Published
I think it's yet one more example of homophobia, xenophobia, anti-semitism and racism being permitted under the guise of "religious freedom".
How many steps, after all, would it take to go from the EMT who doesn't think the gay guy at the MVA should be saved to declaring that anyone not Christian should not be saved? Or not "his kind" (define what that is?) to be saved?
This bill purports to allow the freedom to keep "deeply religious" people (Christians, I'm going to say based on the architects of this bill) from having to care humanely and fairly for other human beings they deem as unworthy of their care. How can ANYONE think this is a GOOD idea?
Pretty sure the gay ED doc isn't going to toss the "deeply religious" bleeding guy out into the street, but....it's ok the other way?
If I believed in Hell, I'd have to say we're one step closer to it...
Snopes has a great analysis of this bill with some of the actual wording. It is NOT as cut and dry as the news article makes it seem.
snopes.com: Michigan Exempts Emergency Medical Personnel from Treating Gay People?
Thank you for providing the Snopes link, it's appreciated. I did read it, and while it's technically not being put forth as a means of denying care to those whom the provider deems unworthy of care (in effect, since THEY won't do it), it is just a heartbeat away from EVERY misuse and abuse possible.
Incorrect or simply malicious interpretation of a law has occured enough in our history to tell me that this thing can NEVER be a "good" law. It can only be used as a shield for those conscience-less souls to hide behind, IMHO. Or, at the very least, it allows for MUCH more harm than any possible good. I mean, really: is there such a slate of healthcare providers (emergency or otherwise) who have SUCH a problem with gays existing on the planet that they would need a law to protect them when they actively deny life-saving care and treatment?!
Oh, and I love a comment in the original link to the CBS story, the one in which someone who supports this idiocy gives as an example "A Jewish butcher would not have to handle non-kosher meat". Ok, seriously, any Jewish butcher who only wishes to handle kosher meat will work in a kosher shop. Is fine with all meat? Works anywhere (and is this really a problem? NO). Leave the Jews out of this one, LOL, we didn't design this stupidity! Drawing a parallel from the Jewish butcher to an ED doc who doesn't want to work on gay patients is just absurd...pretty sure when one goes into emergency medicine, it's understood that you don't get to choose which patients you can turn away because you don't like how they live....
Sorry, this just burns my butt!
MoonlightIdle
9 Posts
If passed, allows people to not serve those who go against their beliefs. What do you think?
License To Discriminate? Lawmakers Consider Bill Allowing Doctors, EMTs To Refuse Care Of Gay Patients « CBS Detroit