Near miss, should I be blamed?

Nurses General Nursing

Published

This week I got in trouble for a near miss. Well... myself, the secretary, the PCA, and the nurse I took report from. We were all written up for it, but I was told that it was primarily my fault. This is a long post, but for anyone who has the time to read it, here's what happened:

I was floating to PCCU and this particular patient was a fresh post-op open heart who had been transferred in from CVICU a bit early because they needed the bed. In my opinion, this patient should not have been moved from CV because he was still very unstable, on multiple drips, still had respiratory issues, still retaining a lot of fluid from the CHF, and had two lateral and one medial chest tubes draining sanguinous. He was NSR on the monitor but he had had 5 bypasses, and he came over with the pacer set at 50/20. The agency nurse who gave me report on this patient neglected to tell me quite a few important details about this guy. She was very angry and in a bad mood because she had had a very rough shift. All her assignments were pretty complicated cases, she kept complaining that she had to be literally running from one room to the next the whole time and how she couldn't wait to leave and that she was never coming back to work on this unit.

A number of things were strange about this whole event. First of all, the hospital has a policy to not give fresh open heart patients to agency nurses, but in this instance they did because they had no one else. As I would later find out, this particular nurse did not have any experience with cardiac patients and she did not follow some of the post op protocols (which later caused problems for me)---and more serious problems for the patient. The other thing is that PCCU has a policy to not give more than three assignments to a nurse who has fresh heart patients, especially when they are on titrated drips, but in this instance, they gave the nurse six assignments, and she apparently did not know that she should have refused. In my opinion, they shouldn't transfer any post op heart patient who's on titrated drips to stepdown because they need much closer monitoring than you can give when you have three or more other patients to take care of.

During report, she told me that the patient was stable (which was not true), that his surgical dressings were dry and intact (which was also not true), that his o2 sat was good (which was also not true), and that all his drips had been D/C'd except for a bag of LR which was going at 75cc/hr. I was to take over all her other assignments as well, and I spoke to the charge nurse about this because I didn't feel comfortable about having six patients and a fresh heart. Her response to me is that we were really short on staff, and since the patients are all stable we would play it by ear and she would try to make some changes if anything develops. My first big mistake was to agree to this. Under any other circumstances I would have refused the assignments and gone back home, but she warned me that I had already taken report and that if I left she would write me up for pt abandonment.

Only a few minutes into the shift, one of my other patients went asystole and we had to rush in there to run a code. Fortunately, we were able to bring the patient back, but by the time we stabilized the patient and moved him to the ICU I was nearly 2 hours behind with my assessments and chart reviews.

By the time I got around to doing my assessment on the open heart patient (who I decided to see first) I immediately realized that this patient was also going bad. The respirations were labored and I could hear the fluids on his lungs even without using the stethoscope. The continuous pulse ox monitor was still attached to his finger but the machine was off (it was not plugged in and the battery had died). He was supposedly on 5 liters of 02 via NC (which wasn't even humidified, by the way), and when I got the oximeter on again his sat was 80, and only God knows how long it had been there. (The nasal canula he was supposed to be wearing was on his forehead). Ok, so I rush to get the respiratory issue under control (called in RT, etc.). RT eventually had to put a nonrebreather on him, and protocol states that if a patient is unstable enough to need a nonrebreather they must be transferred to ICU. The guy was still not doing so good, and the anesthesiologist from the respiratory ICU was seriously contemplating putting him on a vent, but thankfully, that wasn't necessary. Of course, after I notified the MD and began to prep the pt I was told that there were no ICU beds. In emergency cases such as these, PCCU is supposed to implement ICU protocols and we had the equipment at hand so that was done. But, here's another big problem: ICU protocols have been initiated, but I still have six patients, and neither the charge nurse or the nursing supervisor is returning my calls because they are too busy fighting fires with serious staffing and other issues elsewhere.

Then I start to check out other things on the pt. The dressing on his chest was soaked through and it turned out that the guy had frank, active bleeding from the sternotomy. Applied some pressure to the site, reinforced the dressing and put out a call to the surgeon. But it didn't end there. The guy was also a new onset diabetic with hyperosmolar issues. I immediately went to check the blood sugar because he seemed confused and aggitated and I suspected that the blood sugar might be low because he had been on an insulin drip (which the nurse had told me was DC'd). An order had been written to D/C the insulin drip and switch the pt to a sliding scale with regular insulin and to change him from LR to D5 1/2 (neither of which had been implemented), according to the MAR and the diabetic flow sheets the nurse from the previous shift had been doing the blood sugar checks AC & HS instead of Q2 according to the protocols. Even though the MD had incorrectly written the order for AC and HS she should have known better because the patient was still NPO so an order for AC BS checks makes no sense. Furthermore, the insulin drip protocol overrides written orders for BS checks in all the units. The guy's BS was in the 30s so I immediately shut off the drip and pushed D50. He was also complaining of pain, but I didn't want to give him any narcotics right then because of the respiratory situation.

And, it gets worse. When I went to check the BS, I found that the patient was not wearing an arm band so there was nothing to scan into the glucometer. I eventually found the ID band and the blood arm band on the window ledge (he had been type and screened for blood and he needed 2 units to replace blood loss during surgery). I later found out that the nurse had cut the bands off because his previous IV site had infiltrated and his arm had swollen up so much that the bands were too tight. Yes, she did order new ones from admitting, but when they sent them up she grabbed the wrong ones from the nurses station and put them in the patient's room. So, in my haste to scan the arm band to check the BS I didn't immediately notice that it was the wrong patient name. She also did not give the second unit of PRBCs that was ordered. Thank God, I caught the mistake with the wrong blood ID band during the ID check for the second transfusion otherwise I would have transfused the wrong blood type, and the poor guy probably would not have survived a severe reaction.

The pulmonologist ordered diuresis with 80mg of IV lasix stat. When I went to give it I realized the guy did not have a foley in. How could you have an unstable surgical pt like this in a critical care unit with no foley? I began to wonder where she was getting the information she had been recording as his urine output on the nursing assessment sheet, then I figured she must have made it up because this guy was certainly in no position to use a urinal. Furthermore, the urine output she had recorded could not have been correct because if this guy had been NPO and receiving only 75 ccs of IV fluids an hour and putting out that much urine over the past several hours there's just no way he could still have so much fluid on him. Also, when I checked the post op orders I found that his AV pacer had been incorrectly set. And here's another big one: remember the drips that she told me were off? Well, not so! The guy came from CV on a titrated nitro drip, and not only could I not find any information on the flow sheet to prove that she was titrating the drip but it was actually still going @ 5 mics, which is exactly where it was set when he was transferred from CV hours ago. Also, the PCA who did the vital signs did not tell me his BP was critical low, in fact, I couldn't even find her! When I checked it myself it was 60s over 40s.

There were so many other things that were either not done or done incorrectly that by the time I got around to checking and fixing and assessing everything to prepare to send the patient back to the OR it was now almost 3 hours into the shift and I hadn't yet seen any of my other patients (except for the code) and all my meds were passed very, very late. I don't know what I would have done if one of the other patients had crashed that night. I could just imagine myself explaining to the board of nursing why I had not done any assessments on my other patients after being on shift for more than three hours!

Of course, an incident report had to be done, and administration is saying its primarily my fault because I should have done my initial assessment on my fresh heart patient sooner. I accept some of the responsibility, but I disagree that it was my fault. How do you rationalize switching priorities from responding to a code situation if you are made to believe in report that your other patients are stable. Also, why are they trying to throw all the blame on me when they are also at fault for giving this patient to a nurse with absolutely no critical care training or experience in the first place? Also, the charge nurse later denied that she and I had had a conversation about changing asssignments according to patient acuity. She instead said that I failed to show good professional judgment because I should not have accepted the assignments in the first place. I realize she was covering her butt, but I think its disgusting that she just flat out lied like that. Instead of looking at the whole picture and talking about how to prevent something like this from happening again, the whole incident deteriorated into one of fingerpointing and accusations. If this patient had died its obvious they would have tried to pin the whole thing on me. They would still have their hospital, but its very possible that I could have had charges brought up against me, that I could get sued, or that I could even lose my license.

Now I don't trust anyone when I take report. Perhaps some of you could tell me what I could have done differently.

Hey Tony from new york, you are one awesome nurse! Been there, done that, and am here to say this entire post you wrote made me have a little post traumatic issues, even my darn blood pressure rose reading it. My god, what in god's name do they expect from one person, how could you possibly checked all 6 of these patients for the numerous mistakes made by the previous nurse. How frightening to be a patient in a hospital today when really all they want is a pair of running shoes. The heck with how a case is managed, its all about giving them the basic needs and passing them off to the next pair of shoes. I would never work one more day at that hospital again! You should look into being a manager to make sure this kind of inadequate care is never given to a patient under your care again. Teach nurses that they cannot lie, make up vitals, bring them in when they write the wrong info on a chart, as which you wrote of. You know, its really alarming at how people are killing themselves to get into these nursing schools, only to be placed in these very same situations that almost all seasoned nurses out there have been in. As for agency nurses, even this nurse in your story said "never working this floor again". So, the very very sad thing is this will be repeated again to yet another patient and a nurse. This is the heart and core of nursing folks, when will the big wigs get this??

I, too, read your entire post and I just sat with my mouth getting wider and wider. :angryfire That is horrible staffing, horrible assignments, that is a nightmare waiting to happen.

I think that you did everything you could. It sounds as if you prioritized as best you could. Are they saying that you should have left your coding patient to go do assessments? Ask them how that is suppoed to happen.

I think one of the worst parts is that your nurse manager threw you to the wolves. Personally I would be having a talk directly to her and tell her what a coward she is and a horrible manager. :o That is sick!

Also ditto what everyone else has said... get out now. That is not a safe place to work and your entire future could be in jeopardy. :o

I hope you find some place wonderful to work.

This stuff happens all day every day, all across this once-great country. Not that that makes it alright. It is a story that needs to be told all day every day, all across this wonderful country. Civilians need to know what can happen to them when hospitals put profit above lives, above nurses, above all that is right and proper.

One thing maybe you should do is let the surgeons know what is happening and that they need to either stop cutting or come take care of their patients themselves. Send this story to the TV stations, newspapers, etc. Get a lawyer first, to protect yourself from claims of slander, etc. And, yes, you should always have a witness or 2 and get them to sign for what they heard, and then YOU keep the signed statements, when you discuss staffing with your supervisor.

When will you wake up personally now? Will you continue to work there or try to find a better employer? Get out of nursing altogether?

I wish you the best. This is a really lousy situation.

When getting report, and things sound iffy to you, do walking rounds with the nurse that you are getting report from. Theoretically, you should have two signatures on pressors to begin with, to prove that it was verified, etc.

That way, you know before you get started what is going on, you would have seen the drips running.

Too bad if they are in a hurry to get out. It is their responsibility to give a full report. She should be reported to her agency first of all. But your facility also had no business whatsoever of giving a relatively fresh open heart to a nurse that had no experience. It is no one's fault that the unit was short, but should never have been staffed that way. And wasn't the charge nurse aware of the drips? They get report from the previous charge nurse. So, where were they when this was going on?

And what type of policy do they have in place when a patient is coding? While you are in that room and busy with that patient, who is watching and caring for your other patients? No one?

That definitely is not wright either.

Looks like Risk Manangement definitely needs to get involved with this. And you are not the one that should be written up. They are looking for a scapegoat, and it should not be you.

I think you did a great job. The situation was impossible and shows what is really going on in our "health care" system.

Your post is a perfect example of somethng I've felt and said over and over again as a nurse-

When we get our nursing licenses, the phrase "No good deed goes unpunished" should be printed on them.

Wow. I cannot thank you enough for posting this. There are so many things wrong that I cannot even remember them all.

Problem 1. This patient might not have been a very good surgical candidate to begin with.

P2. A fresh heart is a ONE- TO- ONE assignment. That is the standard of care. Don't tell me that agency nurse had two patients...

P3. Giveing a fresh heart to an unqualified agency nurse= Lawsuit city period. No excuses, ever.

P4. Unqualified agency nurse accepted assignment beyond her personal scope.

p5. CVICU manager/charge allowed not only that, but then xferred pt out to stepdown so that a CV surgeon wouldn't have to cancel his surgery that day and lose his OR time. Geez we need the bed....get this guy outta here, we can blame his death on the agency nurse. JCAHO can you hear me?

p6. Pt should have been a 1:1 even in stepdown with that acuity- drips, unstable, etc.

p7. Nurse (yourself) accepted an assignment you couldn't handle under duress and threat of abandonment. you were the one who was abandoned. Remember, if you take report and its a patient outside your personal scope or impossible to provide safe care to all your assigned patients, you must document that and protest it all the way up the chain to the CEO of the hospital. This needs to be followed up with JCAHO, the states Attorney General, and Board of Nursing. Not to get you in trouble, but to prevent this from happening again

P8. The code in the other room- That was the charge's job to take over that patient. If the house supervisorknew about this and didn't break up the assignment or personally step in and care for that patient, they are all in trouble with JCAHO and the BON and the AG too.

P9. The drips-insulin, nitro, etc, not being titrated was enough to kill the guy right there. You saved his butt with the D50.

p10. The respiratory issue- prolly should've got ABG's stat, tubed him and put him on the vent- he was clearly unstable and prolly acidotic. I don't care if his sats went back up he now prolly has a pco2 of 70 and po2 of 65 for God's sake. He needed The Vent. and sedation and immediate xfer to CVICU or the PACU.

P11. As for the blood transfusion- no ID Band, you must verify who they are per policy before re-applying that id band. You were good to catch it but let's face it at 60/40 he need prolly a stat bolus of NS and doc paged to bedside. If you see this happen, get a helper to hold pressure on the bleed, give a stat bolus, get an H+H, then worry about PRBC later when your pressures are stable. Yes, I'm glad it was a near miss but still likely qualifies as a sentinel event.

p12. this guy hopefully went back to the OR to re-close.

P13. Lets not focus on nurses blaming nurses. None of this would have happened if the facility had kept that patient in CVICU and found a qualified RN to care for them. They are liable for the whole sequence of events that followed. The agency nurse is prolly going to get written up as well as you. You might both be disciplined by the board. However, your documentation and truthful retelling of the story could get you some sympathy, prolly probation, small fine. Your charge, the CVICU charge, the house Supervisor, and anyone else who knew about it and let it stand could have licensure suspended/revoked and be sued. And not only that, your hospital could be de-certified by JCAHO, sued, fined, and may lose all of its CV surgery business when the public finds out.

p14. Your facility would have done better to xfer that pt to another hospital than to allow what happened.

Impression. I'd get an nurse attorney pronto. Get your story completely straight and don't cover for anyone. Talk to the states Attorney General. They will prolly bring suit against this hospital to protect the public and to ensure that the facility has regulatory compliance going forward.

You have a miniscule amount of culpability in comparison to the administrators who allowed such a dangerous breach of standards. Its time to go public with this. I for one will stand behind you. You've got a duty to your patients, yourself, and to the nursing profession to go public with this and fight for whats right.

Specializes in Maternal - Child Health.

Please document this thoroughly in your own personal notes to be kept at home.

Then consider contacting the BON and State Department of Health which licenses the hospital. This is a staffing situation that endangered not only your patients, but threatens the public health.

Kudos to you for maintaining sanity in a dreadful situation.

This is just another clear indication that our medical system is in trouble. It is so sad that our patients are put at such great risk just because of continuing staffing shortages. Sorry you had such a difficult shift:flowersfo .

Specializes in Trauma ICU, MICU/SICU.

Holy Cow! I would copy what you wrote in this post and submit it to the Director of Nursing. This obviously was not your fault. How in the world could you have assessed your patient while running a code. Where was the lying charge nurse? I'm so sorry this happened to you.

I would NOT sign any type of reprimand if asked. I would submit my account of what occurred. Including your discussion with the lying #@*% charge nurse. What a S***bag. If staffing was so bad I don't know why they ever sent the patient from CVICU.

Specializes in ICU, Education.

Well,

This is very bad. The reason the blame is being placed on you is because that place is VERY unsafe, and the powers that be would rather you be accountable than they. I am going to tell you right now, that if you try to go above the chain (even though you have followed it so far), that things may get much worse for you. I have been there.

I guess your duty would be to go to the next level, but if you do this, do NOT expect to come out scott free. You may be having to look over your shoulder constantly, and worry about others trying to catch every little thing on you, and what not. Also, suddenly you may be getting the very worst assignments and schedules. Not to mention the outcome on that patient. It is early. He is by far NOT out of the woods yet. You can bet that if there happened to be a poor outcome, and family wanted to sue, the hospital would do everything they could to dump in in your lap.

I am sick at my stomache when I read this post. These are the type of scenarios that lay people have no clue about-- no idea what we deal with. Funny, there is an article on this forum about a widow who is suing the hospital for poor staffing ratios and does not blame nursing in the slightest. BRAVO to her!! All of your concerns were absolutely correct. You were very on top of things. From what you wrote it couldn't have been handled any differently, except that maybe you could have stood by your refusal of the the assignment from the beginning (however she had you there with the "already took report thing"). Even THAT does not excuse such deplorable managing and staffing.

I think the RIGHT thing to do, is to go to the next level. But if you choose this, do it with your eyes open and know you are making things tough for yourself. Still it is the right thing to do.

The easiest and most self preserving thing is to just get the hell out of Dodge. It is NOT a place you want to work. There are much better places out there. I also suggest you jot down notes while it is fresh in your head so your remember every detail. But don't let ANYONE know you have notes, and always DENY THOSE NOTES TO THE END. They are only so you remember the details in case you need to later.

I am so sorry for you. Whatever you decide, I wish you the best of luck!

WOW!

Things like this is why I am in school for OT instead of nursing.

God bless all you nurses, because honestly I dont know how you do it. I would never be able to deal with things like this.

Specializes in Psych, Med/Surg, LTC.

You are not to blame! Im sorry you had such a tramatic shift! I know I complain a lot on this board, but I have never encountered something like this. Its time to find a new job. That hospital obviously does not care about you, your license, or the patients. Leave while you have your license.

+ Add a Comment