Apr 30, 20215 yr The story of Tinslee Lewis continues. What do you guys think? https://www.Yahoo.com/news/24-million-spent-fort-worth-201250720.html
Apr 30, 20215 yr Experts I really don't know what to think. The pragmatic side of me says "If this child has no hope, then let her go." Then I look at that sweet face and how could anyone just let her go? Of course her mother is going to fight for her. This is the downside of miraculous medical technology. Sometimes it just isn't miraculous enough even though it keeps nature from taking its course. Long time ago I read The Sorcerer's Apprentice by Sallie Tisdale. It describes these kinds of modern day dilemmas. My heart hurts just thinking about the whole thing.
May 2, 20215 yr Every life is worth fighting for! If that is what the family wants, then that is what they should do. Obviously, if the state intervenes then their hands are tied, but till that point, it is the their right.
May 3, 20215 yr 24 million dollars spent on toddler's life support Quote Texas has spent $24 million in Medicaid funds to help keep a toddler alive at Cook Children’s Medical Center, the Fort Worth hospital said in an appeal filed April 16 in the ongoing court case surrounding Tinslee Lewis. Two-year-old Tinslee has been at Cook Children’s for most of her life. Born with a rare heart condition, Tinslee has been kept alive with medical care and “extreme efforts,” the hospital said in the appeal, in which it asked the 48th District Court of Fort Worth to quickly schedule a trial date to decide whether life support care should be removed from Tinslee. “Although this case has never been about money — and Cook Children’s has never considered finances when making an end-of-life decision,” the appeal says, “the State of Texas (through its manager of a Medicaid care program) is now threatening to interject the issue into this dispute.”
May 3, 20215 yr It's difficult for me to understand why any parent would do this to their child. I hope the court has more sense and the child is allowed to die naturally instead of enduring more torture. Money is actually the last thing that comes to mind in cases like these, despite the staggering amounts being spent.
May 3, 20215 yr 2 minutes ago, Sour Lemon said: It's difficult for me to understand why any parent would do this to their child. I hope the court has more sense and the child is allowed to die naturally instead of enduring more torture. Money is actually the last thing that comes to mind in cases like these, despite the staggering amounts being spent. I agree with you about the torture part, but I can't relegate the money to the last thing that comes to mind. (I do frame it as societal medical resources, though, I.e. how much of the "pie" can one person expect to take.) I wonder if the parent(s) would be as aggressive if they had to spend everything they had to continue treatment, as opposed to passing it on to the taxpayers.
May 3, 20215 yr I agree, this is ethically questionable also from a financial standpoint. Not only is it an example of some of the disturbing extremes that modern medicine will go through to achieve a futile outcome, the fact that so many millions of dollars are spent out of the common resources is also a problem.
May 10, 20215 yr On 5/2/2021 at 3:43 PM, yschon said: Every life is worth fighting for! If that is what the family wants, then that is what they should do. Obviously, if the state intervenes then their hands are tied, but till that point, it is the their right. Medical futility and reality trump hope and prayer. Just because we can maintain the function of a human body until the patient's skin blisters and they have weeping wounds on every extremity doesn't mean we should.
May 12, 20215 yr On 5/10/2021 at 7:29 AM, dzadzey said: Medical futility and reality trump hope and prayer. Just because we can maintain the function of a human body until the patient's skin blisters and they have weeping wounds on every extremity doesn't mean we should. That is your opinion, and someone with that view would have the right to make such a decision for a loved one. However, others might object and value life even when someone is long brain dead, and that decision is theirs. It’s the USA; we are all entitled to our opinions and religious/ethical beliefs. My argument is not about spending government money.
May 12, 20215 yr Author On 5/10/2021 at 6:29 AM, dzadzey said: Medical futility and reality trump hope and prayer. Just because we can maintain the function of a human body until the patient's skin blisters and they have weeping wounds on every extremity doesn't mean we should. I agree. Some times the compassionate thing to do is to let nature take its course. In cases like this I believe family members want to hang on to their dying loved one to avoid the pain of having to say goodbye. You have to know when its time to let go.
May 13, 20215 yr Experts On 5/11/2021 at 10:28 PM, PPediRN said: Some times the compassionate thing to do is to let nature take its course. In cases like this I believe family members want to hang on to their dying loved one to avoid the pain of having to say goodbye. You have to know when its time to let go If they consider the main ethical tenets, continuing this is not supportable. The other thing to consider is that the family have had this as a major focus since her birth, to the point where it’s their identity now. When it goes away, they will lose an enormous part of their sense of who they are, and this is so disorienting. Many couples divorce when their chronically ill child finally dies because they can’t relate to each other anymore as other than parents of a sick child. The loss rips off the bandaid and they see what they don’t have. Another factor is that there’s a whole industry of peripheral “caring” nowadays- prayer circles, vigils, websites, and all. I am not knocking anybody’s religious beliefs, but you have to realize that when this child is allowed to die a lot of people will be outraged, intrusive, inserting themselves into a private situation where they really have no business because it isn’t their actual struggle. Suffering Media, some call it, as addictive as any other kind. Avoiding that crowd’s backlash will be impossibly painful. Last, there’s the “sunken costs” fallacy, by which I am not referring specifically to the spectacular number of dollars involved. It’s the idea that because we have done so much, we have to continue to do so much. This is why some people stay married long after they could have divorced and gone on to happier lives, why we keep fixing a broken first car long after it ought to have been gone, why scammers and Ponzi schemers can keep getting more after more from their marks, why futile wars go on forever. Cutting your losses sounds crassly financial but emotional losses count, too. It’s an awful situation. Maintaining what is essentially a biological specimen isn’t care and love. Ceasing it will be traumatic for everybody involved.
The story of Tinslee Lewis continues. What do you guys think?
https://www.Yahoo.com/news/24-million-spent-fort-worth-201250720.html