The Case Against Job Hopping

Nurses Professionalism

Published

It seems that people can always find a "reason" for job hopping -- some more legitimate than others -- so why not just hop away? What's the downside? I'm only looking out for number one, and no one ELSE is going to do that.

Most employers -- and ALL the ones I've worked for -- genuinely want to treat their employees well. Reading some of the posts on AN, you'd think that all employers were out to run employees into the ground with back breaking labor for inadequate compensation and decreasing benefits. Yes, benefits are taking a hit -- as the entire economy did. Employers have to do more with less, and they're passing that on to the employees. It would be nice if the hospital would just take the hit in the profit margin -- or maybe out of the CEO's bonuses -- but business doesn't really work that way. We're all going to feel the pinch. Jumping to a new job because your employer, feeling the pinch, is passing it along to employees just ensures that you're going to wind up in a new place with no seniority. When that new place starts making cuts, you'll be the first to feel them.

Seniority really does protect you from some of the pain when employers feel the squeeze and start squeezing on down the line. They may cut sick leave or vacation days, but if you've already got some of each banked, you're in a better position than someone who just came on board and has neither. You may not get a pay raise, but at least you have a job. With benefits. When one of my employers cut out the pension plan, those of us who were already vested were grandfathered in. Those hired after a certain date weren't eligible. When they started cutting staff and laying folks off, the least senior went first. If you think it's hard finding a job now, just think about trying to find one after the biggest hospital system in town just laid off 10% of their nursing staff!

Job hopping denies you the chance to become competent. The nurse who has four jobs in one year doesn't have a year of experience; she has three months of experience four times. And the nurse who has four jobs in four years has one year of experience four times. If you're always going somewhere new, you have to relearn the same old things: where is the bathroom, where do I hang my coat, how do I get meds from pharmacy, what is the procedure for ordering blood, how does this doctor like his cases done???????? You never get deeper into the nitty gritty and you never build on your knowledge because you're off to start all over again somewhere else. It takes about two years to become competent as a nurse, and in your particular job. There are posters who will flame me and insist that they've been in their job a year, and they're totally competent. Most of the time, they're wrong. And they don't know what they don't know. That's the most frightening thing of all -- a nurse who insists she's competent, but doesn't know what she doesn't know.

Staying in a job makes you senior staff, and senior staff get to participate in hiring/firing decisions, precepting, chairing committees, design planning if a new unit is in the offing, equipment purchase decisions and countless other aspects of unit life. You have the chance to become a real expert in your specialty and to pass that expertise on to others. Working as a under two year employee is a whole lot different than being senior staff. But if you're always job hopping, you will never get the chance to experience that feeling of ownership in your unit.

Retirement planning is boring, and it's way off in the future anyway, so why should I care that I've never stayed anywhere long enough to be vested in a retirement plan? Someone with more financial expertise than me can explain it so much better, but if you're constantly job hopping, you throw away the chance for matching funds (FREE MONEY!) and the chancee to keep what you've saved in the company retirement fund and take it with you when/if you do eventually leave. It's possible to plan around all of this, but most of us don't know how and don't bother to learn. Then suddenly you're five years from retirement and haven't saved any money.

Job hopping gives you a bad reputation and a worse resume. At some point, you're going to start getting turned down for interviews because no one will want to hire someone they'll have to train and then replace a year later. If that hasn't happened to you yet, you still have a chance to turn things around. Choose the best job you can find and then STAY.

Specializes in Oncology; medical specialty website.

Sounds like some of you work for "Dante's Medical Center." Not every place is like that. Even though I don't work for my employer anymore, I still get long-term disability from them, and will continue to do so until I'm 65. I also get life insurance. That may not sound like a lot, but that disability check helps a lot, and if I relapse, the life insurance may come in handy for my parents. I still get charged the employee rate for some of my rx's, which is a huge savings.

Specializes in ER.

Well, that's why I am trying to get out of "Dante's Medical Center." Things are going downhill due to changes and I am sure they will get better down the line but right now? I am unhappy and it's easier to get back into an ER while my previous history is still fresh than to wait a year or more.

Specializes in ICU.
Sounds like some of you work for "Dante's Medical Center."

That was good! :)

Specializes in Clinical Research, Outpt Women's Health.

I agree things have changed in that for many employers their is no loyalty. However, it looks much better if you can at least have 2-4 years per job when you go looking for a new one. A short 3 monther now and then is fine because everyone knows sometimes it just isnt right. But if you string a bunch of a year or less together it is going to make it hard to get an interview at a good place.

Specializes in NICU.

This is an interesting discussion. The facility I work at is making changes that essentially discourages loyalty

Specializes in Telemetry.

Just found this on Medscape. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/824019?nlid=55647_2822&src=wnl_edit_medp_nurs&spon=24 Would be nice if both staff nurses AND The Powers That Be would make a concerted effort to increase longevity. I very much liked my co - workers on the floor with me at my first job. They are the reason I lasted ~5 years there. The snarky comments and dubious practices of upper management and the corporation (oh, yeah. ..people) who owned is drove many competent and seasoned nurses away.

One point that I disagree with in the OP is how senior nurses have some ownership of the unit and how they participate in hiring/firing, precepting, committee, and etc.

Most places I've worked senior nurses rarely do anything of the things you've mentioned. I've mainly seen nurses with 5 years of experience or less precept, join committees , and participate in hiring and firing.

Most senior nurses I've worked with, do their 12 hours and go home. They make way more than I do but aren't required to do anything extra for the unit. Me on the other hand was asked to join 2 committees and attend shared governance meetings because the senior nurses don't have too.

I personally don't have a problem with this, as I believe senior nurses has paid their dues and do contribute alot to the unit.

I'm off topic, I just wanted to make a point that not all senior nurses like yourself takes ownership in the unit. Some do but not all.

Specializes in CDI Supervisor; Formerly NICU.

Several ladies from my nursing school cohort, which graduated 5 years ago, have had 4-5 nursing jobs since we became nurses. It amazes me. I've had 3 FT jobs in my life, now moving to number 4 (my 2nd as a nurse).

I try to explain to them that they're making themselves unhirable, but they won't listen. Oh well. Drive on, big girls.

Specializes in CDI Supervisor; Formerly NICU.

Speaking of discouraging loyalty: Hospitals absolutely do this, in regards to nurses who started their career at a facility as a new grad.

If you start as a new grad, you start at the absolute bottom of the nursing pay scale in a facility. Year by year, you might gain 2-3% in annual raises. This amounts to CENTS, usually, rather than dollars. If you stay there 5, 10, 15 years...you'll always be one of the lowest paid nurses in the joint. The only way to equalize your pay with those of similar experience is to leave your job and go somewhere else, where you're hired based on experience rather than toiling on a new hire pay scale.

It's completely asinine that hospitals do this, and it is totally counterproductive to good nursing and good staffing.

Specializes in Psych, Corrections, Med-Surg, Ambulatory.

Some things have changed; some have not. I'm not a big proponent of company loyalty; most nowadays are happy to treat you like a piece of meat. I also don't advocate staying somewhere that's sucking your soul. However, frequent job-hopping makes you look like a flake who can't commit to anything. Unless you have to run away screaming, it's really to your advantage to stay somewhere at least 2 years to build some competence in that area. As far as accruing sick and vacation time, and getting vested in the pension plan, you have to crunch the numbers and weigh the pros and cons.

Nowadays, it's best to think of yourself as an independent contractor, even if you're really an employee. Make your career work to your best advantage. If you think job-hopping does that, great. I do think it usually turns out to be counter-productive. For people who need to find their "dream job", you have to weigh that need with market reality. For a lot of us, a dream job is anything that provides a paycheque.

Specializes in geriatrics.

It wouldn't matter nearly as much if there was a nursing shortage and employers were desperate to hire. But that's not the case. So it's more about protecting yourself and your future options, not about loyalty to the employer when you're considering leaving a job.

If you've got 100 applicants, who would you choose? Someone who might leave in a year or less, or someone who you think might stick around?

Define job hopping.

I am on job #4 in my 7 years as a nurse.

Did leaving after an average of 2 years on each job hurt my ability to find another job? Not in the least.

Because I have a diverse background, have shown flexibility and adaptability, have solid references due to having developed good relationships with my co-workers and having performed above average in my job duties, and have demonstrated a commitment to continued learning by taking classes, keeping my certifications current (even if not required for my specialty) and attained specialty certification, I am a highly desirable employee. I have never left a position on bad terms, and any of my previous jobs would take me back in a heartbeat.

While it's true that by looking at my resume one could infer a risk that they may only get a couple of years out of me before I move on, they're willing to take that risk in order to have an exceptional employee who is an asset to their organization, even if it's only for a couple of years. If I experience a high level of job satisfaction, they may be able to retain me longer.

Sounds pretty conceited, no? But I have worked really hard to make myself an asset to wherever it is I work. I work hard, never sitting on my butt when others are running around drowning. I make the time and effort to learn more about my specialty and develop my skills. I display a positive attitude while at work. I contribute to the unit by showing up at the staff meetings and being solution oriented when discussing problems. I'm friendly to my co-workers, and try to make them feel good about themselves by pointing out things that I think they are really good at or that I admire about them. This is how I develop positive relationships with those I work with, including my supervisors, and end up getting good references and avoid burning bridges when I leave.

The days of the "company man" are over. Switching jobs in a less than 5 year span is becoming more and more common and one could even argue that it's become the norm, and is not as deadly to your career as some would have you think.

+ Add a Comment