Does anyone else find it redundant to be testing every student in the school for hearing and vision, even when they have had a screening at their own pediatrician's office recently? This is only my second year as a school nurse, but in our state it is mandated that kids get screened "within 30 days of the first day of school", and every year after that. For me, it seems like a huge waste of time and resources to screen kids when I have a copy of their physicals and their H/V screening results on file. I prioritize those kids who don't have a screening on file, and obviously any kid who is brought in by a teacher that thinks there might be an issue. It is just hard for me to pull a kid from class for 20-30 minutes when I have a hearing and vision screening result right in front of me that was just done over the Summer at their annual check-up.
Am I the only one? What am I missing?
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Does anyone else find it redundant to be testing every student in the school for hearing and vision, even when they have had a screening at their own pediatrician's office recently? This is only my second year as a school nurse, but in our state it is mandated that kids get screened "within 30 days of the first day of school", and every year after that. For me, it seems like a huge waste of time and resources to screen kids when I have a copy of their physicals and their H/V screening results on file. I prioritize those kids who don't have a screening on file, and obviously any kid who is brought in by a teacher that thinks there might be an issue. It is just hard for me to pull a kid from class for 20-30 minutes when I have a hearing and vision screening result right in front of me that was just done over the Summer at their annual check-up.
Am I the only one? What am I missing?