The Controversy: Mandatory Flu Vaccines

Many hospitals are moving towards creating mandatory influenza vaccination policies as a condition of employment. Such mandates are causing surefire responses on both sides of the fence. What is the push behind the movement, and what is causing the pushback?

Updated:  

First, let me just go over some of the symptoms of the flu, and then we will get down to business on the controversy surrounding the push to create mandatory flu vaccines for healthcare workers:

  • Sudden onset fever
  • Headache
  • Chills
  • Myalgia
  • Dry cough
  • Sore throat
  • Stuffy nose
  • Loss of appetite
  • Limb or joint pain
  • Difficulty sleeping
  • Diarrhea or upset stomach

I can't think of anyone who wants any of these symptoms, or to come down with the flu, can you?

Influenza vaccination research has clearly documented the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine (Google it - you will find a plethora of information...however, I will list some links at the end of this article for your information). However, even though there is sufficient evidence to prove the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine, vaccination rates among healthcare workers are pitifully low. In 2013, only 55% of nurses in the frontlines were vaccinated.

Organizations such as The Joint Commission, the American Nurses Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Centers for Disease Control, Healthy People 2020, etc., etc., have stated their position on recommending the flu vaccine for healthcare workers in order to decrease the risk of exposure and reduce deaths. Due to this recommendation, many healthcare facilities are now creating mandatory flu vaccine policies as a condition of employment.

Employers who create mandatory policies will have exemptions, of course. Exemptions are made for medical and religious exceptions. For places that do not have a mandatory flu vaccine, they may "strongly recommend" the vaccination and may have a declination form for employees to submit if they refuse the vaccine. Additionally, some employers will enforce refusers to wear a mask during flu season while they are at work in order to protect the patients and the employee.

What is the purpose behind the push toward flu vaccines?

Evidence has shown that there are more than 36,000 deaths in the US each year related to influenza, and more than 200,000 hospitalizations. Influenza is the 6th leading cause of death. Healthcare workers are the leading cause of influenza outbreaks in the healthcare system. up to 50% of people who are infected by the flu virus do not fill ill for several days and can spread the virus to people at risk of complications and death from the flu. Additionally, evidence shows vaccination decreases mortality by 40%, decreases the spread of nosocomial infections by 43%, and decreases absenteeism by 20-30%.

Additionally, there is the ethics to consider. As healthcare workers, we have all taken an oath to "do no harm". As a nurse caring for patients who are not in their most physically healthy state, do we take the vaccination in order to prevent spreading the flu to our vulnerable patients, in order to "do no harm"? We must consider this when we make our decision to take or refuse the vaccination.

What hospitals have created a mandatory flu vaccine policy?

I have the names of a few hospitals, and this is by no means a comprehensive list. This is based on a ListServe survey of hospitals and these are the responses received:

  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Philadelphia, PA) - since 2009
  • Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics (Kansas City, MO)
  • Children's Colorado (Aurora, CO)
  • Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters (Norfolk, VA)
  • Children's Medical Center Dallas (Dallas, TX) - since 2012
  • Riley Children's (Indianapolis, IN) - since 2012
  • East Tennessee Children's (Knoxville, TX) - since 2013
  • Boston Children's (Boston, MA)
  • Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns (San Diego, CA) - since 2013
  • Roger Williams Medical Center (Providence, RI)
  • Brookwood Medical Center (Birmingham, AL)
  • Johns Hopkins (all hospitals/clinics) (Baltimore, MD)
  • Driscoll Children's Hospital (Corpus Christi, TX)
  • Spohn Health System (Corpus Christi / San Antonio, TX)
  • All Connecticut Hospitals

What are some reasons that people refuse the flu vaccine?

Refusal may be largely due to misconceptions related to the vaccine. Fears that the immune system will cause them to get the flu, beliefs that hygiene and better nutrition are more helpful than the vaccine, fear of needles, beliefs that the vaccine does not work, and fear of side effects. Others believe that they have a constitutional right to refuse the vaccine and that mandatory policies are violating these rights.

Common concerns and myths about the flu vaccination

(taken from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health outline of flu vaccine talking points for managers)

The flu shot will give me the flu

The flu shot does not give people the flu. It uses inactivated ("dead") virus. People may still catch a cold or other virus that the vaccine is not designed match.

I don't believe the flu vaccine actually works

Studies have shown that flu vaccination prevents flu in 70% to 90% of healthy adults younger than 65 years old.

I had the vaccination last year

You need a new vaccine every year - the virus changes over time.

What about possible adverse reactions

Serious adverse reactions are very rare. They are explained on the CDC's Vaccine Information Statement, which is distributed when the vaccine is administered.

Local short-term reactions - such soreness at the vaccination site, slight fever, achy feeling - may occur but usually do not last long. Over the counter medicines are helpful. Even short-term reactions are much less bothersome than catching the flu and feeling very sick for days.

I'm not in a high-risk group

Your patients are at-risk, and possibly some friends and family members. You can be infected with the flu virus but not feel ill - and can still transmit flu to at-risk patients.

The flu vaccine made every year does not match the circulating flu strain

Inactivated influenza vaccine is effective in preventing transmission and reducing complications of the flu. In years when there is a close match between the vaccine and circulating virus strains, the vaccine prevents illness among approximately 70%--90% of healthy adults under 65 years of age. Vaccinating healthy adults also has been proven to lead to decreased work absenteeism and use of health-care resources, including use of antibiotics. Strong protection is also expected when the vaccine is not a close match with circulating strains, with 50%--77% effectiveness in these instances. In addition, effectiveness against influenza-related hospitalization for healthy adults from inactivated vaccine is estimated at 90%.

Knowledge is Power

All healthcare facilities will be facing the choice of creating a mandatory influenza vaccination in the near future, if they have not already. In order to make an informed decision on the topic, we must have information. Knowledge is power. Before you make a blanket statement on pros or cons, have the information you need, know the research, and make an educated decision.

Please respond to this article by answering the following questions:

  1. Do you take the flu vaccine yearly? If you do not, what is the reason you do not participate (if you don't mind answering this question)?
  2. Does your employer have a mandatory influenza vaccination policy as a condition of employment? If yes, where do you work?
  3. What concerns do you have about the flu vaccine?
  4. Do you know if anyone who has been released from their job because they did not get the flu vaccine?

References

American Association of Family Practitioners. (2011). AAFP supports mandatory flu vaccinations for healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: AAFP Supports Mandatory Flu Vaccinations for Health Care Personnel

ATrain. (2014). To accept or refuse the flu vaccine. Retrieved from: ZZZ_133_Influenza: Module 7

CDC. (2014). Vaccination: Who should do it, who should not and who should take precautions. Retrieved from: Vaccination: Who Should Do It, Who Should Not and Who Should Take Precautions | Seasonal Influenza (Flu) | CDC

Influenza Action Coalition. (2015). Influenza vaccination honor roll. Retrieved from: Honor Roll: Mandatory Influenza Vaccination Policies for Healthcare Personnel

Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2014). Talking points for managers. Retrieved from: http://tinyurl.com/p6nbg2u

National adult and influenza immunization summit. (2015). Vaccinating healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: Vaccinating Healthcare Personnel - National Adult and Influenza Immunization Summit

NursingTimes. (2014). Why do health workers decline flu vaccination? Retrieved from: http://www.nursingtimes.net/Journals/2014/11/28/y/k/x/031214-Why-do-health-workers-decline-flu-vaccination.pdf

TJC. (2012). R3 Report: Requirement, rationale, reference. Retrieved from: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/R3_Report_Issue_3_5_18_12_final.pdf

Specializes in Reproductive & Public Health.
But you got the flu shot so why do you care if they breath in your direction. If the flu shot works, as you advocate you shouldn't have to worry about getting the flu from someone breathing in your direction.

I swear, it's like talking to a brick wall.

I didn't immunize my babies for all the reasons other anti-vaxxers have mentioned. I was concerned about the adjuvants, I thought natural infection provided healthier immunity, I thought vaccines commonly shedded virus and was once in a panic after someone holding my baby told me they had just gotten an MMR booster.

I couldn't bear the thought of causing my baby pain from a shot when he wasn't even sick. And I knew that most VPD were likely to cause relatively mild illnesses in most cases. I exclusively breast fed, was very particular about giving my kids healthy, whole foods, and believed strongly in alternative remedies as a valid alternative for medical care. I believed the risks of vaccines thoroughly outweighed any possible benefit. I believed these things deeply, and surrounded myself with likeminded parents, the kind of person who asked me to bring my child over for a playdate after being diagnosed with chicken pox.

It took a while for me to recognize the fundamental fallacies in my logic. it was a humbling process, one that I was very quiet about for a long time because I feared derision from both my antivax friends for "drinking the koolaid" as well as from the provaccine community, for failing to protect my children and the rest of the community from these potentially devastating diseases.

Cognitive dissonance is hard. Realizing you are wrong about something as important as vaccines is HARD. Your faith in your own judgment is shaken, and it forces you to re-evaluate a lot of your closely held beliefs.

I fully understand why those in the anti-vax community seem to cling harder to their beliefs when presented with facts and evidence. It's a natural reaction, one we are all prone to. Hell, any science-based provider has to wrestle with this on a regular basis, as our knowledge of disease processes and health grows and changes. You ask an old school OB why he doesn't delay cord clamping and still frequently performs episiotomies, and he will have ALL sorts of sciency reasons.

Our brains do not like to modify previously held beliefs- it doesn't matter how smart you are or how long you have worked in health care, we are ALL prone to this problem. It takes conscious and concerted effort to be aware of this and try to compensate. And as healthcare providers, it is our ethical duty to acknowledge our human fallibility and make a good faith effort to overcome it.

Specializes in Emergency.

I have restocked the kettle corn popcorn. Carry on.

Just FYI, "flu-like symptoms" are clearly defined in the research methodology and remain constant without regard to vaccination status or etiology. Flu-like symptoms that present in individuals with laboratory-confirmed influenza is called influenza the rest is called non-influenza acute respiratory illness.

i think you missed the poster's point, that the vaxed persons COULDN;T possible have the flu, right? so to continue the story, it has to be something else. why don't we have a study like T Jefferson suggested? because it might not prove what so many want to believe.

Specializes in Medical-Surgial, Cardiac, Pediatrics.

"1)__ Do you take the flu vaccine yearly? If you do not, what is the reason you do not participate (if you don't mind answering this question)?

2)__ Does your employer have a mandatory influenza vaccination policy as a condition of employment? If yes, where do you work?

3)__ What concerns do you have about the flu vaccine?

4)__ Do you know if anyone who has been released from their job because they did not get the flu vaccine?"

1) I do, but largely because my employer mandates it.

2) I worked for one of the Trauma II centers in Colorado, who required it, though not as a condition of employment, and a second Trauma II which requires it. You may refuse, but you have to wear a mask for the entire flu season if you do. And they know, because they put stickers on your badge if you get it.

3) I don't have concerns. I do know that last year, I ended up with vomiting and diarrhea for 24 hours directly after getting it, then was fine. Linked? Eh, I still have to get the shot, regardless, so even if it was, I can't refuse.

4) I don't know anyone who was released from their job, though they do enforce wearing the masks every shift if you don't have that sticker.

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
i think you missed the poster's point, that the vaxed persons COULDN;T possible have the flu, right? so to continue the story, it has to be something else. why don't we have a study like T Jefferson suggested? because it might not prove what so many want to believe.

I don't think I follow you.

A study subject has a constellation of symptoms that meets the criteria for flu-like illness.

They are swabbed and a laboratory test confirms if it is influenza A or not.

If the test is positive that subject is diagnosed with influenza.

If the test is negative it is diagnosed as flu-like illness.

It has nothing to do with the vaccination status of the study subject.

Specializes in Peds/Neo CCT,Flight, ER, Hem/Onc.
I'm more concerned with the dangers of "shedding" onto immune compromised people, by recently vaccinated folks, who I think should voluntarily do "self isolation" (avoid contact with patients and staff), until the shedding possibility is over.

OMG when did you graduate nursing school? In the 1800s?

FTR, I work closely with an infectious disease doctor in a large renowned university medical center with a top 10 certified cancer center. I showed him your post. I wish I had a picture of the look on his face. Please stop spreading this utter nonsense. At the very least it's not helping your cause.

Y'all realize you're wasting your time and effort, right? You're not going to change any of the anti-vaxxers' minds. Presenting studies and documentation and evidence is likely to just cause them to dig their heels in further.

How facts backfire - The Boston Globe

Annnnndddd, now at 26 pages, and still a waste of time and effort ... :)

Specializes in OR, Nursing Professional Development.
I have restocked the kettle corn popcorn. Carry on.

Care to share? I have a tendency to burn popcorn when I try to make it.

Specializes in Critical Care.
I know . . . Isn't BostonFNP amazing! :inlove:

Yes. He. Is. Just keep talking BostonFNP.

:p

Specializes in Critical Care.
I have restocked the kettle corn popcorn. Carry on.

Quit bogarting the kettle corn...pass this way...

No, I had not read all the previous posts (or yours either, as of yet)as I am new to the site, and had trouble getting in. I have read a few posts as of now, and am glad to see so many thinking people questioning this issue. I was referring to the main article posted by the site, which is pro-vaccine. I'm so used to seeing only one side presented in nursing school, the media, etc. I don;t know if Dr. Sherry Tenpenny's website has been mentioned, but there is access there to a whole library of medical research on vaccines. When I have time to read your post, I will be happy to respond.

Specializes in CVICU.
Thinking for yourself is always a good thing, provided it is done with an understanding of the data. I am sure you have read the actual data not just the CDC summary.

The 2014-5 influenza season, like the 2004-5 season, was drastically altered by A(H3N2) virus. There was antigenic drift this past season in H3N2 and H3N2 was responsible for 95% of documented cases, unfortunately, of those cases more than 80% were drifted H3N2 (3C.2a, 3C.3a). The VE for vaccine-like H3N2 was 49%, unfortunately the majority of cases were 3C.2a with a VE of 15%.

If one looks at the flu season data for the majority of seasons the VE is consistently in the 47-62% range, save for the seasons with known antigenic drift. Making a bold statement based on a small part of the data isn't good science.

Please post your claims of 47-62% consistently…

I am not going to manipulate data to back my claims….or justify my line of support. But I have stated pure data, not "what if" speculation. WHich is what you just posted. Overstating is bad science.