Addressing Sexual Orientation in Healthcare

Medical providers may often ignore the sexual orientation of a patient, for a variety of reasons, but doing so can cause a patient’s comprehensive health to also be ignored(1). Whether the topic is uncomfortable for a provider, a patient, or both should not influence care. Maybe a provider simply doesn’t see the necessity in inquiring about sexual orientation. Nurses Announcements Archive Article

Sponsored Content

According to the American Psychological Association, sexual orientation "refers to the sex of those to whom one is sexually and romantically attracted to." Sexual orientation impacts health in several ways, from communicable diseases, like HIV/AIDS, to mental health. Research has found that gay and bisexual men have a higher risk of major depression, bipolar disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder than heterosexual men. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states that this increase can be partly attributed to discrimination and/or a lack of familial support2. One study found that gay, bisexual, and lesbian youth are twice as likely to attempt suicide as their heterosexual peers.3 These mental health risks cannot and should not be overlooked.

Understanding sexual orientation and how to nonjudgmentally approach it is vital to providing excellent patient care. Heterosexual, homosexual, gay, lesbian, bisexual - these are the common words that people use to label their sexual orientation. The fact that these words are labels is an important distinction to understand because labels try to fit people or things in a box that might not truly fit. With that said, a majority of people will identify with one of these labels, so here's a quick review of what they mean:

1) Heterosexual: A person who is sexually attracted to the opposite gender.

2) Homosexual: A person who is sexually attracted to the same gender.

3) Gay: A man who is sexually attracted to the male gender.

4) Lesbian: A woman who is sexually attracted to the female gender.

5) Bisexual: A person who is sexually attracted to both the female and male genders.

6) Asexual: A person who is not sexually attracted to either gender.

Some men will identify as heterosexual, but they also have sex with men. Therefore, in HIV/AIDS prevention work, public health uses the term "men who have sex with men" (MSM) because MSM refers to a behavior and not a sexual orientation label. Additionally, the term "women who have sex with women" (WSW) is used to denote a sexual activity and not a sexual orientation identity. Public health is typically unconcerned with a sexual orientation label; instead, the concern lies in educating people about health and safer sex practices.

In some instances, using specific labels can risk people identifying with a sexual orientation that differs from their sexual activity. Some people don't identify with any of these labels, so they either refuse to label their sexual orientation or decide to choose an alternative label. Understanding a patient's sexual practices, not simply their identified sexual orientation, allows the healthcare provider to better understand the patient's holistic health risks.

Since using a sexual orientation label has the potential to mislabel a patient's sexual activity, there is a strategy that can help bypass this issue: ask questions that are focused on sexual activity, not sexual orientation labels. During a health history with a sexually active patient, it is informative and nonjudgmental to ask the patient if they are having sex with men, women, or both, as opposed to simply assuming the gender(s) of a patient's sexual partner(s). This information can be gathered passively by including the question and answer choices on a self-assessment form that the patient fills out. It can also be done directly by providing privacy during the intake process and by taking time to educate the patient on the purpose behind the questioning so that they understand the goal is to provide a safe place for communication to be exchanged and to enable the healthcare provider to better assess health risks and develop an appropriate plan of care.

When first meeting a patient, instead of asking if they have a husband or wife, ask if they have a significant other. This is an easy method that healthcare providers can utilize to show patients that they are in an atmosphere with providers who are open to all sexual orientations. It is possible to avoid forcing patients to use sexual orientation labels, and by doing so, the healthcare provider can gain a better understanding of their patients.

The role of the healthcare provider is to provide patients with excellent care and education that is patient-specific. Building a discrimination-free health zone will have the potential to improve the health and lives of all patients, regardless of sexual orientation or sexual activity.

[1] National LGBT Health Education Center. (2013). Collecting Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data in Electronic Health Records. Take the Next Steps. Retrieved from http://www.lgbthealtheducation.org/wp-content/uploads/COM-2111-Brief_Collecting-SOGI-Data.pdf

[2] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Mental Health. Retrieved from Mental Health | Gay and Bisexual Men's Health | CDC

[3] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Stigma and Discrimination. Retrieved from Suicide and Violence Prevention | Gay and Bisexual Men's Health | CDC

Specializes in Emergency/Cath Lab.

OR we stop treating everyone like they belong to a special group for whatever reason and treat everyone equally.

Specializes in Critical Care and ED.
OR we stop treating everyone like they belong to a special group for whatever reason and treat everyone equally.

In the real world, of course, but that doesn't happen does it, hence the need for articles like this. I still wince when I have to give my next of kin/emergency contact information at my doctor's office. The fleeting change of expression and awkward silence of the receptionist when I give my same sex partners name is always embarrassing and excruciating. We still have a long way to go.

Specializes in ICU, trauma.
Gay persons can have a husband or a wife, just like heterosexuals. This article is like pouring substance from one empty bucket into another empty bucket - nothing accomplished.

I think it's more saying that you should ask if they have a significant other because assuming a female patient has a husband when she really has a wife can come off as condescending

I guess the question becomes 'where does it all end?' I have no doubt that to some (if not many) just the question regarding a 'significant other' is painful for a myriad of reasons. A divorce, death, break up or just the inability to find someone with whom to share one's life with all are very painful circumstances.

Compassion is called for in all circumstances where someone is hurting, but ultimately, the burden is on that person to come to terms with their situation with help if necessary, if it is so uncomfortable for them to live with.

Why do we even need to include sexual orientation at all? At work we ask "if there is an emergency, who can we call?", which then is followed up with "how do you know this person?" This can stop the need for asking sexual orientation altogether. I frankly do not care about the orientation of my patient, nor is it relevant in their care. I find asking, is divisive at times. If we need to ask marital status, ask that and not if you have a husband or wife. It is almost 2017, do we really need to be asking some of these questions to our patients?

Specializes in Adult ICU/PICU/NICU.

I was an MICU nurse back in the early 1980s when the AIDS crisis was in its infancy. People were scared and very ignorant toward the men (and it was almost always gay men at that time) who had AIDS. Hearing "they deserve to die" from the nurses who were taking care of them wasn't a surprise back then. I accepted it, but I made sure that I would sign up to be the associate nurse for these men to prevent such ignorant and uncaring nurses from taking care of them. I will NEVER forget the ignorant comments directed towards these men as long as I live. For me, it was a peak experience in my nursing career that gay families really aren't any different from heterosexual families. Just making that statement today sounds obvious, but it sure wasn't back then.

When my daughter came out to me some years ten years later and then my grandson almost twenty years later....it was easy for me. I think those men taught me more than I taught them.

I retired from the hospital in 2009, and at the time of my retirement, we had many openly gay and lesbian people working in the hospital. Comments like "they deserve to die" wouldn't be accepted at all, and I sure wouldn't be one who would tolerate it in my presence. Most likely, they would be disciplined if the wrong person overheard the comment, especially if it was a family member.

In my old age and retirement, I now work as a substitute assistant school nurse in the public schools a few days a month. We have GSAs in most of our high schools that stand for Gay Straight Alliances for our LGBT youth and their supporters. Our nursing staff is trained on LGBT issues as school nurses are often times the only health care professional that our young people see on a regular basis. I'm just a substitute assistant school nurse, so I have not been the one to deal with these issues..but I would have no issue telling them this:

It doesn't matter who you love as long as the person you love is rich which allows you to quit your job and spend their money on yourself.

Kidding...that's my grandson's version that he says that all the time and it used to make me laugh as I hope some of you are now.

MY true version is that doesn't matter who you love as long as you do love and the person treats you well.

Best,

Mrs H.

Specializes in ER.

I am thankful to be instructed in definitions because, I've been living in a cave on a remote island, and reading this article is my first contact with the outside world in 40 years. Homosexuals can marry now? I'm shocked beyond belief. This will take some getting used to.

Specializes in Hospice.

I would like to mention that the legal status of a relationship directly affects the identification of next-of-kin when a written POA is not available. The number and gender of sexual contacts directly affects the statistical chances of someone having certain medical conditions which then moves that condition up or down on the differential diagnosis.

When I worked in a Gyn clinic, I asked about the gender of sexual partners with every patient ... the "outrage" that is so feared rarely occurred and, when it did, became a teaching moment. I didn't even have to lecture ... just the aknowledgement that something other than cisgendered heterosexuals actually exists is healthy especially when it comes as a surprise.

My heterosexual grandmother had a "significant other" after my grandfather died (also male) that she did not marry because she would have lost significant social security benefits, so older people need asked too. I ask "are you sexually active?" "Are you both monogamous, or use protection?" "Have you been tested for STDs?" And I assume nothing about the gender of the partner. I will ask if I feel it is pertinent, such as if a STD is found, and we may need to discuss notification of the partner, and others if the partner is not (or may not be) monogamous.

Specializes in CEU Courses for Nurses.

Thanks for sharing. These personal experiences speak louder than any article can.

More sexual orientation than those just listed. There is Cis normative, het normative, polysexual which is not bisexual. There is the group of transgendeted who considers themselves straight then there is the group that considered themselves gay. So really who cares who is sleeping with who and who they are attracted to sexually. It is not going to change how I care for the person in the hospital getting blood sugar under control or about to have the gall bladder taken out.