Published
Hello!! I just recently graduated with an ADN degree one week ago and waiting to take my boards. I been.an LPN 8yrs amd finally decided togo back for my RN anf here i am...but i digress...
Is having an ADN REALLY that? I already have a job lined up and i will be starting soon....the main reason i offered the position was becuz of my RN completion and i will be takin my NCLEX soon. Grant it, it at a LTAC facility but i figure this is a great way for me to get experience and.not become part of the sooo many new grads (ADN&BSN) that are not employed becuz they soooo desire to work in a hospital.
So please can someone clarify, IS HAVING AN A.D.N. DEGREE A TERRIBLE HORRIBLE NO GOOD VERY BAD WASTE??
(some post i read sure makes it feel that way) :-(
I already had a BA when I decided to become a nurse. Aside from student loans, I got no financial help from anyone. I could get an Associates for $7,000, a BSN for at least $15,000, or a Masters for at least $23,000. All RNs take the same licensing exam, so I went with the ADN.
I found out after graduation that hospitals in my area only hired BSNs. So far, I've worked LTC (which I will never do again) and Home Health.
MissChrissy,why should phase out either Lpn or Adn?
Why not phase out both?
What's going to happen to Adn's? Can you really downgrade them to Lpn's?
You do realize those are 2 different degrees?
(I personally favor phasing out the Lpn,as they have the least education of all nurses)
Also,I don't understand how people can talk about phasing out Adn's when they have more education than Lpn's.
Why is no one thinking about phasing out Lpn's?
My question is why are you considering phasing out LPNs? I work in an acute care hospital that is doing just that. We have lost a lot of experienced, very smart nurses. Nurses that taught me a lot. I understand that there are different levels of nursing care, however, just because the initials behind your name state LPN doesn't meant that they are less of a nurse than one that has BSN behind theirs.
So,do you think its better to phase out Adn's,when there are nurses with less education?
I thought the whole point of an all Bsn nursing force was to show that we are educated?
How can that be when we have nurses that are in school for a 1yr,yet people actually want to phase out nurses that are in school,(and have degrees) for 2 and 3 yrs?
I'm an Adn,but I don't understand people that want to phase "me" out,yet the Lpn gets to keep their titles,and yet I 'm more educated than them.
Doesn't make a bit of sense to me,unless you downgrade everyone else. Make the Adn. And Lpn,and downgrade the Lpn to something else. That might be fair.....
My point was we shouldn't be phasing ANYONE out. I don't agree that a BSN degree saves lives. I too am an associate nurse and I have probably saved more lives than the BSNs at my hospital.
I may officially only have 2 years nursing education, however, I have a PhD in the school of nursing hard knocks.
KimberlyRN89, BSN, RN
1,641 Posts