The Controversy: Mandatory Flu Vaccines

Many hospitals are moving towards creating mandatory influenza vaccination policies as a condition of employment. Such mandates are causing surefire responses on both sides of the fence. What is the push behind the movement, and what is causing the pushback?

Updated:  

First, let me just go over some of the symptoms of the flu, and then we will get down to business on the controversy surrounding the push to create mandatory flu vaccines for healthcare workers:

  • Sudden onset fever
  • Headache
  • Chills
  • Myalgia
  • Dry cough
  • Sore throat
  • Stuffy nose
  • Loss of appetite
  • Limb or joint pain
  • Difficulty sleeping
  • Diarrhea or upset stomach

I can't think of anyone who wants any of these symptoms, or to come down with the flu, can you?

Influenza vaccination research has clearly documented the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine (Google it - you will find a plethora of information...however, I will list some links at the end of this article for your information). However, even though there is sufficient evidence to prove the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine, vaccination rates among healthcare workers are pitifully low. In 2013, only 55% of nurses in the frontlines were vaccinated.

Organizations such as The Joint Commission, the American Nurses Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Centers for Disease Control, Healthy People 2020, etc., etc., have stated their position on recommending the flu vaccine for healthcare workers in order to decrease the risk of exposure and reduce deaths. Due to this recommendation, many healthcare facilities are now creating mandatory flu vaccine policies as a condition of employment.

Employers who create mandatory policies will have exemptions, of course. Exemptions are made for medical and religious exceptions. For places that do not have a mandatory flu vaccine, they may "strongly recommend" the vaccination and may have a declination form for employees to submit if they refuse the vaccine. Additionally, some employers will enforce refusers to wear a mask during flu season while they are at work in order to protect the patients and the employee.

What is the purpose behind the push toward flu vaccines?

Evidence has shown that there are more than 36,000 deaths in the US each year related to influenza, and more than 200,000 hospitalizations. Influenza is the 6th leading cause of death. Healthcare workers are the leading cause of influenza outbreaks in the healthcare system. up to 50% of people who are infected by the flu virus do not fill ill for several days and can spread the virus to people at risk of complications and death from the flu. Additionally, evidence shows vaccination decreases mortality by 40%, decreases the spread of nosocomial infections by 43%, and decreases absenteeism by 20-30%.

Additionally, there is the ethics to consider. As healthcare workers, we have all taken an oath to "do no harm". As a nurse caring for patients who are not in their most physically healthy state, do we take the vaccination in order to prevent spreading the flu to our vulnerable patients, in order to "do no harm"? We must consider this when we make our decision to take or refuse the vaccination.

What hospitals have created a mandatory flu vaccine policy?

I have the names of a few hospitals, and this is by no means a comprehensive list. This is based on a ListServe survey of hospitals and these are the responses received:

  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Philadelphia, PA) - since 2009
  • Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics (Kansas City, MO)
  • Children's Colorado (Aurora, CO)
  • Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters (Norfolk, VA)
  • Children's Medical Center Dallas (Dallas, TX) - since 2012
  • Riley Children's (Indianapolis, IN) - since 2012
  • East Tennessee Children's (Knoxville, TX) - since 2013
  • Boston Children's (Boston, MA)
  • Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns (San Diego, CA) - since 2013
  • Roger Williams Medical Center (Providence, RI)
  • Brookwood Medical Center (Birmingham, AL)
  • Johns Hopkins (all hospitals/clinics) (Baltimore, MD)
  • Driscoll Children's Hospital (Corpus Christi, TX)
  • Spohn Health System (Corpus Christi / San Antonio, TX)
  • All Connecticut Hospitals

What are some reasons that people refuse the flu vaccine?

Refusal may be largely due to misconceptions related to the vaccine. Fears that the immune system will cause them to get the flu, beliefs that hygiene and better nutrition are more helpful than the vaccine, fear of needles, beliefs that the vaccine does not work, and fear of side effects. Others believe that they have a constitutional right to refuse the vaccine and that mandatory policies are violating these rights.

Common concerns and myths about the flu vaccination

(taken from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health outline of flu vaccine talking points for managers)

The flu shot will give me the flu

The flu shot does not give people the flu. It uses inactivated ("dead") virus. People may still catch a cold or other virus that the vaccine is not designed match.

I don't believe the flu vaccine actually works

Studies have shown that flu vaccination prevents flu in 70% to 90% of healthy adults younger than 65 years old.

I had the vaccination last year

You need a new vaccine every year - the virus changes over time.

What about possible adverse reactions

Serious adverse reactions are very rare. They are explained on the CDC's Vaccine Information Statement, which is distributed when the vaccine is administered.

Local short-term reactions - such soreness at the vaccination site, slight fever, achy feeling - may occur but usually do not last long. Over the counter medicines are helpful. Even short-term reactions are much less bothersome than catching the flu and feeling very sick for days.

I'm not in a high-risk group

Your patients are at-risk, and possibly some friends and family members. You can be infected with the flu virus but not feel ill - and can still transmit flu to at-risk patients.

The flu vaccine made every year does not match the circulating flu strain

Inactivated influenza vaccine is effective in preventing transmission and reducing complications of the flu. In years when there is a close match between the vaccine and circulating virus strains, the vaccine prevents illness among approximately 70%--90% of healthy adults under 65 years of age. Vaccinating healthy adults also has been proven to lead to decreased work absenteeism and use of health-care resources, including use of antibiotics. Strong protection is also expected when the vaccine is not a close match with circulating strains, with 50%--77% effectiveness in these instances. In addition, effectiveness against influenza-related hospitalization for healthy adults from inactivated vaccine is estimated at 90%.

Knowledge is Power

All healthcare facilities will be facing the choice of creating a mandatory influenza vaccination in the near future, if they have not already. In order to make an informed decision on the topic, we must have information. Knowledge is power. Before you make a blanket statement on pros or cons, have the information you need, know the research, and make an educated decision.

Please respond to this article by answering the following questions:

  1. Do you take the flu vaccine yearly? If you do not, what is the reason you do not participate (if you don't mind answering this question)?
  2. Does your employer have a mandatory influenza vaccination policy as a condition of employment? If yes, where do you work?
  3. What concerns do you have about the flu vaccine?
  4. Do you know if anyone who has been released from their job because they did not get the flu vaccine?

References

American Association of Family Practitioners. (2011). AAFP supports mandatory flu vaccinations for healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: AAFP Supports Mandatory Flu Vaccinations for Health Care Personnel

ATrain. (2014). To accept or refuse the flu vaccine. Retrieved from: ZZZ_133_Influenza: Module 7

CDC. (2014). Vaccination: Who should do it, who should not and who should take precautions. Retrieved from: Vaccination: Who Should Do It, Who Should Not and Who Should Take Precautions | Seasonal Influenza (Flu) | CDC

Influenza Action Coalition. (2015). Influenza vaccination honor roll. Retrieved from: Honor Roll: Mandatory Influenza Vaccination Policies for Healthcare Personnel

Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2014). Talking points for managers. Retrieved from: http://tinyurl.com/p6nbg2u

National adult and influenza immunization summit. (2015). Vaccinating healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: Vaccinating Healthcare Personnel - National Adult and Influenza Immunization Summit

NursingTimes. (2014). Why do health workers decline flu vaccination? Retrieved from: http://www.nursingtimes.net/Journals/2014/11/28/y/k/x/031214-Why-do-health-workers-decline-flu-vaccination.pdf

TJC. (2012). R3 Report: Requirement, rationale, reference. Retrieved from: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/R3_Report_Issue_3_5_18_12_final.pdf

I cannot be forced to recognize conspiracy theories as valid, and I cannot be forced to recognize nonsense masquerading as factual data to be reasonable. I cannot be forced to respect what is not worthy of respect. It's the "C'mon, everybody play nice in the sandbox" mentality of insisting that EVERY viewpoint is worthy of respect that landed us in this mess of decreased vaccination rates increasing the rates of preventable diseases in the first place!

I agree. Just as a general statement, no, I do not have to always respect the beliefs of others. I respect the concept of free speech, but I absolutely am NOT under any moral obligation to respect whatever comes out of someone's mouth, pen, or keyboard simply because someone tells me I must.

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
for the most part, someone with something to gain. common sense, Boston.

The government funds the majority of medical research. You tell me what they have to gain from it? It's all public record. Follow the money and show us exactly how the mass international governmental conspiracy is functioning.

Common sense. Logically it must be a global conspiracy.

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.

If the advocates of the various "alternative" therapies are so convinced of the efficacy of those therapies, why aren't they doing the studies that would show all the rest of us that they're right?

Most times it's because the studies are done and don't show any significant benefit over placebo.

Like:

Vitetta, L. (2011). The role of intravenous [iV] Vitamin C [Ascorbate] in the therapeutic treatment of Cancer. In International Conference on the Science of Nutrition in Medicine and Healthcare.

It fascinates me that a virus knows to come out of hiding every Autumn and hang about for a few months. A virus different from last year's virus.

Specializes in critical care.
So, easier is better?

Easier than finding yourself clinging to life on a vent? Yes. Easier is better.

Specializes in Critical Care.
CDC Scientist Still Maintains Agency Forced Researchers To Lie About Safety Of Mercury Based Vaccines has within this link, a short video of the CDC whistleblower, wanting to come clean now, about the CDC data "coverup" (fudging & omitting data, showing a link between certain vaccines, and AUTISM)..................................To hear William Thompson, phD senior scientist at the CDC speak, please see this link: ..........https://vimeo.com/user5503203/review/106398908/44f9634e1b

I would find that potentially interesting if there was any new information that could come out of it. The supposed "coverup" has already been out there, and it's now pretty clear that the excluded data did not show what was claimed as the "coverup". The journal the initially published the flawed interpretation of the data to show that MMR increased autism risk then issued this retraction shortly after:

The Editor and Publisher regretfully retract the article [1] as there were undeclared competing interests on the part of the author which compromised the peer review process. Furthermore, post-publication peer review raised concerns about the validity of the methods and statistical analysis, therefore the Editors no longer have confidence in the soundness of the findings. We apologise to all affected parties for the inconvenience caused.

Translational Neurodegeneration | Full text | Retraction: Measles-mumps-rubella vaccination timing and autism among young African American boys: a reanalysis of CDC data

Specializes in Reproductive & Public Health.
It fascinates me that a virus knows to come out of hiding every Autumn and hang about for a few months. A virus different from last year's virus.

The flu virus is in circulation all the time. Infections peak during flu season, likely due to a combination of environmental and individual/lifestyle factors.

And its not like we have one type of flu virus in 2014 and a new one in 2015. There are multiple strains circulating at any time, and their prevalence changes due to evolution and the aforementioned environmental/lifestyle/individual factors.

I agree that it is most definitely fascinating.

Specializes in CVICU.
for the most part, someone with something to gain. common sense, Boston.

In the world of fairy tales and pixy dust, no one has anything to gain.

Everything is free.

It amazes me the amount of trust in our government. And even more comical that people think the billions spent by lobbyist is ethical. (But then again people don't think for themselves)

Specializes in Long Term Acute Care, TCU.
The government funds the majority of medical research. You tell me what they have to gain from it? It's all public record. Follow the money and show us exactly how the mass international governmental conspiracy is functioning.

Common sense. Logically it must be a global conspiracy.

This is the same government that has become a fascist state in which corporations wield power. GMOs are king and stated to be safe, yet no one one in D.C. eats food with GMOs. The same government that raided seed banks in Iraq. The same government that was founded for the businessman.

Every single war in this country was staged for the sake of business interests. You pretend to know science, but apparently you know nothing about history. Lobbyists from major corporations control the Government, surely you are not that blind.

Where are the double blind studies showing that vaccines are actually effective, rather than them using "the placebo effect"?

Where are the double blind studies showing that vaccines are actually effective, rather than them using "the placebo effect"?

You do realize that that would be unethical right?

But, aren't OTHER drugs/medications (other than vaccines) double blind tested, using actual placebos, in order to verify those OTHER drugs' effectiveness? And such double blind studies using placebo, are considered ethical, aren't they?