Medicare fines over hospitals' readmitted patients to begin on Monday Oct 1,2012

Nurses Activism

Published

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2012/09/30/medicare-fines-over-hospitals-readmitted-patients/1603827/

Medicare fines over hospitals' readmitted patientsding...

By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR, AP

42 minutes ago

WASHINGTON-If you or an elderly relative have been hospitalized recently and noticed extra attention when the time came to be discharged, there's more to it than good customer service.

As of Monday, Medicare will start fining hospitals that have too many patients readmitted within 30 days of discharge due to complications. The penalties are part of a broader push under President Barack Obama's health care law to improve quality while also trying to save taxpayers money.

About two-thirds of the hospitals serving Medicare patients, or some 2,200 facilities, will be hit with penalties averaging around $125,000 per facility this coming year, according to government estimates.

Data to assess the penalties have been collected and crunched, and Medicare has shared the results with individual hospitals. Medicare plans to post details online later in October, and people can look up how their community hospitals performed by using the agency's "Hospital Compare" website.

It adds up to a new way of doing business for hospitals, and they have scrambled to prepare for well over a year. They are working on ways to improve communication with rehabilitation centers and doctors who follow patients after they're released, as well as connecting individually with patients.

"There is a lot of activity at the hospital level to straighten out our internal processes," said Nancy Foster, vice president for quality and safety at the American Hospital Association. "We are also spreading our wings a little and reaching outside the hospital, to the extent that we can, to make sure patients are getting the ongoing treatment they need."

Still, industry officials say they have misgivings about being held liable for circumstances beyond their control. They also complain that facilities serving low-income people, including many major teaching hospitals, are much more likely to be fined, raising questions of fairness.

"Readmissions are partially within the control of the hospital and partially within the control of others," Foster said.

Consumer advocates say Medicare's nudge to hospitals is long overdue and not nearly stiff enough.

"It's modest, but it's a start," said Dr. John Santa, director of the Consumer Reports Health Ratings Center. "Should we be surprised that industry is objecting? You would expect them to object to anything that changes the status quo."

For the first year, the penalty is capped at 1 percent of a hospital's Medicare payments. The overwhelming majority of penalized facilities will pay less. Also, for now, hospitals are only being measured on three medical conditions: heart attacks, heart failure and pneumonia.

Under the health care law, the penalties gradually will rise until 3 percent of Medicare payments to hospitals are at risk. Medicare is considering holding hospitals accountable on four more measures: joint replacements, stenting, heart bypass and treatment of stroke.

If General Motors and Toyota issue warranties for their vehicles, hospitals should have some similar obligation when a patient gets a new knee or a stent to relieve a blocked artery, Santa contends. "People go to the hospital to get their problem solved, not to have to come back," he said.

Excessive rates of readmission are only part of the problem of high costs and uneven quality in the U.S. health care system. While some estimates put readmission rates as high as 20 percent, a congressional agency says the level of preventable readmissions is much lower. About 12 percent of Medicare beneficiaries who are hospitalized are later readmitted for a potentially preventable problem, said the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, known as MedPAC.

Foster, the hospital association official, said medication mix-ups account for a big share of problems. Many Medicare beneficiaries are coping with multiple chronic conditions, and it's not unusual for their medication lists to be changed in the hospital. But their doctors outside sometimes don't get the word; other times, the patients themselves don't understand there's been a change.

Another issue is making sure patients go to their required follow-up appointments.

Medicare deputy administrator Jonathan Blum said he thinks hospitals have gotten the message.

"Clearly it's captured their attention," said Blum. "It's galvanized the hospital industry on ways to reduce unnecessary readmissions. It's forced more parts of the health care system to work together to ensure that patients have much smoother transitions."

MedPAC, the congressional advisory group, has produced research findings that back up the industry's assertion that hospitals serving the poor, including major teaching facilities, are more likely to face penalties. But for now, Blum said Medicare is not inclined to grade on the curve.

"We have really tried to address and study this issue," said Blum. "If you look at the data, there are hospitals that serve a low-income patient mix and do very well on these measures. It seems to us that hospitals that serve low-income people can control readmissions very well."

Under Obama's health care overhaul, Medicare is pursuing efforts to try to improve quality and lower costs. They include rewarding hospitals for quality results, and encouraging hospitals, nursing homes and medical practice groups to join in "accountable care organizations." Dozens of pilot programs are under way. The jury is still out on the results.

My take on this is: This could have positive implications for nurses in that if alot of these hospitals perform poorly, which I think they will, the hospital may have to look seriously at their staffing levels.

The greatest impact on controlling and reducing these readmissions falls under nursing's control. WE are with these patient's 24/7. We are the doctors's eyes and ears. These eyes and ears can only be in one place at one time. Like mentioned- these patients are complex with multiple co morbidities, this is where these hospitals are going to have to face facts. They can't competely take care of this level of complex patient's on a shoe string anymore. They can either increse and hire more nures or pay the fines to medicare. These hospitals need to have enough nurses staffed to competently monitor a patient's progess and the Licensed nurse is the one responsible for discharge teaching. If the staff levels are to low, which we all know they are, this is where the patient's slip through the cracks and are doomed for readmission.

I don't see this as a bad thing. I think it is finially going to make hosptial adminstration face up and be responsible for the poor decisions they have been making .

What I am seeing in SE PA is some gaming of the system. Medicare clients readmitted within 30 days with minor illness: 2-4 day stay is being placed under observation status rather than admision. Readmission now results in homecare referral (should have had as part of 1st admit discharge planning) with RN visiting next day. Even SNF's are having patients be readmitted within 1st week home if they can't function with caregiver support. This never happened in my area prior 2012-had to go to the hospital first. Two major health systems in my area closed their SNF's 4 yrs ago as losing monies resulting in patient being placed 30 miles away in different counties due to lack of beds. Now health systems are forming alliances with SNF owners to decrease length of stay and readmit rates and lwith bed closer to home.
Interesting you say that. I work for a SNF and just over the weekend received 3 screens for patients that were just in the E.D. for screening. One was with a bp of 240/130 and coffee ground emesis, observation only? Scary times ahead I think.

The Nurse Navigators for cancer patients have nothing to do with the Medicare issues. The issues here are limited to CHF, MI, and pneumonia. And the readmission has to be related to those issues, as well, not if the patient fell 2 weeks later and broke her hip - - unless the fall can be directly related to a poor understanding of their meds!

As a former home health nurse, meds and follow-up care are so incredibly important and often misunderstood. And few Medicare patients will get home health care - the patient must be homebound! I would like to see that more patients get to their PCP for a follow-up visit within a week following discharge, but I know that is not always possible.

Med changes are such a big problem after discharge. People get so confused - - they don't want to go out and get all of the prescriptions filled if they already have some of the meds at home, and may not know which, if any, have been changed. And EVEN WHEN THEY HAVE BEEN TAUGHT about their meds at the hospital, they have NOT understood. All they understand is that they are going home. It is part of teaching that we insist that the patient REPEAT all of the instructions back to the nurse, not just nod their heads and say Ok, ok. Signing that discharge form means next to nothing. I am a nurse of many years and did not understand why I was placed on metoprolol post-stent placement; I am not hypertensive.

And pneumonia is a tuffy, too. When patients simply do not perform any deep breathing exercises, or don't take their meds, they will frequently relapse. Some think, EVEN WHEN THEY HAVE BEEN TOLD OTHERWISE, that those exercises were something they did to please the staff!!! They just don't do them at home. Or they resume smoking. Really hard to deal with these patients, sometimes!

EVERY time a med is given, EVERY SINGLE TIME, the nurse must tell the patient why they are getting this med. ASK the patient why they are getting these meds. Make sure the patient really understands long before discharge. And sit down when you are doing discharge teaching - otherwise, the patient just wants to get you out of the room so they can get dressed and then wait three hours for their ride to show up!

This has little to do with 'Obamacare' and much more to do with Medicare. But it mostly has to do with PATIENT CARE.

Teach, teach, teach! Make sure your patients what is expected of THEM when they go home.

Specializes in PCCN.

Just another reason to fire us nurses.I also see that people wont be readmitted then.

I think it is so hard , as some of these"frequent fliers" also are noncompliant despite all the teaching yyou could do. MI? pt goes out to smoke right after stents. comes back with chest pain- how is that MY fault if ii told him he needed to quit? How about the dialysis or chf's who pay no attention to salt intake and fluid intake despite being educated and saying "yeah, I know" yet still come back a week later with sob. Thats just as pathetic as the copd'ers who smoke while on oxygen.Despite all the documentation of teaching, and the person either saying "yeah yeah" or flat out refusing.

It seems that all are going to be punished for the screw ups of the few.

I pray my fam. members never have to go into a hospital ever.

These" death panels" might actually be more of a reality- just in the form of non- readmitts.

Someone might have to explain this to me. But here's what I thought this was about. I, initially, thought that they were saying if a patient was re-admitted due to being discharged too soon (Medicare patients are usually "get them in, get them out" type thing; all pts are, but specifically them. Then, you see them re-admitted because they went home before they needed to and it all comes down to reimbursement). Now, that I read this and it mentions re-admitted due to complications...is that saying only if the patient is experiencing complications due to something that was done/or not done in the hospital (i.e. nosocomial infection) the hospital will be fined? Or is it saying what I initially thought?

Also, not every complication a patient gets is due to lack of teaching or poor care given in a hospital. Patients make choices and not all of them are good ones for their conditions (a diabetic eating tons of candy and has an awful diet, a smoker who continues to smoke despite lung disease, etc.) and also, some patients don't have primary care providers or they lack the funds to get medications filled, so they either don't take the medication or they cut them in half. How exactly is that the health care provider's (nurse, physician, etc.) or hospital's fault?

Specializes in LTC Rehab Med/Surg.

Most of you are talking about short hospital stays, where the pt is "fixed" then sent home too early. What we have where I work is the pt is kept too long, PT et OT for weeks, bleeding the system. One thing for sure in the hospital, keep a pt too long and eventually they catch something else. So, we send them home 2-3 weeks after their PT goals are met. Then in another week they're in the ER or PCP office coughing and febrile, having developed pneumonia laying in a hospital bed 15 hrs out of 24.

We cycle the same old pts in and out every month. They're admitted with weakness and dehydration, kept for therapy, then discharged. Admitted a week later with pneumonia, kept for 2 weeks worth of ATB, then discharged to home. Readmitted with weakness a week later......

Lots of waste and it should have been fixed a long time ago.

I completely agree with you. I was on the floor before going to the ICU. My background was a renal, pts coded almost daily in HD yet DC planning was trying to get them out...why, because reimbursement was cut and although the pt needed to be in the hospital per insurance there admitting dx was a 2-5 day stay only. A time limit on hospital stays was part of the downfall, now hospitals will be fined for readmission's, how is that going to fund more staff. Sounds like we as nurses will be blamed for more while expecting to do more with/for less.

This is what is going on now. Mark my words peeps! Insurance companies are the root of all evil, to placate them is why CMs exist. Nothing gets better until we bring the insurance companies to task. Right now, everything that is, and will happen works in their favor. GMLOS/LOS

Specializes in Oncology.

Now they will be holding acutely ill people in SNFs that are severely understaffed and more deaths will result. Patients will be not admitted when they need to be. The staff nurses and floor nurses aren't the reason these patients are being readmitted. They are sent home too soon, too sick, and with not enough support, and half these people shouldn't be living alone as it is, in my opinion. We have patients whose family members bring them in, bedsores, UTIs, open wounds, cellulitus, dirty, smelly, wet and soiled, dirty clothes, malnutrition, blood sugars and blood pressures out of control, clearly not getting their meds, dehydrated, confused and can't even tell you what meds they're on, let alone how many, how often, with what, why, etc.

As a staff nurse, I can't make sure they take meds at home, can't make sure they get wound care, can't make sure they do incentive spirometry, can't make sure they check their sugars, clean their caths, etc. Then somehow it's my fault when they come back in a week with DKA or an infection because they failed to care for themselves at home.

These fines will just lead to worse staffing because you know the hospital won't take the hit.

Specializes in Oncology.
The Nurse Navigators for cancer patients have nothing to do with the Medicare issues. The issues here are limited to CHF, MI, and pneumonia. And the readmission has to be related to those issues, as well, not if the patient fell 2 weeks later and broke her hip - - unless the fall can be directly related to a poor understanding of their meds!

As a former home health nurse, meds and follow-up care are so incredibly important and often misunderstood. And few Medicare patients will get home health care - the patient must be homebound! I would like to see that more patients get to their PCP for a follow-up visit within a week following discharge, but I know that is not always possible.

Med changes are such a big problem after discharge. People get so confused - - they don't want to go out and get all of the prescriptions filled if they already have some of the meds at home, and may not know which, if any, have been changed. And EVEN WHEN THEY HAVE BEEN TAUGHT about their meds at the hospital, they have NOT understood. All they understand is that they are going home. It is part of teaching that we insist that the patient REPEAT all of the instructions back to the nurse, not just nod their heads and say Ok, ok. Signing that discharge form means next to nothing. I am a nurse of many years and did not understand why I was placed on metoprolol post-stent placement; I am not hypertensive.

And pneumonia is a tuffy, too. When patients simply do not perform any deep breathing exercises, or don't take their meds, they will frequently relapse. Some think, EVEN WHEN THEY HAVE BEEN TOLD OTHERWISE, that those exercises were something they did to please the staff!!! They just don't do them at home. Or they resume smoking. Really hard to deal with these patients, sometimes!

EVERY time a med is given, EVERY SINGLE TIME, the nurse must tell the patient why they are getting this med. ASK the patient why they are getting these meds. Make sure the patient really understands long before discharge. And sit down when you are doing discharge teaching - otherwise, the patient just wants to get you out of the room so they can get dressed and then wait three hours for their ride to show up!

This has little to do with 'Obamacare' and much more to do with Medicare. But it mostly has to do with PATIENT CARE.

Teach, teach, teach! Make sure your patients what is expected of THEM when they go home.

It's true, but even with the best teaching, not everyone will ever understand. I find that at least half of my elderly patients (and about 80-90% are elderly) have some degree of memory loss and I couldn't even understand their RIDICULOUS med regimens so how could they? They take about a hundred meds, some of them for the same thing. They don't understand when you say, these 5 pills are for your blood pressure, they'll say "Why do I need this if I have this" and the ever famous "color" questions. I advise a patient that their medication has been changed. They then ask "Is that the yellow one?" Ummmm I have no freaking idea what color your pills are, they could be generic or name brand, could be any color!!!!" It drives me crazy. And they want us to explain each one? Sometimes it takes these people 5 times of me repeating myself just to get them to understand "stand up" or something that simple. Call me impatient, but I don't have time to teach every pill every time, heck, I barely have time to give the pills. Part of this problem is that patients don't have the capability to manage their own medications at all but they can't afford home care or it's not covered or there's not enough home care hours or whatever, and families in this country are almost completely unwilling to care for their family members, either. And let's not get started on how they expect us to get anything done with our staffing levels.

Specializes in Oncology.

PS- those of you blaming Obama- think again. or think at all. This change brought to you by GREED. Corporate greed.

Specializes in Emergency/Cath Lab.

HAHA HA HA. So you think people actually take care of themselves when they go home? Oh classic.

Specializes in PICU, NICU, L&D, Public Health, Hospice.

Because hospitals have cut nursing to the bone, the best way to promote patient health in the outpatient setting is to assign nurse case managers to each patient with chronic disease especially if they have 2 or more co-morbidities.

This all about continuum of care...not just about admissions. When we have a good continuum of care for our patients they do better and achieve better health outcomes.

Of course, CEO's could give 2 craps about patient outcomes outside of their walls...actually they probably don't really care about patients at all...just the business model.

. . . These fines will just lead to worse staffing because you know the hospital won't take the hit.

Sadly, this is probably true.

Hospital finance staff will look at the options to avoid the fines, which I would bet involve hiring more personnel, likely nurses. If the calculation is that, say ten additional nurses are needed to keep readmissions under the threshold for the Medicare fines, that cost will likely be much greater than the cost of the fines. In fact, if the article is accurate and the average fine is going to be $125,000, that is pretty close to the cost of hiring just one additional nurse. So in our example, the cost to avoid the fine is ten times greater than simply paying the fine. The rational economic decision is clear. It may not be the right ethical decision, but that is not really a concern in a free-market system.

In theory of course, customers (we know them as patients), would also act rationally and avoid those hospitals with high readmit rates in favor of those who did the responsible thing and hired more staff. So, again in theory, the responsible hospitals would be rewarded with more revenue (and related benefits, such as attracting the best staff) while the other hospitals would be punished by the market and see their revenues decline. This is where the free-market system falls apart though, since the health care marketplace differs dramatically from other retail operations.

While consumers looking to but a new widescreen television for example have many options regarding where to make their purchase, that is not the case in for health care consumers (patients), who don't have the unfettered ability to choose their hospital - and in many cases have no option at all. Sticking with the TV example, potential customers have access to a lot of information about their purchase (ratings and reviews, both on-line and in print, in-person inspection and evaluation in the store, etc). That is not the case for health care, where information is much more limited and often difficult to access. Finally, those wishing to buy a new TV have the luxury of time (though the number who wait until the weekend of the Super Bowl to pull the trigger on that new flat screen never ceases to amaze me). While in some cases, such as for elective surgery or perhaps labor and delivery, patients have time to do their research, most hospital visits are on an urgent or emergent basis. So the free-market is really only free for one side of the equation when it comes to health care.

Of course, depending on the outcome in November, this discussion may or may not be rendered moot.

+ Add a Comment