"Shift goes to the lowest bidder..."

Nurses Activism

Published

This is NOT an advertisement; it is a copy of an article. Maybe it's just me, but I find it disgusting:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Online Shift Auction by Charles Townson and Catherine Whelchel April 2003 - Healthcare Information Many people today are eBay junkies, hooked on bidding and buying from home. We decided to use the same approach, in reverse, to help with nurse staffing at Spartanburg (S.C.) Regional Healthcare System.

Our information systems department set up a Web site where nurses can bid to work certain shifts. But in this case, the lowest bidder wins. For example, an employee might bid $40/hour to work an emergency department night shift. The next employee might bid $38/hour, and so on until the auction ends. The low bidder gets extra income and the healthcare system reaps benefits as well.

Online auctioning gives nurses options, flexibility and scheduling control, enabling them to choose desired shifts and work locations. Some of our nurses were doing extra shifts at other hospitals, and we wanted to give them the extra hours at their own facility while also covering shifts previously covered by agency nurses. Having our own nurses cover additional shifts would ensure a level of dedication and efficiency that could not be achieved with contract nurses.

Key players in planning the site were the system webmaster and nurse staffing coordinator for the internal float pool, with assistance from human resources and accounting. Guidelines were set to ensure that nurses would be qualified for the areas they bid on. The staffing coordinator placed some bids to test the site and resolve problems. Within weeks, the site was ready for use.

Pilot testing was set so only PRN (as-needed) RNs could bid, simplifying payroll issues during the trial period. At first, most shifts sold at the opening bid. In the first two months, only 12 shifts were bid on. But through word of mouth, our organization newsletter and letters to RNs homes, interest grew. Now, with the site in place for more than six months, 35 shifts have been put up for bid in a single week, with up to 10 bids on a shift.

After completion of the pilot phase, the site was opened to full and part-time RNs, and more than 150 have applied to use it. Another hospital in the system has also begun to use the application.

To use the site, nurses must have completed orientation and may not be under any disciplinary action or probation. Logins and passwords cannot be shared. Passwords are program-generated only after a completed online application is approved.

The auction is accessible at Spartanburg's site (http://www.spartanburgregional.com/employment/auction.htm). For the time being, employees cannot place bids while at work inside the system. They must have a unique e-mail address outside the system, which may be a limiting factor for nurses who do not have Internet capabilities at home.

The site is very easy to use. Nurses can search for open shifts by date or work area. The opening bid is set to less than what the hospital would pay to a nursing agency but in the range of what an agency would pay so we can compete with agencies while eliminating associated overhead costs. Rates are set in 50-cent increments to eliminate penny-by-penny bids.

Shifts appear on the site 17 days in advance. The winner is notified electronically 72 hours before the shift. Nurse managers may check to see if there is a bid for a given shift but, because of system security, cannot tell who has bid. At present, winners must call the staffing office to confirm the shift.

The site does not integrate with hospital systems, so payroll remains a manual check-request process since every rate is different. Personnel who oversee the site each day perform this check-and-balance procedure. As the site becomes more active, automatic feed into the payroll system will become a necessity. The positives far outweigh the costs of establishing and maintaining the auction site. More shifts are covered internally, by personnel who have a working relationship with the healthcare system. The site keeps technically savvy nurses engaged, and we hope that visiting the auction site will become part of their routine. Nurses can make extra money at a competitive rate and can schedule their time in advance.

We are considering adding LPNs and other positions to the auction site, and ancillary departments with staffing shortages, such as respiratory therapy and radiology, are also interested in trying out the system. The site has truly provided an innovative solution to our staffing complexities. It is a win-win-win situation: patients receive care, nurses have choices and the organizations saves agency expenditures. Charles Townson is chief operating officer and Catherine Whelchel is chief nursing officer, Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System, Spartanburg, S.C.

Copyright © 2003. The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved

I don't know if this hospital is still continuing this practice, I've since moved......I think it back fired (on them...ha!) because the nurses all agreed to not ever go below a certain rate.

Wrightgd---"But if I could outbid you for a shift, and I was willing to work for free, then the only concern anyone should have is that I provide competent care for my patients. I hope that is sincerely everyone's concern who has posted here... Not ego, not pride, not professionalism..."

So far off based can hardly contain the millions of words in my head. And how many other professions would be willing to act the same? My guess, none.

Groveling with thanks for filling positions with such 'creativity' so I don't have to work short handed after 'THEY" caused the very problem doesn't get the candy. Not for one minute do I believe this innovative marketing ploy was created for the benefit of bedside nurses. It IS all about money and in this case - the hospital is beneifiting. And, yes, I DO need money to live on. And that shouldn't in any way be in opposition to the compassionate,professional, competent, safe,knowlegable and prideful experienced way with which I care for my patients.

If they are offering these as extra shifts to the nurses who already work there, its actually overtime then, isnt it? So what happened to the time & half they should be getting for it?

I dont see that this kind of auction is necessary. There are hospitals all over the place that do not have bedside RN shortages - some even have waiting lists of nurses looking for jobs at those facilities. Because those facilities made a committment to nurses, have a culture that values/respects them, pays them what they are worth and improved their work environment, for starters.

Simple solutions and no gimmicks.

Specializes in MS Home Health.

If the pay was decent and if people agreed not to go to a lower wage I would do it in a heartbeat. I used to have to go floor to floor to sign overtime sheets if I wanted to pick up extra hours. I usually worked 50 to 60 hours per week. I needed to as a single mom. If the pay was good I would do it. Like I said I would not go below what a good wage would be. If someone undercut me so be it. Then I don't think it would work. Personally I can't see someone bidding below a reasonable wage. Paying a person who is on staff their hourly wage is cheaper than agency and much better for patient care.

Go ahead now people, flame me LOL.

renerian

Specializes in ER.

I don't see why any nurse would bid so low that he/she was getting less than overtime pay. If the need is so great that they are willing to pay $50/h if necessary to cover each shift there must be enough shifts so that bidding below regular pay is unnecessary to get extra hours.

I can see that if there wasn't such a shortage of nurses that the pay might be poor, but we all know hospitals are crying for nurses. This new system could convince TPTB that if they raised their hourly wages by $5-$10/h they might get more people willing to become regular staff, and hve less of a shortage. Seems win-win to me.

Can anyone see this evolving into units with mostly LPN staff and one RN willing to supervise? I guess I see this to some extent already in my area. This is a good plan for the good LPN's out there, who CAN undercut our wage... and administration likes that, obviously. PRN RN's are canceled while FT or PRN LVN's are on OT....the only thing that stops this is when my fellow RN's stand together and say NO, we need more RN's on the unit tonight.

And what is to stop low bidder staff (who may be desperate to get the hours) from bumping the rest of us completely off the schedule with a lower bid at the last minute? We seldom are 'promised' shifts...so even fulltimers would not be immune to this.

I hope to see this plan fizzle when RN's stand together, or say no and vote with their feet. We shall see.

Can anyone see this evolving into units with mostly LPN staff and one RN willing to supervise? I guess I see this to some extent already in my area. This is a good plan for the good LPN's out there, who CAN undercut our wage... and administration likes that, obviously. PRN RN's are canceled while FT or PRN LVN's are on OT....the only thing that stops this is when my fellow RN's stand together and say NO, we need more RN's on the unit tonight.

And what is to stop low bidder staff (who may be desperate to get the hours) from bumping the rest of us completely off the schedule with a lower bid at the last minute? We seldom are 'promised' shifts...so even fulltimers would not be immune to this.

I hope to see this plan fizzle when RN's stand together, or say no and vote with their feet. We shall see.

Mattsmom, I am just curious what type of unit you work on? (Is it an ICU?). I am working at a hospital with an all RN staff now, and even in other hospitals I worked in LPNs were not employed in specialty areas, so I have never worried about them undercutting RNs. Maybe this should be a pm because it's a little off topic, but I am just curious about how you ensure there are enough RNs on if management is trying to save money by using less of them. I would never feel comfortable in a "supervisory" role over a slew of LPNs.

Mattsmom, I am just curious what type of unit you work on? (Is it an ICU?). I am working at a hospital with an all RN staff now, and even in other hospitals I worked in LPNs were not employed in specialty areas, so I have never worried about them undercutting RNs. Maybe this should be a pm because it's a little off topic, but I am just curious about how you ensure there are enough RNs on if management is trying to save money by using less of them. I would never feel comfortable in a "supervisory" role over a slew of LPNs.

I think many of us are missing the economic principles here... No one is going to bid below their standard rate. That would take a complete lack of financial sense on the part of the bidder. Ask yourself this... Would YOU work an extra shift at YOUR job for regular pay? No? Well, then why are you worried that overworked nurses elsewhere in the same hospital would rush to fill those jobs at regular pay? They won't. Since time and a half is required OT pay, if the bidders are even remotely intelligent they will bid AT LEAST 2x regular pay. If they don't then they need to go back to school and take a few economics classes, because they are obviously depriving some village of an idiot.

Also, no one is losing their "regular shift". The positions up for bid are to fill holes where no one is scheduled, not to bump regular staff from a position.

This is simple economics of supply and demand. Nurses are in short supply, and high demand. We command a higer price for our services. If you can't see that this is an opportunity for water to find it's own level, then God bless you.

And for those who think this is degrading, and that other professions would never stoop so low as to sell their services as a bid... You should take a few business classes, this is how the world works everyday with all sorts of professional services, from architects and engineers to real estate and lawyers... This is the basis of the American economy. You sell your skills and services for as much as the market will allow, but low enough to get the contract... That's all this is...

George

I think many of us are missing the economic principles here... No one is going to bid below their standard rate. That would take a complete lack of financial sense on the part of the bidder. Ask yourself this... Would YOU work an extra shift at YOUR job for regular pay? No? Well, then why are you worried that overworked nurses elsewhere in the same hospital would rush to fill those jobs at regular pay? They won't. Since time and a half is required OT pay, if the bidders are even remotely intelligent they will bid AT LEAST 2x regular pay. If they don't then they need to go back to school and take a few economics classes, because they are obviously depriving some village of an idiot.

Also, no one is losing their "regular shift". The positions up for bid are to fill holes where no one is scheduled, not to bump regular staff from a position.

This is simple economics of supply and demand. Nurses are in short supply, and high demand. We command a higer price for our services. If you can't see that this is an opportunity for water to find it's own level, then God bless you.

And for those who think this is degrading, and that other professions would never stoop so low as to sell their services as a bid... You should take a few business classes, this is how the world works everyday with all sorts of professional services, from architects and engineers to real estate and lawyers... This is the basis of the American economy. You sell your skills and services for as much as the market will allow, but low enough to get the contract... That's all this is...

George

Sigh.....

Just another slight to nurses

My facility has a different way to deal with this...

We do use a lot of agency

But when one of the reg staff wants to pick up some ot they just go to scheduling and tell her they can pick up some shifts at such and such a time and she will gather together the shifts she needs covered and get back to them... It is treated as ot ....but the attitude is that if the need them they are wiling to pay

+ Add a Comment