Published
Something to understand what nurses think about re the Current News and their opinions!
So what are y'all doing with the baby parts that you're getting from eBay and Amazon. Asking for a friend.
Given the sheer number of abortions it's not surprising that it's a billion dollar industry. Heck, my "not for profit" employer is worth 7 billion. Health expenditures are a 4 trillion dollar a year industry. And.......
1 hour ago, Tweety said:So what are y'all doing with the baby parts that you're getting from eBay and Amazon. Asking for a friend.
Given the sheer number of abortions it's not surprising that it's a billion dollar industry. Heck, my "not for profit" employer is worth 7 billion. Health expenditures are a 4 trillion dollar a year industry. And.......
Saving up for a Lamborghini.
5 hours ago, MaybeeRN said:Ask Dr. Mary Gatter. She runs the parts department at planned parenthood. I wonder if she ever got her Lamborghini?
Unlike liberals. Republicans have a soul and values all innocent human life.
Then why did 9 of them vote against measures to increase production of baby formula? I hope they get thrown dirty diapers when the walk the streets of their own districts....if they have the courage.
5 hours ago, Beerman said:Not in the sense that breeding cheap labor is behind the pro-life movement.
If you are interesting in following the money, you should do some research on the multi-billion dollar abortion industry.
You’re oversimplifying a bit - like saying that rainfall is behind climate. As I said before, ever-increasing profits are also dependent on ever-increasing consumption. Why do you think that American business was so hot to trot into mainland China? Where an individual falls along the worker<>consumer continuum depends largely on socio-economic class, but all provide powerful incentives for maximizing population growth.
As for following the money, why should abortion providers be any different from the rest of the healthcare industry? There was a period of time right after Roe v. Wade came down when New York State was the only place where abortions were decriminalized and available. New York abortion providers were known to be contributing to anti-choice activists in neighboring states. Good for business, doncha know …
Meanwhile, as I research that, you might be interested in researching the finances of forced pregnancy organizations. The list provided by sunlight.org of corporations funding anti-choice legislators is especially illuminating (pun intended).
1 hour ago, heron said:You’re oversimplifying a bit - like saying that rainfall is behind climate. As I said before, ever-increasing profits are also dependent on ever-increasing consumption. Why do you think that American business was so hot to trot into mainland China? Where an individual falls along the worker<>consumer continuum depends largely on socio-economic class, but all provide powerful incentives for maximizing population growth.
As for following the money, why should abortion providers be any different from the rest of the healthcare industry? There was a period of time right after Roe v. Wade came down when New York State was the only place where abortions were decriminalized and available. New York abortion providers were known to be contributing to anti-choice activists in neighboring states. Good for business, doncha know …
Meanwhile, as I research that, you might be interested in researching the finances of forced pregnancy organizations. The list provided by sunlight.org of corporations funding anti-choice legislators is especially illuminating (pun intended).
I tried. Sunlight.org doesn't exist.
3 hours ago, Tweety said:So what are y'all doing with the baby parts that you're getting from eBay and Amazon. Asking for a friend.
Given the sheer number of abortions it's not surprising that it's a billion dollar industry. Heck, my "not for profit" employer is worth 7 billion. Health expenditures are a 4 trillion dollar a year industry. And.......
Right. And the "sheer number abortions" should be a bit troubling to everyone.
3 hours ago, subee said:Then why did 9 of them vote against measures to increase production of baby formula? I hope they get thrown dirty diapers when the walk the streets of their own districts....if they have the courage.
Why does a vote have to be taken to increase baby formula? Trump would have already done it and solved it on his own months ago.
1 hour ago, Beerman said:Right. And the "sheer number abortions" should be a bit troubling to everyone.
liberals would have to have a soul first.
9 hours ago, heron said:Yup - deliberately obtuse. You want us to believe that you are unaware that pregnant results in children, who grow up to be both workers and consumers. One woman is one worker, but as a reproductively active person, she can produce multiple workers in addition to herself. It’s why animal farming is about raising female animals.
BTW, your mis-statement of my point is almost the very definition of a straw man argument. If you find that it “devalues” your argument, that’s because you know that you are trying to derail the discussion. Either that or you don’t know what it means.
Yup! Ad hominem tactic....... It really doesn't devalue my argument but merely establishes that you do not have one...
9 hours ago, MaybeeRN said:Ask Dr. Mary Gatter. She runs the parts department at planned parenthood. I wonder if she ever got her Lamborghini?
Unlike liberals. Republicans have a soul and values all innocent human life.
Or they have a conspiracy to make women pregnant more because of capitalism or something??......
MaybeeRN
797 Posts
You're the one claiming to be ill informed.