I traditionally have a thread heading to the election, here we go.
Get out the popcorn for this one.
Quote
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is expected to formally announce next week he is running for president in 2024, NBC News reported Thursday, citing two sources familiar with the matter.
The governor's official entry into the Republican primary field will put him head-to-head with former President Donald Trump, the party's current frontrunner for the nomination. Trump has already spent months treating DeSantis as his primary campaign rival, thrashing him with torrents of criticism over his gubernatorial record, his political skills and his personality.
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Crusades said:
You not so subtle suggest that people who vote for Trump are in the same ball park as Nazis and supremist. Over and over.
You don't think Nazis and supremist are evil? Interesting. That explains why you wouldn't support the death penalty for Hitler.
Nobody is sensitive to being called Nazi and supremist anymore. What are you talking about? The meaning of both has been perverted and exploited to no end by democrats. The people who casually and frivolousley throw around a name that caused the death of millions of people.
Why should I be subtle about the truth? The truth is that not all Trump supporters are racists but all of the racists are Trump supporters. There are no neo-Nazis voting for Harris but those groups love Trump's anti-immigrant rhetoric.
Did you forget? I explained why I don't support the death penalty. You don't need to guess or speculate or make things up about why I don't support government sanctioned murder. Is it hard for you to not do those things?
I doubt that you can articulate what the term "Nazi" means in 2024, is it fair to expect that you might explain what the heck you are talking about?
There's nothing casual or frivolous about correctly identifying Trump as a fascist.
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Crusades said:
You keep saying that there is racism in these threads when you are the member that frequently includes the color of skin of any given person and what they have in their pants. And completely unrelated to the topic.
You have several time referenced Trump voters and Republicans as voting for the party of "supremist and Nazis"
Perhaps your preoccupation with skin color and genitalia is rooted in your implicit racism all white men have? And the preoccupation with gender originates from your toxic masculinity? Perhaps Obama can scold you on voting for Harris because she is blk? He's half white so he can play both ways.
This is a great time for me. Watching democrats panick for the most likely 2nd Trump presidency. LOL. Or Vance (spoooooky)
When half or more of the country doesn't support Trump, I'll consider your exploited propaganda.
Sure, sure. I'll take the assessment on racism in these threads from the person who defends racist tropes and pretends that Trump isn't a racist.
Trump IS the political candidate of the racists and neo-Nazis even if that makes hot feel uncomfortable to hear it. White nationalists are a dependable part of Trump's voting base as are you.
I can't speak to the rest of your confused rant. It bounced around almost as bad as Trump.
Sure, sure. I'll take the assessment on racism in these threads from the person who defends racist tropes and pretends that Trump isn't a racist.
Trump IS the political candidate of the racists and neo-Nazis even if that makes hot feel uncomfortable to hear it. White nationalists are a dependable part of Trump's voting base as are you.
I can't speak to the rest of your confused rant. It bounced around almost as bad as Trump.
Please provide an example of a "racist yroph" that I have defended.
I can provide several examples of you inserting the race and gender of certain people repetitively. "White man" , " woman of color" and even trying to spook me out of critiquing Harris by suggesting I think she's not qualified due to her ethnicity and gender.
The democrats are the political party if sex traffickers. P, Diddy ran a aggressive campaign for Obama and continued to Biden. He endorsed Biden.
So using your logic, well known sex traffickers endorsed Biden so that make all democrats guilty by association?
Why should I be subtle about the truth? The truth is that not all Trump supporters are racists but all of the racists are Trump supporters. There are no neo-Nazis voting for Harris but those groups love Trump's anti-immigrant rhetoric.
Did you forget? I explained why I don't support the death penalty. You don't need to guess or speculate or make things up about why I don't support government sanctioned murder. Is it hard for you to not do those things?
I doubt that you can articulate what the term "Nazi" means in 2024, is it fair to expect that you might explain what the heck you are talking about?
There's nothing casual or frivolous about correctly identifying Trump as a fascist.
You know that for a fact? All racist are Trump supporters? Does the FBI have a stat on that? Perhaps they will quietly update their figures on "racist who vote for Trump" like they quietly updated their violent crime figures? What was it? Up by 4.9"%. is racist voting for Trump up 4.9%? LOL
Do you really believe there are no racist who vote democrat? LOL
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Crusades said:
You know that for a fact? All racist are Trump supporters? Does the FBI have a stat on that? Perhaps they will quietly update their figures on "racist who vote for Trump" like they quietly updated their violent crime figures? What was it? Up by 4.9"%. is racist voting for Trump up 4.9%? LOL
Do you really believe there are no racist who vote democrat? LOL
Maybe I know that all of the known racist groups and organizations support Trump.
Of course there are random racists who vote for democrats just like there are random individual Republicans who are voting for Harris. Is stating the obvious some kind of a strategy here? Maybe you're just kidding and that wasn't a serious question.
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Crusades said:
Please provide an example of a "racist yroph" that I have defended.
I can provide several examples of you inserting the race and gender of certain people repetitively. "White man" , " woman of color" and even trying to spook me out of critiquing Harris by suggesting I think she's not qualified due to her ethnicity and gender.
The democrats are the political party if sex traffickers. P, Diddy ran a aggressive campaign for Obama and continued to Biden. He endorsed Biden.
So using your logic, well known sex traffickers endorsed Biden so that make all democrats guilty by association?
See how ridiculous this sounds? LOL.
Nah... it's not my problem that you have a short memory. No one else in this thread is interested in rehashing your defenses of racist tropes.
Sure you can provide those examples but I'm not interested in your efforts and I doubt anyone else is either give that this thread is about the election and not your indignation.
You're so triggered now that you're throwing all manner of projections around in a weird rant about sex traffickers while you plan to vote for the candidate who sexually assaulted more than one woman and bragged about it while being good friends with an infamous sex trafficker.
It's really hard to have to confront the difficult reality that Trump is a corrupt liar who is mentally ill and in cognitive decline.
Nah... it's not my problem that you have a short memory. No one else in this thread is interested in rehashing your defenses of racist tropes.
Sure you can provide those examples but I'm not interested in your efforts and I doubt anyone else is either give that this thread is about the election and not your indignation.
You're so triggered now that you're throwing all manner of projections around in a weird rant about sex traffickers while you plan to vote for the candidate who sexually assaulted more than one woman and bragged about it while being good friends with an infamous sex trafficker.
It's really hard to have to confront the difficult reality that Trump is a corrupt liar who is mentally ill and in cognitive decline.
That's the usual left radical default. Call someone "racist "then say "it's not my job to prove something I accused you for". If you make that accusation, you back it up. So please, tell me where I defended "racist tropes ".
It's interesting that you find a comparison of a man that has multiple charges of rape and sex trafficking to a woman who decided to report a rape 25 yrs after apparetly being raped who then went on MSNBC offering to take Racheal Maddow on a shopping spree with the money she was awarded for the civil case. Who likes to post about rape fantasies and named her cat vagina. Then pretend that accusing Trump of rape wasn't conveniently done at a time of political and monetary value.
Oh. He sexually assaulted multiple women now? Not just the one I described above? Are you talking about accusations? Biden has a few of those too. I guess we only decide if a woman was raped depending on who raped her?
I'm so sure you would give the same credit to Bidens accusers. It appears our VP husband has a history himself.
This is what it boils down to, and why Trump will win:
"I'm looking at ideas and which idea lands on which side of the aisle," Ramsey said. "Where am I most likely to get a tax policy that I like? Where am I most likely to get an immigration policy I like? Where am I most likely to get a foreign policy I like? Where am I most likely to get a gun policy I like? A climate change policy I like? A woke policy I like? That I agree with."
"And I can check those boxes very clearly, very quickly on these two candidates," he said. "So I'm going to tell you, I'm voting for Donald Trump. Because I checked those boxes and more of them are on that side than the other."
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Crusades said:
That's the usual left radical default. Call someone "racist "then say "it's not my job to prove something I accused you for". If you make that accusation, you back it up. So please, tell me where I defended "racist tropes ".
It's interesting that you find a comparison of a man that has multiple charges of rape and sex trafficking to a woman who decided to report a rape 25 yrs after apparetly being raped who then went on MSNBC offering to take Racheal Maddow on a shopping spree with the money she was awarded for the civil case. Who likes to post about rape fantasies and named her cat vagina. Then pretend that accusing Trump of rape wasn't conveniently done at a time of political and monetary value.
Oh. He sexually assaulted multiple women now? Not just the one I described above? Are you talking about accusations? Biden has a few of those too. I guess we only decide if a woman was raped depending on who raped her?
I'm so sure you would give the same credit to Bidens accusers. It appears our VP husband has a history himself.
Sure. Whatever makes you feel better.
I'm not following the rant about trafficking. It was Trump who raped at least one woman (proven in court)and bragged about his sexual abuse of women (there's receipts)during the time he was socializing with the well known trafficker. Now that same guy is clearly struggling with significant cognitive decline after recently making a big stink about someone else's cognition. Are you trying to make Harris seem as morally bankrupt as Trump?
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Beerman said:
Trump comes with a lot that many don't like.
This is what it boils down to, and why Trump will win:
"I'm looking at ideas and which idea lands on which side of the aisle," Ramsey said. "Where am I most likely to get a tax policy that I like? Where am I most likely to get an immigration policy I like? Where am I most likely to get a foreign policy I like? Where am I most likely to get a gun policy I like? A climate change policy I like? A woke policy I like? That I agree with."
"And I can check those boxes very clearly, very quickly on these two candidates," he said. "So I'm going to tell you, I'm voting for Donald Trump. Because I checked those boxes and more of them are on that side than the other."
Does this endorsement carry some specific weight or significance? I wonder, because it's pretty clear that Trump would have a difficult time communicating specific policy ideas or details going forward. It's not realistic to expect Trump would be running the show in his current state.
Does this endorsement carry some specific weight or significance? I wonder, because it's pretty clear that Trump would have a difficult time communicating specific policy ideas or details going forward. It's not realistic to expect Trump would be running the show in his current state.
His "current state"??
Trump, or Vance. Either way is good with me. Much better than those running the show the last 4 years.
toomuchbaloney
16,092 Posts
It would definitely be hard to read it.