What do you think about with current News and Opinions?

Published

Something to understand what nurses think about re the Current News and their opinions!

Specializes in Hospice.
1 hour ago, Beerman said:

Is this a widespread belief among the "pro-choice" crowd?

I have no idea. As I said, I don’t wait for permission to form an opinion. In this case, I followed the money. Are you suggesting that economic factors have no bearing on the abortion debate?

1
Up Vote Up Vote ×
1 minute ago, heron said:

I have no idea. As I said, I don’t wait for permission to form an opinion. In this case, I followed the money. Are you suggesting that economic factors have no bearing on the abortion debate?

Of course they do.  We have already seen how much planned parenthood gains by "eBaying" fetal body parts so they can get a nice Mercedes Benz.

Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in This and that.
2 hours ago, heron said:

Are you being deliberately obtuse? Or just taking another shot at building a straw man?

Why do you suppose American companies have moved their manufacturing to third world countries? Why are those who hire undocumented immigrants so eager to do so, and why aren’t the few laws against such behavior so poorly enforced? Cheap labor, the cheaper, the better - with captive labor (the afore-mentioned undocumented workers, along with women being forced to stay pregnant when they don’t want to be) being the ideal

Who produces and raises all that cheap labor? Is it any surprise, then, that the economic interests of the 1% is served by forcing women to carry every pregnancy to term, regardless of her own needs or wishes? Or do you not consider bearing and raising children to be labor?

As for your comment re CRT - I never said it was being utilized by financial institutions. Read the post again.

Are you able to respond to a post without differing to devaluation of the poster? " Strawman"? Shouldn't it be "StrawTHEY" anyway? 

It didn't make sense to me that Republican old men want to take away women's reproductive rights because they want to capitalize on their labour. When in fact women would be working less because of maternity leave and more money spent on benefits.  

From a capitalist standpoint, they would want to make abortions even more assessable because that would mean less time off and more labour hence profits could be made.

Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in Hospice.
34 minutes ago, Justlookingfornow said:

Are you able to respond to a post without differing to devaluation of the poster? " Strawman"? Shouldn't it be "StrawTHEY" anyway? 

It didn't make sense to me that Republican old men want to take away women's reproductive rights because they want to capitalize on their labour. When in fact women would be working less because of maternity leave and more money spent on benefits.  

From a capitalist standpoint, they would want to make abortions even more assessable because that would mean less time off and more labour hence profits could be made.

Yup - deliberately obtuse. You want us to believe that you are unaware that pregnant results in children, who grow up to be both workers and consumers. One woman is one worker, but as a reproductively active person, she can produce multiple workers in addition to herself. It’s why animal farming is about raising female animals.

BTW, your mis-statement of my point is almost the very definition of a straw man argument. If you find that it “devalues” your argument, that’s because you know that you are trying to derail the discussion. Either that or you don’t know what it means.

2
Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in CRNA, Finally retired.
23 minutes ago, MaybeeRN said:

Of course they do.  We have already seen how much planned parenthood gains by "eBaying" fetal body parts so they can get a nice Mercedes Benz.

You are gonna have to offer some evidence of that.  Who got the car?  This is blather.  

2
Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in CRNA, Finally retired.
21 minutes ago, Justlookingfornow said:

Are you able to respond to a post without differing to devaluation of the poster? " Strawman"? Shouldn't it be "StrawTHEY" anyway? 

It didn't make sense to me that Republican old men want to take away women's reproductive rights because they want to capitalize on their labour. When in fact women would be working less because of maternity leave and more money spent on benefits.  

From a capitalist standpoint, they would want to make abortions even more assessable because that would mean less time off and more labour hence profits could be made.

accessible is a real word.  

Up Vote Up Vote ×
18 minutes ago, subee said:

You are gonna have to offer some evidence of that.  Who got the car?  This is blather.  

Ask Dr. Mary Gatter.  She runs the parts department at planned parenthood.  I wonder if she ever got her Lamborghini?

39 minutes ago, Justlookingfornow said:

Are you able to respond to a post without differing to devaluation of the poster? " Strawman"? Shouldn't it be "StrawTHEY" anyway? 

It didn't make sense to me that Republican old men want to take away women's reproductive rights because they want to capitalize on their labour. When in fact women would be working less because of maternity leave and more money spent on benefits.  

From a capitalist standpoint, they would want to make abortions even more assessable because that would mean less time off and more labour hence profits could be made.

Unlike liberals.  Republicans have a soul and values all innocent human life.

Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
2 minutes ago, MaybeeRN said:

Ask Dr. Mary Gatter.  She runs the parts department at planned parenthood.  I wonder if she ever got her Lamborghini?

Unlike liberals.  Republicans have a soul and values all innocent human life.

Nah... you made the claim... you produce the evidence to support your belief. 

I suspect the belief is based in gibberish, which covers the last two word groupings in your comment.

2
Up Vote Up Vote ×
53 minutes ago, heron said:

I have no idea. As I said, I don’t wait for permission to form an opinion. In this case, I followed the money. Are you suggesting that economic factors have no bearing on the abortion debate?

Not in the sense that breeding cheap labor is behind the pro-life movement.

If you are interesting in following the money, you should do some research on the multi-billion dollar abortion industry.

1
Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in Critical Care.
1 hour ago, MaybeeRN said:

Of course they do.  We have already seen how much planned parenthood gains by "eBaying" fetal body parts so they can get a nice Mercedes Benz.

Everybody knows the dead-fetus-parts from eBay are of poor quality.  

If you want the good stuff you need to get them from Amazon, plus Amazon has the only good Adrenochrome.  If it doesn't say it was harvested in the basement of Comet pizza then it's not the real Clinton/Fauci grade stuff.

5
Up Vote Up Vote ×
58 minutes ago, toomuchbaloney said:

Nah... you made the claim... you produce the evidence to support your belief. 

I suspect the belief is based in gibberish, which covers the last two word groupings in your comment.

Google is your friend

6 minutes ago, MunoRN said:

Everybody knows the dead-fetus-parts from eBay are of poor quality.  

If you want the good stuff you need to get them from Amazon, plus Amazon has the only good Adrenochrome.  If it doesn't say it was harvested in the basement of Comet pizza then it's not the real Clinton/Fauci grade stuff.

All Amazon baby parts are made in China and strictly female and the lungs have water damage.

Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
1 hour ago, MaybeeRN said:

Google is your friend

All Amazon baby parts are made in China and strictly female and the lungs have water damage.

Nah...I don't Google nonsense to amuse others. 

1
Up Vote Up Vote ×
+ Join the Discussion