Published
Let me preface this article to say that I'm not stirring a pot. I found this article a little dispassionate considering the choice made.
When One Is Enough
By AMY RICHARDS as told to AMY BARRETT
Published: July 18, 2004
I grew up in a working-class family in Pennsylvania not knowing my father. I have never missed not having him. I firmly believe that, but for much of my life I felt that what I probably would have gained was economic security and with that societal security. Growing up with a single mother, I was always buying into the myth that I was going to be seduced in the back of a pickup truck and become pregnant when I was 16. I had friends when I was in school who were helping to rear nieces and nephews, because their siblings, who were not much older, were having babies. I had friends from all over the class spectrum: I saw the nieces and nephews on the one hand and country-club memberships and station wagons on the other. I felt I was in the middle. I had this fear: What would it take for me to just slip?
Now I'm 34. My boyfriend, Peter, and I have been together three years. I'm old enough to presume that I wasn't going to have an easy time becoming pregnant. I was tired of being on the pill, because it made me moody. Before I went off it, Peter and I talked about what would happen if I became pregnant, and we both agreed that we would have the child.
I found out I was having triplets when I went to my obstetrician. The doctor had just finished telling me I was going to have a low-risk pregnancy. She turned on the sonogram machine. There was a long pause, then she said, ''Are you sure you didn't take fertility drugs?'' I said, ''I'm positive.'' Peter and I were very shocked when she said there were three. ''You know, this changes everything,'' she said. ''You'll have to see a specialist.''
My immediate response was, I cannot have triplets. I was not married; I lived in a five-story walk-up in the East Village; I worked freelance; and I would have to go on bed rest in March. I lecture at colleges, and my biggest months are March and April. I would have to give up my main income for the rest of the year. There was a part of me that was sure I could work around that. But it was a matter of, Do I want to?
I looked at Peter and asked the doctor: ''Is it possible to get rid of one of them? Or two of them?'' The obstetrician wasn't an expert in selective reduction, but she knew that with a shot of potassium chloride you could eliminate one or more.
Having felt physically fine up to this point, I got on the subway afterward, and all of a sudden, I felt ill. I didn't want to eat anything. What I was going through seemed like a very unnatural experience. On the subway, Peter asked, ''Shouldn't we consider having triplets?'' And I had this adverse reaction: ''This is why they say it's the woman's choice, because you think I could just carry triplets. That's easy for you to say, but I'd have to give up my life.'' Not only would I have to be on bed rest at 20 weeks, I wouldn't be able to fly after 15. I was already at eight weeks. When I found out about the triplets, I felt like: It's not the back of a pickup at 16, but now I'm going to have to move to Staten Island. I'll never leave my house because I'll have to care for these children. I'll have to start shopping only at Costco and buying big jars of mayonnaise. Even in my moments of thinking about having three, I don't think that deep down I was ever considering it.
The specialist called me back at 10 p.m. I had just finished watching a Boston Pops concert at Symphony Hall. As everybody burst into applause, I watched my cellphone vibrating, grabbed it and ran into the lobby. He told me that he does a detailed sonogram before doing a selective reduction to see if one fetus appears to be struggling. The procedure involves a shot of potassium chloride to the heart of the fetus. There are a lot more complications when a woman carries multiples. And so, from the doctor's perspective, it's a matter of trying to save the woman this trauma. After I talked to the specialist, I told Peter, ''That's what I'm going to do.'' He replied, ''What we're going to do.'' He respected what I was going through, but at a certain point, he felt that this was a decision we were making. I agreed.
When we saw the specialist, we found out that I was carrying identical twins and a stand alone. My doctors thought the stand alone was three days older. There was something psychologically comforting about that, since I wanted to have just one. Before the procedure, I was focused on relaxing. But Peter was staring at the sonogram screen thinking: Oh, my gosh, there are three heartbeats. I can't believe we're about to make two disappear. The doctor came in, and then Peter was asked to leave. I said, ''Can Peter stay?'' The doctor said no. I know Peter was offended by that.
Two days after the procedure, smells no longer set me off and I no longer wanted to eat nothing but sour-apple gum. I went on to have a pretty seamless pregnancy. But I had a recurring feeling that this was going to come back and haunt me. Was I going to have a stillbirth or miscarry late in my pregnancy?
I had a boy, and everything is fine. But thinking about becoming pregnant again is terrifying. Am I going to have quintuplets? I would do the same thing if I had triplets again, but if I had twins, I would probably have twins. Then again, I don't know.
Thank you ferg. You know what, I am real sick of hearing people ask me "why don't you just adopt" as if you can go and pick out the kid like at a store or something, and it's a done deal. PUUUUHLEEZE it can be a nightmare process. One many just can't stomach or afford! It should NOT be so damn hard for good people who want to take in a child and make him or her a part of their lives and family.
Oh no, I do not think it's like going to the store and picking out a kid. I have BEEN through adoption, as the birth mother, true, but I am very close to the family that adopted my boy, and I have heard their stories. They were foster parents for years, and they had their hearts ripped out more than once. This is not even taking into account having their lives scrutinized, taking classes, travel expenses, etc. They waited for YEARS before they were able to adopt their first boy. So don't even make assumptions about what I do or do not know about the adoption process. Again, I will admit that I have given birth, so I cannot relate to what it's like not to be able to concieve - I believe I've already stated this - HOWEVER, nor can any of you relate to what that woman may have been going through unless you've been in her EXACT situation.
As far as prospective parents who cannot "stomach" adoption, you just finished making a moral judgement about this woman because she couldn't "stomach" parenting 3 kids by herself for 18 years. But it's okay to completely forsake all of the potential adoptive children because you can't stomach adoption? It's okay to be put your own biological urge to procreate in front of the needs of innocent children who are ALIVE and fully developed? It's okay to bring yet another kid into the world when, as I said before, the ones already here are not cared for? This is what I say PUUUUHLEEZE to.
Regarding the cost of adoption and the fact that it is not feasible for everyone, I agree. I wish there were a way around that. But saying someone should give birth because "other people are torturing themselves to have kids" makes no sense at all. You're comparing apples and oranges. To some, triplets are a blessing. To others, it may be a curse. Can we please understand that people come to motherhood or pregnancy from different places in life? Different perspectives, different situations.
Did I say that her decision was an ideal one? Nope. Would I be able to make that decision? Probably not. I have been pregnant twice in my life. The first child I am raising. The second was adopted. So please, no one preach to me about being pro-life. Until you have handed away your flesh and blood in the name of life, you do not even know the full extent of it. But I think it's ludicrous to judge her and talk about the sanctity of life when there are living, breathing people - children - on this earth who need us.
Oh no, I do not think it's like going to the store and picking out a kid. I have BEEN through adoption, as the birth mother, true, but I am very close to the family that adopted my boy, and I have heard their stories. They were foster parents for years, and they had their hearts ripped out more than once. This is not even taking into account having their lives scrutinized, taking classes, travel expenses, etc. They waited for YEARS before they were able to adopt their first boy. So don't even make assumptions about what I do or do not know about the adoption process. Again, I will admit that I have given birth, so I cannot relate to what it's like not to be able to concieve - I believe I've already stated this - HOWEVER, nor can any of you relate to what that woman may have been going through unless you've been in her EXACT situation.As far as prospective parents who cannot "stomach" adoption, you just finished making a moral judgement about this woman because she couldn't "stomach" parenting 3 kids by herself for 18 years. But it's okay to completely forsake all of the potential adoptive children because you can't stomach adoption? It's okay to be put your own biological urge to procreate in front of the needs of innocent children who are ALIVE and fully developed? It's okay to bring yet another kid into the world when, as I said before, the ones already here are not cared for? This is what I say PUUUUHLEEZE to.
Regarding the cost of adoption and the fact that it is not feasible for everyone, I agree. I wish there were a way around that. But saying someone should give birth because "other people are torturing themselves to have kids" makes no sense at all. You're comparing apples and oranges. To some, triplets are a blessing. To others, it may be a curse. Can we please understand that people come to motherhood or pregnancy from different places in life? Different perspectives, different situations.
Did I say that her decision was an ideal one? Nope. Would I be able to make that decision? Probably not. I have been pregnant twice in my life. The first child I am raising. The second was adopted. So please, no one preach to me about being pro-life. Until you have handed away your flesh and blood in the name of life, you do not even know the full extent of it. But I think it's ludicrous to judge her and talk about the sanctity of life when there are living, breathing people - children - on this earth who need us.
Well like you said, no need for you to judge me. You have not had my experiences, and you have no idea what it's been like to be me for the last 3 years. Peace out. I am thru w/this thread.
I really don't think it's fair to make it seem like people who choose not to adopt are being selfish. They aren't.
My point is being misinterpreted. I am saying that it is just as easy to judge those who choose not to adopt - the point being, let's stop judging! We shouldn't be judging (in my opinion) this woman, just as we should not be juding those who choose not to adopt! Both can, if you try hard enough, be contrued as immoral - but on either side, it is complicated, and no one has any idea what is going on in the minds of those making the choices. I was trying to illustrate that these judgements are ugly - period - and it is painful to be judged on such a personal, intimate issue - no matter what choice you are making. It just aggravates me that people behave so self righteously and look down their noses on other people when they are not in that situation! It goes both ways.
I don't have any idea if I would be selfless enough to forsake in vitro and choose adoption, were I in that situation. I'm not even claiming that I would. But I am saying that abortion is not necessarily selfish - no more than choosing to fight nature and insist on conception rather than adoption.
One more question - for those of you who insist that abortion is wrong but approve of in vitro - what about all the fertilized embryos that don't get implanted?
that is just gross and wrong that someone would be so selfish to kill innocent children. If she didn't want all three why not give up the twins for adoption? I feel sorry that the father didn't have a say, they were his kids too. So what if she doesn't want to carry them, she should have sat down with her husband and talked about their options. There are tons of families out there who can't have kids and are willing to adopt, I don't see why we even have abortion in this world. They are so many other and more humane options. I wonder if anyone ever thinks how the baby feels. They can sense pain, and feelings, they are not immune, they are human just like you and me so they can feel, fear, smile, etc. I don't see how people can look at a sonogram and a baby's heartbeat knowing full well that it is alive and then kill it without a second thought. This story breaks my heart to pieces. As far as people have "litters" that was the doctors' fault for putting too many embryos in the womb, we should never put more than three in and the doctor should ask the parents how many he should put in. there is always a chance whenever you are trying to get pregnant that you may have more than one, people need to learn to think before they act. I hope those babies are safe and happy wherever they are.God Bless those children.
In a perfect world there would be a warm and loving, safe home for every unwanted child, of course if the world were perfect there would be no unwanted children. Unfortunately our world isn't anywhere close to perfect. There are more than enough children in this country waiting to be adopted. But they aren't "perfect" or they aren't the right color, age, gender, whatever. It doesn't have to cost a small fortune to adopt. There are state programs to help with the adoption of children in state custody. My sister adopted a 3 year old little girl with CP. The most georgous, precious child we ever laid eyes on. That was 19 years ago, that child became the center of our family. She is the most precious gift we could have been given. Grandparents, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, cousins all adore her, even at 22. Yes she required a lot of care, and still does but she has given back a hundred fold in love. There are literally thousands of children out there looking for someone to love them. They aren't perfect but many of them don't require special care, just someone who does care. Take a chance and take a look, I think there are a lot of sons and daughters waiting to be given a chance.
Something about the article just gives me the feeling that she's not as pleased, on some level, with her boyfriend's reaction to the idea of reduction as she's telling herself that she is. (She knows he will be reading it, for one thing.) I think that whether or not she ever acknowledges, in years to come, a feeling of guilt, the relationship is probably doomed. She's a human being, and people are introspective about their lives, and their ideas about past events in their lives are subject to new interpetations. And that's on her side. What about him, and his thoughts regarding what happened? In coming years, is he going to think about the averted "horror" of Costco mayonaisse jars, having to move to Staten Island, etc.? All that's probably being stored up, like rotten wood, to throw on the fire. But maybe I'm just being a pessimist. It's like she identifies herself too much with her chosen profession, so much that she sold part of herself down the river, because she cares about wealth/status symbols which are attained through her work. And please don't flame me--I'm not saying she has no soul, I'm saying that because she has a soul, she surely will have recurring (probably troubling) thoughts/doubts regarding what occured, no matter what picture she paints for the article. I'm pro-choice, by the way.
Frankly, if I were that guy, I would have offered to get a second job or something, so that her mind could be eased regarding the financial apsect of the situation. At least he could have offered some token gesture like that. It doesn't say he said that in the article, if I remember it right.
Okay, flame me if you want.
Kat, I hate to say this, but I can't imagine ever wanting to adopt through foster parenting in this country. I have seen too many kids ripped from loving foster parents and given back to their "real" parents to want to put myself through that.Niobius, I agree we should try not to judge.
You are of course right, too many kids are returned to abusive or negelectful parents. Unfortunately, the foster home my niece was in was not helping her or taking very good care of her and the social worker was fully aware. My sister and her adoption social worker moved as quickly as possible to move her into our family. She has flourished under her mom's care (my sister used to work in a NICU). After the adoption the foster care license for those parents was revoked and the social worker retired. The foster care system as it is does not meet the needs of these kids. They need parents not paid caregivers. Many of the foster parents are excellent, but there just aren't enough of them. Until we, the entire country, make the welfare and safety of children a priority these things will continue to happen. People who care about kids and want but can't have kids of thier own should really look at the kids that are available, they might be surprised at the possibilities. Not everyone can take a special needs kid. The state adoption system helps you to evaluate the type of kid you feel you would like, so many of them out there, think about it! I personally think it's time to start licensing parents. People complalin about how intrusive the investigations are for adoption, they still aren't enough to keep pedofiles and child abusers/murders from getting their hands on kids. I know it's a ludicrious idea but we need to find a way to make parenthood a privilidge not a right. I choose not to have children, I don't have the patience and I am to selfish, I like my life the way it is, I made that choice. Too many people don't think about having children they just do it by accident, OOPS! Makes me crazy. sorry about getting off topic, I support a women's right to choose, I hate the thought of abortion or selection, but it's not my body or my choice.
I want to thank everyone for their thoughts on this. It has been interesting reading everyone's perspective and I'm surprised and gratified at the wide array of opinion. Lots of good information here for women.
I don't think anyone is flaming here at all - maybe things get a little touchy but that is to be expected seeing that the subject is a little touchy.
As someone who has experienced surprise pregnancies (my youngest son turns 3 tomorrow, my oldest son is 21 and my middle son is 19) and is also interested in adopting, all of you ladies have given me alot to think about. We planned our daughter and she is almost 15 - took us 6 months though. :)
Thank you.
steph
imenid37
1,804 Posts
Fertility doesn't discriminate based on morals, common sense, or life situation. Thousands of other 35 year olds would've been thrilled to have this triplet pregnancy. Go figure. I am sorry to judge, but this woman sounds like a really self-absorbed individual. I feel badly for her child because although she feared that having three kids would leave her financially poor, it seems she may be poor in a far more important way(IMHO). I am not pro-choice, but I would have some measure of respect for a person who chose selective reduction for health/medical reasons rather than just having to settle for the mini-van vs. the BMW SUV because of the "financial burden" of three kids. She sounds shallower than a puddle. It's a really sad story.