Published Feb 20, 2021
Something to understand what nurses think about re the Current News and their opinions!
heron, ASN, RN
4,186 Posts
6 minutes ago, emtb2rn said: ?
?
I know … shall we start a pool as to which trope shows up here first? Threats, victim or religion?
Gimme $5.00 on victim.
emtb2rn, BSN, RN, EMT-B
2,942 Posts
2 hours ago, Beerman said: "And now, with this jaw-dropping raid, the law-enforcement arm of the Dems, formerly known as the Department of Justice, goes for the jugular. But as it stands now, the raid only makes the swamp look as deep and dirty as ever and bolsters the one man who promised to drain it — Trump. His fortunes have ebbed lately but unless the raiders produce a bombshell, they’ve given more millions of Americans reason to trust him over anybody else in Washington." https://nypost.com/2022/08/09/if-dems-doj-doesnt-have-enough-to-convict-trump-will-be-back-in-oval-office/
"And now, with this jaw-dropping raid, the law-enforcement arm of the Dems, formerly known as the Department of Justice, goes for the jugular. But as it stands now, the raid only makes the swamp look as deep and dirty as ever and bolsters the one man who promised to drain it — Trump.
His fortunes have ebbed lately but unless the raiders produce a bombshell, they’ve given more millions of Americans reason to trust him over anybody else in Washington."
https://nypost.com/2022/08/09/if-dems-doj-doesnt-have-enough-to-convict-trump-will-be-back-in-oval-office/
The best retort you can come up with is an op-ED by a trump fanboy? So, the fbi believed it had probable federal criminal cause, doj brass agreed (because it was being served on a former potus), and a federal judge signed off on the warrant. The warrant was served and the seizure, in accordance with the 4th amendment, was done without any publicity or notification to the media by anyone other than trump.
And not for nuthin’, but “the raid only makes the swamp look as deep and dirty as ever and bolsters the one man who promised to drain it — Trump.” Really? Drained it like this - bannon, barrack, broidy, cohen, flynn, gates, manafort, nader, papadopoulos, stone, & weisselberg. Plus don’t forget about what’s facing rudy & eastman. Yeah, swamp draining.
https://www.wklaw.com/federal-warrant-work/
https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/received-a-search-warrant-10-facts-you-3337954/
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/21/politics/tom-barrack-trump-arrested/index.html
5 minutes ago, heron said: I know … shall we start a pool as to which trope shows up here first? Threats, victim or religion? Gimme $5.00 on victim.
I’ll take a piece of that.
You got it … proceeds to go to the activist group of your choice?
All games aside, the amateur sociologist in me is fascinated.
The mother in me is eternally grateful that my son and his ex-wife are teaching my grandchildren how to shoot.
The dyke, witch and the grandmother of a transgendered person in me are thinking, “Oh, crap! Here we go again (sigh).”
The Native in me is telling the ancestors, “skoden”.
The nurse in me is calling a psych code.
3 minutes ago, heron said: Oops
Oops
toomuchbaloney
13,031 Posts
58 minutes ago, heron said: I know … shall we start a pool as to which trope shows up here first? Threats, victim or religion? Gimme $5.00 on victim.
Victimhood is one his favorite claims. He tweeted about being a victim of witch hunts and the like before he got banned from Twitter.
I'll take that bet.
27 minutes ago, heron said: The nurse in me is calling a psych code.
B52 & 4 points.
17 minutes ago, emtb2rn said: B52 & 4 points.
Watch the airway and start frequent checks. Ugh!
So … so far we have $15 on victim, $0 on threats and religion. Right?
5 minutes ago, heron said: Watch the airway and start frequent checks. Ugh! So … so far we have $15 on victim, $0 on threats and religion. Right?
Yep, always a victim. There will be threats, but it will predominantly be poor poor pitiful me.
Beerman, BSN
3,256 Posts
2 hours ago, emtb2rn said: The best retort you can come up with is an op-ED by a trump fanboy? So, the fbi believed it had probable federal criminal cause, doj brass agreed (because it was being served on a former potus), and a federal judge signed off on the warrant. The warrant was served and the seizure, in accordance with the 4th amendment, was done without any publicity or notification to the media by anyone other than trump. And not for nuthin’, but “the raid only makes the swamp look as deep and dirty as ever and bolsters the one man who promised to drain it — Trump.” Really? Drained it like this - bannon, barrack, broidy, cohen, flynn, gates, manafort, nader, papadopoulos, stone, & weisselberg. Plus don’t forget about what’s facing rudy & eastman. Yeah, swamp draining. https://www.wklaw.com/federal-warrant-work/ https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/received-a-search-warrant-10-facts-you-3337954/ https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/21/politics/tom-barrack-trump-arrested/index.html I’ll take a piece of that.
Wasn't a retort, or meant to convince anyone he's guilty or innocent. You missed the point of, or perhaps didn't read the opinion piece.
9 minutes ago, Beerman said: Wasn't a retort, or meant to convince anyone he's guilty or innocent. You missed the point, or perhaps didn't read the opinion piece.
Wasn't a retort, or meant to convince anyone he's guilty or innocent. You missed the point, or perhaps didn't read the opinion piece.
Not sure about emt, but I did. Pretty predictable. Personally, I think it’s way premature to pontificate - we don’t even know what is in the warrant or what was seized. So … why hasn’t Trump made them public?
Meanwhile, I expected the lock and load rhetoric to be a lot more prevalent than it is.
31 minutes ago, Beerman said: Wasn't a retort, or meant to convince anyone he's guilty or innocent. You missed the point of, or perhaps didn't read the opinion piece.
I read it & got the right wing gist. That op-ED writer has a pattern, poor poor trump, everybody’s out to get him.