A few hospitals I've worked at have started to implement bedside shift report. I dislike it. There is information that I don't feel comfortable sharing in front of the patient because 1) it may make them unnecessarily concerned 2) it may insult them 3) they'll ask questions which would interrupt the flow of report. It seems that to play along with management, RNs will stand near the bedside but report out of earshot from the patient.
Variations I do like include forms of rounding together on each patient after report to check that the patient is alive, that tubes/wires/drains are labeled and present as described, or to clarify any complex parts of report.
But giving the entire report AT the bedside I think is nonsense. I've wanted to ask management WHY they think this is important. It's not mandated by JCAHO and yet management feels very proud to implement this as a "quality improvement" project. So what are you improving exactly? Well... I looked it up and research appears to say that the benefit of bedside shift report is to make THE PATIENT feel more empowered/involved/part of the diagnostic process. They are given an opportunity to ask questions and voice concerns which is supposedly going to make their care better or seem better.
I feel that throughout my day and especially during assessments, I give my patients ample opportunity to be involved in their care. This new interaction is just a disruption to the excellent care I already DO provide. I feel like I'm starting to sound like the heartless RN who just wants to get through with her day but I'd like to think that's not me.
I think of shift report as sacred. It is an exchange that requires high-level communication and attention to transmit vital information. I take this bedside reporting idea as another encroachment on our practice in the name of "patient satisfaction". I hear about bedside charting. What's left? Should all our communication with doctors and various practitioners be projected through the patient's speakerphone?
A few hospitals I've worked at have started to implement bedside shift report. I dislike it. There is information that I don't feel comfortable sharing in front of the patient because 1) it may make them unnecessarily concerned 2) it may insult them 3) they'll ask questions which would interrupt the flow of report. It seems that to play along with management, RNs will stand near the bedside but report out of earshot from the patient.
Variations I do like include forms of rounding together on each patient after report to check that the patient is alive, that tubes/wires/drains are labeled and present as described, or to clarify any complex parts of report.
But giving the entire report AT the bedside I think is nonsense. I've wanted to ask management WHY they think this is important. It's not mandated by JCAHO and yet management feels very proud to implement this as a "quality improvement" project. So what are you improving exactly? Well... I looked it up and research appears to say that the benefit of bedside shift report is to make THE PATIENT feel more empowered/involved/part of the diagnostic process. They are given an opportunity to ask questions and voice concerns which is supposedly going to make their care better or seem better.
I feel that throughout my day and especially during assessments, I give my patients ample opportunity to be involved in their care. This new interaction is just a disruption to the excellent care I already DO provide. I feel like I'm starting to sound like the heartless RN who just wants to get through with her day but I'd like to think that's not me.
I think of shift report as sacred. It is an exchange that requires high-level communication and attention to transmit vital information. I take this bedside reporting idea as another encroachment on our practice in the name of "patient satisfaction". I hear about bedside charting. What's left? Should all our communication with doctors and various practitioners be projected through the patient's speakerphone?