Ohio Hospital Fires 23 After Fentanyl Overdose Deaths

A hospital in Ohio recently fired 23 physicians, nurses and pharmacists after 25 patients died from excessive doses of fentanyl. In addition, 48 nurses and pharmacists were reported to state licensing boards for their roles in the overdoses. Nurses Headlines News

On July 12, 2019, Mount Carmel Health System in Columbus, Ohio, announced the firing of 23 employees, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists and managers. The terminations were related to the deaths of 29 critically ill patients from fentanyl administered during hospitalization that resulted in overdoses. Additionally, the hospital’s chief executive officer announced he would be stepping down and the executive vice president and chief clinical officer would retire in late September. These events are centered around the alleged criminal activity of William Husel, DO, an intensive care physician practicing at Mount Carmel from 2013 until the end of 2018.

The Details

Dr. Husel started working at Mount Carmel in 2013 and during his employment, potentially fatal doses of fentanyl were ordered and administered to 29 of his patients. According to the hospital’s internal investigation, this included five patients whose conditions could potentially improve.. The investigation also concluded six additional patients were overdosed on fentanyl, however, it was not likely the cause of their deaths.

The affected patients were critically ill and their families had requested that all life-saving measures be stopped. While the fentanyl was ordered as a comfort measure, the doses far exceeded the amount needed for palliation. Patients received fentanyl doses as high as 2,000 micrograms, midazolam as high as 10 milligrams and several patients were also given dilaudid doses up to 10mg.

Dr. Husel has been charged with murder in the deaths of 25 patients and has entered a plea of not guilty.

Failed Safeguards

Although Dr. Husel provided the order, physicians do not practice in silos. Others played a part, many unknowingly, in administering the excess doses and safeguards to protect patients were either ignored or did not exist. These include:

  • A formal report was received related to Dr. Husel’s care on October 25, 2018, however, Dr. Husel was not removed from patient care until November 21, 2019. During this time, three patients died from potentially fatal doses of medication ordered by the doctor.
  • Layers of medical protocols were overlooked or did not exist.
    • Medications obtained through electronic drug dispensing cabinet by nurses using the override function that avoided warnings
    • Orders verified by pharmacists after administration and some overridden doses bypassed the pharmacists altogether.
  • No system in place to audit or track the amount of medications ordered, including fentanyl, prior to the first formal complaint in October 2018
  • Instances of a nurse or pharmacist raising questions about the ordered doses, but the concerns did not make it up to the higher level administrators.

Mount Carmel Health System reported 48 nurses and pharmacists to state licensing boards. The reported individuals face disciplinary actions ranging from reprimand and fines to permanent revocation.

Response By Ohio Board of Nursing

In March, the Ohio Board of Nursing sent letters to 25 nurses who administered the drugs ordered by Husel. The letters outlined state law violations based on the nurse:

  • Knowing or should have known the drugs would be harmful
  • No documentation orders were questioned or that they consulted with others involved in the patient's care.

The nursing board also questioned the use of paralytics without nursing documentation to support the clinical need. In one case, the nurse failed to question the removal of a breathing tube after a paralytic had been administered.

Corrective Actions

To address gaps in standardized procedures, policies and safeguards, Mount Carmel Health Systems implemented a detailed action plan. Examples include:

  • Adding protocols to set maximum doses for pain medications in the electronic medical record
  • Implementing an escalation policy for deviations in pain administration protocols:
  • Restricting the ability to bypass pharmacy review of medication orders
  • Increasing staff education on end of life care
  • Implementing initiatives to ensure patient medication safety

Civil Suits

Numerous families brought civil actions for the loss of loved ones given the excessive fentanyl doses. To date, reported settlements range from $200,000 to $700,000 and total 4.5 million.

What are your thoughts on the events at Mount Carmel? Where do you see safeguards failing in your area of practice?

Interested in reading more about this story?

Could Mount Carmel Deaths Have Been Prevented?

Ohio Doctor Charged With Killing 25 Patients in Fentanyl Overdoses

Mount Carmel Health Systems FAQ Related to Overdose Investigation

Specializes in Surgical Specialty Clinic - Ambulatory Care.
Just now, Luchador said:

Well I just finished my first year, so you're wrong

You said ANY first year RN. I have mentored a few, so no. It is presumptuous of you to think that all RNs received the same education you have. As I said of my own education, I started IVs on a computer with a mouse and never did one until I was a New grad. And I wasn’t good at it until I started in the ER 4 years later.

Specializes in Surgical Specialty Clinic - Ambulatory Care.
3 minutes ago, TriciaJ said:

In the interest of space I didn't quote the whole rambling diatribe. Nowhere have I advocated that those at the top get a free pass. The fact is that licensed professionals can and do get held accountable for their own practice. "Just following orders" will not save your livelihood.

Hospitals can threaten your license all they want but it's the BON that determines this. Nurses are placed in Catch-22 situations all the time. Personally, I've always been more willing to risk my job than my license. I could always wait tables until I find another nursing job. If I lose my license, I'm looking at waiting tables forever.

Of course it isn't always easy to stand up for what's right. Of course there are still repercussions. But what is the alternative? Sometimes you have to pick your poison.

We've all been in situations where we were intimidated, threatened, desperately needed the income, were working short-staffed, etc. etc. We can cut one another all the slack you want. Unfortunately the BON, legal system and general public are not always very understanding. As individual nurses, we need to be painfully aware of that every minute, and be prepared to govern ourselves accordingly.

The exploitation of the integrity of healthcare professionals leads to this constant loop where we are held accountable for everything. As a nurse my job is to take the order, clarify the order if I have a concern, and administer the orders. Because these 48 individuals didn’t chart, “contacted physician to clarify dose” when they probably did, means they should loose their license? I had an order to give 1000mg of prednisone to a patient once. I called and clarified that was real, can’t really remember if I charted that I did. 1000mg of prednisone doesn’t really seem safe when I normally give 10-40mg. But that was the order, I clarified that was the order, and I did it. That is the nurses’ responsibility, nothing more.

Specializes in Psych, Corrections, Med-Surg, Ambulatory.
5 minutes ago, KalipsoRed21 said:

The exploitation of the integrity of healthcare professionals leads to this constant loop where we are held accountable for everything. As a nurse my job is to take the order, clarify the order if I have a concern, and administer the orders. Because these 48 individuals didn’t chart, “contacted physician to clarify dose” when they probably did, means they should loose their license? I had an order to give 1000mg of prednisone to a patient once. I called and clarified that was real, can’t really remember if I charted that I did. 1000mg of prednisone doesn’t really seem safe when I normally give 10-40mg. But that was the order, I clarified that was the order, and I did it. That is the nurses’ responsibility, nothing more.

I'm not talking "should"; I'm talking "is". I think we've all expressed about all the opinions we can based on the information available. Now, just like the case, we see how it plays out.

There used to be a member on this site called Risk Manager who would give us the legal skinny on these issues. I haven't seen him around for quite some time. Wish he was still around to weigh in.

Specializes in OR, Nursing Professional Development.
12 hours ago, KalipsoRed21 said:

It is a nurse and pharmacist’s job to follow the orders of the physician.

I would absolutely love to see that in a state's nurse practice act. But I won't hold my breath waiting, because it's not there. Nurses are held to the expectations they will provide prudent nursing care, which means knowing appropriate dosages and reasons to give meds.

Specializes in Critical Care.
4 hours ago, KalipsoRed21 said:
10 hours ago, Rose_Queen said:

It's absolutely within the scope of an RN to refuse to carry out an order they believe is inappropriate, it's not only allowed it's required by our license to refuse to carry out such an order. This is a common requirement of all states' practice acts.

Specializes in Critical Care.
20 hours ago, NurseBlaq said:

The nurses have active licenses now, doesn't mean they'll make it out of this unscathed. Ditto for the pharmacists. The Dr won't be so lucky in OH. Also, I know how palliative care/hospice works, especially in OH. I have an OH license. I also know many nurses and docs who lost licenses in OH. The OH BON doesn't play. Additionally, him touting Cleveland Clinic as his chip on his shoulder won't go over so well either. The Clinic takes their rep serious!

I also worked on vent units and my grandparents were hospice/palliative in OH so you're preaching to the choir on how this works. Most docs don't order large one time doses to kill off patients no matter how you explain it, especially since they also take into account giving extended family time to come say goodbyes or giving families time to come to terms with patient deaths. Also, not all patients are at imminent death status when they go on palliative/hospice care, so no it's not normal to give large doses, especially of fentanyl, and especially when there's a massive lawsuit in OH right now about narcotics.

Also, directly from the hospital's website regarding this doctor and his prescribing practices

https://www.mountcarmelhealth.com/about-us/facts/faqs

IE The dosages weren't standard practice by any means.

You're correct that not all palliative patients require large doses of medications for symptom management, conversely not all patients only require relatively small doses. There is no such thing as a defined excessive dose in end-of-life symptom management, it's completely patient specific, I've had patients that only receive 2mg of morphine through the entire process, and I've patients requiring a combination of Dilaudid (at 100mg per hour) with a ketamine potentiator, versed, palliative dose decadron, precede, and despite that still require palliative sedation with Propofol, so the hospital's assertion that such a limit exists shows a poor understanding of the practice standards in question.

The Physician in question got on the hospital's radar for what appear to be legitimate reasons, but then, as hospital administrators sometimes do, there was an assumption that all of his practice was wildly inappropriate. There are reasonable explanations for the dosages these patient's received, and no details have been provided that would rule out these explanations, so at this point it wouldn't be accurate to assume the 40-some nurses and pharmacists named by the hospital were all grossly negligent.

2 hours ago, MunoRN said:

There is no such thing as a defined excessive dose in end-of-life symptom management, it's completely patient specific,..... so the hospital's assertion that such a limit exists shows a poor understanding of the practice standards in question.

The Physician in question got on the hospital's radar for what appear to be legitimate reasons, but then, as hospital administrators sometimes do, there was an assumption that all of his practice was wildly inappropriate. There are reasonable explanations for the dosages these patient's received, and no details have been provided that would rule out these explanations, so at this point it wouldn't be accurate to assume the 40-some nurses and pharmacists named by the hospital were all grossly negligent.

At this point you're arguing for the sake of being right. The hospital said he violated their policy. Stop. They fired individuals and thoroughly investigated Dr Death and stuck by their rulings. Stop. You're personal experience is irrelevant to this hospital's policies and what's standard practice in their facility. Stop. Lastly, you're not the only one who has an understanding of hospice/palliative care and familiarity with the meds you listed. Full stop.

So again, what you think is right/wrong is irrelevant because after their thorough investigation and their policy and the fact he circumvented pharmacists means YOU are wrong here. It's not up for discussion. You can't deem a their medical community has "a poor understanding of the practice standards in question" just to make your understanding be correct. My gawd, let it go and get over yourself. ?

Specializes in Travel, Home Health, Med-Surg.
On 7/20/2019 at 9:56 AM, TriciaJ said:

You're right. We aren't robots. We are capable of autonomous thought and action. Yes, you're right; hospitals are money-making corporations. They often throw safety to the wind and get away with whatever they can. When they are caught, they look for people to throw under the bus.

That is why it is vitally important that we as individuals insist on following our own inner compass. Going with the flow only makes life easier in the moment. It only protects your paycheque today. It is not ultimately safer to go along with the group. The group (or the corporation) will not reward this loyalty when their own feet are to the fire.

Exactly!!!

We (as nurses) are paid, and it is our job and responsibility, to know which drugs can be given with other drugs, and which doses are safe and appropriate for not just a patient but a specific patient based on their history/diagnosis etc. These are very large doses. I have given very large doses (Oncology/palliative/end of life) but I (as the nurse administering) have always taken appropriate steps to ensure safety even with hospice/end of life care. Yes, it is a fine line between providing enough meds to ensure comfort without hastening/causing death and although I am sure there might be some cross over at times it is not our place to purposefully cause death (which it sounds like might have been going on here, hence the murder charges against the MD and also one article states the high dose meds were ordered prior to talking to the family about DNR etc). Lets just say I would not want to be in any of those nurses shoes right now having to explain this, don't know that they have any good answers unless their attempts to clarify are well documented. I agree that some patients will need large doses and some small doses but there needs to be appropriate documentation. I remember one patient that I gave a very large dose (of pain meds), I clarified with the MD, checked the med hx, home meds, past MAR's etc and documented very well. I hope that these nurses were very careful. I have also told new nurses, they may fire you but you will still have your license. I cannot tell you how many times I have refused to give a med bc of safety or policy reason even though it did cause a problem for me. Told MD s/he can give but I cannot (sometimes they gave and sometimes they did not). Told a manager once (after back and forth) that I would give but I was going to chart that the the Manager told me it was OK despite this/that.. Manager changed their mind real quick, go figure (I was hoping the manager wasn't going to call my bluff!) Yes, the group/corp will not think twice about throwing the nurse (or anyone else) under the bus. And, of course it is not just about us, it is about what is best for the patient!

Specializes in Surgical Specialty Clinic - Ambulatory Care.
53 minutes ago, Daisy4RN said:

Yes, the group/corp will not think twice about throwing the nurse (or anyone else) under the bus. And, of course it is not just about us, it is about what is best for the patient!

I re read my state act today as I still see this as a doctor issue/Administration over look and not one 40+ nurses should be held accountable for. My state act says I can delegate nursing tasks and I responsible for implementing the plan of care and explaining it to the patient. But no where in there did it say it was okay for me to refuse to preform an order. It said I could refuse to delegate nursing tasks.

“The Corp/group will it think twice about throwing the nurse under the bus....It is not about us it is about the patient.” My argument would be that if you read the article documented concerns about this physician were made by nurses and pharmacists A YEAR before any action was taken. This article and we are focusing on what the nurses and pharmacists should have done. Which is what we always do. Attack each other in our righteous ‘knowing’ of being a good professional. And while we do this the higher ups who ignored these complaints by nurses and pharmacists get away scott free. The doctor gets accused of murder and 40+ people loose their license but to me the people who created this problem suffer no consequences and get to live on to do it another day. Until the balance of power is more even I’m not pointing my finger at the people stuck in a situation created by the wealthy who got away because ‘it wasn’t our responsibility to stop this doctor, the nurses and pharmacists are the ones who have to live up to the standards of their professions....not me. But hey, I’ll go ahead and punish myself by retiring early.” Really?! This is how those assholes get away with this *** every time!!! And here we fall into it again by pointing out why these professionals screwed up and didn’t live up to the expectations of their field when we only know part of the story about the situations they were put in. Gawd, please look at the bigger picture!

Specializes in OR, Nursing Professional Development.
27 minutes ago, KalipsoRed21 said:

I re read my state act today as I still see this as a doctor issue/Administration over look and not one 40+ nurses should be held accountable for. My state act says I can delegate nursing tasks and I responsible for implementing the plan of care and explaining it to the patient. But no where in there did it say it was okay for me to refuse to preform an order. It said I could refuse to delegate nursing tasks.

But does it state to blindly follow physician or advanced practice providers' orders? No, because nurses don't blindly follow orders. They need to think! Nurses can and have been disciplined for following a medication order when they knew the order was inappropriate.

Specializes in Travel, Home Health, Med-Surg.
44 minutes ago, KalipsoRed21 said:

I re read my state act today as I still see this as a doctor issue/Administration over look and not one 40+ nurses should be held accountable for. My state act says I can delegate nursing tasks and I responsible for implementing the plan of care and explaining it to the patient. But no where in there did it say it was okay for me to refuse to preform an order. It said I could refuse to delegate nursing tasks.

“The Corp/group will it think twice about throwing the nurse under the bus....It is not about us it is about the patient.” My argument would be that if you read the article documented concerns about this physician were made by nurses and pharmacists A YEAR before any action was taken. This article and we are focusing on what the nurses and pharmacists should have done. Which is what we always do. Attack each other in our righteous ‘knowing’ of being a good professional. And while we do this the higher ups who ignored these complaints by nurses and pharmacists get away scott free. The doctor gets accused of murder and 40+ people loose their license but to me the people who created this problem suffer no consequences and get to live on to do it another day. Until the balance of power is more even I’m not pointing my finger at the people stuck in a situation created by the wealthy who got away because ‘it wasn’t our responsibility to stop this doctor, the nurses and pharmacists are the ones who have to live up to the standards of their professions....not me. But hey, I’ll go ahead and punish myself by retiring early.” Really?! This is how those assholes get away with this *** every time!!! And here we fall into it again by pointing out why these professionals screwed up and didn’t live up to the expectations of their field when we only know part of the story about the situations they were put in. Gawd, please look at the bigger picture!

You most certainly can (and it is your responsibility to) question and when appropriate refuse any intervention including medication administration. So you are saying (after receiving MD order) you would give 2000mg of fentanyl?

I am not attacking anyone! The individual nurses will have to answer for their individual practice and prove that they acted as any prudent nurse should have in that given situation. This applies to all nurses in all situations. I point this out bc one cannot blindly follow MD orders and then claim (after it goes to $*#@) "well the MD ordered it". It doesnt work that way! Dont get me wrong, i do blame the MD and admin but my point is that they will not back you up, even if you are right. In this case some management was held accountable but that doesnt usually happen and esp if/when it was a nurse error/bad judgement call. We are not talking about delegating tasks to others, we are talking about the nurse professional role and responsibilities. After many years being a nurse in many different roles/facilities believe me i get the big picture, and part of that is always always always CYA.

While working in the ER I have refused to give a medication ordered by a Physician who was called to come in to admit a patient but did not want to come in. He asked me to look in the PDR for the correct dose so he could order it. The ER Physician heard the conversation and got involved. What the Physician had ordered was 3 times the amount that should have been ordered. I refused to give the medication. The Nursing Supervisor was called and ended up taking over care of that patient as I let her know between the admitting doctor, ER physician, Pharmacy, poison control who was called I refused to be a part of it. I was sent home. Met with the Nursing director, Director of the Hospital, Pharmacy Director was there. After being threatened with dismissal. I let them know I would gladly go public with the facts that if a compepent Physician had came in to the Hospital and did admit ordered as usual I may have followed his ordered but I refused to work out of my scope of practice to look up medication in the PDR to give a Physician the dosage of a medication to treat a life threatening over dose. Ended up staying 11 years in the ER.