Ohio Hospital Fires 23 After Fentanyl Overdose Deaths

A hospital in Ohio recently fired 23 physicians, nurses and pharmacists after 25 patients died from excessive doses of fentanyl. In addition, 48 nurses and pharmacists were reported to state licensing boards for their roles in the overdoses. Nurses Headlines News

On July 12, 2019, Mount Carmel Health System in Columbus, Ohio, announced the firing of 23 employees, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists and managers. The terminations were related to the deaths of 29 critically ill patients from fentanyl administered during hospitalization that resulted in overdoses. Additionally, the hospital’s chief executive officer announced he would be stepping down and the executive vice president and chief clinical officer would retire in late September. These events are centered around the alleged criminal activity of William Husel, DO, an intensive care physician practicing at Mount Carmel from 2013 until the end of 2018.

The Details

Dr. Husel started working at Mount Carmel in 2013 and during his employment, potentially fatal doses of fentanyl were ordered and administered to 29 of his patients. According to the hospital’s internal investigation, this included five patients whose conditions could potentially improve.. The investigation also concluded six additional patients were overdosed on fentanyl, however, it was not likely the cause of their deaths.

The affected patients were critically ill and their families had requested that all life-saving measures be stopped. While the fentanyl was ordered as a comfort measure, the doses far exceeded the amount needed for palliation. Patients received fentanyl doses as high as 2,000 micrograms, midazolam as high as 10 milligrams and several patients were also given dilaudid doses up to 10mg.

Dr. Husel has been charged with murder in the deaths of 25 patients and has entered a plea of not guilty.

Failed Safeguards

Although Dr. Husel provided the order, physicians do not practice in silos. Others played a part, many unknowingly, in administering the excess doses and safeguards to protect patients were either ignored or did not exist. These include:

  • A formal report was received related to Dr. Husel’s care on October 25, 2018, however, Dr. Husel was not removed from patient care until November 21, 2019. During this time, three patients died from potentially fatal doses of medication ordered by the doctor.
  • Layers of medical protocols were overlooked or did not exist.
    • Medications obtained through electronic drug dispensing cabinet by nurses using the override function that avoided warnings
    • Orders verified by pharmacists after administration and some overridden doses bypassed the pharmacists altogether.
  • No system in place to audit or track the amount of medications ordered, including fentanyl, prior to the first formal complaint in October 2018
  • Instances of a nurse or pharmacist raising questions about the ordered doses, but the concerns did not make it up to the higher level administrators.

Mount Carmel Health System reported 48 nurses and pharmacists to state licensing boards. The reported individuals face disciplinary actions ranging from reprimand and fines to permanent revocation.

Response By Ohio Board of Nursing

In March, the Ohio Board of Nursing sent letters to 25 nurses who administered the drugs ordered by Husel. The letters outlined state law violations based on the nurse:

  • Knowing or should have known the drugs would be harmful
  • No documentation orders were questioned or that they consulted with others involved in the patient's care.

The nursing board also questioned the use of paralytics without nursing documentation to support the clinical need. In one case, the nurse failed to question the removal of a breathing tube after a paralytic had been administered.

Corrective Actions

To address gaps in standardized procedures, policies and safeguards, Mount Carmel Health Systems implemented a detailed action plan. Examples include:

  • Adding protocols to set maximum doses for pain medications in the electronic medical record
  • Implementing an escalation policy for deviations in pain administration protocols:
  • Restricting the ability to bypass pharmacy review of medication orders
  • Increasing staff education on end of life care
  • Implementing initiatives to ensure patient medication safety

Civil Suits

Numerous families brought civil actions for the loss of loved ones given the excessive fentanyl doses. To date, reported settlements range from $200,000 to $700,000 and total 4.5 million.

What are your thoughts on the events at Mount Carmel? Where do you see safeguards failing in your area of practice?

Interested in reading more about this story?

Could Mount Carmel Deaths Have Been Prevented?

Ohio Doctor Charged With Killing 25 Patients in Fentanyl Overdoses

Mount Carmel Health Systems FAQ Related to Overdose Investigation

Specializes in Surgical Specialty Clinic - Ambulatory Care.
On 7/24/2019 at 7:24 AM, Wuzzie said:

So what you are saying then is if a doctor ordered you to administer Vecuronium to a patient and immediately extubate a patient you would question it but go ahead and do it if he gave you a good enough explanation? Not trying to be contrary just trying to wrap my head around your viewpoint.

Overall I do not believe there is enough data, as I have not read the nurses testimonies and seen the charting leading up to each incident, for any of us to be definitive that the blame is on the nurses & pharmacists. And the consistent comments of “they should have know better, these are crazy doses” has no real meaning as none of us were in the situation. Those are all just speculation....as much speculation as I am having saying they are not guilty.....mostly I’m not sure they are guilty because I can see how a reasonable, safe person can still end up administering some of these doses. No, I have no idea how a nurse or respiratory therapist could end up agreeing to extubate a patient after administering a paralytic. But I am opposed, on the small amount of biased information we know, to say the nurse was practicing poorly until I have more information.

What comes out in the news is sensationalized and biased, I would consider an internal report made by the hospital biased, innocent people are often damned because only the most shocking parts of the story are out. This is why I cannot just go along with ‘everyone’.

Specializes in Practice educator.

I really don't need any more information than 'Nurse administered 2000mcg of Fentanyl', that is more than enough to know you should lose your job.

There isn't a circumstance or situation in the world that would make me give 10x the normal maximum dose, crying sensationalism is a waste of time when the facts are so clear.

On 7/25/2019 at 9:40 PM, KalipsoRed21 said:

No, I have no idea how a nurse or respiratory therapist could end up agreeing to extubate a patient after administering a paralytic.

But I wasn't asking what you thought of the events that occurred at Mt. Carmel. I was speaking to your hard stance that as a nurse we are to follow orders, even those we question because it is our job to do what the physician tells us to do. You have repeatedly stated that. So I want to know what you, personally, would do in this situation (giving a paralytic prior to extubation) given your position on the subject.

As someone who has been in a situation where the employer was raking them over the coals over questioning a doctor’s order, I find this entire discussion to be very disturbing on a gut level. One time in my early working life I was told, “You can be right, and you can be dead right.” In either situation, it does not feel satisfying to be “dead right.” I only wish I had knowledge of all of this before I signed on the dotted line for nursing school.

Specializes in Critical Care.
10 hours ago, osceteacher said:

I really don't need any more information than 'Nurse administered 2000mcg of Fentanyl', that is more than enough to know you should lose your job.

There isn't a circumstance or situation in the world that would make me give 10x the normal maximum dose, crying sensationalism is a waste of time when the facts are so clear.

It's certainly not the typical dosage required in a terminal wean, but I have given this amount and more (more commonly in morphine of opiate dose equivalents) during a terminal wean, this is based off established protocols. In a terminal wean there is no "normal maximum dose", it's highly patient specific.

6 minutes ago, MunoRN said:

It's certainly not the typical dosage required in a terminal wean, but I have given this amount and more (more commonly in morphine of opiate dose equivalents) during a terminal wean, this is based off established protocols. In a terminal wean there is no "normal maximum dose", it's highly patient specific.

I've not seen it in my limited student experience (Nursling !) , but don't some burn victims and cancer pts get doses that are incredibly high, too?

Specializes in Surgical Specialty Clinic - Ambulatory Care.
13 hours ago, Wuzzie said:

But I wasn't asking what you thought of the events that occurred at Mt. Carmel. I was speaking to your hard stance that as a nurse we are to follow orders, even those we question because it is our job to do what the physician tells us to do. You have repeatedly stated that. So I want to know what you, personally, would do in this situation (giving a paralytic prior to extubation) given your position on the subject.

I probably would have reviewed with my supervisor and if s/he said it was okay I would have assisted in this order. I do fundamentally agree that these orders are more in the doctor’s realm of decisions than mine. And when a I disagree with both the doctor and the supervisor I do attempt to pull family aside and express my personal concerns.

Specializes in Travel, Home Health, Med-Surg.
14 hours ago, KalipsoRed21 said:

I probably would have reviewed with my supervisor and if s/he said it was okay I would have assisted in this order. I do fundamentally agree that these orders are more in the doctor’s realm of decisions than mine. And when a I disagree with both the doctor and the supervisor I do attempt to pull family aside and express my personal concerns.

I think that you may be putting yourself more at risk by doing this. If you disagree with both the MD and Sup re: a pt trmt it is not your personal concern, rather it is your professional concern. After having admitted your professional concern to the pt/family and then performing the intervention anyway this (IMO) creates more trouble for you if something goes wrong. Family will be upset and questioning why you did this/that if you knew better. And of course management will still throw you under the bus.

14 hours ago, KalipsoRed21 said:

I probably would have reviewed with my supervisor and if s/he said it was okay I would have assisted in this order. I do fundamentally agree that these orders are more in the doctor’s realm of decisions than mine. And when a I disagree with both the doctor and the supervisor I do attempt to pull family aside and express my personal concerns.

While I don't agree with your viewpoint I do appreciate your honesty.

3 hours ago, Daisy4RN said:

I think that you may be putting yourself more at risk by doing this. If you disagree with both the MD and Sup re: a pt trmt it is not your personal concern, rather it is your professional concern. After having admitted your professional concern to the pt/family and then performing the intervention anyway this (IMO) creates more trouble for you if something goes wrong. Family will be upset and questioning why you did this/that if you knew better. And of course management will still throw you under the bus.

Agree. Advancing any serious concern up the chain of command is our responsibility/duty. And, at the very least, you refuse to participate. KalipsoRed: Maybe that sounds scary but it really isn't. We aren't refusing to do something every time we turn around; it's for those rare occasions where you know this seriously isn't right or there is a high risk of completely avoidable badness and a much less risky and more standard way that things could proceed. Then you put your foot down. Work for a safer compromise, provide rationales, etc., etc., but in the end if there is a stand off about something serious, you have to stand your ground. I have done it a time or two - and in those instances the procedure/process did not go on without me; alternatives were found because when those involved were left on the hotseat by themselves, they quickly realized how inadvisable their plan was.

Although much of what we do does require a physician's order, that does not mean that if something is ordered we are then blindly compelled and *must* do it.

Another thing to keep in mind is that doctors typically don't know the ins and outs of our role (scope of practice) and our professional ethical duties; some of them think that we are legally allowed to do whatever they say we can do, or whatever they tell us to do. That is just not the case. It is perfectly fine to, as collegially as possible, inform them that your duty goes beyond what they say. "I'm sorry but professionally I am not on solid footing with this from a nursing standards/scope of practice perspective; there is nothing I can refer to that would support my doing this" (I have said that almost verbatim). Sometimes they just don't know and they haven't really thought too much about their plan/order until someone registers a concern.

Specializes in APRN / Critical Care Neuro.
8 minutes ago, JKL33 said:

Agree. Advancing any serious concern up the chain of command is our responsibility/duty. And, at the very least, you refuse to participate. KalipsoRed: Maybe that sounds scary but it really isn't. We aren't refusing to do something every time we turn around; it's for those rare occasions where you know this seriously isn't right or there is a high risk of completely avoidable badness and a much less risky and more standard way that things could proceed. Then you put your foot down. Work for a safer compromise, provide rationales, etc., etc., but in the end if there is a stand off about something serious, you have to stand your ground. I have done it a time or two - and in those instances the procedure/process did not go on without me; alternatives were found because when those involved were left on the hotseat by themselves, they quickly realized how inadvisable their plan was.

Although much of what we do does require a physician's order, that does not mean that if something is ordered we are then blindly compelled and *must* do it.

Another thing to keep in mind is that doctors typically don't know the ins and outs of our role (scope of practice) and our professional ethical duties; some of them think that we are legally allowed to do whatever they say we can do, or whatever they tell us to do. That is just not the case. It is perfectly fine to, as collegially as possible, inform them that your duty goes beyond what they say. "I'm sorry but professionally I am not on solid footing with this from a nursing standards/scope of practice perspective; there is nothing I can refer to that would support my doing this" (I have said that almost verbatim). Sometimes they just don't know and they haven't really thought too much about their plan/order until someone registers a concern.

I like the way you explain this and people should think of it in terms of WWII and the Nuremberg trials. Never again did we want to create an atmosphere of “I was just following orders” and if you feel compelled to ever say this it should make you stop and take great pause. Human beings are dependent upon us acting as a double check system all the way up and all the way down the chain of command so that we can avoid similar situations ever occurring. It is the most extreme example of following orders, but this is what gave birth to the thought process of nurses not blindly following orders. Also take into consideration well documented inappropriate clinical trials or the horrors of what was happening as recently as the 19th and 20th centuries in “mental health wards”. Our scope of practice and the ethics of our practice was carefully crafted to help protect people and hopefully avoid similar situations.

Specializes in CRNA, Finally retired.
On 7/30/2019 at 8:18 PM, KalipsoRed21 said:

I probably would have reviewed with my supervisor and if s/he said it was okay I would have assisted in this order. I do fundamentally agree that these orders are more in the doctor’s realm of decisions than mine. And when a I disagree with both the doctor and the supervisor I do attempt to pull family aside and express my personal concerns.

2000mcg Fentanyl would require breaking open 20 glass ampoules of Fentanyl (in the smaller size) so that's a red flag. Don't need a supervisor to tell you that and if he/she went along with it raise your arms high and scream. This should have been taken up the medical chain of command.