Published Jan 11, 2017
Pachinko
297 Posts
I recently heard from a colleague that a hospital here in the LA area makes new grads sign contracts prior to orientation. The new grads agree to pay back the cost of their training if they do not complete the orientation period, and it can result in bills of up to $5000. They will be billed if they are not found to be a good fit for the facility, and several of this hospital's most recent cohort have been let go and billed.
I was so shocked by this that I emailed the hospital's HR department, and they confirmed that it's true.
Is this the new norm for hiring new grads?! It is outrageous and shameful to bill new grads, who are likely in debt and who are certainly unemployed, because the job did not work out.
caliotter3
38,333 Posts
I can see doing that for someone not having problems who chooses to leave, but to punish a new hire that does not meet expectations? No, no, no.
Sour Lemon
5,016 Posts
I recently heard from a colleague that a hospital here in the LA area makes new grads sign contracts prior to orientation. The new grads agree to pay back the cost of their training if they do not complete the orientation period, and it can result in bills of up to $5000. They will be billed if they are not found to be a good fit for the facility, and several of this hospital's most recent cohort have been let go and billed.I was so shocked by this that I emailed the hospital's HR department, and they confirmed that it's true.Is this the new norm for hiring new grads?! It is outrageous and shameful to bill new grads, who are likely in debt and who are certainly unemployed, because the job did not work out.
Wow ....yeah, contracts for new grads are pretty common in tight markets, but firing someone and then expecting them to pay is especially harsh. I guess we're all free to sign or not to sign, though. I wonder if people have intentionally "not worked out" to break their contracts? ...like called in a bunch of times without concern because they want to be released.
roser13, ASN, RN
6,504 Posts
Totally agree that charging an employee who was let go during orientation is cruel and unusual.
HOWEVER, I see too many new nurses here (not gonna say young, just new grads) who treat orientation in a very cavalier manner. Even when a contract has been signed (as in the OR), the questions we get here are all about how to skip out on the position while avoiding paying for the contract that they signed. So, given that (in my opinion) trend, and the oversupply of new grads in most large cities, I can understand why this is happening.
NurseSpeedy, ADN, LPN, RN
1,599 Posts
Ouch. I've seen many companies require a 2 year contract in exchange for a lengthy orientation but to charge them for the cost of the orientation only because they are found to be 'not a good fit' and therefore let go seems like a really shady deal. I could understand letting someone go because they call off too much or aren't performing up to standard, but this reason is way too broad (oops, we overhired, time to make cuts....hope this isn't the case).
I've been lucky with never having to sign a contract. I have known of some nurses getting stuck with crappy assignments and no way out due to a contract that would cost them too much to break.
A contract is always meant to benefit the employer. Read and understand the fine print before signing.
Swellz
746 Posts
My job required us to sign a 2 year contract if we were required to take the critical care course to work on our unit; not fulfilling the 2 year contract resulted in paying back $6000. Mind you, there was a policy on file that said my floor didn't have to do the course, but I had no idea when I signed. Miscommunication is fun.
Scottishtape
561 Posts
I believe Florida hospital is doing the same thing, to the tune of $13,000.
Its defintely making me rethink which new grad residencies I want to apply for.
Extra Pickles
1,403 Posts
I think this makes it abundantly clear for those who still insist that there's a national shortage of nurses that obviously there is not. If hospitals can afford to have such a contract in place it means they know they can fill new grad vacancies easily. If someone chooses to not sign they can be replaced by someone who will. Not a good position to be in as a new grad but also like roser said it'll probably make some people who don't take contracts seriously to start taking them seriously.
Ruby Vee, BSN
17 Articles; 14,036 Posts
We see so many new grads in my magnet hospital who have no plans to stay in their jobs any longer than the absolute minimum time it takes them to get into anesthesia school. Seeing a few go from orientation to anesthesia school without ever spending any time as a nurse makes one understand why contracts are necessary. Paying for your training even if you're fired seems a bit harsh, but I'm guessing that hospital has been burned a few times to even consider such a thing.
Jules A, MSN
8,864 Posts
Absolutely and with the expectation of the length of orientation that new nurses seemt entitled to now I can imagine why the hospital would want something in return if they are horrible or leave quickly. I mean some of the posts here are amazingly smug with regard to the demands that orientations essentially last months and teach them what the nursing schools really should taught them prior to graduation. Going back years now but I literally had a new grad RN, CNL so supposedly masters prepared, who had not given an IM injection while in nursing school, WTH?
The other thing is why would a hospital just fire a new employee they hired and trained unless they were terrible? It doesn't make sense. The $5,000 to a new grad might seem like a fortune but is nothing to a hospital especially compared to having a skilled new team member.
HelloWish, ADN, BSN
486 Posts
I actually feel that many hospitals need to have this contract in place because they cannot hold onto nurses due to a broken system, under staffing, too high patient to nurse ratio, the bottom line is most important, etc. I signed a 2 year contract as new grad and I am not a young new grad as a 40 year old. Never again will I sign a contract with any company because now I realize it is because hospitals just don't treat their nurses well and the bottom line is priority one - ultimately retention is a problem. They know they will not be able to hold onto these nurses so rather than fix what is broken so they can keep new nurses, charge the nurses who leave. The previous new cohort from my hospital of new grads have all quit except for one and moved on to other similar positions because they felt it was worthwhile to pay $5000 back.
llg, PhD, RN
13,469 Posts
The worst case I ever dealt with personally was an experienced nurse switching specialties. She put in her 30-day resignation on Day 2 of employment. She had accepted a job in that new specialty in another city -- and wanted to go there with some experience under her belt. She thought she would get 30 days of paid orientation from us and then take that experience to her new employer. (And no, she didn't work for us before. She was a new employee for the hospital system.)
She was surprised that I told her to leave right away -- in the middle of the day -- and that we would not pay her to take our orientation classes prior to her move out of town.
It's nurses like that who have lead hospitals to require contracts.