Many hospitals are moving towards creating mandatory influenza vaccination policies as a condition of employment. Such mandates are causing surefire responses on both sides of the fence. What is the push behind the movement, and what is causing the pushback?
Updated:
First, let me just go over some of the symptoms of the flu, and then we will get down to business on the controversy surrounding the push to create mandatory flu vaccines for healthcare workers:
I can't think of anyone who wants any of these symptoms, or to come down with the flu, can you?
Influenza vaccination research has clearly documented the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine (Google it - you will find a plethora of information...however, I will list some links at the end of this article for your information). However, even though there is sufficient evidence to prove the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine, vaccination rates among healthcare workers are pitifully low. In 2013, only 55% of nurses in the frontlines were vaccinated.
Organizations such as The Joint Commission, the American Nurses Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Centers for Disease Control, Healthy People 2020, etc., etc., have stated their position on recommending the flu vaccine for healthcare workers in order to decrease the risk of exposure and reduce deaths. Due to this recommendation, many healthcare facilities are now creating mandatory flu vaccine policies as a condition of employment.
Employers who create mandatory policies will have exemptions, of course. Exemptions are made for medical and religious exceptions. For places that do not have a mandatory flu vaccine, they may "strongly recommend" the vaccination and may have a declination form for employees to submit if they refuse the vaccine. Additionally, some employers will enforce refusers to wear a mask during flu season while they are at work in order to protect the patients and the employee.
Evidence has shown that there are more than 36,000 deaths in the US each year related to influenza, and more than 200,000 hospitalizations. Influenza is the 6th leading cause of death. Healthcare workers are the leading cause of influenza outbreaks in the healthcare system. up to 50% of people who are infected by the flu virus do not fill ill for several days and can spread the virus to people at risk of complications and death from the flu. Additionally, evidence shows vaccination decreases mortality by 40%, decreases the spread of nosocomial infections by 43%, and decreases absenteeism by 20-30%.
Additionally, there is the ethics to consider. As healthcare workers, we have all taken an oath to "do no harm". As a nurse caring for patients who are not in their most physically healthy state, do we take the vaccination in order to prevent spreading the flu to our vulnerable patients, in order to "do no harm"? We must consider this when we make our decision to take or refuse the vaccination.
I have the names of a few hospitals, and this is by no means a comprehensive list. This is based on a ListServe survey of hospitals and these are the responses received:
Refusal may be largely due to misconceptions related to the vaccine. Fears that the immune system will cause them to get the flu, beliefs that hygiene and better nutrition are more helpful than the vaccine, fear of needles, beliefs that the vaccine does not work, and fear of side effects. Others believe that they have a constitutional right to refuse the vaccine and that mandatory policies are violating these rights.
(taken from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health outline of flu vaccine talking points for managers)
The flu shot does not give people the flu. It uses inactivated ("dead") virus. People may still catch a cold or other virus that the vaccine is not designed match.
Studies have shown that flu vaccination prevents flu in 70% to 90% of healthy adults younger than 65 years old.
You need a new vaccine every year - the virus changes over time.
Serious adverse reactions are very rare. They are explained on the CDC's Vaccine Information Statement, which is distributed when the vaccine is administered.
Local short-term reactions - such soreness at the vaccination site, slight fever, achy feeling - may occur but usually do not last long. Over the counter medicines are helpful. Even short-term reactions are much less bothersome than catching the flu and feeling very sick for days.
Your patients are at-risk, and possibly some friends and family members. You can be infected with the flu virus but not feel ill - and can still transmit flu to at-risk patients.
Inactivated influenza vaccine is effective in preventing transmission and reducing complications of the flu. In years when there is a close match between the vaccine and circulating virus strains, the vaccine prevents illness among approximately 70%--90% of healthy adults under 65 years of age. Vaccinating healthy adults also has been proven to lead to decreased work absenteeism and use of health-care resources, including use of antibiotics. Strong protection is also expected when the vaccine is not a close match with circulating strains, with 50%--77% effectiveness in these instances. In addition, effectiveness against influenza-related hospitalization for healthy adults from inactivated vaccine is estimated at 90%.
All healthcare facilities will be facing the choice of creating a mandatory influenza vaccination in the near future, if they have not already. In order to make an informed decision on the topic, we must have information. Knowledge is power. Before you make a blanket statement on pros or cons, have the information you need, know the research, and make an educated decision.
Please respond to this article by answering the following questions:
References
American Association of Family Practitioners. (2011). AAFP supports mandatory flu vaccinations for healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: AAFP Supports Mandatory Flu Vaccinations for Health Care Personnel
ATrain. (2014). To accept or refuse the flu vaccine. Retrieved from: ZZZ_133_Influenza: Module 7
CDC. (2014). Vaccination: Who should do it, who should not and who should take precautions. Retrieved from: Vaccination: Who Should Do It, Who Should Not and Who Should Take Precautions | Seasonal Influenza (Flu) | CDC
Influenza Action Coalition. (2015). Influenza vaccination honor roll. Retrieved from: Honor Roll: Mandatory Influenza Vaccination Policies for Healthcare Personnel
Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2014). Talking points for managers. Retrieved from: http://tinyurl.com/p6nbg2u
National adult and influenza immunization summit. (2015). Vaccinating healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: Vaccinating Healthcare Personnel - National Adult and Influenza Immunization Summit
NursingTimes. (2014). Why do health workers decline flu vaccination? Retrieved from: http://www.nursingtimes.net/Journals/2014/11/28/y/k/x/031214-Why-do-health-workers-decline-flu-vaccination.pdf
TJC. (2012). R3 Report: Requirement, rationale, reference. Retrieved from: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/R3_Report_Issue_3_5_18_12_final.pdf
1) I get the flu vaccine yearly as it is required by my job and because I deal with immunocompromised and elderly patients. Can't pass on what I don't have. I wouldn't get it otherwise, as I have no small children nor immunocompromised nor elderly people in my life that I can catch it from/give it to.2) All of the facilities I have worked at (LTC, hospital, school) and agencies I have worked for have required the vaccine.
3) Concerns? The repeat of the same moronic thread every year between anti-vaxxers and pro-vaxxers. The stupid people come out in droves in September. I am also concerned about the number of people who work/visit/volunteer in LTC that don't get vaccinated and the sweet little old people they kill with their principles.
4) Yes. A couple of idiots who declared they have the right to refuse a vaccine and they shouldn't have to sign any declination form or wear a mask, no matter whether it's a job requirement or not.
Just sign the form, people. And wear the mask. I don't want you breathing your flu germs in my general direction.
But you got the flu shot so why do you care if they breath in your direction. If the flu shot works, as you advocate you shouldn't have to worry about getting the flu from someone breathing in your direction.
Could so-called "herd immunity" be a figment of
the imagination/brainwashing found in "herd mentality"?
I'm more concerned with the dangers of "shedding" onto immune compromised people, by recently vaccinated folks, who I think should voluntarily do "self isolation" (avoid contact with patients and staff), until the shedding possibility is over.
Myths abound--for example: Alcohol wipes don't kill C. diff bacteria,
but too many think the opposite.
Could so-called "herd immunity" be a figment ofthe imagination/brainwashing found in "herd mentality"?
I'm more concerned with the dangers of "shedding" onto immune compromised people, by recently vaccinated folks, who I think should voluntarily do "self isolation" (avoid contact with patients and staff), until the shedding possibility is over.
Myths abound--for example: Alcohol wipes don't kill C. diff bacteria,
but too many think the opposite.
Herd immunity is simple math nothing more nothing less. It is no more imaginary than 2+2=4.
Let me get this straight, you are concerned about the inactivated influneza vaccine (shot) shedding virus? Is that your concern?
Everyone who went to nursing school knows alcohol doesn't kill c. diff.
But you got the flu shot so why do you care if they breath in your direction. If the flu shot works, as you advocate you shouldn't have to worry about getting the flu from someone breathing in your direction.
You are of the belief that a vaccine needs to be 100% effective to be worth having? Sadly, no vaccines are. The good news is they have been very successful anyways.
To Spidey's mom re:your comments about NVIC.org
Amanda Z. Naprawa is a lawyer who writes a blog she calls "The Vaccine Advocate" Her comments that NVIC is anti-science, anti-vaccine and anti-informed consent are beyond comment. She lists some websites she likes. Some are financed by the CDC and pharmacy trade groups. There are legitimate concerns about vaccines that need to be addressed with more independent research. To dismiss people who question the safety and efficacy of vaccines as anti-science is not helpful. I believe vaccines can be made safer. I also believe that the current child vaccine schedule is too aggressive. You need to be healthy to receive a vaccine. We are exposed to more man made chemicals than ever before. The past 30 years has seen an explosion in allergies, autism, and Alzheimer's and we don't know why. Pollution free air, food, and water would be a good place to start to get our health back.
I was born in the fifties and had the mumps, measles , and chicken pox. I also received all the recommended vaccines in place at that time. I have also traveled extensively in my adult life and was required to be vaccinated. I got them because I wanted to travel. My decision and I accepted the risks. I think anyone would be foolish not to consider getting most of the recommended vaccines provided you are healthy. Having said that I personally do not get the flu shot. I do not wish to have formaldehyde or mercury injected into my body. I will get a shingles vaccine soon. It is a shot for a specific disease that does not contain any preservatives. I will be exposed to a bovine protein but I consider the risk acceptable. Informed consent. Know what you are getting,know the risks, and possible reactions. If someone does not want to accept the risks I accept their decision.
Having said that I personally do not get the flu shot. I do not wish to have formaldehyde or mercury injected into my body.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts as someone who seems to look at both sides of the issue and make an informed decision. I was hoping you could go a bit further and give your impression on these questions:
1. If your objection is to formaldehyde and thimerosal, what is it based on? Are there any compelling studies that have influenced your opinion/decision?
2. Have you considered FluMist which has neither?
3. Do you have concerns regarding the natural levels of those chemicals in our bodies through diet and environmental exposures?
Re: mandatory flu vaccine, I'm wondering why all the medical research on the ineffectiveness and damage of vaccines is not presented in this forum, especially after the recent testimony of Dr. Thompson (CDC) regarding the CDC cover-up of the strong evidence of the link between vaccination and autism? According to the government's vaccine adverse effect reporting program, the influenza vaccine had the most reported adverse effects of all (nearly one million, taking into account the CDC's own statement that less than 10% of all adverse effects are reported). This would bring the estimated death rate up to 10,000. As to efficacy,86% of those vaccinated still get the flu.
Re: mandatory flu vaccine, I'm wondering why all the medical research on the ineffectiveness and damage of vaccines is not presented in this forum, especially after the recent testimony of Dr. Thompson (CDC) regarding the CDC cover-up of the strong evidence of the link between vaccination and autism? According to the government's vaccine adverse effect reporting program, the influenza vaccine had the most reported adverse effects of all (nearly one million, taking into account the CDC's own statement that less than 10% of all adverse effects are reported). This would bring the estimated death rate up to 10,000. As to efficacy,86% of those vaccinated still get the flu.
Did you read the previous posts? This is a topic about influenza, but if you want to discuss Dr. Thompson and your factually incorrect statement, start a thread and we can discuss that component, but as this is not about MMR it can't be discussed here.
There (to my knowledge) has never been any association between autism and influenza. As above, I would happy to discuss the topic if you start a new thread on it.
As for influenza, please, share your citations and any scientific study you feel presents the other side of the debate! It will give us studies to talk about.
Could so-called "herd immunity" be a figment ofthe imagination/brainwashing found in "herd mentality"?
No....at least no more so than gravity is a figment of the imagination. Drop an apple. Hits the floor. Gravity proven. Herd immunity. Math equation with results documented extensively. Herd immunity proven.
I'm more concerned with the dangers of "shedding" onto immune compromised people, by recently vaccinated folks, who I think should voluntarily do "self isolation" (avoid contact with patients and staff), until the shedding possibility is over.
You want people to believe you are a retired RN, but speak utter nonsense. I'm curious to know how a dead virus causes illness in people around the person injected with the dead virus. Since there IS no shedding....it's nonsense.
Myths abound--for example: Alcohol wipes don't kill C. diff bacteria,but too many think the opposite.
A myth like this would only be spoken in non-nursing circles. Since you claim to BE a retired RN, surely YOU KNOW that this is nonsense....so why repeat it? As this is a nursing website, the only ones who would BELIEVE this myth would be people who are not nurses. Think of anyone offhand who fits that bill?
Tex.
232 Posts
I can't concentrate with Bostonfnp whispering sweet nothings into my ear. #mancrushmondays