Published
I think an entry standard is a good thing, but just for RNs. I don't think the current BSN programs should be the standard, though.
I wish there was a BSN-diploma hybrid, so that the new grad had all the theory and the skills. Maybe drop some of the humanities and electives and add clinical time for all eight semesters.
If it does come to pass, I definitely believe in grandfathering.
There are states in the eastern part of the US, who are actively debating whether to require a BSN as a minimal requirement to become an RN. If this becomes law, should currently licensed RNs be "grandfathered in?"While I hold a BS in Nursing, I personally do not agree with mandating a change. I have seen nurses: the good, the bad, and the ugly who are diploma grads, 2 year college grads and 4+ year grads.
What do you think?
Hasn't this "debate" been going on for 30+ years? Is there actually any serious forward movement?
There are states in the eastern part of the US, who are actively debating whether to require a BSN as a minimal requirement to become an RN. If this becomes law, should currently licensed RNs be "grandfathered in?"
I live in the Eastern part of the country (New England) and I'm wondering which states are debating this. I know it's not CT. But, I do know that many hospitals in State are almost all starting to require BSNs (or require the applicant is in/will be enrolled in a BSN program) even for non-critical floors.
I think an entry standard is a good thing, but just for RNs.
That came out totally wrong. I meant we shouldn't phase out LPNs, not that only RNs should have an entry standard. Sheesh.
roser13, that's a good point. I've heard the said debate has been going on for decades and nothing has happened yet, so I wonder if this is a continuation of the same old, same old.
Been a nurse since 1977. This is hardly new. And I know of ZERO states that are 'actively' considering this- OP could you provide some documentation of this?
But, to the original point, yes, I do think BSN should be the entry to practice degree for RNs. Yes, current RNs should be grandfathered.
I'll go one further and say an AAS should be the standard path for LPN/LVN - and yes, current LPN/LVN should be grandfathered.
Back when I was in LPN school, there were grandfathered LPNs practicing in the hospital who had done on the job training and never attended an actual school. They passed an exam that had both didactic and clinical portions, and were granted licensure.
I first heard about this as I was a part of a national organization of nurses. Here is an article outlining some of the issues that I found online. Hope that helps.
nurseactivist
247 Posts
There are states in the eastern part of the US, who are actively debating whether to require a BSN as a minimal requirement to become an RN. If this becomes law, should currently licensed RNs be "grandfathered in?"
While I hold a BS in Nursing, I personally do not agree with mandating a change. I have seen nurses: the good, the bad, and the ugly who are diploma grads, 2 year college grads and 4+ year grads.
What do you think?