Published
Agreed with Jed. The BON was in the right. 'Just following orders' isn't an adequate defense when those orders are obviously unethical.
It would have been a more interesting and ambiguous case if the pills had been temporarily irreplaceable rather than merely expensive, which would have made the choice between giving possibly contaminated medicine and not giving medicine at all.
That is totally crazy. There is no way in H I would've been involved in retrieving those pills from the sharps container.
This is idiocy on every front - including the idea that you can't trust your expensive pills with your employees, so the best thing to do is have those same employees (or anyone, for that matter) manipulate the pills unnecessarily. <DUH>
If these pills were so expensive, like $1000/pill that they had to be kept locked up with the narcs and counted like narcs why didn't the pharmacy bubble pack them? If you have to dump the pills out to count there is a risk of possibly losing pills? And there is no way that I'd ever try to retrieve anything from the sharps container let alone pills to give to a patient.
Yes, totally poor judgment, but you know what gets my goat? Prisoners get expensive treatments for free, hard working, law abiding citizens can't afford treatments and medicines. Hard working mothers and fathers go into debt paying for astronomical copays and out of pocket expenses while the indolent segment of the population gets a free ride.
KCMnurse, BSN, MSN, RN
1 Article; 283 Posts
This case intrigued me. Let me know what you think regarding the decision to fish wasted tablets out of the sharps container...
https://www.nurse.com/blog/2019/03/13/court-rules-with-board-of-nursing-on-spilled-pills-case-against-nurses/