Violating a Code Status...

Published

An elderly female patient was admitted to the hospital with anemia, R/O GI bleed, dehydrated, c/o pain to right jaw. Admit orders were NPO, type and cross pending H and H, MRI/CT of jaw, rule out infection, d5 1/2 at 75 cc, resume current meds, mostly for DM and mild hypotension, coumadin and synthroid, pain meds ordered and place on telemetry. VS stable upon admit, patient a, a and o x 5, pain is under control. So far so good. Within 3 days she is diagnosed with Parotitis right jaw, transfuse 2 units RBC, place picc line, dc home for daily atb infusion. OK, moved to step down unit....

Day of this incident she is seen by nurse, signed consent for radiology procedure, returned at 1000, some bleeding at site but tolerated well. Spouse at bedside, patient ambulatory and requesting assist with a shower.

Nurse returns at 1210 to discover patient alone, laying on her side in bed, cyanotic, apneic, non responsive, no pulse, calls a code, which per notes happens over 12 minutes before they are able to establish both an airway and a pulse. She is transferred to ICU on vent, BP meds and ativan due to mild seizure activity. Family is notified.

2 days later, despite being on prednisone, intubated, removed from Versed for exam, neuro consult is very grim. Patient has gag reflex, dolls eyes, mild seizures and slowed brain wave activity. Patient is also at this time receiving Glucerna thru oral intubation as midline cath has infiltrated so emesis with positive CRX for fluid aspirate.

Now, upon review of this patients chart, an advance directive is found in the back which the patient and her husband had executed less then 2 years ago, both had checked off "If in the even I am found uncounscious, my condition will not improve or I am faced with artificial life support, including ventilators and advanced cardiac life support, I hereby decline and wish to advance towards a natural death without these measures". It was also in her admitting docs office charts and on file with this hospital.

It was not, however anywhere in her Kardex, anywhere in her admit notes, transfer notes or during a 24 hour chart check. 6 days she was being treated for this infection and no one saw this, nor was it mentioned. Someone finally did though, she was extubated on a Friday evening, given comfort measures, transferred to a med floor and finally passed away early on a Sunday morning.

Now, I guess we all know whom I am am taking about so issue is out of the way, but never in my years of nursing, even while covering for another nurse talking a bathroom break, lunch break, whatever, not know the code status of a patient. I have grieved and felt saddened by the loss of patients, have seen the tears, disbelief and sorrow at a loved ones passing but I always knew the code status and would never subject a patient to something they had gone out of their way to make sure would never happen to them.

People spend thousands of duckets on advance directives, wills and testiments and I am scared 3 shades of psycho to think it could be so blatently (is that conceivable) overlooked in such a way.

Well, in conclusion, always, always know your patients code status and keep your fellow nurses informed. No one should have to go thru this, especially a patient. What do ya say ?

However I can't believe my parents (at the age of 70+) still don't have advance directives. And they have extensive histories! All I can do is encourage them, I can't exactly hold a gun to their head and force them to do it.

Why not? I did! I got two forms and took them to my parents' house. I asked them the questions and filled out the forms, and they signed them. They knew I wasn't leaving until the directives were filled out and signed.

This happened to one of my patients in clinical. She was vented when her advance directive clearly stated that she did not want it.

The lady was very distressed and uncomfortable and kept trying to take her trach tube out.

The doctor's plan was to wean her off the vent so that she could go home to die. I really didn't understand why it was necessary to wean her so she could die?!?! Why not just take her off the vent?

I had a pt. come from the ICU with a central line. Pt. is A&O times 1-2. Never saw family at bedside. Pt. has unstable b/p and blood sugars. Treated and everything was ok. I go home and come back 12 hours later. Pt. pulled the central line out and have some resp. distress. I get the honor of transfering the pt. even though I don't know what happened that day. I call the sister who was about 5 hours away or something like that. She says he is not supposed to be on a vent???? He has papers that say he is not supposed to be on a vent. I dig through the chart and lord and behold DNR papers. He came from ICU being on a vent this admisson and he had been in the hospital a month. The paper work was drawn up 2-3 months before that admisson date. I made sure the response nurse who was transfering him to ICU knew about it. I never knew about how it all went, but if that was as big of an issue you would have thought someone would have said something like this "active" sister??? There wasn't an order like someone else posted there is supposed to be. I run into this all the time where the pt. has DNR papers in a security box that they only know about and they are full code. I explain to the family if there is one, that we need to have the paperwork.

My mother in law goes and gets a DNR paperwork. Tells no one about it and then when I get a copy I ask her some details. She is in good health. All she doesn't want is a foley??? She goes under anestesia for teeth implants, No Paperwork is filed. Also had general anestesia and no paperwork. I just trying to say that sometimes the population getting these paperwork doesn't know what they mean or let the family know.

Specializes in tele, stepdown/PCU, med/surg.

I find it odd the woman was resuming coumadin while she is anemic and worked up for bleed.

Specializes in OB, M/S, HH, Medical Imaging RN.

Where I work the patients with DNR written in their orders have a red dot on the outside of their chart and also inconspiculously above their bed. And yes they are removed when the patient is discharged or expires. It doesn't accidently get left behind. We have several double checks in place for that one.

Off subject: Hi Haunted! How ya doing hon? I'll give you a jingle.

Specializes in Cardiac, ER, ICU.

That is a very unfortunate situation. I am not sure if it is being used across the board but we are switching to MOLST forms. They are bright hot pink and go right in the front of the chart. It is harder when pts have thier wishes blended into an advance directives sheet. Sometimes I think those are too easy to overlook. Also same situation as Nursingiswork said, a pt is only a DNR when the MD writes the order "DNR". I have had pts that made me awful nervous until I got that order. I would hate to have to call a code when I know they have an out of hopsital DNR, but the MD hasn't taken the time to order it yet!

Specializes in RN, BSN, CHDN.

It took me 12 hours to get a DNR order on a pt last month-then the dd decided the next day there was some hope, so he was dialysed and treated for 5 days until eventually after chemo he died. The patients wishes before he became confused were DNR and he had Advanced Directives. It broke my heart to see what he went through and believe me he went through the works at 90yrs old. So relatives can overturn the wishes of their loved ones, which I find apauling I have warned my family that under NO circumstances must my wishes be over turned.

Specializes in Emergency.

SO sad :o .

Sometimes when I push to get a DNR order, the mds do not seem to agree with me. Thus, I put on the idiot cap and say "with end stage CHF, ARF, hepatitis, COPD, DM, fluid overload, pt withdrawn and not eating.....etc etc, what do you feel the prognosis is for this 90 year old woman after we put in a permacath, do dialysis, blood transfusions, thoracentesis, possible PEG placement?

And then, of course, the cardiologist and pulmonologist look me in the eye and say "well, not everybody like her will die. We see many that live. She wants to live her life as long as possible."

And then I say "Well maybe it is just me, but she looks like she is dying and I don't think she could withstand the chest compressions. She has not responded to agressive treatment and in fact her health is rapidly declining. Would you really do that and intubate a pt that will never recover afterwards? Please discuss with the family." Enter the DNR order 2 hours later.

:banghead: Was I really the only one that thought about it?

It does seem that sometimes the md is reluctant to order it for a very sick pt as it is admitting some kind of defeat? It always breaks my heart to watch the mds pull out all the stops when an elderly pt is clearly actively dying (pacemakers, PEG tubes, dialysis, back to back blood transfusions, lab work drawn every two hours). Kind of like they lost all reason.

I go home in tears every time this happens thinking of the suffering and wondering what I missed that made it ok. I am not saying every pt should be a DNR, but there is a certain point when somebody needs to stop and say "we did everything we could within reason, now it is up to the pt." And back off.

Where I work the patients with DNR written in their orders have a red dot on the outside of their chart and also inconspiculously above their bed. And yes they are removed when the patient is discharged or expires. It doesn't accidently get left behind. We have several double checks in place for that one.

Off subject: Hi Haunted! How ya doing hon? I'll give you a jingle.

Hey Jo! Do that, love to catch up.

On subject: A patient has an advance directive in place dictating specifics in which they do not want CPR, compressions, intubation, ACLS etc. They are also provided with a Patients Bill of Rights upon admit that covers their rights as patients.

Also, if I go to provide a medication or a treatment to a patient and they refuse and I do it anyway, it's my understanding that I could be faced with a battery charge, so how is this situation different?

On subject: A patient has an advance directive in place dictating specifics in which they do not want CPR, compressions, intubation, ACLS etc. They are also provided with a Patients Bill of Rights upon admit that covers their rights as patients.

Also, if I go to provide a medication or a treatment to a patient and they refuse and I do it anyway, it's my understanding that I could be faced with a battery charge, so how is this situation different?

It's different because the pt has flat out refused. If the pt were unresponsive and you did not know there was a DNR, that's an error on side of caution. If you knowingly go against the pt's wishes, that is battery.

Specializes in Med/Surg.

the other nurses on my floor act like I am the angel of death bc I am always asking about a pts code status. Sure we are a med/srg floor, but most of our pts recently have been of advanced age and most from NH. I do not want to code someone who is 89 with a G tube and endstage CHF. And most of the time the fam has not even been asked about it!! Never fails I say something to the fam about it and they are like "Oh, No Mom doesn't want any of that done!" :banghead: May want to tell the doc.

Specializes in ER, NICU, NSY and some other stuff.

Just a thought, but most surgical consents include a notation that your DNR IS NOT in effect at that time. If you have an event around your surgery you WOULD be a DNR.

+ Join the Discussion