Vaccinations Rock! How to Get Parents to Think So

The author discusses how nurses can help parents understand the importance of vaccinations. Nurses Announcements Archive

Published

A few weeks ago a friend with a new grandchild whispered to me, "What am I going to do? My daughter doesn't want to get the baby vaccinated!" My dismay must have been evident as I spoke gently to her, "Oh Linda, I'm so sorry. What have you tried so far to convince her?" She went on to list her various tactics, everything from infomercial-style science to cajoling to arguing to demanding. Nothing was working. The baby had passed the time for its 2-month shots. The mother had even changed providers in order to find one that agreed to see her child without vaccinations.

What do we do as nurses? What is the best way to convince reluctant parents of the benefits of vaccination for all children? How do you talk to someone who is completely against vaccination and who believes the false news stories condemning their use?

Our tendency is to want to assign blame for the situation we find ourselves in as a society. How did we get where we are? What caused this sudden shift in vaccination usage? The causes would involve a long exploration of lots of studies and literature, but ultimately, parents have given birth to children in a time of deep distrust of the established way of doing things. That coupled with sensationalized stories of supposed harm from vaccinations may have led to drop in the numbers of children being vaccinated and to dangerous outbreaks of diseases like measles-once a rarity, now distressingly more common. Another factor pointed out by researchers is the fact that these childhood diseases, once common and dreaded passages of childhood, are now so uncommon that many parents have never witnessed the true misery they can inflict on a child and the potential sequelae. In their efforts to protect their child from harm, they mistakenly think that they are doing the best thing by not vaccinating.

The CDC does an impressive job with their easily accessible information on vaccination (Facts for Parents: For Parents of Infants and Young Children (birth through 6 years old) | CDC). Listing the 14 diseases that vaccines prevent before age 2, the CDC goes on to provide all the science and detail that parents might be interested in regarding those once common scourges: Chickenpox (Varicella), Diphtheria, Flu (Influenza), Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Hib, Measles, Mumps, Polio, Pneumococcal, Rotavirus, Rubella, Tetorifice, Whooping Cough (Pertussis).

So what's a nurse to do to counter this tsunami of non-compliance? How can we help our patients/parents understand the risks and benefits of vaccinations in a comprehensive way that promotes health for all children?

Stay respectful

Shaming and blaming are not great tools in our teaching toolkit. We have to acknowledge that just about every parent out there only wants what is ultimately best for their child. When we are less than professional we break the tenuous bridges of communication and miss out on an opportunity to offer that particular parent the benefit of our knowledge and expertise.

Listen with compassion to the parents' reasoning and motivation

Having open-ended conversations that allow for questions and answers has a chance of producing the desired outcome. When we listen, we build trust. When we build trust, we maximize the opportunity for success in being able to have our instruction received in a positive manner. This is easier to do when we remember that one of the contributing factors to the drop in level of inoculation may be the distrust between young parents and the established medical community.

Learn a few facts that can make an impression

One that I used several times this past flu season was the fact that children who were vaccinated for influenza got less sick than children who were not vaccinated and of those children who died, 74% had not had the vaccine (Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Against Pediatric Deaths: 21-214 | Articles | Pediatrics). The number of statistics and the complexity of their interpretation can make our arguments seem like so much white noise to parents who are already overwhelmed. If we keep our advice on topic, our information to the point, it is possible that we will avoid turning the parents' attention setting to "off" before we get started. Sometimes it seems like we can be our own worst enemies as we try to cover every possible scenario, every single number, every potential complication-all in an effort to be complete. Is it possible that this is one of those times when less is actually more?

Lay down the law

After California laid down laws making it tougher for parents to get exemptions, vaccination rates rose among incoming school-age children (Vaccination rate jumps in California after tougher inoculation law). As professional nurses, we can all speak to our state officials and our representatives about the need for stricter vaccination standards.

Make it clear

Zach Horne, a graduate student in psychology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign researched the link between information and change in behavior related to vaccinations: "What's going on with anti-vaccination parents, we think, is because they haven't seen kids with measles and mumps, those consequences aren't that real to them." (There's a surprisingly simple way to convince vaccine skeptics to reconsider - The Washington Post) Is it possible that because parents had never seen the devastating effects of the "Big 14" listed above, they were less likely to inoculate? Horne and others emphasize that more work needs to be done. Meanwhile, could it help to show some pictures? It is unclear but may be helpful.

As nurses, we are ambassadors for accurate scientific information. As we help spread the good news that vaccinations really do help kids, may we do it with kindness, respect and also thoroughness. My friend's grandchild remains unvaccinated, but the conversation continues and has really only just begun.

Joy Eastridge

Specializes in Adult Gerontology.

I am a nurse practitioner and it is appalling how many nurses are willing to jump on other nurses for a very personal decision. Many if not most of the studies done on vaccinations and medications in general are done by the pharmaceutical company who has created the drug. I would NEVER get the flu vaccine nor would I BERATE someone who did choose to get it. Nurses are the most beloved profession and yet our dirty little secret of judgement persists. You may want to critically read these studies as the Cochrane Reviews are simply pulling together all that is out there...they're not responsible for determining if the pharmaceutical industry hid, excluded or destroyed data or skewed statistics...and they're not responsible for calling out the doctors and scientists who are on the payroll of the pharmaceutical industry. It's kind of funny that the U.S. pays more for healthcare and gets less than good results AND we prescribe more pharmaceuticals including vaccinations than many countries combined.

I know as nurses we need to rely on more than anecdotal evidence but sometimes a personal story helps. My husband was diagnosed with ( and thankfully fully recovered from) HPV+ throat cancer. Had the HPV vaccine been available when he was of the age to receive it, he could have been spared the surgery, radiation and miserable recovery. He still suffers from recurring shingles which I credit to his impaired immune system during the radiation. He still has other side effects such as numbness on one side of his face, decreased saliva and taste differences. We are so grateful for the care he received and he is well again but all this never needs to happen today, at least with the HPV+ cancer. As a high school nurse, I repeat this story to every parent who declines the HPV vaccine.

Specializes in Med/Surg/Infection Control/Geriatrics.

I would have to respectfully disagree with you. It's not always wise to believe everything you read on the Internet. :)

Specializes in Mental Health, Gerontology, Palliative.
... My patients will be provided INFORMED CONSENT.

I'm all about informed consent. That is a patient is provided with the potential positives and the potential negatives of a proposed course of action

The issue i have with what antivaxxers constitute as informed consent is much of it comes from a study that has been disproven and that the study author was struck off for multiple ethics violations.

Also people talk about their right to make decisions for their children, I always end up thinking "what about your childs right to be free from easily preventable childhood diseases'

I would have to respectfully disagree with you. It's not always wise to believe everything you read on the Internet. :)

Who are you responding to in this post? Please use the quote function when you reply to a specific person or post.

Specializes in Public Health, TB.

Vaccines are the most studied pharmaceuticals of all. They of course go through all the levels of research. and then need approval from the FDA, the CDC and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) before they ever reach market. And even after they reach the public they are continually tracked and studied. ACIP, which is made up of researchers, physicians, nurses and lay people, meets three times a year to review new and current vaccines and schedules, where they examine tons of evidence.

I have had the great pleasure of meeting current and past ACIP members. They are to a person, smart, caring individuals who want nothing but the best for people, and most especially children. Many of the academics have seen and treated the gamut of vaccine preventable diseases. They can bring you to tears about babies struggling for breath, parents sitting vigil at the bedside of their ventilated children, and the results of meningococcal sepsis.

Vaccines save lives. Period.

Specializes in School Nursing.

This has been my go-to argument, "Would you rather lose a child because you don't vaccinate for protection, or lose a child because you tried to protect him with vaccination?"

Specializes in Mental Health, Gerontology, Palliative.

I was reading something this morning about a mum who got massively upset because her 19 year old daughter chose to go out and get all the shots they should have had as a kid.

"Those that do not know history are doomed to repeat it "

Please check out the history of vaccines before you condemn this loving grandmother. Google Dr. Alton Oschsner who publicly declared the polio vaccine as safe and then vaccinated his grandchildren resulting in the death of his grandson and his granddaughter contracted polio.

Musings from 2

Specializes in Public Health, TB.

If only the native people had known about coconut oil and colloidal silver before they were nearly wiped out by small pox and measles.

Small pox has been eradicated because of vaccines. Diphtheria, that used to be the number one killer of teenagers is unheard of in this country, because of vaccines. Parents don't fear sending their children to public swimming pools because of polio vaccine. Yes, there was a terrible incident in the 1950s where the vaccine was not properly attenuated, and a terrible lesson was learned. And now, polio is nearly eradicated. There are hopes that Hepatitis B, the major cause of liver cancer can be eradicated.

Sure, nutrition is important, but it is one component of preventative health.

"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge " Hosea 4:6

FTR. This scripture has nothing to do with anything being discussed here. It speaks to the lack of acknowledgment of God's law. More specifically the writer was saying that if you do not acknowledge God's law He will not acknowledge you. Shame on this poster who twists scripture to suit their purpose. It sullies the reputation of people who identify as Christian and flies in the face of the tenets of Christianity. You do not have the knowledge of God's purpose and it is utter hubris for you to think you do. Furthermore, this is a forum based in scientific evidence. It is not the place for you to espouse your religion or use it as a brickbat against those who disagree with your viewpoint. There are other avenues on this site for that and you are free to use them. Please do.

Specializes in Pediatrics Retired.
FTR. This scripture has nothing to do with anything being discussed here. It speaks to the lack of acknowledgment of God's law. More specifically the writer was saying that if you do not acknowledge God's law He will not acknowledge you. Shame on this poster who twists scripture to suit their purpose. It sullies the reputation of people who identify as Christian and flies in the face of the tenets of Christianity. You do not have the knowledge of God's purpose and it is utter hubris for you to think you do. Furthermore, this is a forum based in scientific evidence. It is not the place for you to espouse your religion or use it as a brickbat against those who disagree with your viewpoint. There are other avenues on this site for that and you are free to use them. Please do.

Hmmmm....Wuzzie, I am a Christian, and I have quoted scripture on this site, but your post has caused me to step back and take another look at what fits the subject and what might not fit the subject. It is easy to pull scripture from your quiver and sling it at someone you disagree with. So, thank you for this post and the reminder to use scripture in accordance to what God would approve of.

+ Add a Comment