Published
I would also vote for an outside candidate. We have promoted from outside our ICU but within the organization and some of that nurse's former employees worked on our floor and it was a disaster for them. They left the former unit to get away from her and found her being their manager again.
I was asked if once I got my BSN if I wanted to be an ACM on a unit and said "NO way". I knew I couldn't be fair with some of the nurses I previously worked with. Why? Because I knew them from before and the problems they caused, and knew I would not be fair in dealing with them due to preconceived notions.
An experienced manager knows how to 'learn' a new department... how and when to introduce change in a way that will most benefit everyone involved. Internal promotions always trigger resentment because in order to be an effective leader, you cannot be 'friends' with subordinates... you have to treat everyone the same. This is unbelievably difficult especially when it comes to colleagues that may have seen you through "thick and thin" as a staff nurse. A first management job is stressful enough without having to deal with this also.
Yep - experienced manager from outside is preferable.
klone, MSN, RN
14,857 Posts
Do you think it's generally better to promote from within the unit, someone who is acutely aware of the unit's issues and problems, and knows in and out how the unit operates? Or would you see benefit of an 'outsider' taking over the unit manager job - fresh eyes, no previous relationships with staff as a peer, etc?
Would you choose the devil you know over the devil you don't?
Just curious about people's feelings - do you feel there are more hard feelings if a manager is chosen from outside the unit, rather than choosing to promote an internal candidate?