Ohio Hospital Fires 23 After Fentanyl Overdose Deaths

A hospital in Ohio recently fired 23 physicians, nurses and pharmacists after 25 patients died from excessive doses of fentanyl. In addition, 48 nurses and pharmacists were reported to state licensing boards for their roles in the overdoses. Nurses Headlines News

On July 12, 2019, Mount Carmel Health System in Columbus, Ohio, announced the firing of 23 employees, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists and managers. The terminations were related to the deaths of 29 critically ill patients from fentanyl administered during hospitalization that resulted in overdoses. Additionally, the hospital’s chief executive officer announced he would be stepping down and the executive vice president and chief clinical officer would retire in late September. These events are centered around the alleged criminal activity of William Husel, DO, an intensive care physician practicing at Mount Carmel from 2013 until the end of 2018.

The Details

Dr. Husel started working at Mount Carmel in 2013 and during his employment, potentially fatal doses of fentanyl were ordered and administered to 29 of his patients. According to the hospital’s internal investigation, this included five patients whose conditions could potentially improve.. The investigation also concluded six additional patients were overdosed on fentanyl, however, it was not likely the cause of their deaths.

The affected patients were critically ill and their families had requested that all life-saving measures be stopped. While the fentanyl was ordered as a comfort measure, the doses far exceeded the amount needed for palliation. Patients received fentanyl doses as high as 2,000 micrograms, midazolam as high as 10 milligrams and several patients were also given dilaudid doses up to 10mg.

Dr. Husel has been charged with murder in the deaths of 25 patients and has entered a plea of not guilty.

Failed Safeguards

Although Dr. Husel provided the order, physicians do not practice in silos. Others played a part, many unknowingly, in administering the excess doses and safeguards to protect patients were either ignored or did not exist. These include:

  • A formal report was received related to Dr. Husel’s care on October 25, 2018, however, Dr. Husel was not removed from patient care until November 21, 2019. During this time, three patients died from potentially fatal doses of medication ordered by the doctor.
  • Layers of medical protocols were overlooked or did not exist.
    • Medications obtained through electronic drug dispensing cabinet by nurses using the override function that avoided warnings
    • Orders verified by pharmacists after administration and some overridden doses bypassed the pharmacists altogether.
  • No system in place to audit or track the amount of medications ordered, including fentanyl, prior to the first formal complaint in October 2018
  • Instances of a nurse or pharmacist raising questions about the ordered doses, but the concerns did not make it up to the higher level administrators.

Mount Carmel Health System reported 48 nurses and pharmacists to state licensing boards. The reported individuals face disciplinary actions ranging from reprimand and fines to permanent revocation.

Response By Ohio Board of Nursing

In March, the Ohio Board of Nursing sent letters to 25 nurses who administered the drugs ordered by Husel. The letters outlined state law violations based on the nurse:

  • Knowing or should have known the drugs would be harmful
  • No documentation orders were questioned or that they consulted with others involved in the patient's care.

The nursing board also questioned the use of paralytics without nursing documentation to support the clinical need. In one case, the nurse failed to question the removal of a breathing tube after a paralytic had been administered.

Corrective Actions

To address gaps in standardized procedures, policies and safeguards, Mount Carmel Health Systems implemented a detailed action plan. Examples include:

  • Adding protocols to set maximum doses for pain medications in the electronic medical record
  • Implementing an escalation policy for deviations in pain administration protocols:
  • Restricting the ability to bypass pharmacy review of medication orders
  • Increasing staff education on end of life care
  • Implementing initiatives to ensure patient medication safety

Civil Suits

Numerous families brought civil actions for the loss of loved ones given the excessive fentanyl doses. To date, reported settlements range from $200,000 to $700,000 and total 4.5 million.

What are your thoughts on the events at Mount Carmel? Where do you see safeguards failing in your area of practice?

Interested in reading more about this story?

Could Mount Carmel Deaths Have Been Prevented?

Ohio Doctor Charged With Killing 25 Patients in Fentanyl Overdoses

Mount Carmel Health Systems FAQ Related to Overdose Investigation

Specializes in Critical Care.
11 minutes ago, NurseBlaq said:

Keep the condescension. You've made a whole thesis on assumption, what you claim others are doing. Secondly, it was more than one nurse, it was several, and pharmacists, and the MD was charged so why keep speaking as though it's one nurse when it's many. What's known is they medicated patients who died, a whole 25 of them. That is known, that's why they were fired and lost their license. Why you keep pretending like it's not true because YOU don't have intricate details is the problem here. They were wrong, full stop.

Just because someone says "shut up and follow orders...... you are JUST a nurse" doesn't mean it has to be accepted and all common sense goes out the window. If you've seen and heard this then you were in the wrong environment. I would have left it that moment, but that's just me.

The fact so many patients died and nurses medicated them resulting in their deaths doesn't excuse their complicity in this. They willingly went along with the program, despite knowing it was wrong. I can't argue on their behalf. There's no justification for this. This is the Vandy nurse on a mass scale with a psycho doctor.

To clarify, it's been reported that all of these patients had become comfort-measures-only and were transitioning from aggressive critical care and were terminal, these were not otherwise good-prognosis patients who only died because of the medications they received.

Just now, MunoRN said:

To clarify, it's been reported that all of these patients had become comfort-measures-only and were transitioning from aggressive critical care and were terminal, these were not otherwise good-prognosis patients who only died because of the medications they received.

I get that. It doesn't excuse the fact that he singularly decided it was time to be Dr Kevorkian without consulting the patients and/or their families. I'm well versed in palliative and hospice care.

2 minutes ago, RN-husband-MD said:

Can anyone else comment as to whether or not this really is Canadian law?

My understanding is that the defense, "I was just following orders" is not a defense under the Nuremberg Principles--to which Canada is a signatory. These were established when Nazi soldiers committed war crimes. Many of these soldiers could prove to have met the 3 factors outlines above.

I don't know about Canada but it's definitely not a valid excuse in the States.

3 minutes ago, ZenLover said:

Excuse me? I don’t have to keep anything except a respectful tongue in my head. Why? Because this isn’t my personal battle. I have an opinion. Maybe not worth anything, but I was never looking to make enemies and I will not be replying to again for fear of further aggravating the situation.

My replies have been directed, not towards the story, but the direct statements here attacking s nurse for extubation after giving a paralytic. I simply said what you did....she didn’t do it alone and we should not be out to crucify one person or claims that it would never be any of us. We don’t know the full story. The stories printed don’t give those details for a reason. Where you involved? You seem awfully hot and angry. So I will just leave you with a thank you for providing a different perspective.

See, there's that passive aggressive condescension again.

No, I wasn't involved.

Again, for the umpteeenth time, it's more than one nurse. The fact you keep alluding it it being a singular nurse or incident means either you didn't read the article or understand it.

I never said she didn't do it alone and leave it there because I don't know who "she" is as it's many. I said THEY, meaning everyone involved, are justifiably wrong based upon what we know.

No one "crucified one person" because, again, there are many.

Appears you're arguing the nurse case when this is in Ohio and contain several medical professionals, not just nurses. Your whole argument is confusing because you have variables that are nonexistent and/or irrelevant to your point. It's hard to follow.

Lastly, how are you being condescending and passive aggressive AND playing victim at the same time? How you legit make the statement: "I will not be replying to again for fear of further aggravating the situation." when your very first response to me was dismissive and hateful, and this quoted post you claim I'm angry and I must be the imaginary singular nurse you think everyone is bashing, which by the way isn't the case either.

Make it make sense. ?

Specializes in Critical Care.
5 minutes ago, NurseBlaq said:

I get that. It doesn't excuse the fact that he singularly decided it was time to be Dr Kevorkian without consulting the patients and/or their families. I'm well versed in palliative and hospice care.

According to the reporting he had discussed and the families agreed to transition to comfort care, I would agree his descriptions of the patients' conditions to family lacked accuracy, but their conditions appear to have all been acutely terminal. Other than potentially excessively erring on the side of comfort vs a potentially unnecessarily slow meticulous and painstaking process, how do you feel this differed from 'normally' practiced end-of-life care in critically ill terminal patients?

Ideally we know what that exact required dose is to provide adequate comfort, but since we typically don't, the process will inevitably involve either insufficient symptom management or excessive symptom management.

Just now, MunoRN said:

According to the reporting he had discussed and the families agreed to transition to comfort care, I would agree his descriptions of the patients' conditions to family lacked accuracy, but their conditions appear to have all been acutely terminal. Other than potentially excessively erring on the side of comfort vs a potentially unnecessarily slow meticulous and painstaking process, how do you feel this differed from 'normally' practiced end-of-life care in critically ill terminal patients?

Ideally we know what that exact required dose is to provide adequate comfort, but since we typically don't, the process will inevitably involve either insufficient symptom management or excessive symptom management.

If that was the case, no one would be fired, licenses wouldn't be lost, and he wouldn't be facing jail time. Was his documentation not accurate or did he not tell families the whole truth? Did they not understand?

I've never excessively medicated a patient to the point of immediate death after one dose simply because they're palliative/hospice. It's usually a process. Patients don't suffer because they're asleep most of the time but they don't die in one to three doses either unless they were already on their way out and even then it's most times they pass away in their sleep.

We all know the side effects of narcs. It appears he ordered doses that were so high as to make sure they would pass after the initial dose. End of life care is to keep them from suffering, not kill them as soon as possible.

Specializes in Critical Care.
48 minutes ago, NurseBlaq said:

If that was the case, no one would be fired, licenses wouldn't be lost, and he wouldn't be facing jail time. Was his documentation not accurate or did he not tell families the whole truth? Did they not understand?

I've never excessively medicated a patient to the point of immediate death after one dose simply because they're palliative/hospice. It's usually a process. Patients don't suffer because they're asleep most of the time but they don't die in one to three doses either unless they were already on their way out and even then it's most times they pass away in their sleep.

We all know the side effects of narcs. It appears he ordered doses that were so high as to make sure they would pass after the initial dose. End of life care is to keep them from suffering, not kill them as soon as possible.

The nurses involved are still listed as having "active" licenses by the Ohio Nursing Board. The Physician displayed a lack of prudent practice in assessing and describing the condition of these patients, but most of the public furor appears based on a poor understanding of what normally happens in these situations.

Outside of critical care and transitioning from aggressive intensive care to full withdrawl of support palliative care is typically as you describe, a gradual process that lends itself to more fastidious and gradual titration of symptom management. Transitioning from maximum ventilator support in a patient who would have otherwise passed a week or two ago, and who's respiratory function has only gotten worse since the point of likely death is not only significantly different from more traditional hospice care, it's not even really comparable.

Ideally after extubation you can find the amount of opiate required to adequately suppress respiratory drive to provide comfort, but it's not unusual that it's any amount of respiratory drive at all that causes suffering, and the required amount of respiratory drive suppression required is complete and total suppression of respiratory drive. Basically, any amount of an attempt to breathe causes suffering, so in order to ease suffering what's required to ensure the patient doesn't make any attempt to breathe at all.

Although I've had many a Doc order a single, massive dose of opiate to achieve this from the start, common practice is to keep doubling doses until sufficient symptom management is achieved. This often results in eventually getting to the cumulative dose the Doc directed originally, often within a matter of minutes, but with what in retrospect was an avoidable period of suffering, and the idea of just starting with that dose doesn't seem all that inappropriate.

22 minutes ago, MunoRN said:

The nurses involved are still listed as having "active" licenses by the Ohio Nursing Board. The Physician displayed a lack of prudent practice in assessing and describing the condition of these patients, but most of the public furor appears based on a poor understanding of what normally happens in these situations.

Outside of critical care and transitioning from aggressive intensive care to full withdrawl of support palliative care is typically as you describe, a gradual process that lends itself to more fastidious and gradual titration of symptom management. Transitioning from maximum ventilator support in a patient who would have otherwise passed a week or two ago, and who's respiratory function has only gotten worse since the point of likely death is not only significantly different from more traditional hospice care, it's not even really comparable.

Ideally after extubation you can find the amount of opiate required to adequately suppress respiratory drive to provide comfort, but it's not unusual that it's any amount of respiratory drive at all that causes suffering, and the required amount of respiratory drive suppression required is complete and total suppression of respiratory drive. Basically, any amount of an attempt to breathe causes suffering, so in order to ease suffering what's required to ensure the patient doesn't make any attempt to breathe at all.

Although I've had many a Doc order a single, massive dose of opiate to achieve this from the start, common practice is to keep doubling doses until sufficient symptom management is achieved. This often results in eventually getting to the cumulative dose the Doc directed originally, often within a matter of minutes, but with what in retrospect was an avoidable period of suffering, and the idea of just starting with that dose doesn't seem all that inappropriate.

The nurses have active licenses now, doesn't mean they'll make it out of this unscathed. Ditto for the pharmacists. The Dr won't be so lucky in OH. Also, I know how palliative care/hospice works, especially in OH. I have an OH license. I also know many nurses and docs who lost licenses in OH. The OH BON doesn't play. Additionally, him touting Cleveland Clinic as his chip on his shoulder won't go over so well either. The Clinic takes their rep serious!

I also worked on vent units and my grandparents were hospice/palliative in OH so you're preaching to the choir on how this works. Most docs don't order large one time doses to kill off patients no matter how you explain it, especially since they also take into account giving extended family time to come say goodbyes or giving families time to come to terms with patient deaths. Also, not all patients are at imminent death status when they go on palliative/hospice care, so no it's not normal to give large doses, especially of fentanyl, and especially when there's a massive lawsuit in OH right now about narcotics.

Also, directly from the hospital's website regarding this doctor and his prescribing practices

Quote

The doses ordered by Dr. Husel went far beyond providing medication for patient comfort; they were all excessive and most were potentially fatal.

https://www.mountcarmelhealth.com/about-us/facts/faqs

IE The dosages weren't standard practice by any means.

1 hour ago, ZenLover said:

My replies have been directed, not towards the story, but the direct statements here attacking s nurse for extubation after giving a paralytic. I simply said what you did....she didn’t do it alone .

Except it's the opposite. Most likely there was only one person that gave a paralytic and then actually removed the ventilator. Maybe 2.

Were hey bullied by doctor death? It certainly seems that way. Should this nurse have stood up for him or herself? Of course.

Specializes in Cath Lab, EP.

I see a lot of “Florence Nightingale” wannabes on here...trying to be self righteous. Judgemental AF. I think there are many details left out of this story (like duration of time the doses were delivered over)...but some people just aren’t smart enough to ask more questions.

But ya’ll sure do love to VILLIFY.

Maybe you should try supporting your peers rather than your administrators... I find my moral compass aligns with true north. How bout you????

Hospital Industrial Complex = Nazi Germany.

Get your mind right people.

Specializes in Cardiology.
10 minutes ago, sassyrn333 said:

I see a lot of “Florence Nightingale” wannabes on here...trying to be self righteous. Judgemental AF. I think there are many details left out of this story (like duration of time the doses were delivered over)...but some people just aren’t smart enough to ask more questions.

But ya’ll sure do love to VILLIFY.

Maybe you should try supporting your peers rather than your administrators... I find my moral compass aligns with true north. Hi bout you????

Hospital Industrial Complex = Nazi Germany.

Get your mind right people.

Not a fan of hospitals being compared to Nazi Germany. That word gets thrown around way too much in today’s society. I also dont think many people are defending administrators.

You are right, there needs to be more questions asked. Perhaps those will come down the line. The way the story makes it sound it sounds like these pts received those high doses at once. However, it isnt very clear and I would be hard pressed to think those nurses gave such high doses at once.

Specializes in Cath Lab, EP.

Oh, you don’t draw the conclusion of Nazi Germany = Hospital Industrial complex ? K. Enjoy living in your denial.