Are LPNs the Answer to the RN Shortage in Some Locations?

Allnurses staffers recently attended the 2017 Emergency Nursing Conference in St Louis. We had some interesting conversations... Nurses General Nursing Article

Updated:  

Allnurses had the opportunity to talk with multiple healthcare systems throughout the US at a national conference. Many had the same issue: not enough RNs. Some had sign on bonuses - up to $10,000 for experienced critical care nurses, while others offered tuition reimbursement, high PTO accrual rate, guaranteed days off, self-scheduling, and free meals. Many nurses at the conference were reporting mandated overtime, on-call time - again that was mandated and staffing shortfalls. Several of the nurses were overheard discussing the sheer exhaustion they were experiencing as a result of "always working short." It is a phenomenon that allnurses hears and reports all the time. So...what's the solution? Decrease the acuity? Doubt that will happen anytime soon - our patients are sicker than ever. Increase the staff? As the hospital recruiters told us, the sign on bonuses are not always the answer.

However, one healthcare system, Erlanger Health Systems in Chattanooga, TN, spoke to us about how they are meeting the demand for RNs.... by hiring LPNs. Here are some of the guidelines:

  • Obtain a certification to give IV meds within 7 months of hire date
  • Become an RN within 3 years of hire date

The LPN to RN transition program is about one year in length and they partner with a community college to facilitate clinicals.

As we all know, healthcare needs ebb and flow. In 2011, Media Health Leaders brought us this news; speaking about primary nursing models, "and in this model, we're going to replace LPNs with more RNs and also more nurse aides. It's a model which, essentially, does not use LPNs."

From 2007, HC Pro reports; "Kaiser Permanente hospitals in Sacramento and Roseville, CA, are to replace their licensed vocational nurses (LVNs) with registered nurses (RNs) as part of efforts to provide a higher-level of care to patients. A total of 280 Kaiser LVNs will be affected by this change, which was made following negotiation between the health maintenance organization and United Healthcare Workers West, the labor union representing the LVNs."

And these are just two examples of how over the past few years, LPNs have been moved out of the acute care environment.

Now, Erlanger Health System in Chattanooga, TN is bringing LPNs back to the hospital. From their website, they have multiple LPN positions available that are inpatient-based.

When we discussed this trend with the staff from Erlanger at the conference, they welcome LPNs in the hospital and encourage them to continue their education and in fact offer an LPN to RN bridge program. They couple an LPN with an RN and are using a team nursing approach for the ever-increasing acuity of hospitalized patients. This has resulted in higher satisfaction for the RN, LPN and has improved the patient experience as well. LPNs are able to provide nursing care within their scope of practice which far exceeds what an unlicensed person can provide. As licensed staff, they are held to a higher standard but they also have more knowledge and more ability to affect patient outcomes.

The Institute for Health Improvement recommends a team-based care approach across all domains of care including acute care. They cite the "definition of "team-based care" for all care settings that is most widely accepted and consistent with the World Health Organization."

ANA published a white paper in 2015 about staffing strategies for nurses and stated; "Over the years a number of nurse staffing strategies and models have been tested and utilized across and within healthcare organizations. Inherent weaknesses in some models present opportunities for improvement that benefit patients, nurses, and healthcare organizations. The underlying discussion essentially involves the contrast between fixed or rigid models and those which include components that allow for the greatest degree of flexibility to ensure staffing needs are met in real time."

There are many different outlooks on team nursing, primary care nursing or some hybrid type of nursing care. While none of them are perfect, we as nurses need to speak up, voice our opinions and continue to encourage innovative strategies such as the ones at Erlanger Healthcare.

For more information about Erlanger Healthcare, contact: Careers with Erlanger

Horseshoe said:
I have read all the Texas BON position statements on LVN scope. I disagree that the LVN has a "wide" scope. Just a matter of opinion on how to define the word "wide."

I've only worked in Texas and California and Texas does seem very wide, to me. In California, they barely allow LVNs to breathe. And the few hospitals I've worked at have restricted them even further than the state.

Thank you for this article. I am a clinical nursing instructor for PN students, and I can tell you that their training is very rigorous. Unfortunately the LPN/LVN is under appreciated and under utilized. How can we ignore this when there is such a shortage of nurses?

There is a shortage of nurses in certain areas of the country. Those crying there is not are uninformed. Unfortunately, LPNs are not the answer in my state. They have a limited scope of practice and cannot complete assessments.

My answer is to pay RNs more money and support them more. There also needs to be better schooling to better prepare our new grads. Stop making it all about NCLEX.

Specializes in Home health, Addictions, Detox, Psych and clinics..
Julius Seizure said:
What's the reason?

Oh really? No theory eh? That's a loaded, bold and absolutely ridiculous statement about LPNs. Idk if you ever went through an LPN program, but I know I did, and theory was definitely a heavy component in our program. Not so say we went as in depth as an RN program would, but please don't make insulting comments like that. I'm a licensed nurse, not a technician, thank you.

Archerlpvn said:
Oh really? No theory eh? That's a loaded, bold and absolutely ridiculous statement about LPNs. Idk if you ever went through an LPN program, but I know I did, and theory was definitely a heavy component in our program. Not so say we went as in depth as an RN program would, but please don't make insulting comments like that. I'm a licensed nurse, not a technician, thank you.

I think you have replied to the wrong poster?

Specializes in Home health, Addictions, Detox, Psych and clinics..
JKL33 said:
I think you have replied to the wrong poster?

I did. Sorry! It's hard to reply accurately sometimes with my tiny phone lol.

I believe what 1 province back in Canada is doing, or attempting to do is changing the scope of practice for LPNs. They give them the training and viola they can then do that skill.....and get paid less than a RN......

Tommy5677 said:
LPNs are definitely not the answer. The answer is to stop with the "BSN required/preferred" nonsense as an excuse to not hire ADNs and/or pay them less money. Remember, all 3 entry levels take the same test and if you want the ADN to somehow be less of a nurse, then give them a different test. Also, remember that the extras the BSN has, such as research and community health, are not on the test. That's for a reason. LPNs have one year of training with little to no theory. They're technicians, not professionals.No, they are not the answer. There are a lot of ADNs out there waiting for you to hire them.

Oooohh that's why my name hasn't popped up on the office of professions website, I thought it was because I just passed the NCLEX last week. Can someone point me to the office of technicians website?

When a lawyer, or the state refers to you as a "professional" - it's nearly always so they can add responsibilities to you, sue you, make you work overtime without compensation, or otherwise mistreat you without paying you for the privilege.

This is one perfect example of the skilled *trade* of nursing cutting it's own throat by referring to themselves as "professionals". I also hold a real-estate license & they like to call themselves "professionals" too, and it's (frankly) bull. If you can get your license with a 40-hour online class, you're not a "professional", and if you're subject to stepping in poop at work, you're not a professional - you're a (skilled) tradesperson. At the master's level of education- if you're *not* at the bedside, using the term "professional" is appropriate and valid.

Words mean something & "professional" in the US means something other than a compliment. At best, it's stolen valor & at worst, it's playing into a legal mine field that doesn't end well for nurses. Taking the title of "professional" is no different legally than accepting the "manager" tag - once you let your boss stick one on your shirt, you get the pleasure of unlimited overtime without compensation.

TLDR; you should be rejecting the "professional" tag if you know what's good for you.

I know. I don't care what I'm referred to as I was just being a wise***.

LPN=N stands for nurse RN=N stands for nurse

We all save lives and we all are medical professionals.

Specializes in School Nursing.

My experience-

I am a LVN in California. I graduated, and it was nearly impossible to find work. Everyone wanted a (year) experience. My first and only job, has been working for a school district in the health office. Now when I try to look for work I am meet with 2 huge obstacles. #1- the employer is discouraged by the fact that I am not using my (skills). #2- the pay for LVN in assisted living (SNF) really is low. Its almost $10 lower than the wage I am currently making, and for more work. So I have decided that I am stuck working this school job because I am not desired in the real world of nursing.

Just my point of view:whistling: