Near miss, should I be blamed?

Nurses General Nursing

Published

This week I got in trouble for a near miss. Well... myself, the secretary, the PCA, and the nurse I took report from. We were all written up for it, but I was told that it was primarily my fault. This is a long post, but for anyone who has the time to read it, here's what happened:

I was floating to PCCU and this particular patient was a fresh post-op open heart who had been transferred in from CVICU a bit early because they needed the bed. In my opinion, this patient should not have been moved from CV because he was still very unstable, on multiple drips, still had respiratory issues, still retaining a lot of fluid from the CHF, and had two lateral and one medial chest tubes draining sanguinous. He was NSR on the monitor but he had had 5 bypasses, and he came over with the pacer set at 50/20. The agency nurse who gave me report on this patient neglected to tell me quite a few important details about this guy. She was very angry and in a bad mood because she had had a very rough shift. All her assignments were pretty complicated cases, she kept complaining that she had to be literally running from one room to the next the whole time and how she couldn't wait to leave and that she was never coming back to work on this unit.

A number of things were strange about this whole event. First of all, the hospital has a policy to not give fresh open heart patients to agency nurses, but in this instance they did because they had no one else. As I would later find out, this particular nurse did not have any experience with cardiac patients and she did not follow some of the post op protocols (which later caused problems for me)---and more serious problems for the patient. The other thing is that PCCU has a policy to not give more than three assignments to a nurse who has fresh heart patients, especially when they are on titrated drips, but in this instance, they gave the nurse six assignments, and she apparently did not know that she should have refused. In my opinion, they shouldn't transfer any post op heart patient who's on titrated drips to stepdown because they need much closer monitoring than you can give when you have three or more other patients to take care of.

During report, she told me that the patient was stable (which was not true), that his surgical dressings were dry and intact (which was also not true), that his o2 sat was good (which was also not true), and that all his drips had been D/C'd except for a bag of LR which was going at 75cc/hr. I was to take over all her other assignments as well, and I spoke to the charge nurse about this because I didn't feel comfortable about having six patients and a fresh heart. Her response to me is that we were really short on staff, and since the patients are all stable we would play it by ear and she would try to make some changes if anything develops. My first big mistake was to agree to this. Under any other circumstances I would have refused the assignments and gone back home, but she warned me that I had already taken report and that if I left she would write me up for pt abandonment.

Only a few minutes into the shift, one of my other patients went asystole and we had to rush in there to run a code. Fortunately, we were able to bring the patient back, but by the time we stabilized the patient and moved him to the ICU I was nearly 2 hours behind with my assessments and chart reviews.

By the time I got around to doing my assessment on the open heart patient (who I decided to see first) I immediately realized that this patient was also going bad. The respirations were labored and I could hear the fluids on his lungs even without using the stethoscope. The continuous pulse ox monitor was still attached to his finger but the machine was off (it was not plugged in and the battery had died). He was supposedly on 5 liters of 02 via NC (which wasn't even humidified, by the way), and when I got the oximeter on again his sat was 80, and only God knows how long it had been there. (The nasal canula he was supposed to be wearing was on his forehead). Ok, so I rush to get the respiratory issue under control (called in RT, etc.). RT eventually had to put a nonrebreather on him, and protocol states that if a patient is unstable enough to need a nonrebreather they must be transferred to ICU. The guy was still not doing so good, and the anesthesiologist from the respiratory ICU was seriously contemplating putting him on a vent, but thankfully, that wasn't necessary. Of course, after I notified the MD and began to prep the pt I was told that there were no ICU beds. In emergency cases such as these, PCCU is supposed to implement ICU protocols and we had the equipment at hand so that was done. But, here's another big problem: ICU protocols have been initiated, but I still have six patients, and neither the charge nurse or the nursing supervisor is returning my calls because they are too busy fighting fires with serious staffing and other issues elsewhere.

Then I start to check out other things on the pt. The dressing on his chest was soaked through and it turned out that the guy had frank, active bleeding from the sternotomy. Applied some pressure to the site, reinforced the dressing and put out a call to the surgeon. But it didn't end there. The guy was also a new onset diabetic with hyperosmolar issues. I immediately went to check the blood sugar because he seemed confused and aggitated and I suspected that the blood sugar might be low because he had been on an insulin drip (which the nurse had told me was DC'd). An order had been written to D/C the insulin drip and switch the pt to a sliding scale with regular insulin and to change him from LR to D5 1/2 (neither of which had been implemented), according to the MAR and the diabetic flow sheets the nurse from the previous shift had been doing the blood sugar checks AC & HS instead of Q2 according to the protocols. Even though the MD had incorrectly written the order for AC and HS she should have known better because the patient was still NPO so an order for AC BS checks makes no sense. Furthermore, the insulin drip protocol overrides written orders for BS checks in all the units. The guy's BS was in the 30s so I immediately shut off the drip and pushed D50. He was also complaining of pain, but I didn't want to give him any narcotics right then because of the respiratory situation.

And, it gets worse. When I went to check the BS, I found that the patient was not wearing an arm band so there was nothing to scan into the glucometer. I eventually found the ID band and the blood arm band on the window ledge (he had been type and screened for blood and he needed 2 units to replace blood loss during surgery). I later found out that the nurse had cut the bands off because his previous IV site had infiltrated and his arm had swollen up so much that the bands were too tight. Yes, she did order new ones from admitting, but when they sent them up she grabbed the wrong ones from the nurses station and put them in the patient's room. So, in my haste to scan the arm band to check the BS I didn't immediately notice that it was the wrong patient name. She also did not give the second unit of PRBCs that was ordered. Thank God, I caught the mistake with the wrong blood ID band during the ID check for the second transfusion otherwise I would have transfused the wrong blood type, and the poor guy probably would not have survived a severe reaction.

The pulmonologist ordered diuresis with 80mg of IV lasix stat. When I went to give it I realized the guy did not have a foley in. How could you have an unstable surgical pt like this in a critical care unit with no foley? I began to wonder where she was getting the information she had been recording as his urine output on the nursing assessment sheet, then I figured she must have made it up because this guy was certainly in no position to use a urinal. Furthermore, the urine output she had recorded could not have been correct because if this guy had been NPO and receiving only 75 ccs of IV fluids an hour and putting out that much urine over the past several hours there's just no way he could still have so much fluid on him. Also, when I checked the post op orders I found that his AV pacer had been incorrectly set. And here's another big one: remember the drips that she told me were off? Well, not so! The guy came from CV on a titrated nitro drip, and not only could I not find any information on the flow sheet to prove that she was titrating the drip but it was actually still going @ 5 mics, which is exactly where it was set when he was transferred from CV hours ago. Also, the PCA who did the vital signs did not tell me his BP was critical low, in fact, I couldn't even find her! When I checked it myself it was 60s over 40s.

There were so many other things that were either not done or done incorrectly that by the time I got around to checking and fixing and assessing everything to prepare to send the patient back to the OR it was now almost 3 hours into the shift and I hadn't yet seen any of my other patients (except for the code) and all my meds were passed very, very late. I don't know what I would have done if one of the other patients had crashed that night. I could just imagine myself explaining to the board of nursing why I had not done any assessments on my other patients after being on shift for more than three hours!

Of course, an incident report had to be done, and administration is saying its primarily my fault because I should have done my initial assessment on my fresh heart patient sooner. I accept some of the responsibility, but I disagree that it was my fault. How do you rationalize switching priorities from responding to a code situation if you are made to believe in report that your other patients are stable. Also, why are they trying to throw all the blame on me when they are also at fault for giving this patient to a nurse with absolutely no critical care training or experience in the first place? Also, the charge nurse later denied that she and I had had a conversation about changing asssignments according to patient acuity. She instead said that I failed to show good professional judgment because I should not have accepted the assignments in the first place. I realize she was covering her butt, but I think its disgusting that she just flat out lied like that. Instead of looking at the whole picture and talking about how to prevent something like this from happening again, the whole incident deteriorated into one of fingerpointing and accusations. If this patient had died its obvious they would have tried to pin the whole thing on me. They would still have their hospital, but its very possible that I could have had charges brought up against me, that I could get sued, or that I could even lose my license.

Now I don't trust anyone when I take report. Perhaps some of you could tell me what I could have done differently.

Specializes in ICU, Cardiac Cath/EPS Labs.

WOW!--Oh my god! I just read this post--and will continue reading the entire thread--but just wanted to state my initial reaction: I am graduating this month and looking for a job and am incredulous at the situation you were put in!---People LYING to your face about crucial patient issues and apparently falsifying records (e.g., the I/Output amounts), and then a supervisor LYING about the conversation in which you had explained the looming difficulty....I will continue reading and hope something good can come out of this--I hope a Union--if there is one there--could help, and I also VERY SERIOUSLY would like to know who this employer is---so I CAN AVOID them in my job search (please PM me if you don't want to post the employer's name, but I think they deserve to have people know the truth--particularly after they had the gall to write YOU up--you were the one who made the best of an unbelievable situation)...I've heard about being overloaded, but this is a real example that sends the message home and will ensure that I ask prospective employers during my interviews about orientation, patient loads, etc...It also makes me MORE interested in having a Union at the hospital I end up working for. I hope you are doing OK and, as stated earlier, I will continue reading the thread to see what happened.

This week I got in trouble for a near miss. Well... myself, the secretary, the PCA, and the nurse I took report from. We were all written up for it, but I was told that it was primarily my fault. This is a long post, but for anyone who has the time to read it, here's what happened:

I was floating to PCCU and this particular patient was a fresh post-op open heart who had been transferred in from CVICU a bit early because they needed the bed. In my opinion, this patient should not have been moved from CV because he was still very unstable, on multiple drips, still had respiratory issues, still retaining a lot of fluid from the CHF, and had two lateral and one medial chest tubes draining sanguinous. He was NSR on the monitor but he had had 5 bypasses, and he came over with the pacer set at 50/20. The agency nurse who gave me report on this patient neglected to tell me quite a few important details about this guy. She was very angry and in a bad mood because she had had a very rough shift. All her assignments were pretty complicated cases, she kept complaining that she had to be literally running from one room to the next the whole time and how she couldn't wait to leave and that she was never coming back to work on this unit.

A number of things were strange about this whole event. First of all, the hospital has a policy to not give fresh open heart patients to agency nurses, but in this instance they did because they had no one else. As I would later find out, this particular nurse did not have any experience with cardiac patients and she did not follow some of the post op protocols (which later caused problems for me)---and more serious problems for the patient. The other thing is that PCCU has a policy to not give more than three assignments to a nurse who has fresh heart patients, especially when they are on titrated drips, but in this instance, they gave the nurse six assignments, and she apparently did not know that she should have refused. In my opinion, they shouldn't transfer any post op heart patient who's on titrated drips to stepdown because they need much closer monitoring than you can give when you have three or more other patients to take care of.

During report, she told me that the patient was stable (which was not true), that his surgical dressings were dry and intact (which was also not true), that his o2 sat was good (which was also not true), and that all his drips had been D/C'd except for a bag of LR which was going at 75cc/hr. I was to take over all her other assignments as well, and I spoke to the charge nurse about this because I didn't feel comfortable about having six patients and a fresh heart. Her response to me is that we were really short on staff, and since the patients are all stable we would play it by ear and she would try to make some changes if anything develops. My first big mistake was to agree to this. Under any other circumstances I would have refused the assignments and gone back home, but she warned me that I had already taken report and that if I left she would write me up for pt abandonment.

Only a few minutes into the shift, one of my other patients went asystole and we had to rush in there to run a code. Fortunately, we were able to bring the patient back, but by the time we stabilized the patient and moved him to the ICU I was nearly 2 hours behind with my assessments and chart reviews.

By the time I got around to doing my assessment on the open heart patient (who I decided to see first) I immediately realized that this patient was also going bad. The respirations were labored and I could hear the fluids on his lungs even without using the stethoscope. The continuous pulse ox monitor was still attached to his finger but the machine was off (it was not plugged in and the battery had died). He was supposedly on 5 liters of 02 via NC (which wasn't even humidified, by the way), and when I got the oximeter on again his sat was 80, and only God knows how long it had been there. (The nasal canula he was supposed to be wearing was on his forehead). Ok, so I rush to get the respiratory issue under control (called in RT, etc.). RT eventually had to put a nonrebreather on him, and protocol states that if a patient is unstable enough to need a nonrebreather they must be transferred to ICU. The guy was still not doing so good, and the anesthesiologist from the respiratory ICU was seriously contemplating putting him on a vent, but thankfully, that wasn't necessary. Of course, after I notified the MD and began to prep the pt I was told that there were no ICU beds. In emergency cases such as these, PCCU is supposed to implement ICU protocols and we had the equipment at hand so that was done. But, here's another big problem: ICU protocols have been initiated, but I still have six patients, and neither the charge nurse or the nursing supervisor is returning my calls because they are too busy fighting fires with serious staffing and other issues elsewhere.

Then I start to check out other things on the pt. The dressing on his chest was soaked through and it turned out that the guy had frank, active bleeding from the sternotomy. Applied some pressure to the site, reinforced the dressing and put out a call to the surgeon. But it didn't end there. The guy was also a new onset diabetic with hyperosmolar issues. I immediately went to check the blood sugar because he seemed confused and aggitated and I suspected that the blood sugar might be low because he had been on an insulin drip (which the nurse had told me was DC'd). An order had been written to D/C the insulin drip and switch the pt to a sliding scale with regular insulin and to change him from LR to D5 1/2 (neither of which had been implemented), according to the MAR and the diabetic flow sheets the nurse from the previous shift had been doing the blood sugar checks AC & HS instead of Q2 according to the protocols. Even though the MD had incorrectly written the order for AC and HS she should have known better because the patient was still NPO so an order for AC BS checks makes no sense. Furthermore, the insulin drip protocol overrides written orders for BS checks in all the units. The guy's BS was in the 30s so I immediately shut off the drip and pushed D50. He was also complaining of pain, but I didn't want to give him any narcotics right then because of the respiratory situation.

And, it gets worse. When I went to check the BS, I found that the patient was not wearing an arm band so there was nothing to scan into the glucometer. I eventually found the ID band and the blood arm band on the window ledge (he had been type and screened for blood and he needed 2 units to replace blood loss during surgery). I later found out that the nurse had cut the bands off because his previous IV site had infiltrated and his arm had swollen up so much that the bands were too tight. Yes, she did order new ones from admitting, but when they sent them up she grabbed the wrong ones from the nurses station and put them in the patient's room. So, in my haste to scan the arm band to check the BS I didn't immediately notice that it was the wrong patient name. She also did not give the second unit of PRBCs that was ordered. Thank God, I caught the mistake with the wrong blood ID band during the ID check for the second transfusion otherwise I would have transfused the wrong blood type, and the poor guy probably would not have survived a severe reaction.

The pulmonologist ordered diuresis with 80mg of IV lasix stat. When I went to give it I realized the guy did not have a foley in. How could you have an unstable surgical pt like this in a critical care unit with no foley? I began to wonder where she was getting the information she had been recording as his urine output on the nursing assessment sheet, then I figured she must have made it up because this guy was certainly in no position to use a urinal. Furthermore, the urine output she had recorded could not have been correct because if this guy had been NPO and receiving only 75 ccs of IV fluids an hour and putting out that much urine over the past several hours there's just no way he could still have so much fluid on him. Also, when I checked the post op orders I found that his AV pacer had been incorrectly set. And here's another big one: remember the drips that she told me were off? Well, not so! The guy came from CV on a titrated nitro drip, and not only could I not find any information on the flow sheet to prove that she was titrating the drip but it was actually still going @ 5 mics, which is exactly where it was set when he was transferred from CV hours ago. Also, the PCA who did the vital signs did not tell me his BP was critical low, in fact, I couldn't even find her! When I checked it myself it was 60s over 40s.

There were so many other things that were either not done or done incorrectly that by the time I got around to checking and fixing and assessing everything to prepare to send the patient back to the OR it was now almost 3 hours into the shift and I hadn't yet seen any of my other patients (except for the code) and all my meds were passed very, very late. I don't know what I would have done if one of the other patients had crashed that night. I could just imagine myself explaining to the board of nursing why I had not done any assessments on my other patients after being on shift for more than three hours!

Of course, an incident report had to be done, and administration is saying its primarily my fault because I should have done my initial assessment on my fresh heart patient sooner. I accept some of the responsibility, but I disagree that it was my fault. How do you rationalize switching priorities from responding to a code situation if you are made to believe in report that your other patients are stable. Also, why are they trying to throw all the blame on me when they are also at fault for giving this patient to a nurse with absolutely no critical care training or experience in the first place? Also, the charge nurse later denied that she and I had had a conversation about changing asssignments according to patient acuity. She instead said that I failed to show good professional judgment because I should not have accepted the assignments in the first place. I realize she was covering her butt, but I think its disgusting that she just flat out lied like that. Instead of looking at the whole picture and talking about how to prevent something like this from happening again, the whole incident deteriorated into one of fingerpointing and accusations. If this patient had died its obvious they would have tried to pin the whole thing on me. They would still have their hospital, but its very possible that I could have had charges brought up against me, that I could get sued, or that I could even lose my license.

Now I don't trust anyone when I take report. Perhaps some of you could tell me what I could have done differently.

Specializes in ICU, Cardiac Cath/EPS Labs.

Again, I am incredulous! Perhaps an expose by the NYTimes on how horrible the situation is might improve things. You have eloquently and forcefully detailed a horrible patient situation. Please keep us posted and remain calm.

First of all, thanks to everyone for your encouragement and support. I wanted to update you with the latest developments, and you may be surprised. But, before I get into any of that, the good news is that the 'near-miss' patient is doing very well since his second surgery, and he is still being kept in CV even though his condition has been upgraded to stable.

Now for the other stuff. Some of you raised questions about the outcome of the incident so I am going to fill you in. They had pulled two nurses from the floors that day to sit at the monitors because they were short on monitor techs to cover the shift. Then they split up those nurses' patients among the other nurses, and that's one reason each nurse ended up with so many patients on the previous shift. At the change of shift, they simply passed on the mess to us.

I had to sit through an hour-long meeting with my nurse manager and listen to her hypocritical B/S. On the one hand she's telling me I'm a great nurse, and at the same time she's telling me that I'm careless and unprofessional and that my bad judgment could have resulted in the patient's death. No mention of CVICU for transferring out an unstable patient, no mention of the charge nurse assigning an unstable heart patient to an inexperienced agency nurse, no mention of the fact that we were working under impossible conditions, no mention of why the charge nurse did nothing when I asked for her intervention with the patient assignments... Then she had the nerve to ask why I was just sitting there staring at her and not saying anything. Its just that I couldn't think of anything to say at the time that wouldn't be rude. Notwithstanding, I was given both a verbal and written reprimand, and the paper says that the document will go on record even if I refuse to sign it. I am being suspended for 2 days without pay, and told that I have to attend an EAP thing on time management and prioritization skills within the next 30 days and bring proof of attendance back to the nurse manager, and also that I have to demonstrate "improved communications skills" with the charge nurse regarding patient assessments (to be signed off by at least two different charge nurses). If I do not do these things within the 30 days I will again be suspended without pay and, possibly, terminated! I am unfazed by these threats.

Our PCCU is comprised of three adjacent units, each with 40 beds. Each unit is supposed to have its own charge nurse, its own monitor techs, and its own nurses. But they have no staff, so what they've been doing a lot lately is using one charge nurse to cover all three units on each shift, and she/he spends the entire shift running back and forth between the units trying to keep on top of things. Sure, the charge has report on which patient is in what room, and who's on which drips, etc. but even a super chargenurse can't cover 3 units with 120 patients! Also, they never have enough nurses to properly staff all 3 units so they frequently pull nurses from one area to staff another, and whenever they do this no matter how many other patients you have, if your unit is the one that is losing a nurse every other nurse on that unit has to pick up another patient or two. You can protest and refuse all you want, but they don't care. If you complain they say you are not a teamplayer and you are blacklisted as a troublemaker (no end of year bonus, and a paltry salary increase). I've seen it happen.

Another bad thing is that they have one nurse manager overseeing all three PCCUs and this woman has no management skills whatsoever. During the past several months she's hired a number of assistant managers, and all but one of them have quit after only a month or so. (The one assistant manager who's still there is a joke. She does nothing but sleep whenever she's on. For the first few hours she acts as if she's really busy then the next thing you know she's heading to a private area wrapped from head to toe in a sheet and complaing that the place is so cold. Then you don't see her again at all until about an hour before the night shift ends, and her only concern is that everyone has written report so she can leave on time.) As for the manager, all she does is attend meetings and go off to seminars, then she comes back and holds staff meetings with all these grandiose ideas that never come to fruition. Staff has grown so weary of her lies and deceptive promises that no one takes her seriously anymore, and she just sits there and allows the situation to get from bad to worse.

This hospital is huge, and they recently did a LOT of expansion to it. The huge lobby with Italian stone tiles, a marble fountain, and exotic foliage. The new ORs, units, and private rooms are all so big and fancy that you would think you are in the Waldorf Astoria, and I'm not exaggerating. Some of the private rooms have well-decked guest suites attached so friends and family can stay over. The board of directors went all out with the construction of this new cardiac wing, and you can actually see the millions that went into it. There isn't a single patient or visitor who comes in there since it opened who hasn't complimented the ornate design, state of the art equipment, and furnishings. Even the paintings on the walls cost a bundle. All of this was done to attract more 'upscale' clients. And they have been aggressively marketing the hospital's specialty cardiac services to "uptown" folks who can either afford to pay big bucks or have very good private insurance. The people who run this joint couldn't care any less about quality care as long as they are raking in bags of money from the patients. But all this prettiness doesn't change the fact that the place is a deathtrap being run by a board of money-loving hoods.

They recently closed down a number of the med surg, ortho, and psych units to make way for highly specialized cardiac services. Then they brought on more high-profile cardiac surgeons because they are trying to increase the number of open-heart and cardiac cath procedures to make bigger profits. The problems began because they now have these huge cardiac units with too many patients and nowhere near enough nurses to staff them. The new CVICU is so fancy and high tech that its like something out of a Star Trek movie, and it costs a ton of money to stay in there. So, its not good business for them to keep people in there too long if they don't have good insurance or the cash to pay, and what they've been doing is ushering out the HMO and no-insurance patients faster to the step-down units. There are even certain cardiac surgeons who demand that their clients be given preferred room assignments, and because these surgeons are the ones who are bringing in the money they always get their way. So even if a CV nurse suggests that a patient is too unstable to leave the unit, whether the patient stays there or not almost always depends on the patient's surgeon, $$$, the type of insurance the patient has, or how badly another high-profile surgeon wants the bed.

All things considered, I've decided that I can no longer continue to work at this place. I am going to take some time off to think about whether I really want to continue in nursing because I keep hearing that this type of situation is the norm almost everywhere. In any case, I plan to put in my notice. Before I became an RN I worked as a manager in a cut-throat, backstabbing corporate environment but even that pales in comparison to this. At least then I would never repeatedly find myself in ridiculous situations where I could unreasonably be held responsible for someone's death. Thanks to everyone for your advice, I have detailed notes on the incident when I went on shift that night, and I have an appointment to see an attorney later this week. I also plan to send an anonymous letter to JCAHO about this hospital, and I hope they get a surprise visit sometime soon.

Specializes in NICU.

I read through the entire first post before I realized this was posted back in April. So I hope the last few months the OP has been able to find some peace after such a horrendous night.

To the OP: I hope you don't give up on nursing. While reading your posts I can see what a good nurse you are ....... you did a lot of good things for that patient that night, fixing all the mistakes that the previous nurse made. I was mad while reading all that stuff ...... as a new nurse I can't even imagine something like that happening and it scares me to death. I hope things work out for you, with whatever you decide for your career. Let us know how things are going!

+ Add a Comment