg. You know what, I am real sick of hearing people ask me "why don't you just adopt" as if you can go and pick out the kid like at a store or something, and it's a done deal. PUUUUHLEEZE it can be a nightmare process. One many just can't stomach or afford! It should NOT be so damn hard for good people who want to take in a child and make him or her a part of their lives and family.

You're welcome and I completely agree. I would adopt before doing IVF, but otherwise it is usually much easier and cheaper to have a family the traditional way.

OT, but I used to think that's how adoption worked. You just had to go to Sears or the Bay and say "I want a girl with blue eyes and brown hair please" and they would give you one. (I went to Sears and the Bay a lot as a child and used to ask my parents where the babies were and get angry when they'd take me to the doll section apparently. They finally figured it out when I was like "No, where are the babies like me for the moms whose tummies are broken?!").

Specializes in Geriatrics, DD, Peri-op.
One person's idea of morals may not be another's.

I completely understand this. However, is it really "in the eye of the beholder" as far as what constitutes a baby? We act like our kids are parasites/tumors that should be easily gotten rid of when me make an "oopsie". Awful. So heart-wrenching to know that children are being ripped from their mother's womb...the ONE place in the world that they should have safety.

And, this woman planned on having a child, but, since she was going to have "too many"....she chose to get rid of 2 beautiful identical twins. How can mothers really look themselves in the mirror after this, I'll never know. Thanks but no thanks.

Fighting to save what essentially, at the time the author wrote this, is truly a cluster of cells (I know that sounds heartless, but the triplets had not become sentinent beings yet, they had not gained consciousness)?

If you want it put it that way, we are ALL just a cluster of cells. :rolleyes:

My best friend was VERY pro-choice until she worked in an abortion clinic. After seeing clearly recognizable humans that were 8 weeks gestation...well, that kind of changed that.

You're welcome and I completely agree. I would adopt before doing IVF, but otherwise it is usually much easier and cheaper to have a family the traditional way.

OT, but I used to think that's how adoption worked. You just had to go to Sears or the Bay and say "I want a girl with blue eyes and brown hair please" and they would give you one. (I went to Sears and the Bay a lot as a child and used to ask my parents where the babies were and get angry when they'd take me to the doll section apparently. They finally figured it out when I was like "No, where are the babies like me for the moms whose tummies are broken?!").

Fergus, what a sweet story. I can just see it.

I think we are fooling ourselves if we think we do not "judge". Maybe it is the definition that is tripping people up. Discernment vs. stoning someone to death. Judging a situation does not mean the latter.

I can't agree with the idea that the twins were just a cluster of cells. The mom herself said she and the father heard their heartbeats. They had working hearts and so a nervous system. But this is getting into areas I didn't intend. This isn't meant to be pro-life vs. pro-choice. Just an example of something that fell between the cracks.

I do agree with the poster who wrote that some things are better off NOT being told to kids. The truth will not always set you free.

steph

+ Join the Discussion