Understanding the Risk of Firearms: Suicide vs. Homicide

Gun violence is a hot topic these days. Turn on the TV for any length of time, and you will hear stories of firearm homicide. But, did you know that firearm suicide is more common in the U.S? Learn about the statistics of this public health issue and if nurses have a role in the firearms debate. Nurses General Nursing Article

Updated:  

If you watch the news or TV shows, you might be led to believe that there is a high risk of firearm homicide. Researchers from Northeastern University, University of Washington, and Harvard University conducted a study into the perceptions of gun violence and the leading cause of death in the United States. They found that the presence of a firearm in a home increases the risk for suicide, which is more common than firearm homicide.

So, what's behind our misconception about gun violence and how do you educate the community about the real dangers?

Looking at the Numbers

According to the Brady Campaign, the oldest organization in the gun violence prevention movement, 96 people die every day in the United States from gun violence. Of these 96, 34 are murdered, and 59 die from suicide. That means nearly twice as many people die from firearm suicide compared to firearm homicide. There are also 246 people shot daily who survive - 183 are injured in an attack, 49 are shot unintentionally, 4 are shot in a legal intervention, and 11 survive a suicide attempt.

A 2014 study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine reported that access to firearms in the home increases your risk of violent death by suicide, homicide, or unintentional injury. There was a direct correlation to the risk of suicide among people who had access to firearms compared to those without access. The study also reported that the US has one of the highest rates of access to firearms in the world.

Could impulsivity and the ease of access to a gun place some people at a higher risk of committing suicide or homicide? The study suggests that it's possible. Yet, there are no hard data to support the claim. States with the highest rates of firearms, also have a higher percentage of firearm violence compared to non-firearm violence.

Is it a Public Health Issue?

According to the American Public Health Association (APHA), gun violence is an issue that is deeply rooted in our culture and must be addressed through a public health approach. Violence research should be conducted to ensure that guns don't fall into the wrong hands. APHA also believes that access to mental health services must be expanded to those who need it most to decrease the number of suicides by firearms.

Do Nurses Have a Role In the Firearms Debate?

Every day nurses in Emergency Rooms across the country come face-to-face with the gun violence issue. They might deal with victims of homicide, suicide, and unintentional shootings.

Nurses who work in schools have become far too familiar with the issue over the past few years. The National Association of School Nurses released a Position Brief in which they state that school shootings in the US are an urgent public health crisis. The NASN advocates for safe school environments for all children and recognizes the emotional and physical effects that gun violence has on our students. This doesn't account for nurses in the ICU, rehabilitation units, and many other settings that might care for gunshot victims.

Unfortunately, healthcare workers can fall victim to gun violence, too. Recent research has highlighted the prevalence of suicide among nurses. And, gun violence in hospitals and other healthcare facilities seems to happen at an alarming rate. In fact, just a few weeks ago, a young doctor was killed in the parking lot of Mercy Hospital in Chicago at the hands of her former fiancee.

What Can You Do To Help?

Gun violence is a hot political debate these days. No matter which side of the aisle you stand on, as a nurse there are a few things you can do to help keep patients safe:

  1. Educate patients about the risks inherent in having a gun in their home. It's particularly important to speak to parents of young children about safe storage of all firearms.
  2. Connect patients with mental health concerns to services as quickly as possible. Many patients have mental health needs that if left unattended can quickly lead to violence towards themselves or others.
  3. Participate in violence prevention and intervention programs at your hospital or facility. None of us want to discuss or consider that a shooting could happen at our workplace, but unfortunately, the risk is real.
  4. Write to your elected officials to make your viewpoints on the issues known.
  5. Advocate for more research to be done to increase our understanding of homicide, suicide, and those who commit both.

What are your thoughts on the firearm statistics? Do you feel that nurses have a place in the firearm debate? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

Specializes in Critical Care.
It's not even a secret that both moms against gun violence and the parkland "survivors" are funded by Michael Bloomberg. David Hogg was / is not a "survivor" of the parkland shooting, he was at home when it happened. Giffords is literally a puppet of her money-chasing husband - this has all been well documented. And the Brady campaign is still "handgun control inc", with the same agenda today that they had in 1975.

I'm a gun owner and supporter of the second amendment, and it's people like you who are the biggest threat to the preservation of rights for gun owners. As a sort of separate issue, your contention that David Hogg was "at home" during the shooting, which has been well debunked, as well as putting Parkland "sruvivors" in quotes minimizes and discounts what kids go through in these situations, which makes you a generally horrible human being.

There's no need for a "conversation" that involves only one side sacrificing their constitutional rights.

The best protection of the second amendment is not to overplay our hand, which is what people like you do. The second amendment protects the rights of law-abiding gun owners to own guns which are primarily for a lawful purpose. None of the commonly proposed 'gun control' laws violate these rights, and it's these measures that will best protect the second amendment.

Specializes in OB.
It's not even a secret that both moms against gun violence and the parkland "survivors" are funded by Michael Bloomberg. David Hogg was / is not a "survivor" of the parkland shooting, he was at home when it happened. Giffords is literally a puppet of her money-chasing husband - this has all been well documented. And the Brady campaign is still "handgun control inc", with the same agenda today that they had in 1975.

There's no need for a "conversation" that involves only one side sacrificing their constitutional rights.

"Survivors" in quotes? Are you implying the shooting at Parkland was a hoax? Do you realize how despicable you sound?

Specializes in Pediatrics Retired.

OK...here goes. I've said it before and I'm saying it now. Regardless of your point of view about the subject, guns in the US are here to stay, and the best route forward is to deal with those who will use them to try and kill innocent people. Regardless of regulation, guns will be available to bad guys, good guys, and the entire spectrum of guys between those book ends. I believe once we stop trying to control the guns and wholeheartedly concentrate on the woefully lacking mental health climate in the US we can make a difference in the senseless loss of life and grief as has been inflicted to now.

Specializes in allergy and asthma, urgent care.
It's not even a secret that both moms against gun violence and the parkland "survivors" are funded by Michael Bloomberg. David Hogg was / is not a "survivor" of the parkland shooting, he was at home when it happened. Giffords is literally a puppet of her money-chasing husband - this has all been well documented. And the Brady campaign is still "handgun control inc", with the same agenda today that they had in 1975.

There's no need for a "conversation" that involves only one side sacrificing their constitutional rights.

This is one of the most ignorant posts I've ever read.

Thanks, Tomi.

I'm sure that fact gives a lot of comfort to the parents of the babies who died at Sandy Hook, or my personal friend, who's daughter was killed in the Santa Fe High School shooting last May.

It doesn't stand for Assault Rifle?? Well, THAT'S sure as **** a relief!

Klone-

If you are referring to "Tomi" as in the Tommy Gun that would constitute an example of a fully automated rifle. They were around during prohibition and no, I'm not related to Al Capone. I did get a laugh at the spelling if that was your intention.

I am sorry for your loss Klone. I'm sorry for everyone that was affected by the shootings. I'm pretty sure my words of sorrow do not offer any comfort to those you speak of just as my clarification of what AR actually stands for doesn't either. That was the point of my post you quoted. It has an undeserved reputation due to mislabeling, assumption, lack of understanding and/or education et al. That was my intent.

Specializes in OB-Gyn/Primary Care/Ambulatory Leadership.
Klone-

If you are referring to "Tomi" as in the Tommy Gun that would constitute an example of a fully automated rifle. They were around during prohibition and no, I'm not related to Al Capone. I did get a laugh at the spelling if that was your.

No, I was referring to Tomi Lahren, and her infamous "Geez, stupid lefties, AR doesn't mean Assault Rifle" tweet, as if that REALLY makes a difference in this debate. What it's called and what the letters stand for doesn't change what it is.

"Survivors" in quotes? Are you implying the shooting at Parkland was a hoax? Do you realize how despicable you sound?

It is quite despicable that within hours of both the sandy hook and parkland shootings those who had an agenda were flying in schills and public relations hacks toplay a pre-recorded script that advocated abridging our rights. The proposed laws were already written. The "victims" were and are interchangeable. The agenda was waiting for the opportunity to be aired. Those facts can't be debunked. Read the stories about the "help" the parkland students received & how long that help took to arrive.

If the "victims" are interchangeable, their message isn't organic or grassroots- it's AstroTurf.

Specializes in OB-Gyn/Primary Care/Ambulatory Leadership.

Please, out of a basic sense of decency, stop putting "victims" in quotes. There are people HERE at this website, reading and participating in this thread, who lost friends or family in these shootings. To suggest that these lost lives are fictional is despicable and gross.

Specializes in school nurse.
It's not even a secret that both moms against gun violence and the parkland "survivors" are funded by Michael Bloomberg. David Hogg was / is not a "survivor" of the parkland shooting, he was at home when it happened. Giffords is literally a puppet of her money-chasing husband - this has all been well documented. And the Brady campaign is still "handgun control inc", with the same agenda today that they had in 1975.

There's no need for a "conversation" that involves only one side sacrificing their constitutional rights.

You could probably make an argument for your side without resorting to trotting out base propaganda lies...

You could probably make an argument for your side without resorting to trotting out base propaganda lies...

Please show me where the lies are?

David Hogg, et al is controlled & funded by Shannon Watts, who is on Michael Bloomberg's payroll. One big check-writer, multiple AstroTurf organizations.

Gun-control groups seize on Parkland shooting to build a bigger movement

Specializes in ED, psych.
OK...here goes. I've said it before and I'm saying it now. Regardless of your point of view about the subject, guns in the US are here to stay, and the best route forward is to deal with those who will use them to try and kill innocent people. Regardless of regulation, guns will be available to bad guys, good guys, and the entire spectrum of guys between those book ends. I believe once we stop trying to control the guns and wholeheartedly concentrate on the woefully lacking mental health climate in the US we can make a difference in the senseless loss of life and grief as has been inflicted to now.

Guns are here to stay. I'm not here to speak in place of every gun control advocate, but as much as I would love to abolish them, we'd never get rid of them all. There is simply too many. And there are people who are responsible gun owners; I have several family out in the Midwest who are avid hunters, and they are responsible gun owners in the truest, law abiding way possible.

But.

"Once we stop trying to control the guns and wholeheartedly concentrate on the woefully lacking mental health climate in the US" - it isn't *just* mental health. I started my career in psych, work per diem 1-3x/week in psych (inpatient and ED) and was a teacher before this. We have woefully inadequate mental health services in this country. We are packed to the gills in the ED (we had people in the halls earlier in the week, which is normal) and currently full in inpatient.

But it's not JUST mental health. And this is why we can't make a difference. We need to control aspects of guns - sorry, it's true. People DON'T need lots and lots of guns; the more guns out there in circulation, the more likely the bad guys can get them. Or high rounds/minute - more people die. Or whatever.

Bowing out of this debate.

1. The "bad guys " (used as an umbrella term) will always find a way to possess a firearm. They do not/will not follow any type of law. I am stating the obvious.

2. Automatic guns, which have been banned for purchase since 1986 I believe, and are the type of guns used by the military only, are often lumped in with semi-automatic guns. The wording is not interchangeable.

3. AR does NOT stand for Assault/Automatic Rifle. It is a brand name, Armalite. This is a redundant fact that still somehow causes confusion even though it's been stated a billion and one times.

4. I am all for complete and thorough background checks. My state is notoriously difficult to obtain a license in.

5. Mental health options/availability is severely lacking, as is addiction treatment facilities.

6. I have my LTC concealed.

7. I also own an "AR" type platform rifle that only fires as fast as I can pull the trigger. That is not considered an assault rifle by any means though it still somehow causes confusion as certain groups will directly or indirectly have people believe.

8. The only reason I do not own an actual AR-15 is because my state banned them without any forewarning to licensed carriers and FFL dealers.

9. This post is just a reflection of my thoughts at the moment.....I am not looking for a debate here.

Keep coming back to number 3.

We know. Who cares?