Ohio Hospital Fires 23 After Fentanyl Overdose Deaths

A hospital in Ohio recently fired 23 physicians, nurses and pharmacists after 25 patients died from excessive doses of fentanyl. In addition, 48 nurses and pharmacists were reported to state licensing boards for their roles in the overdoses. Nurses Headlines News

On July 12, 2019, Mount Carmel Health System in Columbus, Ohio, announced the firing of 23 employees, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists and managers. The terminations were related to the deaths of 29 critically ill patients from fentanyl administered during hospitalization that resulted in overdoses. Additionally, the hospital’s chief executive officer announced he would be stepping down and the executive vice president and chief clinical officer would retire in late September. These events are centered around the alleged criminal activity of William Husel, DO, an intensive care physician practicing at Mount Carmel from 2013 until the end of 2018.

The Details

Dr. Husel started working at Mount Carmel in 2013 and during his employment, potentially fatal doses of fentanyl were ordered and administered to 29 of his patients. According to the hospital’s internal investigation, this included five patients whose conditions could potentially improve.. The investigation also concluded six additional patients were overdosed on fentanyl, however, it was not likely the cause of their deaths.

The affected patients were critically ill and their families had requested that all life-saving measures be stopped. While the fentanyl was ordered as a comfort measure, the doses far exceeded the amount needed for palliation. Patients received fentanyl doses as high as 2,000 micrograms, midazolam as high as 10 milligrams and several patients were also given dilaudid doses up to 10mg.

Dr. Husel has been charged with murder in the deaths of 25 patients and has entered a plea of not guilty.

Failed Safeguards

Although Dr. Husel provided the order, physicians do not practice in silos. Others played a part, many unknowingly, in administering the excess doses and safeguards to protect patients were either ignored or did not exist. These include:

  • A formal report was received related to Dr. Husel’s care on October 25, 2018, however, Dr. Husel was not removed from patient care until November 21, 2019. During this time, three patients died from potentially fatal doses of medication ordered by the doctor.
  • Layers of medical protocols were overlooked or did not exist.
    • Medications obtained through electronic drug dispensing cabinet by nurses using the override function that avoided warnings
    • Orders verified by pharmacists after administration and some overridden doses bypassed the pharmacists altogether.
  • No system in place to audit or track the amount of medications ordered, including fentanyl, prior to the first formal complaint in October 2018
  • Instances of a nurse or pharmacist raising questions about the ordered doses, but the concerns did not make it up to the higher level administrators.

Mount Carmel Health System reported 48 nurses and pharmacists to state licensing boards. The reported individuals face disciplinary actions ranging from reprimand and fines to permanent revocation.

Response By Ohio Board of Nursing

In March, the Ohio Board of Nursing sent letters to 25 nurses who administered the drugs ordered by Husel. The letters outlined state law violations based on the nurse:

  • Knowing or should have known the drugs would be harmful
  • No documentation orders were questioned or that they consulted with others involved in the patient's care.

The nursing board also questioned the use of paralytics without nursing documentation to support the clinical need. In one case, the nurse failed to question the removal of a breathing tube after a paralytic had been administered.

Corrective Actions

To address gaps in standardized procedures, policies and safeguards, Mount Carmel Health Systems implemented a detailed action plan. Examples include:

  • Adding protocols to set maximum doses for pain medications in the electronic medical record
  • Implementing an escalation policy for deviations in pain administration protocols:
  • Restricting the ability to bypass pharmacy review of medication orders
  • Increasing staff education on end of life care
  • Implementing initiatives to ensure patient medication safety

Civil Suits

Numerous families brought civil actions for the loss of loved ones given the excessive fentanyl doses. To date, reported settlements range from $200,000 to $700,000 and total 4.5 million.

What are your thoughts on the events at Mount Carmel? Where do you see safeguards failing in your area of practice?

Interested in reading more about this story?

Could Mount Carmel Deaths Have Been Prevented?

Ohio Doctor Charged With Killing 25 Patients in Fentanyl Overdoses

Mount Carmel Health Systems FAQ Related to Overdose Investigation

Muno, the problem is that some of the families have denied that their loved one was transitioning to comfort care. I don’t have the reference in front of me but I’ll see if I can find it for you.

2 hours ago, MunoRN said:

I'm not sure at what point I apparently 'kicked your dog', but to your points;

All of them because you always do this as though you're the Matlock on nursing policy but never read the links provided in the rebuttals. It's evident by you continuing down the same path despite those exact points being debunked in the provided links. *sigh

The hospital's investigation has not been made public, so I'm not sure how you've come to the conclusion that they "thoroughly investigated" the incidents in question,

Their website says exactly that

what we do know is that they did not have a relevant policy at the time for him and the staff to have violated,

I literally linked their website which says they absolutely do and he violated it

and that legal requirements for practice don't vary by facility.

Again, their facility had what their practice expectations were

Based on what we do know, there's certainly sufficient reason to take action against Dr. Husel based on his history,

Full stop. There is no but, hence why I don't see why you keep going so hard to argue otherwise.

but not related to his prescribing practices for patients transitioning from critical care to comfort care since depending on how these were ordered and implemented they were not necessarily outside the dosages required to properly care for these patients.

They absolutely were because reports said he would wait until late and make stat orders to circumvent pharmacy checking behind him and pinging his orders and that's why the nurses were able to override them in the pyxis as stat orders. On top of, some of the patients he killed off still had a chance at recovery.

Practice guidelines for transitioning to comfort care from critical care are not based on any "standard" dosages but are instead patient specific, and based on the variables in question the cumulative dosages that may be required by a patient are well within the reported amounts administered,

You keep regurgitating this as though others are ignorant to this. This is only partly true and not matter of fact, nor a blanket form of practice, as you seem to keep pushing. It's a variable practice and hospice/palliative care doesn't equate "kill them now and get it over with" which is what Dr Death was doing.

You appear to disagree with this, what do you believe the upper limit of medication requirements to be?

Do I or is that what you have set in your head because you want to pretend like I'm contrary when in reality it's the fact you have this set notion of wanting to be right rather than understanding what I'm actually saying here? The bottom line is he violated the hospital's policy and practiced bad medicine. Even you agree with that yet here you are still going. Ask yourself why? What's your real gripe here? I'm arguing this case and this doctor being wrong but you're arguing as though it's a blanket system and everyone is ignorant on hospice/palliative care except you despite the fact we're also nurses and versed in our own knowledge and experience with this same topic.

What are you basing that on?

Another example of you going hard in the paint and ignoring the fact I've stated I have several years of hospice/palliative care and had several family members who were hospice due to cancer and other medical conditions. Or do you need a full dissertation and infinite references to validate that just for YOU since nothing I say seems to resonate because you're gung ho about being right despite agreeing then disagreeing about something irrelevant or not said?

*Long sigh ? See above.

1 hour ago, Wuzzie said:

Muno, the problem is that some of the families have denied that their loved one was transitioning to comfort care. I don’t have the reference in front of me but I’ll see if I can find it for you.

Thank you. I provided the link to the hospitals findings but apparently Muno didn't bother to read it.

This is nothing new. It is no different than use of morphine to control pain in terminally ill patients...which, at the same time eases them on to expiration. The article says all the patients' families had asked that no further lifesaving measures be taken. Should they be left to suffer painful deaths? IF any nurse did not want to give the doses ordered, he or she does not have to do so. As an oncology R.N., there were times when I refused to give certain drugs and doses. I was never fired or reprimanded. Nurses have the right to refuse to give treatments that they believe are not correct. Not only do they have that right, they have that duty.

Specializes in Surgical Specialty Clinic - Ambulatory Care.
3 hours ago, NurseBlaq said:

*Long sigh ? See above.

Really it is mostly because you are stating everything in kind an *** tone. Full stop.

And all I have been able to see of this case is the hyperlink in the beginning of this post. If there is more information great. Please submit a link. Based on what I read I don’t see why we are treating a hospital internal review as the end all be all of information of all wrong doing here. Is there any institution that is going to place the blame on themselves? A little biased information does not equal guilt. I’m not opposed to all these people being questioned and forced to be on leave of duty for an investigation, but I don’t see hospital review board as being unbiased in these matters.

7 hours ago, KalipsoRed21 said:

Really it is mostly because you are stating everything in kind an *** tone. Full stop.

And all I have been able to see of this case is the hyperlink in the beginning of this post. If there is more information great. Please submit a link. Based on what I read I don’t see why we are treating a hospital internal review as the end all be all of information of all wrong doing here. Is there any institution that is going to place the blame on themselves? A little biased information does not equal guilt. I’m not opposed to all these people being questioned and forced to be on leave of duty for an investigation, but I don’t see hospital review board as being unbiased in these matters.

My tone has been in response to the one(s) I've received. Move along with the BS. You've gone against everything anyone says that doesn't wholeheartedly agree with you, including the detrimental issue of blindly following orders despite pretty much EVERYONE saying that's not the best practice.

The doctor is facing real charges, so it's beyond an internal review because hospitals don't have the ability to hold legal hearings and several patients died, even their families said so but go off.

Lastly, if you perceive everything that goes against what you would have done, which is blindly follow the doctors orders, as bias then obviously you're not opposed to these people being held accountable. Matter of fact, you've been arguing to the opposite this entire thread.

Again, *sigh

Specializes in Surgical Specialty Clinic - Ambulatory Care.

I do disagree with ‘everyone’ in this matter and nothing ‘everyone’ has said makes me think any differently.

I do not feel I ‘blindly’ follow orders, I question orders, but still follow orders.

I have been arguing that I do not feel the nurses or the pharmacist should be held accountable. I don’t think they should. I don’t think everyone who disagrees with me is bias. I think that the only argument that has been put forth as to why ‘everyone’ feels these pharmacists and nurses need to have their licenses taken away is because ‘everyone’ thinks they should have known better. Because ‘everyone’ is assuming these people didn’t ask questions and ‘blindly’ followed orders. And I just cannot believe that 48 pharmacists and nurses didn’t ask ANY QUESTIONS and followed these orders. What I can believe is that questions were asked and explained away to staff. But then ‘everyone’ is saying that you can’t trust your employer, you have to choose what is right.....however we are going to trust what the hospital internal review board has to report about this incident.....?

It’s the stop and full stop. I get that you don’t agree with me, and you think that because ‘everyone’ else here has agreed with you that I should, but I don’t. And I’m not an idiot because I don’t agree, I don’t feel that I’m practicing poorly or unsafely as a nurse....although I can tell that’s how you feel.

35 minutes ago, KalipsoRed21 said:

I do disagree with ‘everyone’ in this matter and nothing ‘everyone’ has said makes me think any differently.

Fine

I do not feel I ‘blindly’ follow orders, I question orders, but still follow orders.

Fine. But why continue to carry out orders you don't feel are right? Do you have a limit? It is OK to not follow an order if you genuinely feel it is unsafe. It is your duty to not follow it if it will harm the patient.

I have been arguing that I do not feel the nurses or the pharmacist should be held accountable. I don’t think they should. I don’t think everyone who disagrees with me is bias. I think that the only argument that has been put forth as to why ‘everyone’ feels these pharmacists and nurses need to have their licenses taken away is because ‘everyone’ thinks they should have known better.

Because they should have, especially with all the warnings such as the pyxis alarming with each pulled dose out of the norm or excessive and the fact the doctor wrote them to avoid being corrected by pharmacy. There were several red flags.

Because ‘everyone’ is assuming these people didn’t ask questions and ‘blindly’ followed orders. And I just cannot believe that 48 pharmacists and nurses didn’t ask ANY QUESTIONS and followed these orders.

But nurses and pharmacists did, hence why it was finally pushed to the level it was. What we don't know is how many others brought it to management and were fired, silenced, or left on their own to avoid losing their licenses. There were questions asked. But if like you've been arguing, maybe they gave up asking and just went along because the doctor wrote the order.

What I can believe is that questions were asked and explained away to staff. But then ‘everyone’ is saying that you can’t trust your employer, you have to choose what is right.....however we are going to trust what the hospital internal review board has to report about this incident.....?

So forget the patients who were killed and not at end of life? Forget the doctors actions? Just forget it all and let everyone go on as usual? I don't get what your gripe is here because it's done, he's caught, and people still lost their lives.

It’s the stop and full stop.

So you decided to give me a label of being an *** because you don't like the words I use? But I'm the *** here huh? OK ?

I get that you don’t agree with me, and you think that because ‘everyone’ else here has agreed with you that I should, but I don’t.

Fine. You don't have to agree but if no one who's been practicing a while agrees with you and we're all saying it's our duty to protect patients and not blindly follow orders then maybe YOU should reevaluate your stance instead of trying to talk everyone to death into changing theirs. If you don't want to, fine but don't keep beating an undead horse trying to kill it with a flower instead of a stick.

And I’m not an idiot because I don’t agree, I don’t feel that I’m practicing poorly or unsafely as a nurse....although I can tell that’s how you feel.

I never said any of that, that's how YOU feel about yourself but go off though. You can't ascribe a mentality to me and give me flack because you have self esteem issues. How that work? So basically it isn't the stop/full stop it's just the fact you already have some fictitious gripe in your head anyway so your interactions with me are based upon that. Interesting. ?

Either way, OK. My life will go on.

4 minutes ago, KalipsoRed21 said:

And I’m not an idiot because I don’t agree, I don’t feel that I’m practicing poorly or unsafely as a nurse....although I can tell that’s how you feel.

So what you are saying then is if a doctor ordered you to administer Vecuronium to a patient and immediately extubate a patient you would question it but go ahead and do it if he gave you a good enough explanation? Not trying to be contrary just trying to wrap my head around your viewpoint.

I wish people would use the rules of debate instead of personal attacks.

Maybe we can agree that nurses have a lot of responsibility and if working in an environment with an administration that is so disconnected that they don't address issues like this then those nurses better get out of that environment.

That is my recommendation.

Specializes in Critical Care.
On 7/23/2019 at 2:47 PM, Wuzzie said:

Muno, the problem is that some of the families have denied that their loved one was transitioning to comfort care. I don’t have the reference in front of me but I’ll see if I can find it for you.

I think you're referring to reporting that some of the family members later discovered that what they were told about their family members prognosis may not be accurate, and had they known that may not have chosen comfort Care. But according to the hospital and the reporting, all the patients in question had transitioned to comfort measures only.

Specializes in Critical Care.
On 7/23/2019 at 4:04 PM, NurseBlaq said:

*Long sigh ? See above.

the hospital statement was that he violated their policy which is to only give the amount of medication indicated for comfort, and that they determined the doses were excessive based solely on the amount with the assumption that these amounts of medications are never required to achieve adequate comfort in a terminal wean patient which isn't correct, I'm still not clear if that's what you disagree with.