Are LPNs the Answer to the RN Shortage in Some Locations?

Allnurses staffers recently attended the 2017 Emergency Nursing Conference in St Louis. We had some interesting conversations... Nurses General Nursing Article

Updated:  

Allnurses had the opportunity to talk with multiple healthcare systems throughout the US at a national conference. Many had the same issue: not enough RNs. Some had sign on bonuses - up to $10,000 for experienced critical care nurses, while others offered tuition reimbursement, high PTO accrual rate, guaranteed days off, self-scheduling, and free meals. Many nurses at the conference were reporting mandated overtime, on-call time - again that was mandated and staffing shortfalls. Several of the nurses were overheard discussing the sheer exhaustion they were experiencing as a result of "always working short." It is a phenomenon that allnurses hears and reports all the time. So...what's the solution? Decrease the acuity? Doubt that will happen anytime soon - our patients are sicker than ever. Increase the staff? As the hospital recruiters told us, the sign on bonuses are not always the answer.

However, one healthcare system, Erlanger Health Systems in Chattanooga, TN, spoke to us about how they are meeting the demand for RNs.... by hiring LPNs. Here are some of the guidelines:

  • Obtain a certification to give IV meds within 7 months of hire date
  • Become an RN within 3 years of hire date

The LPN to RN transition program is about one year in length and they partner with a community college to facilitate clinicals.

As we all know, healthcare needs ebb and flow. In 2011, Media Health Leaders brought us this news; speaking about primary nursing models, "and in this model, we're going to replace LPNs with more RNs and also more nurse aides. It's a model which, essentially, does not use LPNs."

From 2007, HC Pro reports; "Kaiser Permanente hospitals in Sacramento and Roseville, CA, are to replace their licensed vocational nurses (LVNs) with registered nurses (RNs) as part of efforts to provide a higher-level of care to patients. A total of 280 Kaiser LVNs will be affected by this change, which was made following negotiation between the health maintenance organization and United Healthcare Workers West, the labor union representing the LVNs."

And these are just two examples of how over the past few years, LPNs have been moved out of the acute care environment.

Now, Erlanger Health System in Chattanooga, TN is bringing LPNs back to the hospital. From their website, they have multiple LPN positions available that are inpatient-based.

When we discussed this trend with the staff from Erlanger at the conference, they welcome LPNs in the hospital and encourage them to continue their education and in fact offer an LPN to RN bridge program. They couple an LPN with an RN and are using a team nursing approach for the ever-increasing acuity of hospitalized patients. This has resulted in higher satisfaction for the RN, LPN and has improved the patient experience as well. LPNs are able to provide nursing care within their scope of practice which far exceeds what an unlicensed person can provide. As licensed staff, they are held to a higher standard but they also have more knowledge and more ability to affect patient outcomes.

The Institute for Health Improvement recommends a team-based care approach across all domains of care including acute care. They cite the "definition of "team-based care" for all care settings that is most widely accepted and consistent with the World Health Organization."

ANA published a white paper in 2015 about staffing strategies for nurses and stated; "Over the years a number of nurse staffing strategies and models have been tested and utilized across and within healthcare organizations. Inherent weaknesses in some models present opportunities for improvement that benefit patients, nurses, and healthcare organizations. The underlying discussion essentially involves the contrast between fixed or rigid models and those which include components that allow for the greatest degree of flexibility to ensure staffing needs are met in real time."

There are many different outlooks on team nursing, primary care nursing or some hybrid type of nursing care. While none of them are perfect, we as nurses need to speak up, voice our opinions and continue to encourage innovative strategies such as the ones at Erlanger Healthcare.

For more information about Erlanger Healthcare, contact: Careers with Erlanger

JKL33 said:
There is a difference in "nursing shortage" and a "shortage of nurses willing to work in 'X' conditions for '$X' pay." Calling the latter situation a "nursing shortage" is rather dubious, to put it nicely.

If I can't buy a nice filet mignon for $5 that doesn't mean my area is facing a critical food shortage.

I agree with you. There is no shortage of nurses, people are just tiring of the work conditions. I would love to be a floor nurse my whole career. But after 3 months on a Tele floor, I can't see doing it beyond a few years. I'm 30 and in good health. I'm dead tired after 13 hours on my feet and a 10 minute lunch. Sorry but hospitals just don't pay enough for people to want to do this long term. That is where this "shortage" comes from.

GoodDay2017 said:
I wish there was a list somewhere of all these openings, with sign on bonuses, that will also take new grads. I know many new grads BSN's who would relocate if there was assistance to help them.

From what I've seen, it is not typical for new grads to get signing bonuses; it's almost exclusively for experienced nurses. This occurs because a unit will spend a ton of money (tens of thousands of dollars) to orient a new grad, whereas experienced nurses require a much shorter, cheaper orientation. Receiving an expensive new grad orientation is your signing bonus.

There is also a ton of competition for most new grad hospital jobs (depending on your location). Based on supply and demand, there's no reason to pay an incentive bonus for a job that tons of new grads are competing for. In fact, many new grad jobs require that nurses sign a contract to commit to the hospital for a certain number of years; if the new grad breaks the contact, they can owe the hospital up to $5,000. It's kind of like a reverse signing bonus (maybe a 'signing debt'?).

There doesn't appear to be a shortage of overall nurses. Rather, there's a surplus of new grads due to the increase in nursing programs, and a simultaneous shortage of experienced nurses due to burnout, turn-over, and attrition.

Specializes in Pediatric Critical Care.

adventure_rn, BSN, I love your avatar so much...its adorable!

Julius Seizure said:
adventure_rn, BSN, I love your avatar so much...its adorable!

Aww, thank you!! Every time I look at it, it reminds me of why I love NICU nursing. She's a little 34-weeker whose picture went viral last year after parents posted it on their blog. Now she's a beautiful little smiley toddler (more info/pics in the articles below). Love it. :D

Pic Of Preemie Baby With Huge Smile Born In Minnesota Goes Viral

Preemie Inspires Parents With Dazzling Smile 5 Days After Birth - ABC News

Specializes in critical care, ER,ICU, CVSURG, CCU.

In my over 4+ decades of being an RN, I have worked with some exceptional Lvns even in critical care....

Archerlpvn said:
Texas, while it may have a very "specific" list of what LPNs can and cannot do, still has a very wide scope of practice for LVNs. They can perform focused assessments, IV push certain medications and I believe they can infuse medications into both peripheral and central lines in adult patients when they complete the "IV cert." Don't know about you, but that sounds pretty wide to me considering most restrictions with LPNs/LVNs occur in assessment ability and IV therapy practice.

I have read all the Texas BON position statements on LVN scope. I disagree that the LVN has a "wide" scope. Just a matter of opinion on how to define the word "wide."

Specializes in Home health, Addictions, Detox, Psych and clinics..
Horseshoe said:
I have read all the Texas BON position statements on LVN scope. I disagree that the LVN has a "wide" scope. Just a matter of opinion on how to define the word "wide."

That's fine, as an LPN who has practiced in multiple states, often in states with much more restrictive scopes of practice, I know that in general, it is "wider."

Specializes in Emergency.

I would like to hear other's opinions on hours and schedules as it relates to a nurse shortage.

My story is that because of family issues I can only work part-time and I've had trouble finding work that is not full-time. I'm working LTC/SNF right now because of the employer is willing to have part-time staff. (2 or 3 8hr/per week) I don't want to go part-time agency only because I prefer to have one place of employment.

An anecdotal story I have (take it for what it's worth) is a local facility with a very large, varied campus is short staffed and desperate but won't consider part-time personnel. I know a lot of other nurses who would prefer part-time, per diem and other flex schedules. Why the stiffness in scheduling? Any managers out there have an answer or is this a managerial (never been a healthcare provider) issue?

LPNs are definitely not the answer. The answer is to stop with the "BSN required/preferred" nonsense as an excuse to not hire ADNs and/or pay them less money. Remember, all 3 entry levels take the same test and if you want the ADN to somehow be less of a nurse, then give them a different test. Also, remember that the extras the BSN has, such as research and community health, are not on the test. That's for a reason. LPNs have one year of training with little to no theory. They're technicians, not professionals. No, they are not the answer. There are a lot of ADNs out there waiting for you to hire them.

Specializes in Pediatric Critical Care.
CKPM2RN said:
I would like to hear other's opinions on hours and schedules as it relates to a nurse shortage.

My story is that because of family issues I can only work part-time and I've had trouble finding work that is not full-time. I'm working LTC/SNF right now because of the employer is willing to have part-time staff. (2 or 3 8hr/per week) I don't want to go part-time agency only because I prefer to have one place of employment.

An anecdotal story I have (take it for what it's worth) is a local facility with a very large, varied campus is short staffed and desperate but won't consider part-time personnel. I know a lot of other nurses who would prefer part-time, per diem and other flex schedules. Why the stiffness in scheduling? Any managers out there have an answer or is this a managerial (never been a healthcare provider) issue?

I've never been a manager, but could it be because of benefits? Hiring 6 part time staff who all get benefits in some amount, vs. hiring 4 full time staff and only having to provide benefits to 4 people?

Specializes in Pediatric Critical Care.
Tommy5677 said:
LPNs are definitely not the answer. The answer is to stop with the "BSN required/preferred" nonsense as an excuse to not hire ADNs and/or pay them less money. Remember, all 3 entry levels take the same test and if you want the ADN to somehow be less of a nurse, then give them a different test. Also, remember that the extras the BSN has, such as research and community health, are not on the test. That's for a reason. LPNs have one year of training with little to no theory. They're technicians, not professionals. No, they are not the answer. There are a lot of ADNs out there waiting for you to hire them.

What's the reason?

Specializes in Geriatrics, Dialysis.

Sigh, too bad this is devolving into an LPN vs ADN vs BSN debate. Invoking the ANA sure didn't help. I'm also on the anti-ANA bandwagon as I don't think they do a darn thing to help nursing as a profession unless it's fits within their very constrained definitions.

I do find it interesting that at least some health care systems are trying to be more creative with staffing. Personally I think hiring some LPN 's and providing the means to help them become RN's is both helping a short term staffing crunch and ensuring a few more RN's for their facility long term. Sounds like a win-win to me.