The Controversy: Mandatory Flu Vaccines

Many hospitals are moving towards creating mandatory influenza vaccination policies as a condition of employment. Such mandates are causing surefire responses on both sides of the fence. What is the push behind the movement, and what is causing the pushback?

Updated:  

First, let me just go over some of the symptoms of the flu, and then we will get down to business on the controversy surrounding the push to create mandatory flu vaccines for healthcare workers:

  • Sudden onset fever
  • Headache
  • Chills
  • Myalgia
  • Dry cough
  • Sore throat
  • Stuffy nose
  • Loss of appetite
  • Limb or joint pain
  • Difficulty sleeping
  • Diarrhea or upset stomach

I can't think of anyone who wants any of these symptoms, or to come down with the flu, can you?

Influenza vaccination research has clearly documented the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine (Google it - you will find a plethora of information...however, I will list some links at the end of this article for your information). However, even though there is sufficient evidence to prove the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine, vaccination rates among healthcare workers are pitifully low. In 2013, only 55% of nurses in the frontlines were vaccinated.

Organizations such as The Joint Commission, the American Nurses Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Centers for Disease Control, Healthy People 2020, etc., etc., have stated their position on recommending the flu vaccine for healthcare workers in order to decrease the risk of exposure and reduce deaths. Due to this recommendation, many healthcare facilities are now creating mandatory flu vaccine policies as a condition of employment.

Employers who create mandatory policies will have exemptions, of course. Exemptions are made for medical and religious exceptions. For places that do not have a mandatory flu vaccine, they may "strongly recommend" the vaccination and may have a declination form for employees to submit if they refuse the vaccine. Additionally, some employers will enforce refusers to wear a mask during flu season while they are at work in order to protect the patients and the employee.

What is the purpose behind the push toward flu vaccines?

Evidence has shown that there are more than 36,000 deaths in the US each year related to influenza, and more than 200,000 hospitalizations. Influenza is the 6th leading cause of death. Healthcare workers are the leading cause of influenza outbreaks in the healthcare system. up to 50% of people who are infected by the flu virus do not fill ill for several days and can spread the virus to people at risk of complications and death from the flu. Additionally, evidence shows vaccination decreases mortality by 40%, decreases the spread of nosocomial infections by 43%, and decreases absenteeism by 20-30%.

Additionally, there is the ethics to consider. As healthcare workers, we have all taken an oath to "do no harm". As a nurse caring for patients who are not in their most physically healthy state, do we take the vaccination in order to prevent spreading the flu to our vulnerable patients, in order to "do no harm"? We must consider this when we make our decision to take or refuse the vaccination.

What hospitals have created a mandatory flu vaccine policy?

I have the names of a few hospitals, and this is by no means a comprehensive list. This is based on a ListServe survey of hospitals and these are the responses received:

  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Philadelphia, PA) - since 2009
  • Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics (Kansas City, MO)
  • Children's Colorado (Aurora, CO)
  • Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters (Norfolk, VA)
  • Children's Medical Center Dallas (Dallas, TX) - since 2012
  • Riley Children's (Indianapolis, IN) - since 2012
  • East Tennessee Children's (Knoxville, TX) - since 2013
  • Boston Children's (Boston, MA)
  • Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns (San Diego, CA) - since 2013
  • Roger Williams Medical Center (Providence, RI)
  • Brookwood Medical Center (Birmingham, AL)
  • Johns Hopkins (all hospitals/clinics) (Baltimore, MD)
  • Driscoll Children's Hospital (Corpus Christi, TX)
  • Spohn Health System (Corpus Christi / San Antonio, TX)
  • All Connecticut Hospitals

What are some reasons that people refuse the flu vaccine?

Refusal may be largely due to misconceptions related to the vaccine. Fears that the immune system will cause them to get the flu, beliefs that hygiene and better nutrition are more helpful than the vaccine, fear of needles, beliefs that the vaccine does not work, and fear of side effects. Others believe that they have a constitutional right to refuse the vaccine and that mandatory policies are violating these rights.

Common concerns and myths about the flu vaccination

(taken from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health outline of flu vaccine talking points for managers)

The flu shot will give me the flu

The flu shot does not give people the flu. It uses inactivated ("dead") virus. People may still catch a cold or other virus that the vaccine is not designed match.

I don't believe the flu vaccine actually works

Studies have shown that flu vaccination prevents flu in 70% to 90% of healthy adults younger than 65 years old.

I had the vaccination last year

You need a new vaccine every year - the virus changes over time.

What about possible adverse reactions

Serious adverse reactions are very rare. They are explained on the CDC's Vaccine Information Statement, which is distributed when the vaccine is administered.

Local short-term reactions - such soreness at the vaccination site, slight fever, achy feeling - may occur but usually do not last long. Over the counter medicines are helpful. Even short-term reactions are much less bothersome than catching the flu and feeling very sick for days.

I'm not in a high-risk group

Your patients are at-risk, and possibly some friends and family members. You can be infected with the flu virus but not feel ill - and can still transmit flu to at-risk patients.

The flu vaccine made every year does not match the circulating flu strain

Inactivated influenza vaccine is effective in preventing transmission and reducing complications of the flu. In years when there is a close match between the vaccine and circulating virus strains, the vaccine prevents illness among approximately 70%--90% of healthy adults under 65 years of age. Vaccinating healthy adults also has been proven to lead to decreased work absenteeism and use of health-care resources, including use of antibiotics. Strong protection is also expected when the vaccine is not a close match with circulating strains, with 50%--77% effectiveness in these instances. In addition, effectiveness against influenza-related hospitalization for healthy adults from inactivated vaccine is estimated at 90%.

Knowledge is Power

All healthcare facilities will be facing the choice of creating a mandatory influenza vaccination in the near future, if they have not already. In order to make an informed decision on the topic, we must have information. Knowledge is power. Before you make a blanket statement on pros or cons, have the information you need, know the research, and make an educated decision.

Please respond to this article by answering the following questions:

  1. Do you take the flu vaccine yearly? If you do not, what is the reason you do not participate (if you don't mind answering this question)?
  2. Does your employer have a mandatory influenza vaccination policy as a condition of employment? If yes, where do you work?
  3. What concerns do you have about the flu vaccine?
  4. Do you know if anyone who has been released from their job because they did not get the flu vaccine?

References

American Association of Family Practitioners. (2011). AAFP supports mandatory flu vaccinations for healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: AAFP Supports Mandatory Flu Vaccinations for Health Care Personnel

ATrain. (2014). To accept or refuse the flu vaccine. Retrieved from: ZZZ_133_Influenza: Module 7

CDC. (2014). Vaccination: Who should do it, who should not and who should take precautions. Retrieved from: Vaccination: Who Should Do It, Who Should Not and Who Should Take Precautions | Seasonal Influenza (Flu) | CDC

Influenza Action Coalition. (2015). Influenza vaccination honor roll. Retrieved from: Honor Roll: Mandatory Influenza Vaccination Policies for Healthcare Personnel

Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2014). Talking points for managers. Retrieved from: http://tinyurl.com/p6nbg2u

National adult and influenza immunization summit. (2015). Vaccinating healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: Vaccinating Healthcare Personnel - National Adult and Influenza Immunization Summit

NursingTimes. (2014). Why do health workers decline flu vaccination? Retrieved from: http://www.nursingtimes.net/Journals/2014/11/28/y/k/x/031214-Why-do-health-workers-decline-flu-vaccination.pdf

TJC. (2012). R3 Report: Requirement, rationale, reference. Retrieved from: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/R3_Report_Issue_3_5_18_12_final.pdf

Specializes in Reproductive & Public Health.
Exactly, so it seems to be a little disingenuous to require one who is not vaccinated wear a mask around patients, but not one who is vaccinated, who can be ill at any time as well and spread whatever. It seems the whole thing is a charade, to say they "care" for the patient, but only from one is not vaccinated and must wear a mask. I have not had the flu, yet not vaccinated in 10 years. Curious isn't it. :speechless:

the mask is a joke and IMO it is more a punishment and an attempt at public shaming than an actual public health measure. I do not know what the right answer is in terms of mandatory flu vaccines for health care workers. But I do know that the anti vax "science" is anything but.

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
Exactly, so it seems to be a little disingenuous to require one who is not vaccinated wear a mask around patients, but not one who is vaccinated, who can be ill at any time as well and spread whatever. It seems the whole thing is a charade, to say they "care" for the patient, but only from one not vaccinated and wearing a mask. I have not had the flu, yet not vaccinated in 10 years. Curious isn't it. :speechless:

It may be, but employers can do as they wish for the most part. But just because both those who have been vaccinated and haven't been can both get influenza doesn't mean that their risk of having influenza is the same, or their probability of being a vector for it is the same.

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
Lo and behold the day after I posted on this thread I had a fully immunized pediatric patient who had had the mumps months ago. :coldfeet:.

Did they catch it from an unvaccinated person? Had they traveled abroad? It's an excellent argument for herd immunity.

Anti-vaxxers seem to think that for a vaccine to be effective it has to 100% prevent a disease.

Specializes in LTAC, ICU, ER, Informatics.

1)__ Do you take the flu vaccine yearly? If you do not, what is the reason you do not participate (if you don't mind answering this question)?

Yes, always.

2)__ Does your employer have a mandatory influenza vaccination policy as a condition of employment? If yes, where do you work?

Yes. Large health network in North Central Texas.

3)__ What concerns do you have about the flu vaccine?

None, but I don't take the live vaccine because of auto-immune issues.

4)__ Do you know if anyone who has been released from their job because they did not get the flu vaccine?

No.

Lo and behold the day after I posted on this thread I had a fully immunized pediatric patient who had had the mumps months ago. :coldfeet:.

Seems like your little fella should be a walking billboard advertising the need to attain herd immunity, what happens when it drops below the protection threshold, and that opting out of some really basic vaccinations is equivalent to cutting one's nose off to spite his face.

Pretty obvious he didn't get it FROM an IMMUNE person, but rather a non-vaccinated walking viral load. Not something to gloat about. And the reason I have some legitimate fears about my own fully-vaccinated kids meeting up with some of yours out there.

1)__ Do you take the flu vaccine yearly? If you do not, what is the reason you do not participate (if you don't mind answering this question)? I take the vaccine

2)__ Does your employer have a mandatory influenza vaccination policy as a condition of employment? If yes, where do you work? No

3)__ What concerns do you have about the flu vaccine? None

4)__ Do you know if anyone who has been released from their job because they did not get the flu vaccine? No

Ooh, I'm jealous! Would have found that lecture fascinating.

.

Here's the class I took.

https://www.coursera.org/course/vaccines

Specializes in geriatrics.

To BostonFNP: You should revisit the NVIC.org website. It is true you will not find original research on this website but you will find numerous links to universities and other researchers doing legitimate research on vaccines. NVIC advocates for the principle of informed consent. Informed consent for medications and or medical procedures should be an ethical principle of medicine and vaccines should not be an exception. Vaccines are an intervention on a healthy human being that has the potential to cause serious injury or death. Everyone needs to be educated because ultimately you are the one responsible for your own health.

I am not an anti-vaxer (my son had all his vaccines, I took the hepatitis B series as soon as my institution offered it due to the amount of blood and blood products I handled daily - oncology unit, and I plan to take the pneumovax at some point.) But due to my reaction to it (mentioned previously - entire arm swells and turns red) as well as not appreciating taking a questionably effective vaccine yearly, I would not take it even if I could. Not against vaccines in general, just this particular (sometimes effective, sometimes not) vaccine.

Specializes in home care,teaching,private duty,etc..

1- No. Took it several years ago and felt miserable a few days later. Haven't had it since and have been healthy. I don't buy into products where there is no legal responsibility on the part of the maker. My understanding is we cannot take legal action against the makers even if harm is done.

2- it is strongly encouraged but many still wear masks which is allowed. Work in a small community hospital upstate NY. The only nurse I know of with the flu, got the vaccine which was the wrong strain for what she got.

3- my concerns are noted in 1 & 2 as well as it being a new vaccine each year. I have no problem with the ongoing standard ones that have been around for years.

4- As far as I know, no one has lost their job over this issue.

To BostonFNP: You should revisit the NVIC.org website. It is true you will not find original research on this website but you will find numerous links to universities and other researchers doing legitimate research on vaccines. NVIC advocates for the principle of informed consent. Informed consent for medications and or medical procedures should be an ethical principle of medicine and vaccines should not be an exception. Vaccines are an intervention on a healthy human being that has the potential to cause serious injury or death. Everyone needs to be educated because ultimately you are the one responsible for your own health.

NVIC unfortunately is an anti-vax website that spreads misinformation.

Response to NVIC | The Vaccine Advocate

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is an anti-vaccine organization dedicated to reforming vaccination laws and policy to make it easier to obtain exemptions from mandatory vaccination laws. NVIC spreads misinformation about vaccine safety and effectiveness and can be ascribed some of the blame for the recent decline in vaccination rates and increase in diseases once eliminated from the United States like measles and mumps. Recently, NVIC published a guide to reforming vaccine law and policy. This guide is problematic as it encourages individuals to refuse vaccination and misinforms the public about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. This is our response to NVIC's guide.

The National Vaccine Information Center(NVIC”), and other anti-vaccine groups, are not simply consumer advocates for informed consent.

NVIC and other anti-vaccine groups are anti-science, anti-vaccine and anti-informed consent.

This document is a response to NVIC'sReforming Vaccine Policy and Law: A Guide.”1 Our format follows that found in the NVIC guide and is intended to respond to the key claims and arguments made by NVIC.

Attacking vaccines by misrepresenting their risks and benefits is problematic. NVIC ignores existing science and draws on unreliable sources to overstate the risk of vaccines and underplay their benefits. NVIC and other anti-vaccine groups are anti-science, anti-vaccine and anti-informed consent.

This document is a response to NVIC's Reforming Vaccine Policy and Law: A Guide.”1Our format follows that found in the NVIC guide and is intended to respond to the key claims and arguments made by NVIC

Here are a few of places I frequent.

Voices For Vaccines - parents speaking up for immunization

Nurses Who Vaccinate

https://www.facebook.com/thevaccinepage/info?tab=page_info

Supporting parents in the challenging process of understanding vaccines and protecting their children's health. Clear, concise answers without judgment.

https://www.facebook.com/Crunchymamasprovaccine?fref=ts

I know there are more of me out there. Moms who breastfeed, co-sleep, eat only organic fruits and veg yet believe in science and vaccines. Join me!