What do you think about with current News and Opinions?

Justlookingfornow · May 22, 2022

46 minutes ago, heron said:

Trigger alert: I aim to misbehave …

The straw man is still dancing, I see. His strings seem connected to a brand new username who only posts this particular misinformation. Midterm elections coming up … don’t fall for it.

The shortage of cheap, captive labor, white panic over demographic changes, accelerating efforts to force women to conceive and carry unwanted pregnancies to term, falling fertility rates and the increasing amplification of both the replacement theory and Christian theocracy advocates add up to a disturbing picture. Add this to the fact that healthy capitalist economies are defined in terms of growth in both consumption and profits, which, in turn requires a constantly expanding population.

You do the math …

And when you cannot diplomatically debate a topic, you devalue the person who's opinion you do not agree with. I'm sure if I listed my credentials, you woukd have went after that as well. And exactly why I did not list them

Then you add in the "white panic" like you know my race. And as if race has a anything to do with it. You forgot to add "cis,"heterosexual"male to the "white". All the deflective buzz words when you hear something you do not agree with. Seems to be a habit of some all the way up to the politicians......

Justlookingfornow · May 22, 2022

2 hours ago, Tweety said:

Ask that of the politicians that are lowering the gestation time of abortion yet not worrying about dead living people.

What are dead living people?

Justlookingfornow · May 22, 2022

45 minutes ago, heron said:

As is your own failure to demonstrate that post-viability abortion on demand is anything like a serious proposal from anyone other than rabid forced pregnancy advocates looking fo a gotcha. Anyone got a match?

As is your own failure to respectfully participate in a discussion. Being completly unable to resist devaluing the person instead of contributing to your point of view. Or asigning them to some "rabid forced pregnancy advocates".

Sounds just as ridiculous as me saying, " left wing homicidal maniacs advocating for the death of babies"!

Unfortunately for some, how they say it or don't say anything speaks louder than their convictions.

I got your point. Loud and clear.

toomuchbaloney · May 22, 2022

4 hours ago, Justlookingfornow said:

The morjity of parents do not murder their children. Should there be no law?

There are very few transgender people , should we not protect their lives?

There are laws. The only thing that going to change, apparently, is that politically conservative state governments will make safe and legal abortion access difficult or impossible in their states after the SCOTUS what we were assured was precedent.

heron, ASN, RN · May 22, 2022

58 minutes ago, Justlookingfornow said:

And when you cannot diplomatically debate a topic, you devalue the person who's opinion you do not agree with. I'm sure if I listed my credentials, you woukd have went after that as well. And exactly why I did not list them

Then you add in the "white panic" like you know my race. And as if race has a anything to do with it. You forgot to add "cis,"heterosexual"male to the "white". All the deflective buzz words when you hear something you do not agree with. Seems to be a habit of some all the way up to the politicians......

Triggered, much?

heron, ASN, RN · May 22, 2022

48 minutes ago, Justlookingfornow said:

As is your own failure to respectfully participate in a discussion. Being completly unable to resist devaluing the person instead of contributing to your point of view. Or asigning them to some "rabid forced pregnancy advocates".

Sounds just as ridiculous as me saying, " left wing homicidal maniacs advocating for the death of babies"!

Unfortunately for some, how they say it or don't say anything speaks louder than their convictions.

I got your point. Loud and clear.

As if spreading defamatory misinformation about pro-choicers equals respectful debate that values the viewpoint of others.

FYI - I don’t care about your credentials or ethnicity. I do not base my opinions on received wisdom. Nonsense is nonsense, regardless of its source. The proposition that the pro-choice movement is about the frivolous use of on demand post-viability abortion is nonsense. The eruption of this drek is just an attempt to camouflage the egregious attacks on women’s reproductive rights going into the ‘22 midterm elections.

Beerman, BSN · May 22, 2022

2 hours ago, Justlookingfornow said:

And when you cannot diplomatically debate a topic, you devalue the person who's opinion you do not agree with. I'm sure if I listed my credentials, you woukd have went after that as well. And exactly why I did not list them

Then you add in the "white panic" like you know my race. And as if race has a anything to do with it. You forgot to add "cis,"heterosexual"male to the "white". All the deflective buzz words when you hear something you do not agree with. Seems to be a habit of some all the way up to the politicians......

Kudos to you. I couldn't make sense of that incoherent rambling, let alone reply to it.

Tweety, BSN, RN · May 22, 2022

2 hours ago, Justlookingfornow said:

What are dead living people?

zombies? Who the hell knows what I meant. LOL.

I'm thinking I meant people that are murdered after birth. Seems like people are more concerned about the unborn being killed than those killed by gun violence which far outnumbers aborted babies.

Tweety, BSN, RN · May 22, 2022

At the end of the day, as I've said to posters here more than once, most recently to Beerman. "We will never agree" and sometimes that's just how it is and no one gets the last word. People think I'm wrong when I know I'm 100% right and there is no meeting in the middle. There shouldn't be. But for me to drone on and on is a waste of time.

Beerman, BSN · May 22, 2022

1 hour ago, heron said:

As if spreading defamatory misinformation about pro-choicers equals respectful debate that values the viewpoint of others.

FYI - I don’t care about your credentials or ethnicity. I do not base my opinions on received wisdom. Nonsense is nonsense, regardless of its source. The proposition that the pro-choice movement is about the frivolous use of on demand post-viability abortion is nonsense. The eruption of this drek is just an attempt to camouflage the egregious attacks on women’s reproductive rights going into the ‘22 midterm elections.

What defamatory misinformation has been spread?

You use the term "frivolous" on demand late-term abortion. Someone else used the term "whimsical".

What if the same reasons used at 26 weeks were the same as those used at 16 weeks? Are you denouncing late-term abortions for those reasons? Because many here aren't. And most elected Democrats are not. Those folks are saying that there is no demand for them, no talk of allowing them, and no providers would do them. But, they say all this without explicity saying their position on them .

So, as long as elected Democrats and their supporters fail to denounce post-viable abortions on demand, its reasonable to believe that allowing them is on the table.

Justlookingfornow · May 23, 2022

1 hour ago, heron said:

As if spreading defamatory misinformation about pro-choicers equals respectful debate that values the viewpoint of others.

FYI - I don’t care about your credentials or ethnicity. I do not base my opinions on received wisdom. Nonsense is nonsense, regardless of its source. The proposition that the pro-choice movement is about the frivolous use of on demand post-viability abortion is nonsense. The eruption of this drek is just an attempt to camouflage the egregious attacks on women’s reproductive rights going into the ‘22 midterm elections.

Yes because it's the desire and enjoyment of old evil white men to attack women's rights for fun!

Justlookingfornow · May 23, 2022

3 minutes ago, Beerman said:

What defamatory misinformation has been spread?

You use the term "frivolous" on demand late-term abortion. Someone else used the term "whimsical".

What if the same reasons used at 26 weeks were the same as those used at 16 weeks? Are you denouncing late-term abortions for those reasons? Because many here aren't. And most elected Democrats are not. Those folks are saying that there is no demand for them, no talk of allowing them, and no providers would do them. But, they say all this without explicity saying their position on them .

So, as long as elected Democrats and their supporters fail to denounce post-viable abortions on demand, its reasonable to believe that allowing them is on the table.

And they can avoid the topic all they want it will only harm them in the end. So go for it.

I think their reluctance to address it is mostly they are afraid of the potential back lash. I guess that's more important than protecting women and babies......

1 hour ago, heron said:

Triggered, much?

Of course not, you gave trigger warning first! ?