Published
Micro is obviously a lot more work w/ microscopes and slides and growing little "yuckies" :) A&P is more intense, I feel, getting all those bones and muscles and body parts straight. People usually prefer one over the other, depending on your preference. They're both very interesting, though, I thought.
Originally posted by swampmuttam new to this site and its been a long time since i have taken a course. am trying to get a handle on how microbiology stacks up aganist a/p and the various nsg. blocks. I have a masters in psych from pepperdine and hold a lpt license from ca. so am not new to the studying processes. would micro be considered average or above in difficulty compared with other nsg. courses. all feed back would be greatly appreciated.
I thought it was one of the most difficult classes I've had to take. I guess it depends on the school. I learned a lot and loved the class though.
I think it might depend on the class, at my school there are two types of Micro.
I have taken 'Clinical Micro' and it was soooo easy. But we also have another Micro class called 'Principles of Micro' and I have heard it is very hard. Clinical Micro has no pre-reqs, but the Principle of Micro has pre-reqs of : chemistry, cell biology and/or zoology.
Good luck, either way I think Micro is very interesting and to any health care worker, important.
Marilyn
swampmutt
9 Posts
am new to this site and its been a long time since i have taken a course. am trying to get a handle on how microbiology stacks up aganist a/p and the various nsg. blocks. I have a masters in psych from pepperdine and hold a lpt license from ca. so am not new to the studying processes. would micro be considered average or above in difficulty compared with other nsg. courses. all feed back would be greatly appreciated.