Near miss, should I be blamed?

Published

This week I got in trouble for a near miss. Well... myself, the secretary, the PCA, and the nurse I took report from. We were all written up for it, but I was told that it was primarily my fault. This is a long post, but for anyone who has the time to read it, here's what happened:

I was floating to PCCU and this particular patient was a fresh post-op open heart who had been transferred in from CVICU a bit early because they needed the bed. In my opinion, this patient should not have been moved from CV because he was still very unstable, on multiple drips, still had respiratory issues, still retaining a lot of fluid from the CHF, and had two lateral and one medial chest tubes draining sanguinous. He was NSR on the monitor but he had had 5 bypasses, and he came over with the pacer set at 50/20. The agency nurse who gave me report on this patient neglected to tell me quite a few important details about this guy. She was very angry and in a bad mood because she had had a very rough shift. All her assignments were pretty complicated cases, she kept complaining that she had to be literally running from one room to the next the whole time and how she couldn't wait to leave and that she was never coming back to work on this unit.

A number of things were strange about this whole event. First of all, the hospital has a policy to not give fresh open heart patients to agency nurses, but in this instance they did because they had no one else. As I would later find out, this particular nurse did not have any experience with cardiac patients and she did not follow some of the post op protocols (which later caused problems for me)---and more serious problems for the patient. The other thing is that PCCU has a policy to not give more than three assignments to a nurse who has fresh heart patients, especially when they are on titrated drips, but in this instance, they gave the nurse six assignments, and she apparently did not know that she should have refused. In my opinion, they shouldn't transfer any post op heart patient who's on titrated drips to stepdown because they need much closer monitoring than you can give when you have three or more other patients to take care of.

During report, she told me that the patient was stable (which was not true), that his surgical dressings were dry and intact (which was also not true), that his o2 sat was good (which was also not true), and that all his drips had been D/C'd except for a bag of LR which was going at 75cc/hr. I was to take over all her other assignments as well, and I spoke to the charge nurse about this because I didn't feel comfortable about having six patients and a fresh heart. Her response to me is that we were really short on staff, and since the patients are all stable we would play it by ear and she would try to make some changes if anything develops. My first big mistake was to agree to this. Under any other circumstances I would have refused the assignments and gone back home, but she warned me that I had already taken report and that if I left she would write me up for pt abandonment.

Only a few minutes into the shift, one of my other patients went asystole and we had to rush in there to run a code. Fortunately, we were able to bring the patient back, but by the time we stabilized the patient and moved him to the ICU I was nearly 2 hours behind with my assessments and chart reviews.

By the time I got around to doing my assessment on the open heart patient (who I decided to see first) I immediately realized that this patient was also going bad. The respirations were labored and I could hear the fluids on his lungs even without using the stethoscope. The continuous pulse ox monitor was still attached to his finger but the machine was off (it was not plugged in and the battery had died). He was supposedly on 5 liters of 02 via NC (which wasn't even humidified, by the way), and when I got the oximeter on again his sat was 80, and only God knows how long it had been there. (The nasal canula he was supposed to be wearing was on his forehead). Ok, so I rush to get the respiratory issue under control (called in RT, etc.). RT eventually had to put a nonrebreather on him, and protocol states that if a patient is unstable enough to need a nonrebreather they must be transferred to ICU. The guy was still not doing so good, and the anesthesiologist from the respiratory ICU was seriously contemplating putting him on a vent, but thankfully, that wasn't necessary. Of course, after I notified the MD and began to prep the pt I was told that there were no ICU beds. In emergency cases such as these, PCCU is supposed to implement ICU protocols and we had the equipment at hand so that was done. But, here's another big problem: ICU protocols have been initiated, but I still have six patients, and neither the charge nurse or the nursing supervisor is returning my calls because they are too busy fighting fires with serious staffing and other issues elsewhere.

Then I start to check out other things on the pt. The dressing on his chest was soaked through and it turned out that the guy had frank, active bleeding from the sternotomy. Applied some pressure to the site, reinforced the dressing and put out a call to the surgeon. But it didn't end there. The guy was also a new onset diabetic with hyperosmolar issues. I immediately went to check the blood sugar because he seemed confused and aggitated and I suspected that the blood sugar might be low because he had been on an insulin drip (which the nurse had told me was DC'd). An order had been written to D/C the insulin drip and switch the pt to a sliding scale with regular insulin and to change him from LR to D5 1/2 (neither of which had been implemented), according to the MAR and the diabetic flow sheets the nurse from the previous shift had been doing the blood sugar checks AC & HS instead of Q2 according to the protocols. Even though the MD had incorrectly written the order for AC and HS she should have known better because the patient was still NPO so an order for AC BS checks makes no sense. Furthermore, the insulin drip protocol overrides written orders for BS checks in all the units. The guy's BS was in the 30s so I immediately shut off the drip and pushed D50. He was also complaining of pain, but I didn't want to give him any narcotics right then because of the respiratory situation.

And, it gets worse. When I went to check the BS, I found that the patient was not wearing an arm band so there was nothing to scan into the glucometer. I eventually found the ID band and the blood arm band on the window ledge (he had been type and screened for blood and he needed 2 units to replace blood loss during surgery). I later found out that the nurse had cut the bands off because his previous IV site had infiltrated and his arm had swollen up so much that the bands were too tight. Yes, she did order new ones from admitting, but when they sent them up she grabbed the wrong ones from the nurses station and put them in the patient's room. So, in my haste to scan the arm band to check the BS I didn't immediately notice that it was the wrong patient name. She also did not give the second unit of PRBCs that was ordered. Thank God, I caught the mistake with the wrong blood ID band during the ID check for the second transfusion otherwise I would have transfused the wrong blood type, and the poor guy probably would not have survived a severe reaction.

The pulmonologist ordered diuresis with 80mg of IV lasix stat. When I went to give it I realized the guy did not have a foley in. How could you have an unstable surgical pt like this in a critical care unit with no foley? I began to wonder where she was getting the information she had been recording as his urine output on the nursing assessment sheet, then I figured she must have made it up because this guy was certainly in no position to use a urinal. Furthermore, the urine output she had recorded could not have been correct because if this guy had been NPO and receiving only 75 ccs of IV fluids an hour and putting out that much urine over the past several hours there's just no way he could still have so much fluid on him. Also, when I checked the post op orders I found that his AV pacer had been incorrectly set. And here's another big one: remember the drips that she told me were off? Well, not so! The guy came from CV on a titrated nitro drip, and not only could I not find any information on the flow sheet to prove that she was titrating the drip but it was actually still going @ 5 mics, which is exactly where it was set when he was transferred from CV hours ago. Also, the PCA who did the vital signs did not tell me his BP was critical low, in fact, I couldn't even find her! When I checked it myself it was 60s over 40s.

There were so many other things that were either not done or done incorrectly that by the time I got around to checking and fixing and assessing everything to prepare to send the patient back to the OR it was now almost 3 hours into the shift and I hadn't yet seen any of my other patients (except for the code) and all my meds were passed very, very late. I don't know what I would have done if one of the other patients had crashed that night. I could just imagine myself explaining to the board of nursing why I had not done any assessments on my other patients after being on shift for more than three hours!

Of course, an incident report had to be done, and administration is saying its primarily my fault because I should have done my initial assessment on my fresh heart patient sooner. I accept some of the responsibility, but I disagree that it was my fault. How do you rationalize switching priorities from responding to a code situation if you are made to believe in report that your other patients are stable. Also, why are they trying to throw all the blame on me when they are also at fault for giving this patient to a nurse with absolutely no critical care training or experience in the first place? Also, the charge nurse later denied that she and I had had a conversation about changing asssignments according to patient acuity. She instead said that I failed to show good professional judgment because I should not have accepted the assignments in the first place. I realize she was covering her butt, but I think its disgusting that she just flat out lied like that. Instead of looking at the whole picture and talking about how to prevent something like this from happening again, the whole incident deteriorated into one of fingerpointing and accusations. If this patient had died its obvious they would have tried to pin the whole thing on me. They would still have their hospital, but its very possible that I could have had charges brought up against me, that I could get sued, or that I could even lose my license.

Now I don't trust anyone when I take report. Perhaps some of you could tell me what I could have done differently.

Tony,

It doesn't sound like you did anything wrong. That was a horrifying situation for you and for your patients and I'm really sorry. This gives me the willies, bigtime. I always try to do an eyeballing of my patients within minutes of receiving report. You probably do too, though...your other pt. just coded too fast for that to happen. :( Hell, even if you knew that this guy was going down the tubes, with staffing levels like you described, a code takes precedent over the guy that's ABOUT to code! Absolutely chilliing!

My only advice is what you've no doubt already learned: Don't trust inexperienced nurses' reports. Raise a stink about them being given inappropriate assignments. Call the newspaper about it! I'm so sorry this happened and I hope that this is the last time!

Specializes in Day Surgery/Infusion/ED.

Tony: You did not do anything wrong. The only way that situation could have been worse would have been having JAWS show up for a visit.

Get another job...protect your license.

Tony:

I am so sorry you were put in that situation. First, I want to say that you seem like an excellent and very smart nurse. You will go far. The assignment you got sounds horrible and very scary. Not even super nurse could have handled that assignment. Everyone has given good advice so far about documentation and my best advice would be to find another job. I have been a nurse 8 years and I have never been put in a situation like that. I have primarily worked NICU and I feel that I am very supported and for the most part always receive a safe assignment. If I had a baby as sick as the patient you had it would definitely be a 1:1 assignment or at the most 1:2 and I know my fellow staff nurses and especially my charge nurse would be there to assist me with anything I needed. That makes me very grateful that I am a NICU nurse. The most babies I ever get is 4. I am just appalled at the situation you were put in. I am also EXTREMELY appalled that an agency nurse was taking care of that patient that had no cardiac experience. UNBELEIVABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I blame the hospital for the care and outcome of this patient!!! You are not at fault. Sure, there are things you could have probably done different, but the hospital should have NEVER put you in that situation.

Take a deep breath, hang in there, and keep us updated!

Tony, you poor soul! You need to find another job. If your charge nurse is that dishonest and spineless she will obviously hang you out to dry when something goes wrong. Like a previous poster said, the only thing I think you could do in the future is go bed to bed with the previous shift's nurse. We do that in my unit to make sure the IVs/drips are correct. Seriously, you need to start looking for another job ASAP. Not only does your employer not provide a safe environment for patient care, but they will slander you when it causes problems. GET OUT NOW (while you still have a license!)!

Specializes in LDRP.
I was floating to PCCU and this particular patient was a fresh post-op open heart who had been transferred in from CVICU a bit early

HOW "fresh post-op" was this pt? On Nitro and insulin gtt's, and that wasn't mentioned to you?? bs in the 30s?

arrgggh. I'd mention it also to the manager of the cvicu, so they can request that agency nurse not to come back!

other than that, i second what everyone else was saying, esp the GET OUT NOW

YIKES!!!!!

I agree with the other posters who believe you did not do anything wrong. You took a horrible assignment and did the best you could. It's sad that your charge nurse was not there for you. When I realized all that was wrong, I would have pulled my charge nurse in there to see all the mistakes and problems as well as help me stabilize this patient. This could have been much, much worse as I'm sure you know. Also, assigning a fresh heart to an agency nurse is unacceptable let alone that he was transfered while unstable. At my hospital only a "heart trained" nurse can take the patients throughout their entire stay. No floats, no agency, and no untrained heart nurses....period. If all else fails, management comes in to take an assignment.

Also, how can you be faulted for responding to the asystole patient first? I think in the order of priority, no heartbeat takes priority over someone you are told is stable.

Hopefully you documented well, and I would also write everything down and keep it for yourself (excuding confidential info, of course) just in case sometime down the road you need to have a clear recollection of what happened.

I think if it were me, I would be looking for another place to work. :madface:

OMG! An absolute nightmare. And this same scenario is going on all over the country. How safe as nurses, do we feel for our own loved ones who may be facing a major surgery in a hospital? It scares me to death! I wouldn't want to leave their side while they are in the hospital, knowing what we know goes on. It sounds like that nurse before you, had a horrendous assignment, too. I feel for you both.

Totally agree with hrtprncss' thoughts & SBjerne's practice at her other place of work.

You acted really carefully & thoroughly & quickly, it sounds like to me!! Too bad your management is dumping on you!! That bites!!

Wish you were my nurse (on a better day)

Go easy on yourself, you did good.

Your friend & nursing sister,

A

P.S. Was this REALLY a near-miss?

sounds like a big-time miss to me.

Still think you did well, considering

Tony,

This sounds like a horrific experience for you and so disheartening that your management did not back you up, but actively went against you. I agree with the advice that you should immediately quit and get a job elsewhere. This is an unsafe environment and unacceptable.

My question to you is, how can the manager fault you for taking on the patients if you only find out about their status (faulty or otherwise) AFTER receiving report? How is this pt abandonment if, after report, you realize this is a totally unsafe staffing situation? It's seems a no-win situation.

Specializes in Emergency room, med/surg, UR/CSR.

First off, I would refuse to ever float to that unit again, second, I would contact either the BON, or any association you might be affiliated with to report unsafe nursing conditions to them for that particular hospital. Third, I would run, not walk to the nearest exit and never come back. That's your license on the line and you worked too hard to get it to be letting someone push you into making mistakes. I don't know if you are in the float pool or work on a regular floor and float to other floors, but if it is this bad on other floors of your hospital, I would find another job and shake the dust of the present one off of your shoes. Good luck with whatever you decide to do!! Keep us updated.

Pam

Specializes in CCU,ICU,ER retired.
When I worked in the ICU, I would take report from the offgoing nurse in the break room or nurses' station then we would both walk to the patient's bedside and do a quick overview of the IVs, dsgs, tubes, settings, etc. That way anything said to you in report could be verified and you could get a look of each of your patients. That helped me to prioritize my own schedule for my assessments when the other nurse left. Anything out of the ordinary could be questioned and anything off-kilter could be corrected by the off nurse.

It takes time but when the offgoing nurse knows that it is expected of her, the oral reports tend to be factual and less chatty and the patients look better than if the staff knows that they can run out before you can look at what they've left you.

Get another job. The administration will hang you before they'll admit that they try to abuse their staff. That's abuse of staff and patients, too. Leave before they chip away at your self esteem. You sound like a knowledgeable, caring, astute nurse - the kind the profession should be trying to keep, not harass.

Good luck.

I always did walking rounds after report. I don't care if the offgoing nurse wants to go home I want to see each and every one of my patients with that nurse and make sure the pts. are okay

But the idea of having SIX patients 2 that are ICU patients is literally horrifing. There is absolutely no way I would work there, tooooooo dangerous

+ Join the Discussion