Understanding the Risk of Firearms: Suicide vs. Homicide

Gun violence is a hot topic these days. Turn on the TV for any length of time, and you will hear stories of firearm homicide. But, did you know that firearm suicide is more common in the U.S? Learn about the statistics of this public health issue and if nurses have a role in the firearms debate. Nurses General Nursing Article

Updated:  

If you watch the news or TV shows, you might be led to believe that there is a high risk of firearm homicide. Researchers from Northeastern University, University of Washington, and Harvard University conducted a study into the perceptions of gun violence and the leading cause of death in the United States. They found that the presence of a firearm in a home increases the risk for suicide, which is more common than firearm homicide.

So, what's behind our misconception about gun violence and how do you educate the community about the real dangers?

Looking at the Numbers

According to the Brady Campaign, the oldest organization in the gun violence prevention movement, 96 people die every day in the United States from gun violence. Of these 96, 34 are murdered, and 59 die from suicide. That means nearly twice as many people die from firearm suicide compared to firearm homicide. There are also 246 people shot daily who survive - 183 are injured in an attack, 49 are shot unintentionally, 4 are shot in a legal intervention, and 11 survive a suicide attempt.

A 2014 study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine reported that access to firearms in the home increases your risk of violent death by suicide, homicide, or unintentional injury. There was a direct correlation to the risk of suicide among people who had access to firearms compared to those without access. The study also reported that the US has one of the highest rates of access to firearms in the world.

Could impulsivity and the ease of access to a gun place some people at a higher risk of committing suicide or homicide? The study suggests that it's possible. Yet, there are no hard data to support the claim. States with the highest rates of firearms, also have a higher percentage of firearm violence compared to non-firearm violence.

Is it a Public Health Issue?

According to the American Public Health Association (APHA), gun violence is an issue that is deeply rooted in our culture and must be addressed through a public health approach. Violence research should be conducted to ensure that guns don't fall into the wrong hands. APHA also believes that access to mental health services must be expanded to those who need it most to decrease the number of suicides by firearms.

Do Nurses Have a Role In the Firearms Debate?

Every day nurses in Emergency Rooms across the country come face-to-face with the gun violence issue. They might deal with victims of homicide, suicide, and unintentional shootings.

Nurses who work in schools have become far too familiar with the issue over the past few years. The National Association of School Nurses released a Position Brief in which they state that school shootings in the US are an urgent public health crisis. The NASN advocates for safe school environments for all children and recognizes the emotional and physical effects that gun violence has on our students. This doesn't account for nurses in the ICU, rehabilitation units, and many other settings that might care for gunshot victims.

Unfortunately, healthcare workers can fall victim to gun violence, too. Recent research has highlighted the prevalence of suicide among nurses. And, gun violence in hospitals and other healthcare facilities seems to happen at an alarming rate. In fact, just a few weeks ago, a young doctor was killed in the parking lot of Mercy Hospital in Chicago at the hands of her former fiancee.

What Can You Do To Help?

Gun violence is a hot political debate these days. No matter which side of the aisle you stand on, as a nurse there are a few things you can do to help keep patients safe:

  1. Educate patients about the risks inherent in having a gun in their home. It's particularly important to speak to parents of young children about safe storage of all firearms.
  2. Connect patients with mental health concerns to services as quickly as possible. Many patients have mental health needs that if left unattended can quickly lead to violence towards themselves or others.
  3. Participate in violence prevention and intervention programs at your hospital or facility. None of us want to discuss or consider that a shooting could happen at our workplace, but unfortunately, the risk is real.
  4. Write to your elected officials to make your viewpoints on the issues known.
  5. Advocate for more research to be done to increase our understanding of homicide, suicide, and those who commit both.

What are your thoughts on the firearm statistics? Do you feel that nurses have a place in the firearm debate? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

Bottom line to me-too many people in this country die of gun violence, many of them children. We have to be able to talk about it, do research into the causes, and make appropriate changes to laws, legislation, whatever to change this fact. The NRA should not have the power to block these things from being done. No one wants to take your guns away. We want people to be safe and to stop dying unnecessarily.

You personally might not want to take guns away from law abiding citizens, but the people behind "the Brady campaign " & "moms against gun violence" and the entire Hopkins center are rabidly anti-gun. They have intentionally engaged in dishonesty- conflating "semi-auto" with "automatic" , sporting and target weapons as "weapons of war" & in the case of the Brady campaign, intentionally softening their stated goals vs the goals that they previously (vociferously) stated.

Handgun control inc wanted every handgun in the country taken away from anyone who wasn't a cop. When they realized that was not a view shared by any quantity of Americans, they changed their name & rolled back into "common sense gun reforms" - but the "common sense reforms" were (and are) just incremental steps towards a totalitarian goal.

The bottom line as seen by "ammosexuals" such as myself is that anyone spouting "surveys" from Hopkins or "moms/mayors/high school students against guns" is acting as a tool for the will of just a couple of super-rich anti-gun Americans.

Moms, mayors, parkland students & giffords are all puppet organizations funded by one rich new-Yorker who doesn't share any "common sense" mentality, he wants New York style laws implementated nationwide. New Yorkers don't have appreciable gun rights & under Bloomberg, they were subjected to unconstitutional "stop and frisk" police-state actions.

That's not a model I care to live under & that's who you are helping when you parrot the "common sense gun reform" line.

Registration leads to confiscation. So, as much as many love to spout "we're not asking for your guns", if you're following the marching orders of "handgun control inc", you are asking for my guns. You're a tool of a handful of billionaires who want America disarmed & they're trying to make their voices louder by pretending to be "grassroots" organizations.

Specializes in allergy and asthma, urgent care.
You personally might not want to take guns away from law abiding citizens, but the people behind "the Brady campaign " & "moms against gun violence" and the entire Hopkins center are rabidly anti-gun. They have intentionally engaged in dishonesty- conflating "semi-auto" with "automatic" , sporting and target weapons as "weapons of war" & in the case of the Brady campaign, intentionally softening their stated goals vs the goals that they previously (vociferously) stated.

Handgun control inc wanted every handgun in the country taken away from anyone who wasn't a cop. When they realized that was not a view shared by any quantity of Americans, they changed their name & rolled back into "common sense gun reforms" - but the "common sense reforms" were (and are) just incremental steps towards a totalitarian goal.

The bottom line as seen by "ammosexuals" such as myself is that anyone spouting "surveys" from Hopkins or "moms/mayors/high school students against guns" is acting as a tool for the will of just a couple of super-rich anti-gun Americans.

Moms, mayors, parkland students & giffords are all puppet organizations funded by one rich new-Yorker who doesn't share any "common sense" mentality, he wants New York style laws implementated nationwide. New Yorkers don't have appreciable gun rights & under Bloomberg, they were subjected to unconstitutional "stop and frisk" police-state actions.

That's not a model I care to live under & that's who you are helping when you parrot the "common sense gun reform" line.

Registration leads to confiscation. So, as much as many love to spout "we're not asking for your guns", if you're following the marching orders of "handgun control inc", you are asking for my guns. You're a tool of a handful of billionaires who want America disarmed & they're trying to make their voices louder by pretending to be "grassroots" organizations.

Alrighty, then......I guess I'm just a tool who is tired of seeing the mass shooting and school shooting headlines. So be it. Keep your thoughts and prayers coming.

Specializes in Emergency Department.
I'm angry and frustrated, too. I don't have guns, so I don't shoot anyone. Easy as pie.

That's fine and your choice! I (and others here) do have guns and don't shoot anyone. I do not ask you to have them and I expect that you do not ask me not to. For the vast majority of gun owners, including those that carry every day, as long as you aren't posing a threat of great bodily injury (or greater), you have nothing to fear. With the exception of Hawaii, every state has THOUSANDS of people, if not MILLIONS of regular people legally authorized to carry in public. There are even interstate agreements (reciprocity) where states recognize each other's licenses.

A minority of states (there are 8 of them) restrict who is allowed to obtain a carry license. My own state is one of them. My license is good throughout the State and some other States do recognize that I'm licensed but my own State does not recognize any other State's license. My state is considered a "May Issue" state and this is very open to abuse. If you're in an area where the Sheriff is very strict, it can become a "who do you know" situation before you're allowed to carry. If you're in an area where the Sheriff is more open, anyone that can legally buy handguns can get one.

Seriously, there are probably more legally armed people around you than you realize. They're not the problem.

Specializes in Emergency Department.
Alrighty, then......I guess I'm just a tool who is tired of seeing the mass shooting and school shooting headlines. So be it. Keep your thoughts and prayers coming.

I'm tired of seeing them too. Just remember an old rule of Journalism: If it bleeds, it leads. Some do look for their 15 minutes of fame, even if it's bad...

Specializes in OB.
You personally might not want to take guns away from law abiding citizens, but the people behind "the Brady campaign " & "moms against gun violence" and the entire Hopkins center are rabidly anti-gun. They have intentionally engaged in dishonesty- conflating "semi-auto" with "automatic" , sporting and target weapons as "weapons of war" & in the case of the Brady campaign, intentionally softening their stated goals vs the goals that they previously (vociferously) stated.

Handgun control inc wanted every handgun in the country taken away from anyone who wasn't a cop. When they realized that was not a view shared by any quantity of Americans, they changed their name & rolled back into "common sense gun reforms" - but the "common sense reforms" were (and are) just incremental steps towards a totalitarian goal.

The bottom line as seen by "ammosexuals" such as myself is that anyone spouting "surveys" from Hopkins or "moms/mayors/high school students against guns" is acting as a tool for the will of just a couple of super-rich anti-gun Americans.

Moms, mayors, parkland students & giffords are all puppet organizations funded by one rich new-Yorker who doesn't share any "common sense" mentality, he wants New York style laws implementated nationwide. New Yorkers don't have appreciable gun rights & under Bloomberg, they were subjected to unconstitutional "stop and frisk" police-state actions.

That's not a model I care to live under & that's who you are helping when you parrot the "common sense gun reform" line.

Registration leads to confiscation. So, as much as many love to spout "we're not asking for your guns", if you're following the marching orders of "handgun control inc", you are asking for my guns. You're a tool of a handful of billionaires who want America disarmed & they're trying to make their voices louder by pretending to be "grassroots" organizations.

Parkland students and Giffords are just puppets???? So they didn't actually live through mass shootings/assassination attempts? Do you realize how offensive that is to them and to all victims of shootings who are trying to prevent them from recurring regularly?

Seriously, what solutions do you offer to the problem of mass shootings other than spouting vitriol against anyone who wants sane gun control?

Specializes in OB.
I'm tired of seeing them too. Just remember an old rule of Journalism: If it bleeds, it leads. Some do look for their 15 minutes of fame, even if it's bad...

Can you clarify what you mean by this? Do you mean that mass shooters are just looking for fame? If so, why do you feel that mass shootings occur so frequently in the U.S., and why, in other countries with tighter gun control, do fame seekers somehow manage to seek fame in other ways besides mass murder? What do you feel is unique to the U.S.?

Alrighty, then......I guess I'm just a tool who is tired of seeing the mass shooting and school shooting headlines. So be it. Keep your thoughts and prayers coming.

I would take your guns. I want the strictest gun laws possible. So, there.

This thread is on FB, by the way.

Specializes in allergy and asthma, urgent care.

What are everyone's thoughts on Red Flag or Extreme Risk Protective Order laws, designed to temporarily remove guns from a person who is thought to be an immediate danger to themselves or others? My state enacted one this past year and I am very happy about it.

Specializes in allergy and asthma, urgent care.
I would take your guns. I want the strictest gun laws possible. So, there.

I also want the strictest laws possible, but I believe there are a lot of responsible owners like Dude who should be able to have a handgun or hunting rifle. I don't see the need for an orificenal. I also think the Second Amendment is outdated as written. So there.

I also want the strictest laws possible, but I believe there are a lot of responsible owners like Dude who should be able to have a handgun or hunting rifle. I don't see the need for an orificenal. I also think the Second Amendment is outdated as written. So there.

I can live with this. Sorta.

Many hunters have at least AR-15s, now. When I asked some of my friends why, they said "because they are fun!"

Specializes in ED, psych.
You personally might not want to take guns away from law abiding citizens, but the people behind "the Brady campaign " & "moms against gun violence" and the entire Hopkins center are rabidly anti-gun. They have intentionally engaged in dishonesty- conflating "semi-auto" with "automatic" , sporting and target weapons as "weapons of war" & in the case of the Brady campaign, intentionally softening their stated goals vs the goals that they previously (vociferously) stated.

Handgun control inc wanted every handgun in the country taken away from anyone who wasn't a cop. When they realized that was not a view shared by any quantity of Americans, they changed their name & rolled back into "common sense gun reforms" - but the "common sense reforms" were (and are) just incremental steps towards a totalitarian goal.

The bottom line as seen by "ammosexuals" such as myself is that anyone spouting "surveys" from Hopkins or "moms/mayors/high school students against guns" is acting as a tool for the will of just a couple of super-rich anti-gun Americans.

Moms, mayors, parkland students & giffords are all puppet organizations funded by one rich new-Yorker who doesn't share any "common sense" mentality, he wants New York style laws implementated nationwide. New Yorkers don't have appreciable gun rights & under Bloomberg, they were subjected to unconstitutional "stop and frisk" police-state actions.

That's not a model I care to live under & that's who you are helping when you parrot the "common sense gun reform" line.

Registration leads to confiscation. So, as much as many love to spout "we're not asking for your guns", if you're following the marching orders of "handgun control inc", you are asking for my guns. You're a tool of a handful of billionaires who want America disarmed & they're trying to make their voices louder by pretending to be "grassroots" organizations.

And THIS, THIS post is a big part of the problem.

You have no clue what you're talking about, making it impossible for both sides to meet in the middle. You have pre conceived notions of what these "moms/mayors/high schooler students against guns" are.

I'm part of the Sandy Hook Promise. I'm actually a promise leader. We're not out to take every damn handgun out there. We're not even funded by rich New Yorkers. We start at the community level, working with schools and students ... we focus on mental health initiatives. And yes, we work on gun control initiatives.

What a disgusting comment, "parkland students and gifford's are all puppet organizations ..."

.... I'm going to go ahead and say that those who experienced mass shootings and gun violence first hand can have center stage allllllllllllll they want. Do I need to even say why?

I'm not against guns. I'm not against people like OldDude owning guns. I'm against misinformation like you just spouted as a reason to keep your guns. I'm against the whole, "it's my right as the second amendment intended!" as a reason to keep your guns. I'm against the NRA having so much power.

We have to talk about gun violence. The sad fact is, many gun owners (as seen by this thread) don't want to. They point to, "well, I'm safe and most of us are." Ok. Great. So what can we do about those that kill? Because something has to give, and it ain't all mental health, lack of family values, or everybody else's fault.